Yes as I said that got him fired, but thing is, what happened until that, didn't get him fired. So are you really sure you really have a point.
Printable View
Wow you wrote something that could actually be correct Frag.Quote:
It's simple, it's not t-t-t-true.
In as much as most of what you write on your favourite subjects is simply not true
Was his mother a hamster and did his father smell of elderberries?Quote:
Now stop spreading lies or I shall have to taunt you.
Seek eachother comfort all you want it doesn't make it any less true, and it just happens to be exactly as I say it is
Forgive me, but wasn't Frag's actual point that the translation this chap provided from French into Dutch was not doctored (as claimed), and that it was an example of a socialist also being profoundly sexist.
Sorry to stick my oar in, but this is what I understood Frag to have originally claimed, and this is getting tiring to read.
So, can someone else clarify the competency of this translation?
Well we agree about the translations, I would be pretty surprised if AdrianII isn't fluent in french. Thing is is that these texts aren't the reason he was fired. Now first of all, he was hired to build bridges between the west and the muslim world, lefties feel we need to do consessions apparently. These texts weren't a problem for the leftieloonies they went all the way for seomeone who says women should have their eyes peeled at the concrete at all times, they even accused the publisher of the texts, the head of the Gay-courant out of all people, of having an islamophobe agenda and publishing wrong translations, an accusation that will have lobbyists tear you apart byebye advertising revenues, byebye newspaper, byebye everything really. AdrianII doesn't seem to know how these things work. But there is more. He is also the grandson of the founder of the Muslim Brotherhood, bringing you terrorism since 1930, and he openly admires him when not talking to leftieloonies, praying for all the muslim-soldiers in the world and the victory of Islam, but if he did they would probably mentally block it nononononoNO it isn't true it isn't possible we agreed otherwise. Well and the texts speak for themselves. They knew all about him when they hired him, if they didn't they don't check who they give a lot of money. And in his confidence who thought he could work for the Iranians state tv in the meantime, and I don't blame him it's a pity for the lefties it came out, they had to drop him, but they would never had otherwise, might be dropped yourself in leftielalaland.
Wow you wrote something that could actually be correct Frag.
In as much as most of what you write on your favourite subjects is simply not true
It's always true, otherwise it would be too easy to shoot me down, I don't have the luxory of political correctness, and you never shoot me down. Or anyone really including AdrianII. It's like pouring water on a duck it will stay on top regardless.
In the meantime http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satelli...cle%2FShowFull
for gods sake England press your legs together we live below sealevel here, that is hard enough as it is we can't have your desire on top of that.
What a short memory you have:laugh4::laugh4::laugh4::laugh4:Quote:
It's always true, otherwise it would be too easy to shoot me down
The same goes for turds.
Anyway, interesting link you gave there. I wonder if the 1001 Muslim inventions in that book are as fictive as the 1001 tales.
The gentleman mentions the period of the 7th to the 17th century as the time when the 'first manned flight' took place. This is a bad omen. Define 'manned flight', please.
Kites have been used as man lifters since Antiquity. Manned balloons were introduced by the Montgolfier brothers in 1783. George Cayley's manned glider dates from 1853. In 1903 Orville and Wilbur Wright came up with their flying bicycle - the first powered flight.
Where's Allah is all this?
And where's the 7th to 17th century in all this? Sure, Leonardo drew flying machines and maybe - just maybe- built one, though there is no evidence that he ever flew one. And in the thirteenth century a Chinese mandarin launched himself on a chair that had 48 rockets strapped to it. He flew alright - in very, very small pieces.
Muslims can be as smart as anyone else and Muslim societies produced some interesting inventions before religious orthodoxy and political autocracy killed the spirit of intellectual exploration and experiment in that culture. Similarly the Chinese never benefited from some of their fascinating early discoveries and inventions because Mandarin culture killed human initiative.
It was only in Europe, and by the end of the period mentioned, that the scientific worldview developed in spite of and in opposition to religious prejudice, allowing for systematic experimentation and theory-building. Property law did the rest. Henceforth a man could claim his own inventions and reap the benefits of them, eventually resulting in Europe's industrial take-off and military supremacy. The Chinese invented the rudder, gun powder and cartography alright. The British brought it back to China on superior ships with superior crews, using superior astronomical knowledge, and armed with superior guns.
Jij gaat te wreed konto met mijn pipa swah.
That could be true , if you was ever right on your favourite subject.Quote:
Tribes you have never beaten me in a discussion and that is going to remain so as long as I am right and you are wrong.
So where would you like to revisit ?
"Innocent" people firebombing mosques ?
Introduction of sharia law?
Forcing governments to build mosques?
Crime in the Netherlands?
Demographics?
Immigration?
Tax funding for extremists?
Persecution of christians?
People being found not guilty just because they are Muslims?
People who want to bring their own children to the Pride festival are really child molesters?
Bloody hell you even do the annual OMG they are banning christmas nonsense.
The list goes on and on , in every case you resort to the most ridiculous outright lies , when the discussion ends and your "truth" has been shown to be absolute bollox you leave it a short while then start another topic repeating the same already exposed lies.
:embarassed:I thought when you said Pride, I thought you meant nationalist pride. :embarassed:
Yes it does doesn't it , and in each case you resorted to pathetic lies to try and make a pointQuote:
Yeah that all sounds about just right, minus persecution of christians, and kids at the gay-pride being molested, what gave you that idea.
I suppose the idea from that last bit was some muppet claiming that paedophiles wanted to bring under age people to their butt love fest a flaunt their sickness in front of decent people.
Wow, I've been away nearly a year and Tribesy is still kicking Fragony's rear :laugh4:
I thought teh muslims would have eaten us all by now....
:laugh4:Quote:
much like the Benny Hill Show but without the intellectual rigour.
:laugh4:
Thanks BG :bow: - I hope to have a bit more time for TW & the Org again with winter coming