vote: Stephen Asen
because CountArach also voted and i have not been catching up with thread
Printable View
vote: Stephen Asen
because CountArach also voted and i have not been catching up with thread
IC: I started as a lowly samurai but through my prowess, honour and my inspiration to my fellow men I have gained followers, only so that I may serve our mighty Lord Takeda better
OOC: Well umm reenk offered his alligence to the first that requested it, and pever as well. Since then i have upgraded my role somewhat.... or at least upgraded the character i am roleplaying...
Edit: Ohh Taka, now you vote!
~;)
In that case pever should die.
Stop voting, the day has concluded.
Dang it, I missed the voting. I've got to figure out how Andres' schedule fits together with mine. Looks like the deadline's while I'm at work (not a job I can post from, unfortunately), so I'll either have to post my vote well ahead of the cutoff and miss all the last-minute info and any coordination attempts, or miss out on voting. Bummer. Beskar's aggressive self-defense is the most suspicious thing in my mind. He's just not letting up.
Ajax
edit: I know some of the abbreviations, but could anyone clue me in on WIFOM and OOC?
Perhaps "all over" was an exaggeration. However, he has most definitely been active. I think six posts in another mafia game is sufficient proof of that.Quote:
Originally Posted by Shinseikhaan
In any case, I voted Sigurd when he had 2 votes and the leading lynch candidate had ~12. I just wanted to get Sigurd talking and said so, I was not after his actual death. I considered switching my vote off him when the bandwagon started, but I thought about it and couldn't come up with any reason to do so. I did not find anyone suspicious enough for a lynch, so Sigurd was as good a choice as any.
I find your claims that I "cheered" on the bandwagon dubious at best. I made a grand total of two posts the entire day that discussed Sigurd. The first gave my reason for voting for him, which was perfectly legitimate and made at a time when I thought there wasn't any chance he would be lynched. The second simply pointed out that he was in danger of being lynched due to lurking. The only thing it is fair to accuse me of is silence, which is perfectly true. I sat back and watched the lynch happen and was curious to see how far it would go so I said nothing. Since there are several other moderators in here who did the same thing, why are you so uppity about me in particular?
OOC: Out Of Character
WIFOM: Whoa, I'm Freaking Out Man
WIFOM: Whoa, I'm Freaking Out Man
:laugh4::laugh4::laugh4:
sig worthy...
challenge: Dutch_Guy
:evil:
Spoiler Alert, click show to read:
1) Again- end game =/= start of game. This game has just started, there are few leads thus far. If Sigurd has little time to spare, he will put it towards the game that is inching towards end phase. As I said, its much easier to analyze when there is 6 or 8 people than when there is 55+ people. There isn't nearly as much to be gained from Sigurd plunging into this one as compared to the Magi game. That he would take the first couple rounds off is no wonder, and is in fact something he's done recently in large games regardless of his role.Quote:
Originally Posted by TinCow
2) "To get him talking"... Oh how I hate this phrase. "I voted him to get talking". "Oh, what a scummy response, look how defensive he's getting!" "To get him talking" is nothing more than laying a trap for whomever you choose. Either they come to the thread, respond to you, and are thus marked scummy for being "defensive", or they do not come back to the thread and are lynched. Great couple of choices. If it was "just to get him talking" you should have taken your vote back when it came down to crunch time so he could have another couple days to "get talking". You didn't, which really bugs me.
3) What does being a moderator have to do with any of this? :inquisitive: I'm picking on you for two reasons: 1) For the friggin' "to get him talking line". 2) Because you are a highly, highly dangerous mafioso; you did not win that HoF award for nothing.
OOC: Old oval clocks!Quote:
Originally Posted by Sasaki Kojiro
WIFOM: whoa, your a 'Weird Idiotic Freaky Old Man' my friend :yes:
who is peverpurple?
peverpurple is peverpurple :yes:Quote:
Originally Posted by woad&fangs
And peverblue_ is peverblue_, although once upon a time he might have been known as Rhyfelwyr...
Another <insert "two"> much less obvious name changes. :wall: Great. I'm gettin' peeved.
I thought peverblue was Vuk....? Now I'm thouroughly confused:dizzy2:
Can the ninjas please kill the pevers to lessen the confusion? I'll give a balloon for each pever killed:balloon3:
Quote:
Originally Posted by woad&fangs
<_<
*slowly exits thread*
You seem to be confusing peverblue with peveblue_
It's all in the underscore.
I figure if we work together we can sort out this problem...
We lynch a pever, get CA to choose a player with a high duel score to challenge the other, and the town can request that the traitors and ninjs work with them to remove another few pever's. I figure after one day and night we'll only have the one left, if we keep the green one it will be less work remembering...
As I said, he could have at least posted just to say he was busy. Sigurd said he was busy in RL in the Chicago game and then went on to win as a lurker mafioso. That makes me wary of a lurker Sigurd, and I see no reason to apologize for it. :shrug:Quote:
Originally Posted by Shinseikhaan
If you say so. I can't remember when I've ever used the 'defensive' attack on anyone. It's not a strong one IMO. I simply like to have people contributing in the game. The way I play, the more that other people post, the better I think my odds of victory. Thus, I try and encourage active participation.Quote:
2) "To get him talking"... Oh how I hate this phrase. "I voted him to get talking". "Oh, what a scummy response, look how defensive he's getting!" "To get him talking" is nothing more than laying a trap for whomever you choose. Either they come to the thread, respond to you, and are thus marked scummy for being "defensive", or they do not come back to the thread and are lynched. Great couple of choices. If it was "just to get him talking" you should have taken your vote back when it came down to crunch time so he could have another couple days to "get talking". You didn't, which really bugs me.
I'm confused now. I was responding to the "You knew entirely well why Sigurd isn't active" bit. I assumed you were talking about something Sigurd had mentioned to other mods a while ago about having a reduced time schedule due to RL things. I assumed he had told you about this as well, hence your statement. Since this does not appear to be the case, why exactly did you think I "knew entirely well" the reason Sigurd was absent?Quote:
3) What does being a moderator have to do with any of this? :inquisitive: I'm picking on you for two reasons: 1) For the friggin' "to get him talking line". 2) Because you are a highly, highly dangerous mafioso; you did not win that HoF award for nothing.
Trying to make a new bandwagon are we? This is suspicious to say the least...Quote:
Originally Posted by LittleGrizzly
Trying to make a new bandwagon are we? This is suspicious to say the least...
I don't even now who you are !!
That and my post contained jus' a lil' sarcasm...
Phew... Good thing I havn't joined the pever brigade yet :sweatdrop:
iirc pever blue is vuk and pever purple is Thermal Mercury. You can just check by reading through their public profile
This game is rocketing forth faster than Capo II!
I don't quite understand why Sigurd was lynched but the couple of players who were eager to come forth and save Stephen Asen as soon as opportunity permitted make me more suspicious of him.
Well, there is little I can comment on, so I will address the only claim against me in my absence;
Lord Takeda, you have withdrawn your attack on me anyway, but you must also realise that I had no idea what Northnovas' name was before I duelled with him.
For this reason it may give the town more clues and understanding if everyone writes out their character name in their signature.
I believe mine is Fujimo Yushiro.
Oookay...:inquisitive: What kind of outbreak has just been unleashed here...Spoiler Alert, click show to read:
:edit:
Spoiler Alert, click show to read:
Alright two requests:
1) CAN EVERYONE SEND ME THEIR DUEL RATINGS NOW PLEASE - I liked the feeling of seeing that I had 12 new unread PMs. Thanks for that whoever suggested it :wink: . Seriously though this has helped me already and I have a couple of suspicions...
2) Can those who are part of the 'peverbrigade' please put their old username as their Member Title at least? I have no idea who is who any more and that just ruins it for everyone...
1) CAN EVERYONE SEND ME THEIR DUEL RATINGS NOW PLEASE - I liked the feeling of seeing that I had 12 new unread PMs. Thanks for that whoever suggested it :wink: .
:laugh4::laugh4:
Seriously though this has helped me already and I have a couple of suspicions...
I live only to serve you lord.
Some kind of hint of who's who would help, at least when there were 2 i knew one was pever and thought the other was vuk...
At least spL1tp350naL1ty still has his sig with his name in it...
It's also my member comment thingy XD
also, I tried to change my name back and it said it was already in use, am I :daisy:?
I believe you have to wait at least a month to change it back.Quote:
Originally Posted by PeverMauve