More discussion, from the remaining three, but also from the dead!
We need to know, were Ignoramus and/or the Dons with a grudge? I can't imagine them both being, so one must be alive still.. tib?
Well as they are dead anyway.. they are fully pro town now. So please, get together, do as much analyzing as you can to help the two remaining towns. Right now there's only a one out of three chance we win.
and slin, warluster and tib, panic more! One of you three is guilty! Think of scenario's... if shlin is him, does it all fit?
Quote:
Vote Charge
There are no detectives... read the rules!
I must admit.. this looks scummy.. mafia would read the rules extra carefully..
here comes the point where we need Ig. if he was normal town, shlin isn't a don that hated another. he voted off charge and ig. if ig is also normal town, it's pretty obvious shlin didn't attempt to lynch the other angry don.
warluster.. hmm.. didn't vote first round. would be dumb begin an angry don.. and ignoramus day 2. so, again, we need ig.
so, are omanes and tib the angry dons? their initial countervoting seems to fit in..
Quote:
The mafia, seem to have picked off the most active player first. I'm not sure of the significance of this yet - perhaps this will turn up in the later game.
Right now it could be anybody, but I'm enclined to think Ignoramus. So:
Vote: Ignoramus
He didn't answer my question as to why he voted Charge on the previous round. Why was that Ignoramus? It's feeble evidence, but its still evidence all the same.
this one doesn't, of course.. though.. he might have wanted to live to keep hating the other don instead of dying both by the hand of the mob..
ow well. this indicates lots..
Quote:
Vote: Omanes
Are you the arch-enemy of Tiberius? You first two posts seems to support this. If so, say it! I don't think the rules forbids you to reveal that
this isn't quite hinting after his own role.. so, shlin has no arch-enemy. warluster doesn't seem to do either. so that leaves us with omanes, tib and ig. tib being the only one alive.. hmmm..
Quote:
You were in the bandwagon too you know...
Tiberius and Omanes are pretty much confirmed to be innocent due to Omanes' silence-ness. So whoever killed Omanes were probably trying to kill one of the definitely innocent guys (Omanes and Tiberius), leaving the most suspicious ones, me and Warluster, but with Drisos pointing fingers at me before, the mafia will probably try to frame me...
so... Vote: Warluster
this defence is too weak to be mafia-like.. imo so, I'm inclined to think tib or warluster. yet.. Ignoramus and omanes are not arch-enemies. ignoramus could have had omanes lynched round 1 by votin him in stead of charge
btw, samen goes for Tib. Ig could've lynched him round 1 in stead of charge. so, lets say. ignoramus isn't an arch enemy. that leaves us with.. warluster, tib, omanes, and unlikely but possible shlin.
ok, assuming tib and omanes were it. then, I think, warluster would have to be the mafioso.. lets take a look at the kills hmmm.
ok
Quote:
shlin28 (probably normal town)
Warluster (lurking?)
quoting me, right before death. before that, I did only suspect tib. (another points for tib..still almost equal the three of them) so, did the mafioso send in the kill long before that? if not, it probably isn't shlin.
Well. I say... it's not logical shlin being mafia. doesn't fit. (not with the others either, gah)
also, this bandwagon is very scummy:
Quote:
The reason I unvoted is because he was already lynched. But I agree with you Shlin is my suspect
Vote:Shlin28
but so is the attempted bandwagon-start of warluster.
I say, Warluster or Tiberius, which ever one of you is innocent: vote for the other!
*****
ok, I'm retiring. laid down lots of ideas.. maybe not very helpful, but I hope it might help sort things out..
discuss, and find the guilty among you three!:book: