Printable View
Rubbish. It took you all but two minutes after my previous post to find out how to provide that link and edit it into your post.Quote:
I tried the link, but it kept going back to the Index.
I found it in google so didnt know which link from the index it was.
Look, you copy-pasted content and presented it as your own.
Editing your post every two minutes to first add a link, and then to put the text in spoiler tags and then to add a rather unconvincing excuse in your -also (twice) edited- second post is just plain childish.
Kinda obvious it was plagiarized since it lacked his usual poesy.
Just a Girl knows exactly what 'MF' means on the internet.Quote:
Originally Posted by Papewaio
See?Quote:
Originally Posted by Just a Girl
Then maybe you want to ask him the trouble it got him into.
The link i added is the link to the index...
I only added it after you told me which Link from the index i was quoting.
Hence the (a brefier history thingy) {copied from your Text in your post}
in brackets under the newly added link.
I havent stated that it was my work neither did i portray it to be so.
I did not say "EDUCATION THE WAY I TELL IT."
It is The way I KNOW it though.
You guys tell me I dont make sence when i tell you things,
And thats becous you guys dont utilize the subtle diferences between 1 word and the other.
"Seem's to me, Is not a definate statement.
CAN do. does not mean Will do...
Is capable of, does not mean Always does."
-------------
I know That the text in question to be How i see things.
So That is EDUCATION AS I KNOW IT.
It was not education BY me
It was not Literature by me.
It was As I Know it. Not as I tell it.
Once you guys grasp the subtle difrences in the english language Prehaps then you will not be so ready to accuse.
The picture i used, comes from the Web page. and if i was portraying it as my work id have mooved it to my server to prevent You finding where it origionaly came from.
( i found the pick on google and it opens the page it is on, But provides no direct link to the page)
also if i was trying to portray it as my work. i would have deleted the irelivant parts of the text That arent accosiated with darwin. to make it more acceptable to the topic.
And make it more dificult to asociate what I posted, to the origional text.
I did not.
For the simple reason I was not trying to portray that i wrote it.
And your accusations just imply to me that Stealing others work is something you do and there for assume every 1 els does the same.
(see the subtle sentance there "Implys to me"?
That does not mean You definatly do..)
Like a lier wont trust any 1.
or an adulterous person thinks his/her partner is cheating.
Some 1 who passes others work off as there own will inevitably assume every 1 is the same as them.
Any way if you go around and look at all my posts.
They all get edited.
(some small exeptions when i could not edit)
So i dont know what you mean By editing my posts are childish.
Its just how i go about posting.
P.S
MF does mean My freind..
And i NEVER take it to mean anytyhing els.
(I dint even register MF was writen in previous posts I just read My freind. I had to go scrolling to find where it happend)
http://www.filelodge.com/files/hdd4/62692/mf.JPG
Read the conversation.
I have about 100 More screen dumps i have taken since I was Given a hard time for saying MF.
proving that decent people use it to mean MY freind.
Personaly i dont care what vulgar people use it to mean,
It means MY freind to decent people.
So if any 1 hears MF and thinks it means somthing other than MY freind.
That is the readers fault for being crude and vulgar.
And yes saying MF got me in to trouble,
as it seems the predomenant % of this forum Must be crude and vulgar,
So there for dont Instantly read My freind when they see MF.
But instead go through all the vulgar sayings that Could be accosiated with it then asume that that is what it means.
That is the readers problem, Prehaps they should not be so crude.
must resist tempation, but its very hard.... to resist such a statement as this coming from a person who does not present coherent arguements :dizzy2:Quote:
Originally Posted by Just A Girl
Hmm, still resisting the tempation..... :sweatdrop:Quote:
Once you guys grasp the subtle difrences in the english language Prehaps then you will not be so ready to accuse.
But I find the whole thing rather ironic given the nature of someone's posts.
whats your problem now red leg?
Grammer?
when you can Spell. Maths Armour valour colour and labour correctly Il listen to your Words.
But aslong as you dont speak english your self.
Im not going to listen much.
A nother alternative is...
go take tickle webs Literature iq test.
score 180 iq or above,
and il listen to you.
Took a retest.
Werent the Best results ever, but seeing as they were prety High.
it Looks like Bragging.
So I Deleted the results from here.
Nothing just resisting tempation.Quote:
Originally Posted by Just A Girl
What Grammer?Quote:
Grammer?
Hell your not spelling them correctly yourself. :juggle2:Quote:
when you can Spell. Maths Armour valour colour and labour correctly Il listen to your Words.
Since this is a type form - not voice, your not listening anyway. :oops:Quote:
But aslong as you dont speak english your self.
Im not going to listen much.
You don't really want to know my IQ. :book:Quote:
A nother alternative is...
go take tickle webs Literature iq test.
score 180 iq or above,
and il listen to you.
So your inablity to present a logical arguement comes from?Quote:
Took a retest.
Werent the Best results ever, but seeing as they were prety High.
it Looks like Bragging.
So I Deleted the results from here.
I beleive its your inabilaty to Comprehend logical argument's that stems from something.
Possibly some thing army related If your sig is anything to go by.
You seem to have been brainwashed somewhere along the line..
Spoiler Alert, click show to read:
Note the words.
Possibly,
SEEM
and
In My opinion.
They make a HUGE diference to the statment. as oposed to me not using those words.
Inabilaty to see how these words change the The contex in which the argument is put forth. Is where you guys mess up.
I use certain words over others for a reason, and you guys seem to be inable to comprehend those reasons. And there for dont comprehend A logical argument.
Thats not my problem.
Any way The way i see it.
Only the same Few people complain. and they are the same few people who cant answer the questions i ask.
This implys That they understand just fine.
but as they cant answer.
They resort to insults.
Its funny how when i explain How to fix something.
Or write a tutorial for something.
Every 1 understands.
Then when i put forth a logical argument that Some people cant Debate. And expecialy if it goes against what they believe.
They come out with.
I dont understand you.
You cant put forth an argument logically.
You spell badly.
Your grammer sux
That Just makes me laugh.
That is what you'd call "inabilaty to put forth a logical argument. "
And that Is what you do redleg.
(This text is compiled of seems and opinions. No direct statements, No direct claims. Try to comprehend that.)
This thread better gets back on topic - otherwise it will get closed...
Again notice the use of irony, humor and sarcasm. Did you fail to comprehend something?Quote:
Originally Posted by Just A Girl
It obvious you don't understand the nature of the quote. Care to guess what the quote actually means? It might require a history lesson.Quote:
Possibly some thing army related If your sig is anything to go by.
You seem to have been brainwashed somewhere along the line..
"Our loyalty is due entirely to the United States. It is due to the President only and exactly to the degree in which he efficiently serves the United States. It is our duty to support him when he serves the United States well. It is our duty to oppose him when he serves it badly.Teddy "
In my opinion to quote such Pitiful tat is to prove
That you are a brain washed patriot.
Your arguement here makes no sense since you did not note the meaning of the words of the quote.Quote:
Note the words.
Possibly,
SEEM
and
In My opinion.
Take your own advice because your failing terribly.Quote:
They make a HUGE diference to the statment. as oposesd to me not using those words.
:laugh4: You have to understand what the quote means before you can argue the postion that your attempting. Since you have violated your own arguement in that regards.Quote:
Inabilaty to see how these words change the The contex in which the argument is put forth. Is where you guys mess up.
What logic - like alreadly stated you don't even understand the nature of Teddy Rosevelt's quote if you think its one about being brainwashed.Quote:
I use certain words over others for a reason, and you guys seem to be inable to comprehend those reasons. And there for dont comprehend A logical argument.
LOL - I haven't even started. It seems someone got upset over a little bit of humor. Oh wellQuote:
Tit for tat.
Maybe Ser Clegane should close the thread before I get started in a true tit for tat conservation with you.
See above ... Its the resaon i did not read your post.
Apparently my previous post has been completely ignored :no: