So I'm not crazy after all..:dizzy2:.. You all see that trait! :beam:Quote:
Originally Posted by Warmaster Horus
Printable View
So I'm not crazy after all..:dizzy2:.. You all see that trait! :beam:Quote:
Originally Posted by Warmaster Horus
oooh snap so their goes my plan to have a big family with like 20 kids... sheeeeeeeet
WH.. just a reminder.. all Pergamou Mysiakes are family members and in family tree.. so you have to change that in the Royal Library. This means that Attalos Pergamou Mysiakes aka Rodrico Stak is part of the family.
Right-o. Wasn't sure of it, and I was about to check the save for that... Thanks!
Lol.. there is actually only one of them at the moment :beam:
For some reason I thought that there is more than one with that name. :inquisitive:
Nice to see a few stories up, hopefully there will be some mileage in this. Anyway, I was curious as to how everyone plans on playing their character, personally I think EB has a great system of traits which can give a character real personality and I plan to base my avatar around them, and also to bring into play any ancillaries gained. Anybody else going in that direction?
In general I think I will, but I will probably ignore a few that go entirely contrary to my perception of the character.Quote:
Originally Posted by johnhughthom
Well, I certainly am, and I think we all should. It doesn't make much sense, for example, for a languorous coward to rush around all over the battlefield before charging carelessly ahead into the fray. We should all play our characters like they are, not like we are. That's my humble cents, anyway.
There are ways around things like that, for instance my character who is a pretty useless general (dull, languorous, terrible tactician) has a veteran officer ancillary. So I will roleplay that my character "has a headache" on the day of any battles and his faithful officer leads the army.Quote:
Originally Posted by The Celtic Viking
I will do as Rodrico Stak, I'll add a few traits if they don't appear
That's a little bit cheating, IMO. Okay if it happens, but in every battle? Come on. That's not roleplaying, it's just avoiding a flaw you don't want to deal with.Quote:
Originally Posted by johnhughthom
No one except me and WH can not use the console no matter what. If this is discovered then those people are barred from the game and perhaps any similar games I plan to make in the future. People can cheat in singleplayer campaign as much as you want(I do it quite often have to say) but not in here.Quote:
Originally Posted by kingsnake
Yes it is and some very good ones too. :yes:Quote:
Originally Posted by johnhughthom
0.0 That wasn't what I meant... I'm not going to mess with the console lol
How can I explain it... I'll make up new "traits", cause I don't want my roleplay to follow the in game traits 100%. I'll add new imaginery ones lol.
Yes I also cheat on singleplayer.
Also the cheating penalizations should be made clear, it's quite an important issue.
Sry.. I should have looked why you said something like that..:shame:
But just like I said.. If we catch someone cheating then there is only one thing we can do.. He will be thrown out of the game..
EDIT: I will open the Royal Council 2-3 hours from now. So get ready ~:)
wooooo!!
can't wait :smash:
tough I still don't have membership grr
Lol.. The Celtic Viking(from now on as TCV :beam:) posted his suggestions before I managed to do my post.. and they look almost similar :laugh4:
Well, you know what they say: great minds think alike. :clown:
So do dirty...
Perhaps, but then the question is: does IK have a dirty mind? :shy:
I have spoken twice in the Royal Council thread, as two different magistrates.
I'd like to point out that as I am more a gamesmaster than player, that my interventions in the Council are for the more legal/bureaucratic side of things. The other officials of the Arche, in other words.
If it bothers people that I do that, I'll stop doing it and just manage the game from a more OOC perspective. I, personally, think it helps.
I think it does as well..
It's easier for me if I don't have to answer to all the legal questions in the Council. :yes:
I see no reason why you shouldn't do it, either. Actually, I kind of like it, so keep it up.
Agree totally.Quote:
Originally Posted by The Celtic Viking
I do too, it adds a part that as players we cannot fill.
also, whats the Agora for? i know its just another IC place, but like what kind of posts will we see there?
The library says this: "Informal IC Discussion thread, for general roleplaying and interaction outside the Council."
Which is what I expected. Basically, you can form personal alliances with others there, just agree to second Edicts in the next council, conspire to overthrow the Basileus or whatever.
lol yeah and then we'll see who ever tries that in the bottom of a pit.
If you want an idea of what the Agora is, take a look at the Hippodrome in LotR. It's going to be something like that - without the races, obviously...
Or for an older thread, the Tavern of KotR. The Agora is actually closer in spirit to the Tavern than the Hippodrome, I feel.
ahhh thank you horus
Looks like WH already explained why the Agora was created. ~:)
That's (partly) why I'm here :smile:
By the way:
I realize now we should have done something like that since the beginning - and I intend to put a part in the Library (in the first post; underneath Recently Enacted Laws) for it. I'd be very grateful if someone could post the current edict situation in this format:Quote:
Originally Posted by kingsnake (from the Council)
Edict 1.x: the message of the Edict
Proposed: name of the proposer
Seconded: names of the seconders.
And so on, Edict after Edict.
If nobody does it, I'll be free tomorrow afternoon around 5-6 GMT+2 to take care of it. Would save me time, though :yes: