Chivalric men at arms and feudal men at arms.

Jeepers, you boys really take this stuff seriously!

So, after all that, can we conclude that you're better off with CMAA than FMAA, assuming money is not a factor and you're not in the desert?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Matty

Jeepers, you boys really take this stuff seriously!

So, after all that, can we conclude that you're better off with CMAA than FMAA, assuming money is not a factor and you're not in the desert?

---

I'm with you. Even knowing that I am more than a casual player, I don't know all the stats by heart or I don't 1 on 1 every unit to know what wins over what. I just play because I enjoy it. But yes, I agree with your final conclusion.

When you start playing in the high and late eras, you're probably better off with men at arms as when they are in formation they are just as good as chivalric men at arms, but with merely 1 less attack. For multiplayer you should only use CMAA for critical roles where they are likely to be attacked on the flanks.