Printable View
The bit I find funny, is the sentence about cheating/one-night stands/get johnny some action is justified because they would have done it anyway. I am sure they jumped into a really good stable and loving relationship that lasted a long-time afterwards with Kadagar.
Lemur>>> Thank you for that very contributing post. I am proud we have moderators like you :)
Philipvs Vallindervs Calicvla>>> If there is a wrong person and a wrong time, you obviosly don't believe in the theory of "love", now do you?
Beskar>>> What makes you think I offered them a long-time relationship?
Why is it even about me?
Let's get the focus off of me and point it at society at large...
A) Girl (or boy) is in a relationship.
B) Girl (or boy) finds someone better.
C) Girl (or boy) realise her partner is not what she need.
Does it really matter if the specific object that made her realise this is what she needs or not? does it matter if they stay together?
No, it just shows she or he has more to bargain for.
Originally Posted by Kadagar_AV:
I didn't know ski instructors/bartenders are also trained and qualified relation therapists.
Well, if a girl falls for her ski instructor... was it really a good relationship to begin with?
From my point of view I just save time... I think it's better people realise their relationship is wrong as soon as possible, rather than after having kids and stuff.
In your casual sex thread, you claimed that you had slept with women who were either married or in a long lasting relationship with children.
You can explain and avoid all you want, but through your actions you are at least partially responsible for a lot of pain and misery. I hope that one day you will be able to face that and deal with it, as it seems that you are now still in some sort of denial phase.
Or was that whole thread also "not to be taken too seriously" and intended "to upset frigid americans "?
*yawn*
back on topic?
Edit: don't mean to diss you Andres, just that this thread is de-railed enough. You are welcome to PM me and we can discuss it there :)
Originally Posted by Kadagar_AV:
Well, I assume you're male and you're a self proclaimed sex machine, so talking about you seems on topic... :bounce:
*yawn*
back on topic?
Originally Posted by Kadagar_AV:
It seems that both in posting here and in your conduct with women, you don't much like taking responsibility for your own actions.
Why is it even about me?
Originally Posted by Kadagar_AV:
By the same token, everybody's going to die someday. Does it matter if I kill them? I mean, come on, in a hundred years everybody you ever knew will be gone. Why should anybody care if I strangle a few people? It's not my problem, is it?
Does it really matter if the specific object that made her realise this is what she needs or not? does it matter if they stay together?
Lemur>>>Originally Posted by :
I must say, best compliment ever, EVER!
By the same token, everybody's going to die someday. Does it matter if I kill them? I mean, come on, in a hundred years everybody you ever knew will be gone. Why should anybody care if I strangle a few people? It's not my problem, is it?
You equal my seduction ability to forcefully strangling...
:laugh4: :laugh4: :laugh4: :laugh4: :laugh4:
Now, back in the real world...
Originally Posted by Kadagar_AV:
No, I equate your amoral abuse of your (internet-boasted) seduction abilities, and your unwillingness to take any responsibility for your actions with a sociopath. Do you acknowledge that you have any obligation to behave like a higher life form?
You equal my seduction ability to forcefully strangling...
You posts about how seducing married or attached women is really doing a service to society ... that's what sticks in my throat. The level of amorality and rationalization displayed sickens me.
Originally Posted by Kadagar_AV:
You take no account of temporary lapses in judgement.
Lemur>>> Thank you for that very contributing post. I am proud we have moderators like you :)
Philipvs Vallindervs Calicvla>>> If there is a wrong person and a wrong time, you obviosly don't believe in the theory of "love", now do you?
Beskar>>> What makes you think I offered them a long-time relationship?
Why is it even about me?
Let's get the focus off of me and point it at society at large...
A) Girl (or boy) is in a relationship.
B) Girl (or boy) finds someone better.
C) Girl (or boy) realise her partner is not what she need.
Does it really matter if the specific object that made her realise this is what she needs or not? does it matter if they stay together?
No, it just shows she or he has more to bargain for.
You break up relationships and you claim you're doing people a service?
I believe in love, sincerely, but I also believe in screwing up. If even one of those women just made a mistake then you could have ruined her life.
I know I have messed up, are you telling me you never have? Ever? Not once?
This has little or nothing to do with society at large.
Originally Posted by Lemur:
amoral abuse...
No, I equate your amoral abuse of your (internet-boasted) seduction abilities, and your unwillingness to take any responsibility for your actions with a sociopath. Do you acknowledge that you have any obligation to behave like a higher life form?
You posts about how seducing married or attached women is really doing a service to society ... that's what sticks in my throat. The level of amorality and rationalization displayed sickens me.
sociopath...
behave like a higher life form...
stick my throat...
amorality...
sickens...
Did I get you right? Anything I missed?
Again I *bow* to your wisdom and level of discussion.
When you want a serious debate without insults and stuff I welcome you to PM me.
Back on topic?
EDIT: PVC, again, obviosly you don't believe in love :)
A hint, if I am in love there are no "lapses in judgement" or "screwing up".
Still no taking responsibility?
You are completely unwilling to accept that they might not have broken up with their partner, that they might have gone on to be happy?
I think, frankly, this is pertenant to the topic. I would not try to break up a relationship just for a one night stand.
So it would seem I am fundamentally different to you with regard to how I deal with my sexuality.
Originally Posted by :
Obviosly :)
Still no taking responsibility?
Originally Posted by :
You argue that ignorance is a bliss?
You are completely unwilling to accept that they might not have broken up with their partner, that they might have gone on to be happy?
You argue that if they had not met a better guy; they would have gone on to be happily with the poor excuse for a guy they were in a relationship with?
Originally Posted by :
If a women decides a one-night-stand is worth more than her relationship with her poor partner, who am I to say she is wrong?
I think, frankly, this is pertenant to the topic. I would not try to break up a relationship just for a one night stand.
If I on the deathbed could choose between one ood night and a thousand bad ones I'd go with the former. You don't believe she should have that choice?
Originally Posted by :
Yes you are indeed :)
So it would seem I am fundamentally different to you with regard to how I deal with my sexuality.
So why don't we embrace the diversity and be thankful that there are other perspectives?
As a sidenote: This is a internet forum dedicated to a strategic game...
Does anyone think there would be a difference if this was a table talk at the ski school bar after closening hours?
I fear that this thread has been seduced away from it's former topic, and the divorce has caused a lot of angry bad feeling.
Time to be sent to therapy.
:closed: