banning

I'll unfortunately have to agree with Spoon. There has always been the question of "balanced armies"... "balanced units"... etc..etc... this is fairly much an "unwritten rule" of the community.

However, a "rush" type army is a legitimate army and has been used by everyone not only in this game but through history. Ever hear of Blitzkrieg..? (spelling)

Because someone cant or wont defend against a "rush" army doesn't make the rusher "unfair"... it's up to everyone to compile an army to withstand "all" types of attacks. If one cant accept that then maybe it's time to rethink your army.?

I always tailored my army for getting rushed every time I played the RTKs. Elrich, Gawain, and the other RTKs were always double or triple/quadruple teaming me with horsies, swords and/or missile units. I found it quite "refreshing", especially when I brought my ElmoHead All Missile Army hehe

Well , the rushing problem is not really a rushing problem is the good old map problem, as its far too easy on flat and steppe maps ....

On another account the longbow armies are very lame , they are in the same category as the lancer armies of the old MTW , its mediocre ppl seeking a cheap advantage ...

But no I wouldnt ban anyone for stuff like that unless I specifically set certain rules for the game ...

If you dont want ppl to do certain things try to put it in the name of the game , or inform everyone as soon as the game fills up ....



TGI

why are the longbows considered cheap? is it cause of the ap melee? or that they kill cav too fast? would i be cheezy if i took instead of longbows, a unit of regular archers or two units of javelins and held them back and shot your general when he engaged in the melee?

I can't believe anyone would compare lancers to longbows and say their both "lame." If you find yourself putting up rules that you say are fair, what will you say if I start putting up rules that I say are fair? Takes some of the fun out of the game doesn't it? The game to me is balanced, been that way since VI, to those people who want restrictions I say your not liking the game as much as you used to. Maybe you'll find another game to relax with.

Lbows are cheap becouse they got a longer range than everything else , so if ya got them ya dont need to skirmish , and still can keep skirmishers away ....

I usually host and always attack ...And game after game after game the defenders are picking english and it gets very very annoying to play against the same passive non moving longbow armies ....

Yesterday i had like 4 games in a row ( 2 vs 2 3 vs 3 and 4 vs 4 ) and maybe had a total of 2 opponents without longbows .. so yepp getting sick and tired of the longbow people ...( no this is not a topic on how to beat them I dont need advice on that)

TGI http://www.totalwar.org/forum/non-cg...cons/angry.gif


PS: Ok Inda lancers in MTW were even lamer than lbows in VI http://www.totalwar.org/forum/non-cg.../gc-dizzy2.gif ....

the tw mp is one of the worst anti noob comunities i have been too you vets were all one too before. and mayby if you taught them some stufff they might not just charge like a maniac every game. http://www.totalwar.org/forum/non-cg...cons/angry.gif

Moderators, this was an informational post, not a discussion post. can you plz close it? People care little for my opinions do they really expect me to care for theirs?

I agree...Rushers are ignorant...

However,
There is a difference between rushers and chargers.

Chargers know what they're doing most of the time...

rushers....just rush.

It's your thread, 1dread1lahll.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by [b

Quote[/b] ]Moderators, this was an informational post, not a discussion post. can you plz close it? People care little for my opinions do they really expect me to care for theirs?

---

, but I will not stop it being discussed at a later date.

Closed at the request of the threads originator.