Indeed, it's not the size of the postcount that matters, it's what you do with it. One shouldn't be embarrassed about a small postcount, as long as one can use it effectively.Quote:
Originally Posted by Husar
Printable View
Indeed, it's not the size of the postcount that matters, it's what you do with it. One shouldn't be embarrassed about a small postcount, as long as one can use it effectively.Quote:
Originally Posted by Husar
This is a little OOC;
I've already PMed Seamus, but does anyone else have problems with the new end turn times? Just asking. I do, it means I have to stay up until 12:00 at night to post or anything, I have classes from 6am to 3pm., and im in EST, which means if the day ends at 14:00 (2:00) then I will not be able to participate too often..
Back on the topic:
Has anyone forgotten Twilight last night(night for me)? He changed the vote at the last second. Even if it didn't count, it still is scummy, and I think we all lost interest in finding out why it happened.
So, Twilight, anymore explaining to do? :inquisitive:
Whenever Seamus ends it there will be problems for someone. He should do whatever is concvenient.
Quote:
Originally Posted by TruePraetorian
i would also like to hear some reasoning Twilight
Just a little notice. Ill be gone to boarding camp in about 3-4 hours and ill be back at monday in Australia. So I wont be able to reply or vote.
Good luck to good innocent peoples :laugh4: and bad eggs.. Have fun
Well, I can only claim to have neither any connection with twilight or even really to have ever PMed him.
But I realise that does not count for much.
However, the fact that he changed his vote isn't necessarily just good timing, but good reasoning on Pannonian's part.
What if I had been an hour and a half earlier? Would that of made me any more suspicious?
And why was my sudden vote change so scummy?
Either I wanted to live, for the reason which I thought had already been ascertained, that being there is more advantage in life than in death, or because I thought there was overwhelming evidence that Molonthegreat was more likely Mafia than myself.
No offence, Molonthegreat, but your name is very suspicious to me, as is your writing style. You don't put many spaces in your name either.
For the benefit of some of us mafia noobs, what is "WoG"?
Wrath of God. Basically it means you get killed if you arent active enoughQuote:
Originally Posted by TinCow
As a courtesy to new players:
Link to Mafia F.A.Q.
Wog = Wrath of God: (also known as Wrath of GH) What Lurkers suffer. They are no longer alive after the Wrath of God hits. The first Wrath of God famously took place in Game III but there will most likely be more. Many died from "Wrath of Silver Rusher" in the Godfather.
Edit: Beefy beat me to it. That's an old mafia tactic - says so in the f.a.q. too. It's very scummy. *keeps close watch on Beefy from now on*
:laugh4:Quote:
No offence, Molonthegreat, but your name is very suspicious to me, as is your writing style. You don't put many spaces in your name either.
Speaking of God.
GeneralHankerchief, you have been a player who has really kept to the shadows in this game - which means you must have a headstart on information compared to most of us.
Could you reaffirm your status one more time without being inconclusive and drawing off to other games I know nothing about?
I haven't kept to the shadows. I've been under various degrees of pressure for the entire game.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Louis VI the Fat
:bigcry:Quote:
Csar: Guilty.
Glenn, I thought you learned being in the "spotlight" wasn't a good thing? Why are you suddenly suspicious of everyone?
On the topic of post counts, I think that this is only my fourth or fifth post, but that shouldn't matter since I never post much
As for Glenn, I wouldn't be pointing fingers because you're very scummy or at least unpredictable in my books and probably in those of many here so you're probably going to be lynched tomorrow
I shall ask you questions until you get to 4000 posts because I'm a nice guy like that.Quote:
Originally Posted by GeneralHankerchief
So, who do you think deserves to be lynched next round?
As I would like to hear from him. Is there any messages going?Quote:
Originally Posted by TruePraetorian
I'd also agree with Xdeathfire. Are you attempting to push away the spotlight Glenn? Change the view of inquisitive eyes? As for your question why the sudden vote change is scummy; because it means something has suddenly changed your mind.
Who else have I probed other than GH?
I am all but exposed to anyone who reads this thread, so I've fairly well decided I may as well be strapped to a board in the spotlight.
Or the moonlight.. on Hononluuuulu Bay..
As for XDeathfire, you along with Rythmic, and CrazedRabbit are the only three who would prefer to simply see me die rather than listen to any argument.
I think that could mean you are my enemy, and my only enemies are Mafia.
So why don't you take a big step back cat?
GH is my only worry, because I was just starting to PM him wth information and almost everyone I've contacted seems to be sure he is a Mafia-linked player.
Some people even suggested he may be a neutral Mafia, a shadowy Mafia.
Hence his status in sitting back and watching, without having to probe anyone.
Nope, haven't heard from him...haven't tried PMing him to be honest. Thought he might post eventually...
Oh, yes I suppose something did suddenly change in my mind laddy, I'm guessing that was the fact I came back to the forum and found I wasn't dead, but had a good 50/50 chance of survival.
Naturally, I thought I might stay alive, instead of eating poison.
How about you Warbuster? Would you rather eat poison?
This post ticks me off for a variety of reasons.Quote:
Originally Posted by Glenn
- First of all, there's been a lot of "well, there's a lot of people who say GH is guilty." I've been getting this for two days now, and I'm tired of it. How can you expect me to properly defend myself when the accusations are coming from a secret shadow group that just say I'm guilty? They don't say what I've done (slept), they don't say how they got this information (they didn't, since I slept), or any detailed information at all, really. I mean, come on.
- Secondly, again, I am not sitting back and watching. I've been under more scrutiny in this game than everybody, with the exception of Glenn and a few other people. What about Sasaki? What about Ichigo? What about Kommodus? How come there isn't more suspicion on them? Oh wait, because "they" don't say they're guilty. Please.
@Ichigo: I don't know, it depends on what the Detectives say regarding their investigation targets during the night phase.
Well the Twilight thing does need re-iteration as in a general forum (I have no doubt that PM's will have probably been passed around on the issue) , whilst the recent rush in analysing PM's has gone on, we need to see how in the face of an apparent draw...somebody broke ranks to try and change it at the last moment, before anyone else could correct the balance!
Anyhow! Post counts don't mean an awful lot to me....been on here since 03 and still havn't hit 600 yet!
I'm suspicious of both Sasaki and Kommodus, but neither seem to pay any attention. Maybe if I make it bigger they'll see it....Quote:
Originally Posted by GeneralHankerchief
Sasaki:Why did you switch your vote from Glenn to pever even though you were the one who seemed too think he was the most suspicious?
Kommodus:What do you think about the game so far? Who's the most suspicious in your eyes? You haven't posted nearly enough in my mind and I don't like that.
I'm sure you know that in the third round it's highly unlikely that a Detective would reveal anything. I expected a much better response from you honestly. So, who's the most suspicious person in your opinion?
LIES!!! wOAD&fANG pmed me about that at the very begining.Quote:
Originally Posted by Glenn
In my opinion, the most suspicious people are Sigurd and Stranger.
I can't see why Drisos would do a fake reveal, especially after he died, unless he was hoping for a quick lynch (i.e. before his role was determined). Stranger is suspicious for his usual shenanigans, but it could just be normal behavior.
Thats very good point, care to explain Twilight?Quote:
Originally Posted by TruePraetorian
Has anyone else noticed The Stranger always...talking...like this. Maybe be something, maybe be nothing.
Btw, what does OOC stand for?
OOC is Out Of Context. It means "off topic post" for clarifaication.
Then why did you switch your vote from TS to pever?Quote:
Originally Posted by GeneralHankerchief
Because that would make his vote count.
Stranger's overuse of dots is making him very suspicious to everyone, this is why no one wants anything to do with him.
I myself admit I have tried to warn him his sentence structure may end in his death, but alas he continues in that style.
I can only ask, seeing as he came through for me - suddenly, that you find some other evidence other than his attitude before further suspicion.
Im glad someone else agreeds, is there any reason behind this TS?Quote:
Originally Posted by Glenn
And thanks for before TP.