Printable View
Happening Now- No.
Studio B- Alright.
Fox Report- See above, again, mainly because Smith actually has a semblance of consistency.
Alright, I'll give you that Fox does have a couple adequate news shows. Assuming, of course, you know which way they lean. :shrug:
The problem is that nobody makes a distinction between news and pundits.
That's because, in a lot of cases, pundits have become the news. :no:Quote:
Originally Posted by Evil_Maniac From Mars
I like Bill O'Riley
Yes, he's hilarious.Quote:
Originally Posted by Strike For The South
What? Where's 'Special Report'? That's the only show that's on FoxNews that I find worth watching. I think it's slid a peg since Brit Hume semi-retired, but it's still the best show on the network(or probably any of the 24hr news networks), imo.Quote:
Originally Posted by seireikhaan
I'll add:Quote:
Originally Posted by LittleGrizzly
This
and this.
Ah, I see. You know why that is, right?Quote:
Well that's helpful, as someone intrested in foriegn affairs what are the chances i know of these events... i wonder...
When i say we i was talking as a british poster to a british poster with a quote where he was responding to a comment about european terrorist attacks, which is why i mentioned the madrid attacks as well
I guess i could be more specific... swop we for britian...
It's because your country decided not to bother the Islamic terrorists using London as a base to launch attacks on other countries in Europe, like France, in exchange for the Islamists not attacking Britain.
So the lack of attacks was paid for with the blood of others.
Have you ever watched it? Somewhat extensively, instead of just a snippet? Or is this the old 'if enough people repeat the same thing it'll become common knowledge thing'? I'm not saying they're perfect or unbiased but the allegations are usually over the top.Quote:
Now, as I said, I don't really give a damn about the outrage itself, its source, the show. I'm talking broadly about FoxNews. That channel is well known for producing huge pile of crap on a daily basis.
CR
I'll add:
This
and this.
Well thanks guys... where would i be without you... is someone going to give me a wiki link to the london and madrid bombings... it would be about as helpful...
Is someone going to give me a wiki article about simple addition next ?
Ah, I see. You know why that is, right?
Because Iraq increased the terror threat in europe... among other things...
It's because your country decided not to bother the Islamic terrorists using London as a base to launch attacks on other countries in Europe
Already know about it... remember someone criticising the tories for the policy... still doesn't change the fact that the Iraq war increased our terror threat...
The terrorists attacked us and then we stopped letting them roam free... so obviously just letting them roam free doesn't stop them attacking you... hmm i wonder what that leaves...
Gutfield Apologizes.
Spoiler Alert, click show to read:
FoxNEWS is to News, as Military Intelligence is to... well, you know. :)
With the exception of the 2-minute "news Breaks" every half-hour from 0900 to 1600, FoxNews isn't news at all; rather it's FoxCommentary, all day every day.
Who watches FoxNoose at 0300? Insomniacs and drunks, right? Still, apparently Fox Management has figured out that denigrating an ally's military wasn't smart, or hip, or funny.
-edit-
Gregoshi's vid-clip got pulled, but here is a photo-montage of the attention and respect Canadians show their fallen soldiers, on the Highway of Heros.
The video from the OP is outrageous. It makes me angry. I mean...Canadians? Why would any American speak this disrespectful of Canadians? ~:confused::wall:
I am not all that familiar with the US media, so I shall rely on the judgement of the American posters and accept that it is but a trivial late-night show of little relevance.
Even so...much of the tone, the very nature of the comments, does not sound unfamiliar. When you make this sort of 'jokes', you do so in within a wider scheme of social expectations. Because your audience understands the humour. Thinks it is funny, full of good, or even relevant, zingers.
It is not the first time I've seen this sort of video, not the first time I've read or seen this sort of political satire.
This show, however much at late-night, is still on a major nationwide network, it is not a local talkradio for 500 listeners. I thought the jingoism, the insults, the military 'patriotism' (i.e. if you don't toe the line, you must a fool and a coward), the disrespect of it all had slowly faded away after the low point in 2003/2004. One would think even Fox' audience had learned at what great cost to American lives, finances and prestige this jingoism has proven to come.
The guy in charge of the show (rather, its host) Greg Gutfeld has made a career of snarkey, sarcastic, frat-boy so-called "humor", that would never have passed the sniff-test in the immediate aftermath of 9-11. Apparently, enough time has passed since that event, that TV producers think it's OK now - at least at 0300. The Gutfeld guy, according to the Wiki-Bio, doesn't hang on to his gigs very long; I suspect his stint on Red Eye will go away soon, too.
And he'll be all hurt and offended: "It was just a joke! I mean, C'mon!". And his next assignment will be writing commercial advertisements for breakfast cereals. And a book that won't sell.
Louis's point:
is well-taken. If a show made in New York gets shown live in California, it's also available to the 90% of Canadians living within broadcast distance of the american border. Forgetting that is a major "oopsie" on the part of Fox.Quote:
This show, however much at late-night, is still on a major nationwide network, it is not a local talkradio for 500 listeners.
I knew the level of 'humor' was gonna be low after the second or third sentence, where he makes fun of Gen Leslie's name. It was obviously only downhill after that, with each talking head trying to outdo the previous one for outrageousness.
Maybe I don't get out and around that much but this is the first time I've seen anyone sum up Fox"News" correctly. And thanks for supplying a replacement video for my missing link Kukri. It looks like the same sequence of pictures as the slideshow I got from my dad minus the pan & zoom effects.Quote:
Originally Posted by KukriKhan
If Red Eye is a humour show, they need to get some people who know how to do humour. I think the cast sounds too much like the actual commentarians at the network (at least for this infrequent FoxNews viewer) to distinguish the humour from the serious. They are missing those over-the-top visual and audio cues (a la The Daily Show and The Colbert Report) that tell the viewer "I make joke ha ha". Or in Org terms, they need to use emoticons in their show. :thumbsup:
In reflection, my "ticked off" state of mind came from 1) seeing the "Highway of Heroes" piece followed shortly thereafter by the Red Eye segment; and 2) not understanding that Red Eye was meant as a comedy show. Now I see the Red Eye segment as simply unfunny (worse than "not funny") and in poor taste. Me thinks FoxNews should steer clear of the, ahem, funny stuff. Their attempts so far make them the Hindenburg of comedy.
Am I the only who think that entire thing was a joke???
Not a very funny one, true, but a joke. Both Canada and US are free countries, people have the right to make fun of anything they want, I don't understand what's the big deal...
I think most people in this thread are conceding the fact it was a joke. The man even admitted it himself, it was a stab at humor that failed horribly.Quote:
Originally Posted by Sarmatian
That doesn't mean, since it was a joke, that people cannot be upset if they so choose. Especially considering the subject material, when you make light of another country's military you're opening yourself a great big can of worms. If you happen to go about it in the tasteless and juvenile way that Mr. Gutfield did, then you deserve every bit of fallout you get imho.
To paraphrase George Carlin: I have the right to do as I please, but I also believe that if I do something you don't like, you have the right to punch me in the mouth. :2thumbsup:
Nope, it's not just you.... I'm completely mystified as to why this is such big news.Quote:
Originally Posted by Sarmatian
Because there is a guy in Canada named Leslie!! Get it? :laugh4:Quote:
Originally Posted by Xiahou
*sigh*
Liberals are ever-so keen to notice Fox's shortcomings. And with their lion's share of media, criticism of conservative channels is ever-so simple. Just go to the Wikipedia article on "Fox News Channel controversies". It is humongous. The most frightening thing is that the "Controversies" article is substantially larger than the Fox News main article itself.
As a contrast, there is not even a page for "MSNBC News Channel controversies". Just an average-sized sub-section titled "Controversies", that is present in just about any article on anything, Including the Fox News article. Intelligent, seemingly normal/moderate liberals call Fox a "propaganda machine" while the moderate conservatives are barely raising a voice...
Despite this, I am not denying Fox is without shortcomings. I like them because they are less politically correct. However, just check out this example of seeming bias:
Spoiler Alert, click show to read:
One of my teachers is a big conservative and he has Fox on the tv every morning for about 15 minutes (Its a computer class, and we just surf the web in that time). I have YET to see a piece of serios news come out of that garbage. Its either some kid beating up a dog with Judo or someone surviving a plane crash. The whole time with a old man that looks like he has a fake smile and a dumb blonde, both telling "jokes" only a person my father's age would chuckle at.
One thing you NEVER do is make fun of the Canadian military. Especially if your a yank, and definitatly not like he did.Quote:
Originally Posted by Xiahou
This one time, on NBC, at 4 am, a smarthy talker who hosted of of NBCs 8,754 television shows said something that really got under my skin. How dare NBC allow him to say that, and by not issuing an immediate apology for that thing that got under my skin NBC made it very obvious that the entire network and its affiliates and its advertisers support the radical NBC agenda of doing that thing that got under my skin
Come on, why is Canadian military above jokes? Or US, UK, French, Belgian or any other for that matter? What's the big deal? Because he's an American? Would it be ok if a Greek did it?Quote:
Originally Posted by lars573
I never ever heard about MSNBC being as outrageous as FoxNews.Quote:
Originally Posted by EMFM
Now, let's admit that MSNBC is as biased as FoxNews is (which is quite possible I guess), it doesn't make it nearly as stupid.
- Firstly, accusation of liberal bias in the US are pretty stupid. What the conservative members would call a pinko-communist-hippie-terrorists channel in the US would probably appear as slightly leftist everywhere else in the western world.
- Secondly, the right is historically well-known for being much more offensive and outrageous with its propaganda. I'm not even talking about far-right, mind you. Since the 19th century, it has assimilated the idea that the left is actually trying to destroy civilization and is thus much more agressive than traditional leftist propaganda (I'm not talking about Marxists, Trostkysts or Left-Anarchists). Leftist propaganda is at least a bit more subtle.
But for the sake of the discussion, let's say that I dislike MSNBC (according to your claim that it's as biased as FoxNews). Can't really say I hate it, because, as noted earlier, I never received a link to a completely outrageous and stupid MSNBC show (though I just found out it was considered the most biased channel according to a poll conducted in 2004).
Once again, if a Canadian show on one of the main canadian channel started to call US soldiers 'cowards' or 'mass murderers', I'm pretty sure some people here would get quite pissed off.Quote:
Originally Posted by Xiahou
Now, I can't say I understand the way Canadians regard their military. Things is, it caused an outrage, and there's no way FoxNews wouldn't know it beforehand. I mean, I know that insulting the Canadian military is like, "BIG DEAL". There's now way that Greg Gutfield did not.
No, I have never watched FoxNews. And no, I'll never watch it anyway. To be honest,Quote:
Originally Posted by CR
American and Canadian TV is so ridiculously stupid that I haven't bothered to watch it since I understood that its only point was to brainwash people with constant flows of advertising and commercials (most of them being completely unfunny, too long and too repetitive).
That alone is sad for your democracy.
Then, as I said earlier in this post, I quite often receive links to FoxNews videos, and most of the time, I'm like "WTF?". It's not simple bias. I could understand bias. What puzzle me, is the amount of racism, biggotry, personal attacks, plain errors and lies.
Now mind you, I'm pretty sure people who spend their time criticizing FoxNews have their own interests, and it would be faire to assume that most of them are leftist/democrats. But it doesn't make the links, the biggotry, the personal attacks and what not any less real.
Then, if you have link to MSNBC (or any other channel) bias, lies, personal attacks, racism, etc., I'll happilly have a look at it. As I said, I don't have much respect for American TV channels* (and neither do I have for french ones). I'd be more than glad to make fun of your leftist crap. I've only talked about FoxNews because it is well known for its crap, and because it created huge outrage in Canada a few days ago.
*I admit you still have some decent commentary/comedy shows, but I only watch them on internet, as I really can't be arsed to watch all this advertising. I don't consider O'Reilly to be funny. From all I know, he rather looks like a conservative idiot who try - yet fail horribly - to be funny, and who doesn't hesitate to spread misinformation when it fits his right-winged anti-muslim agenda.
Edit:
No military is above jokes. Thing is, in that case, the guy - working for a TV channel that thouroughly(sp?) supported Bush's brillantly executed War on Terror - is making fun of the military of a country that had actually no interests in joining this stupid war, and whose soldiers are losing their life purely for American's interests.Quote:
Originally Posted by Sarmatian
The War on Terror is nothing but a joke. Making fun of people who died because they actually believed your leader is nothing short of stupid and disrespectful.
See last point.Quote:
Now, let's admit that MSNBC is as biased as FoxNews is (which is quite possible I guess), it doesn't make it nearly as stupid.
Everything is relative. Liberalism doesn't even mean the same thing in Germany as it does in the United States.Quote:
- Firstly, accusation of liberal bias in the US are pretty stupid. What the conservative members would call a pinko-communist-hippie-terrorists channel in the US would probably appear as slightly leftist everywhere else in the western world.
Alright, I have to say I beg to differ here. We say the left is trying to destroy civilization (not true, we usually say it is trying to change civilization, but for the sake of argument), and the left says that the right is a fundamentalist horde of ninnies who can't think for themselves.Quote:
- Secondly, the right is historically well-known for being much more offensive and outrageous with its propaganda. I'm not even talking about far-right, mind you. Since the 19th century, it has assimilated the idea that the left is actually trying to destroy civilization and is thus much more agressive than traditional leftist propaganda (I'm not talking about Marxists, Trostkysts or Left-Anarchists). Leftist propaganda is at least a bit more subtle.
:shrug:
Keith Olberman. I have no further comments.Quote:
I never received a link to a completely outrageous and stupid MSNBC show (though I just found out it was considered the most biased channel according to a poll conducted in 2004).
Yes, Pearson, Diefenbaker, Trudeau, Chretien, and to a lesser extent Mulroney already did a good enough job of it as it is.Quote:
Originally Posted by lars573
Except no one on Red Eye said anything of the sort. Don't compare apples to igloos. At least two people expressed respect for the Canadian military during the show, then proceeded to make fun of them. As well as Sarah Palin, a person Fox News is supposed to love, and Norwegians. The show airs at 3am. When your choices are MASH reruns, infomercials that promise to make your willy bigger and your butt smaller, and RedEye. Anyone who takes such a show seriously has a problem.Quote:
Originally Posted by Meneldil
Ah, now I see the issue. The problem isn't that someone made fun of Canada's military. It's just that the news group with the wrong bias made fun of Canada's military. If Fox News hadn't supported Bush, they could giggle all the way to the bank but comedy isn't allowed if you have the wrong opinions. Hopefully MSNBC or CNN will take advantage of their monopoly on Canadian military jokes soon. Or possibly they are too closely tied to the US. Maybe some Norwegians will be qualified to make jokes about the Canadian military.Quote:
No military is above jokes. Thing is, in that case, the guy - working for a TV channel that thouroughly(sp?) supported Bush's brillantly executed War on Terror - is making fun of the military of a country that had actually no interests in joining this stupid war, and whose soldiers are losing their life purely for American's interests.
The War on Terror is nothing but a joke. Making fun of people who died because they actually believed your leader is nothing short of stupid and disrespectful.
No one is allowed ever. The only time your even allowed to approach ctirtism of the military is when they majorly screw-up. Like in '93 when a few para-troopers tourtured a Somali to death. Or the time the CFCWO got a case of "the bad touch" with a female corporal.Quote:
Originally Posted by Sarmatian
As for why, I don't really know. EMFM explaination is a good as any. We've just progressed to the point that we can critisize the RCMP.
And what if it's a minor screw-up? If they just slap around Somali a bit?Quote:
Originally Posted by lars573
No institution is above criticism or jokes. You may disagree with me but free speech is on my side ~:wave:
The rug, it goes under it. Mostly, the indie press would make some noise about it. Besides it's not me who has the problem.
Partisan politics is like laser tag. When someone on the other side sticks their head out everyone on your side tries to shoot 'em down, and vice versa. Whichever side scores the most points "wins".
:coffeenews: