Restless crowns: forging empires [Late era -Skip a few]

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by yuonyuon

Penalty for what??

---

For the rule broken in Baghdad you complained for.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by sonnet

For the rule broken in Baghdad you complained for.

---

5k ? pfff .anyway lets forget about this .

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by yuonyuon

Penalty for what??

---

EDIT: Already been answered.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by yuonyuon

5k ? pfff .anyway lets forget about this .

---

You're breaking the assassin rule since 3 turns (and Dr mac was breaking it since more than 3 too, with at least 3 assassins),
and yet i didn't ask any penalty for you or you predecessor.
Dr Mac also broke the fort rule not once (in Baghdad) but in Yerevan too, and didn't ask any penalty for that .

Yes , lets forget about this too.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by sonnet

You're breaking the assassin rule since 3 turns (and Dr mac was breaking it since more than 3 too, with at least 3 assassins),
and yet i didn't ask any penalty for you or you predecessor.
Dr Mac also broke the fort rule not once (in Baghdad) but in Yerevan too, and didn't ask any penalty for that .

Yes , lets forget about this too.

---

for a fort rule the fine is between 2-5k
but for destroying half of persian army and taking a city by cheating is same 5k???
i already forgot about this .
waiting my turn. i don t even waist my time with this type of things .
i m here to play.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by yuonyuon

for a fort rule the fine is between 2-5k
but for destroying half of persian army and taking a city by cheating is same 5k???
i already forgot about this .
waiting my turn. i don t even waist my time with this type of things .
i m here to play.

---

You can repeat the same over and over, and it won't make it true:
the fort he built, prevented me from taking Baghdad legally and saved 2 of his armies.
I posted the ss showing everything. No rules broken on either sides, and I would still take Baghdad fair and square. The ss I posted are not difficult to understand, they just need unbiased eyes.

The fact that you say punishment for fort is 2k-5k without looking at the advantage the player got from it, shows your usual bias..
Funny part is that you left a HS (BFE) because someone broke the fort rule..but now you're saying it's not that important..you never change..don't you?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by sonnet

You can repeat the same over and over, and it won't make it true:
the fort he built, prevented me from taking Baghdad legally and saved 2 of his armies.
I posted the ss showing everything. No rules broken on either sides, and I would still take Baghdad fair and square. The ss I posted are not difficult to understand, they just need unbiased eyes.

The fact that you say punishment for fort is 2k-5k without looking at the advantage the player got from it, shows your usual bias..
Funny part is that you left a HS (BFE) because someone broke the fort rule..but now you're saying it's not that important..you never change..don't you?

---

i m not saying is not important!

Actually is very important , the problem is lack of admining .After all this time you get 5k fine is ridiculous . is to damn funny . this is not a fine this is a bonus!

you admitted that you didn t had siege weapons so how you could take Baghdad. good question.
the answer is by braking the rule.

ok i m done on this subject as only me, you and Dr mac know what happened , the rest non t care, so let s continue.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by yuonyuon

i m not saying is not important!

Actually is very important , the problem is lack of admining .After all this time you get 5k fine is ridiculous . is to damn funny . this is not a fine this is a bonus!

you admitted that you didn t had siege weapons so how you could take Baghdad. good question.
the answer is by braking the rule.

ok i m done on this subject as only me, you and Dr mac know what happened , the rest non t care, so let s continue.

---

lol

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by yuonyuon

i m not saying is not important!

Actually is very important , the problem is lack of admining .After all this time you get 5k fine is ridiculous . is to damn funny . this is not a fine this is a bonus!

you admitted that you didn t had siege weapons so how you could take Baghdad. good question.
the answer is by braking the rule.

ok i m done on this subject as only me, you and Dr mac know what happened , the rest non t care, so let s continue.

---

Man..I don't really know if you're serious or not.

Spoiler Alert, click show to read: 

I obviously had the siege weapons to take Baghdad (on turn 9).
The armies that were blocked (on turn 8) by the illegal fort had not siege weapons. Those armies were supposed to support (form the quarisiya way) the assault on Baghdad (on turn 9) with the armies coming (with siege weapons) from Mosul's way.
Building the forts, forced the armies in Qarisiya to go the Mosul's way too (and this allowed Kwarezm to safely put 2 stacks behind Baghdad, something he couldn't have done without building the illegal fort).

All in all the fact that you keep talking without knowledge (or will to understand facts, since I provided all the relevant infos) lead me to believe this is your usual biased propaganda.

Only thing I understand from your writing is that if rules are broken against your interests, then regardless of what happened it's something tragic and the opponent need to be executed.
But in your favour,then it's either no punishment at all or -in the worst case scenario- a simple fine is enough (regardless of the advantage you got from it).
Funny part in all this, is that when Dr Mac broke the fort rule, he got the appropriate punishment (not allowed to move armies in baghdad for one turn). But the player asked to turn the faction to ai if such punishment didn't get turn in a financial fine. And I said nothing.
Funny part is that you broke (with your predecessor) the assassin rule for 6 consecutive turns (and if you were in good faith you could have mentioned you had 3 assassins, rather to keep silent about it thinking I wouldn't find out..). And I said nothing , other than asking you to stop breaking the rule.

And the most hilarious of all, is that you accused me of playing Tonno's save..and why did you think that? Oh yes..because I wasn't posting Egypt's saves..but that was because you were downloading them (getting infos you were not supposed to have) even if you were warned 2-3 times that loading other player's turns is cheating!

But sure..keep talking about breaking the rules..coming form you I can see the irony in it.

i ave got 5 assassins on my first turn and i suicide just one by reloading. this turn i will suicide another one maybe two and so on . as long i didn t use them , your complain is worthless.

the rule say you have to suicide them immediately , tell me how to do that?

http://www.filedropper.com/rckharezm13

http://steamcommunity.com/id/puddingkip/screenshots/ pics can be found here. Basically I did very little again except move my troops about and getting ready for war. I know I forgot to take a result screenshot of me fighting the Pope again but seriously look at the odds and it's not even possible to fight the pope in a manual battle. I won, took 25 casualties in a garbage spearmen unit and the pope died. Hope I won't have to replay for this

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by puddingkip

pics can be found here. Basically I did very little again except move my troops about and getting ready for war.

---

@puddingkip : sorry maybe I should have mentioned it to you. You don't need to post ss for battles vs the AI (means AI factions).
Only ss for battles played against factions controlled by Humans. But obviously if you want you can still post ss of battles against the AI (for rp purposes, if you like to)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by sonnet

@puddingkip : sorry maybe I should have mentioned it to you. You don't need to post ss for battles vs the AI (means AI factions).
Only ss for battles played against factions controlled by Humans. But obviously if you want you can still post ss of battles against the AI (for rp purposes, if you like to)

---

Meh not really interested in that bit, I'm an awful writer but well you can find the screenshots there anyway

go go powerrangers... we can get 4 faction out in the next few hours.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by sonnet

@Tonno : pictures from yesterday's turn of Hungary and France
@Lord Luka: you surprised me by taking Innsbruck. You do know that there's a chance your super-general might die for the plague he contracted?
@Tonno: I can open it. Try to install 7zip or re-download the file
@puddingkip : as your jihad army got destroyed, you can't make a new one, as there's a limit of one jihad/crusade army per faction. Saying this just in case you were wondering

---

@sonnet yes i know that my general can die of plague but that doesn't happen very often as far as i know (although cosidering my luck i got while subbing france that may as well happen).Only other choice i had was leaving salzburg and innsbruck to HRE beacuse of the plague and i don't find that option very attractive.

Well, it seems I've missed my turn. :|
I'm sorry, my internet had been down for 2 days.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Tonno

go go powerrangers... we can get 4 faction out in the next few hours.

---

Which ones?

Kwarzem, Turks, Egypt, Castile.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Tonno

Kwarzem, Turks, Egypt, Castile.

---

Yeah..lets keep dreaming about Yuonyuon playing his save in 2 hours or less..(regardless of what he swear or promise). At least now everyone can see the real truth behind Yuonyuon requests of the time windows.
As usual I was right.
Lol

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by sonnet

Yeah..lets keep dreaming about Yuonyuon playing his save in 2 hours or less..(regardless of what he swear or promise). At least now everyone can see the real truth behind Yuonyuon requests of the time windows.
As usual I was right.
Lol

---

there is no reloading involved i received the save via PM at 22:00 as the save posted in the thread was no good and i was kind busy.i will post in about 4 hours from now when i got home from work.

moors save was played in my time frame . so i have the right to extra time.
good news. :i killed another assassin last night

Thread save works properly.
Your time frames are really really weird yuon. Your save posts here and TWC are different as well as time-work relation of those saves, your work time is weird for one European.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Tonno

Thread save works properly.
Your time frames are really really weird yuon. Your save posts here and TWC are different as well as time-work relation of those saves, your work time is weird for one European.

---

what you trying to say....is?? time i wired :))))

i didn t invent time so i can t help you!


edit : here is 12:00 but on the forum is 11:00 , the save i got was moors save but later was modified.
anyway what do you care . i m here now :))))

Just upload the save.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Tonno

Thread save works properly.
Your time frames are really really weird yuon. Your save posts here and TWC are different as well as time-work relation of those saves, your work time is weird for one European.

---

No the save I posted was screwed. He got it via pm later. I saved before clicking end turn so technically it was still my turn even though I was done

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by yuonyuon

there is no reloading involved i received the save via PM at 22:00 as the save posted in the thread was no good and i was kind busy.i will post in about 4 hours from now when i got home from work.

moors save was played in my time frame . so i have the right to extra time.
good news. :i killed another assassin last night

---

Im curious, how much time do you guys spend on your turns?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Tonno

Just upload the save.

---

please don't say that

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by yuonyuon

just shut up!!

---

if next turn takes this ammout of time, I'll request admin to remove you form the HS for obstruction of set up that you agreed on, on the start of the HS and the second time you joined.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Gaius Octavius Caesar

Im curious, how much time do you guys spend on your turns?

---

Is that a general question?

Turks up!

@sonnet up!

i played my turn in about 1-1.5 hours since is a complex turn .

last night i received the save to late and i did had the chance to play .but some players are not understand what good manners are.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Tonno

if next turn takes this ammout of time, I'll request admin to remove you form the HS for obstruction of set up that you agreed on the start of the HS, and the second time you joined.

---

again, please don't say that!

edit:you don t know what are you talking about !

my schedule is between 16:00-20:00 and moors played on my time frame.

that s all just a fort taken this turn!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by yuonyuon

again shut up!

edit:you don t know what are you talking about !

my schedule is between 16:00-20:00 and moors played on my time frame.

---

Couldn't care less. (the little care that I have, is that I will have to play my turn today, not yesterday)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by yuonyuon

.but some players are not understand what good manners are.

---

Says the person that tells others to shut up. You are one conflicted person, aren't you?

It's not that I wasn't raised to understand how to act in good manners, it's that I don't care what they are.