Obama appearantly can also speak "Negro" when necessary

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Husar

It's funny because he capitalizes first nation but not Euro.

---

Ouch

Quote:

---

And HoreTore, I think everybody has their own prejudices about who looks french. To say someone looks french or not already is applying prejudice to the looks of the person, isn't it?

---

And Ouch! :laugh4:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by HoreTore

He doesn't?

He looks very french to me....

---

After some concerted visual fondling, I can say that he looks more like Niko Bellic than a Frenchmen.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by A Very Super Market

After some concerted visual fondling, I can say that he looks more like Niko Bellic than a Frenchmen.

---

Well yeah, he's only one person, of course he doesn't look like frechmen......:clown:

Please keep this thread on theme. I do NOT want to shut down a DevDave thread because of other posters. :beam:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Strike For The South

However it is not on the same level as the "N" word because if that were true the Washington Redskins (amore offensive term) would've changed there name long ago

---

Or, maybe it's socially acceptable to treat Native American culture that way. Besides, words different across borders. For example, I find the word "spaz" very offensive, yet plenty of toys, adverts and TV shows etc. feature "You stupid spaz!".

Nevermind.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Subotan

Or, maybe it's socially acceptable to treat Native American culture that way. Besides, words different across borders. For example, I find the word "spaz" very offensive, yet plenty of toys, adverts and TV shows etc. feature "You stupid spaz!".

---

I find supporting pretend religions insulting to my faith.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Sasaki Kojiro

I find supporting pretend religions insulting to my faith.

---

Hey now! :furious3:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Sasaki Kojiro

I find supporting pretend religions insulting to my faith.

---

As do I :yes:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Sasaki Kojiro

I find supporting pretend religions insulting to my faith.

---

Which "pretend" religion.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Philipvs Vallindervs Calicvla

Which "pretend" religion.

---

All of them? :clown:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Philipvs Vallindervs Calicvla

Which "pretend" religion.

---

The "Church of Google"

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Strike For The South

However it is not on the same level as the "N" word because if that were true the Washington Redskins (amore offensive term) would've changed there name long ago

---

I was just pokin fun at you, old buddy. But yeah, like the Chicago Blackhawks, the Redskins is... rather offensive. I may as well go paint my face black and cheer for that new hockey team called the "New Orleans n-word" or something. Some First Peoples may not find it insulting, but I personally do. It's much like the term "Indian." I don't find it offensive (I'm annoyed when it is used, but certainly not offended), whilst others do; it varies from person to person or community to community.

Anyways, for whatever odd reason...

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Subotan

...it's socially acceptable to treat Native American culture that way.

---

:sad:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by german

It's funny because he capitalizes First Nation but not euro.

---

Fix'd.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Megas Methuselah

I was just pokin fun at you, old buddy. But yeah, like the Chicago Blackhawks, the Redskins is... rather offensive. I may as well go paint my face black and cheer for that new hockey team called the "New Orleans n-word" or something. Some First Peoples may not find it insulting, but I personally do. It's much like the term "Indian." I don't find it offensive (I'm annoyed when it is used, but certainly not offended), whilst others do; it varies from person to person or community to community.

Anyways, for whatever odd reason...

---

You can't complain at all, not when you post things like:

Quote:

---

Fix'd.

---

It's not OK to be racist to white people. Get over yourself, you're no more special than anyone else.

What does it take to get a thread locked these days?

Megas, you're not much different from the people you try to attack. At first I thought you were being satirical, but clearly this is only partially true at best. That is unfortunate, as your attitudes towards whites hurt, rather than help, your case. I don't care what the politically correct belief is, but my personal opinion is that racism is unacceptable regardless of whom it is directed against.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Sasaki Kojiro

The "Church of Google"

---

I will accept that complaint when you can prove that yours is more plausible than mine. For reference, my deity actually exists.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Megas Methuselah

:sad:

---

Huh?

[/URL]

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Lemur

What does it take to get a thread locked these days?

---

3 easy payments to Kukrikhan@paypal.com.

j/k

So, what do we have here? A thread about a white US Senator using an ancient race-designation word in private, revealed by a tell-all book. A discussion of whether his word selection is appropriate, or accurate, or offensive - and if so, offensive enough to lose his current position - or offensive at all, compared to other poilitician's "inartful" wordings in the past. References provided. All normal backroom talk.

Then, inexplicably, a brawl between 2 members, obviously simmering and long in coming, over who or which is racist, or more racist than the other.

Before the thread gets closed, only to erupt in another place at another time, let's have a fight using the Marquis of Queensberry rules (backroom edition), to wit:

PVC having been the last respondent, MM gets the next punch: lay out your case for how the European oppression of North American inhabitants 1492-2010 causes all people of European origin to be genetically hard-wired to be negatively discriminitive or violently disposed toward any people of melanin content over type III.

After which, PVC may present his case to the opposite, or claim irrelevance, or some other device.

Then MM. Then PVC. and so on.

3 rounds, referee'd by me, and judged/scored by the backroom Mods, whose judgment is final.

Boxers may not use the word "you" anywhere in their posts (that being below the belt).

Boxers may not appeal to any authority higher than the backroom for assistance.

If agreed, then "Let's get ready to rumble"

Otherwise... we are done.

I don't need to prove whites are a bad breed. Nor do I answer to people like you, Lemur*. :2thumbsup:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by EMFM

That is unfortunate, as your attitudes towards whites hurt, rather than help, your case. I don't care what the politically correct belief is, but my personal opinion is that racism is unacceptable regardless of whom it is directed against.

---

It's the internet. Rather than scream my hatred in the real world, I can instead direct it at a couple Germans and a Brit with little to no consequences. Be that as it may, my racism is merely a product of... racism. I'm sorry your people hated mine so much as to cause mine to hate yours.

Lemur had no influence on this thead. It was I, KukriKhan, who proposed a fair fight.

Very well then, contest declined by boxer #1.

Thread closed. Thanks all, for your contributions.