I've got two hunks for the price of one. David Hasselhoff and Gary Coleman. S0mething for everyone ...
-deleted-
Printable View
I've got two hunks for the price of one. David Hasselhoff and Gary Coleman. S0mething for everyone ...
-deleted-
Hey! Get rid of that female in the lower left corner! No room for them here!!!:furious3:
Just showing I support equality ~D.
http://www.philippraess.ch/medien/st...tt-brad-07.jpg
http://www.tasoeur.biz/mirroir/be/20...do%20Bloom.jpg
Can't remember where I read it, but it went something like this:
Quote:
Men's magazines have pictures of women. Women's magazines have pictures of women. There is a reason for this: men's bodies are lumpy, hairy and ugly.
Were quite honored but were so humble that we are willing to give the honor to the front room:2thumbsup:
If we are so PC now why does this need to be where non members can't see:inquisitive: YOU SEXIST PIGS:no:
Who's creepy idea was this? As far as I know there are only three or four women on this board....not really enough to warrant a thread.
And the women should be the ones to start it and I find this quite funny.:laugh4:Quote:
Originally Posted by ceasar010
Hey the "Kingdom of Love and Peace" is non specific. ~:flirt:
man, the backroom is getting worse every day now... ~:thumb:
no.....no......NO NO NO this is just wrong:furious3: :wall: :wall: :wall:
Well I got the smiley for the occasion:
Edit, you asked and you received. That smiley was not for a PG site.
guess it'll be worth the compulsory 2 day vacation
that is the most wrong thing i have seen ever:embarassed: :wall: :wall: :wall:
yeah that is wrong Stalin:inquisitive:
Pff... what kind of ninny of a man is threatened by this? Dear God, some people are attracted to the male body; you'd better run away to show how tough you are.:laugh4: The funniest part is that they bothered to enter the "Hunk Thread" to talk about how disgusted they were by having pictures of men in the guild.
Hmm, shouldn't this be in the frontroom?
By placing it in the backroom, you're putting it in a section of the site that not all members can view. Why the unfair treatment for this thread? Does it not deserve equal prominence with the babe thread?
By putting this thread in the backroom, are you not relegating it to second class status, as though ashamed of its topic? Why does the board persist in discrimination?
:shame:
Crazed Rabbit
yes, i just want it moved out of the backroom...
Quote:
And in an effort to make the Org less sexist this is the thread for people who want to post PG 13+ pics of Guys.
This is the last time I will venture into this den of sin but.....I hope you don't mean by pg-13+ you are going to allow pics of guys and their johnsons hanging out.....
What happened to the family friendly board you mods are always talking about:inquisitive:
At least take it to the front room if we are going to have this:no: or bring the babe thread back here:2thumbsup: equal means equal!
Nothing more then you would see at the Modern Olympics.
I always found it interesting that the rating system for movies goes something along the lines of:
Dressed > Topless Guy > Guy being behead > ToplessWomen > Naked Women ---> Naked Guy
So far there has been nothing at all nearly as bad as the babes thread.
Notice that the men posted thus far all have female characteristics of being soft and efemminite.
-deleted-
Here ya go. This gay gets more chicks than anyone.
Gotta love the Hedgehog! :thumbsup:
Can We Take one actor and super impose his head on the body of another??
-deleted-
That's because anything with some skin gets edited out. I had a very tasteful image of Jeff Gannon with his privates blocked entirely out, but it got the axe anyway. Double standard!Quote:
Originally Posted by Shaun
This threead is soooo gay. :grin:
-deleted-
Ohhhhhh yehhhhhh.
yes, i agree.Quote:
Originally Posted by edyzmedieval
is this thread for women or gays?
btw we need more females in the org.
am i right?
i hear that a lot and totally disagree. with minimal upkeep a man can have a slender and mildly muscular physique with very attractive qualities. I believe that it takes much less effort for men to look attractive than it does for women to do so.Quote:
Originally Posted by drone
sure we all love t*ts and a**, but lets be honest, most of us love the way we look in the mirror, too. hair is not unattractive and, more often than not women look all lumpy while men stay skinnier
all in all - i believe that there are more attractive men in the world than attractive women; and i am a total heterosexual - just one who doesn't lie to myself to make me look straighter.
i am, however a firm believer that men are superior to women generally in all things. we make better chefs (generally), clothing designers, hairdressers, teachers and almost all other jobs designated to be female professions. if we could have babies I'd bet we'd do that better too. we are faster, stronger, generally make more money. GENERALLY we are simply better. that does not mean that we are always better, or that great women are not better than weak men, but it does mean something - that men are generally better than women when in even competition with them.
we live in a scientific society and empirical observation does not always mean that the politically correct is true.
What makes you say that?Quote:
Originally Posted by edyzmedieval
https://img.photobucket.com/albums/v...rdaddy1001.jpg
Edit by Pape: Floss away but keep it PG
See Id be to scared I would cut something I need. I can barley shave the face. I refuse to put the boys on the line before I become better.Quote:
Originally Posted by Eclectic
He's only in movies because he can lick his own dong.Quote:
Originally Posted by Eclectic
And I heard he also has poor flexibilityQuote:
Originally Posted by GoreBag