I agree
*yawns*
Unvote, Vote: Stig
Now, that should get discussion going
Printable View
I agree
*yawns*
Unvote, Vote: Stig
Now, that should get discussion going
Scummy...
:shrug:
Tally anyone?
I want to make it perfectly clear that if someone calls WIFOM on Stig, I will vote them. I am so sick of that phrase...
Relatives came to stay with us. Took up my last 4-5 days.Quote:
Originally Posted by Omanes
So we have to get 4 for a lynch? As far as I can tell there are 3 votes on Stig already, so I say we let him speak in his defence as to why he should not be lynched. Ironically, he is one of those voting, so if he chooses not to talk, I say we lynch him.
I don't think Stig is who we are after - no sensible mafioso would dare to place a vote on themself at this stage, either that or they would now be instantly removing it in desperation.Quote:
Originally Posted by CountArach
Well, I for one don't want to lynch the townie target.
Unvote : Stig; Vote : pevergreen
*Is trying to avoid saying WIFOM*Quote:
Originally Posted by Omanes Alexandrapolites
No, I voted myself in the hope someone would quickly put a 4th vote on me, as that would have been your mafia.
I do believe the mafioso would be more intelligent than that. However, perhaps... Unvote:Ichigo, Vote:Andres .
Why pever?
The only posts he made where "In" and "Tally anyone?"...
His lurking draws attention since it is unusual for him. Being the townie target, he shouldn't expose himself like that.
:shifty:
I have been mafia once, in any game. Except for that mini with the breifcases :shame: I played terribly.
Lurking? Maybe :laugh4:
What would you like of me? Reveal who the pro-townie is? But if i tell anyone, how do i know they are townie?
Note re: a question asked by pever: PMing of other players is strictly forbidden
I forgot Unvote: CountArach; Vote: pevergreen
Anything to say about the game thus far, or is your silence an indication of your guilt? I presume two votes is enough to encourage you to speak.
There was...
------
Aha!
Andres, in response to "Why pever?"
I picked that up. Intersting choice of words Andres :inquisitive:Quote:
Originally Posted by Andres
Warmaster Horus has had bad logic and overall seems to be different
Vote: Warmaster Horus
Why always the "2 votes gives more pressure than 1" Omanes?
It makes no good sense, yes it might pressure more, however in this game you don't get lynched unless you have 4 votes, so have the most votes does not pressure anyone.
Unvote, vote: Omanes, for bad logic.
Well, since 2 votes give much pressure according to him:
Unvote : pevergreen ; Vote : Omanes
Meh, bad logic... I forgot you said "only" that.
As for different attitude, look at the other mini-games. I'm really active when the others are less so. And here, the game started, what, 2 days ago?
Besides, today I've had a Economics and Social Sciences (Sciences Economiques et Sociales, pour les francophones) and a maths test, neither of which was quite easy. So I've been busy.
As with many things, having more than one of something provides an increased benefit. As I have said one vote isn't really enough pressure, and three votes easily allow one final voter to bandwagon the target - we want them to speak rather than end up lynched.Quote:
Originally Posted by Stig
Well, you have two votes now. Speak :whip:Quote:
Originally Posted by Omanes Alexandrapolites
May I ask what is it you want me to talk about Andres - I thought that I had just explained my reasoning behind my "two pressure votes" policy?Quote:
Originally Posted by Andres
Meh, as I said, that's BS, this is not about time but total votes, Pever is by far not even nearly lynched.Quote:
Originally Posted by Omanes Alexandrapolites
I think we can remove pever from some suspicion. He was obviously trying to forward his PM to someone, but checked with sapi first.
I think it's either Andres or Stig
I think it isnt Andres.
He mentioned i was the townie target, trying to get me killed in place of it. Too subtle for mafia.
But even so main suspects:
Omanes
Andres (he is that good at this game..)
CountArach (too fast to label me as innocent. which i am. but still)
Vote: Omanes
I don't quite know how to look at this - pevergreen is talking, which is positive, but in the same instance he is voting without specifying a reason - to me this seems like bandwagoning. Under normal circumstances, I would unvote him, but, for this reason, my vote will remain in place.
I will be away until Sunday.
Not nearly enough activity going one here:
Unvote: pevergreen; Vote: Andres
You seem very quiet - typically you would be, effectively, the main creator of discussion. Any reason for the loss of your usual habits?
Everybody is quiet in this game. I can't talk to myself, can I?Quote:
Originally Posted by Omanes Alexandrapolites
OOC: RL. We bought a house recently, the agreement between parties has already been signed, now we still have to sign the final and official agreement at the notary public (my own employer :dizzy2: ). At the moment our appartement is on sale and we didn't expect to have so many visitors. If all goes well, it shouldn't take too long before it's sold.
You can expect even lower activity from me in December/January, as we will be busy painting and doing some small repairs in the new house. Afterwards we will move, which will be time consuming as well.
EDIT: Don't worry too much though. I have internet acces at work, so I'll still be able to oppress any revolt in the Gameroom to ensure the continuation of my dictatorship :grin:
Good luck Andres.
Unvote:Stig, Vote:Andres
We wouldn't want you to have to worry about this game would we? :grin:
Yep, good luck in your move Andres.
Unvote: Andres; Vote: Stig
Your also acting rather quietly - any reason for your silence?