An army southern of Kermanshah has been defeated, some forts captures as also Ray is now under our rule.
I'll post the ss after dinner
@Tonno you're up!
http://www.filedropper.com/rcegypt14
Printable View
An army southern of Kermanshah has been defeated, some forts captures as also Ray is now under our rule.
I'll post the ss after dinner
@Tonno you're up!
http://www.filedropper.com/rcegypt14
post the screens. that is impossibleQuote:
Originally Posted by sonnet
I'm refering to suicide bomber tactics... aka- if I lose, then I got to bomb everyone around me tactics.Quote:
Originally Posted by yuonyuon
This diplo deals... o man, my head hurts.
While we were getting bored waiting for teh Shah Yuonyuon to kick our asses and defeat us, we decided to take the initiative and start to kick his ass first..lol
SS
Spoiler Alert, click show to read:
@Tonno: Kwarezm is running out of money, and sacking settlements is way is trying to make up for some stupid mistake he made.
where are the odes screens . ?? that was what i wanted to see.
this is not fair at all.
clear victory 6 archers 5 star general against a full stack:
edit: what do you think i m stupid.
last time with the same army composition i beat you two stacks.
Odds screenQuote:
Originally Posted by yuonyuon
Spoiler Alert, click show to read:
Blah blah blah blah.... pls don't start crying now :rolleyes:Quote:
Originally Posted by yuonyuon
Actually i will ask an admin to replay the battle 5 times , i bet he can t get clear victory.Quote:
Originally Posted by sonnet
And here we go..actually I got the victory without even reloading..Quote:
Originally Posted by yuonyuon
If required I can send a video to the admin showing the victory.
Pls stop being a bad loser and launching more and more accusations it's not my fault if you're not good at this game :bow:
IMPORTANT
Since I didn't get any straight guidlines for how to play this turn, I did what I consider the fairest.
Peace was made with France, but the last message from Auran was out of the set course. So: I played turn how I would have played it, moved my armies in the position that they would be if me and France are at war (Since Rennes was gifted there where no battle pics for that city but the army is where it would be if there was battle for Rennes).
If I got screwed cuz ppl didn't do their diplo good enough, again, the situation will reset and the France will be given back it's 4k next turn.
EDIT: Never seen Invicta in such a provocative manner... it's sooooo sweet.
insulting me is not making you a good player ether. rather an arrogant. the problem is that i dont have any good generals so looks like my armies are useless without them,Quote:
Originally Posted by sonnet
i Already told you what a good player is .
of course it is since without your money he couldn't achieve nothing.Quote:
EDIT: Never seen Invicta in such a provocative manner... it's sooooo sweet.
But but but, you like challenge.Quote:
Originally Posted by yuonyuon
It's simple, next time when I say to you, make peace don't be all like... "I'll show who's the masta player" in the HS thread, and stuff like that. Both you and Mac got outplayed in both warfare and more importantly- DIPLOMACY.
Arrogant?...really?Quote:
Originally Posted by yuonyuon
This is what you wrote after your first turn.. (so witrh full knowledge of your situation):
https://forums.totalwar.org/vb/showt...post2053611253
I can see someone being arrogant here, and that's not me.Quote:
Originally Posted by yuonyuon
You said yourself you had all the right cards to win the war, when you joined and defeated 2 armies of mine.
Now you're losing and suddenly you start crying..??
You made several major strategy mistakes. Achieving victory by playing with Kwarezm is so easy that I shouldn't even mention that. And you said that yourself in pm.
But either way, I offered you a generous peace when you joined. You decided, as in your right, to keep fighting and for that you can only blame yourself now. You were sure to win the war. Even if now you reconsidered, then it still was a huge mistake of your to not accept peace, which by doing that, you'd have been in a much better position now (surely with more regions than you started with). In those 4 turns you had several choices to make, each one of them could have resulted in a much better position for your faction. Blame yourself if you made the wrong ones.
Sun Tzu:
will win who knows when to fight and when not to fight
And btw: the money I got from Egypt (5k x 5 turns) were not for free (Baghdad was the price of it). And more importantly they didn't help me with the war. They were needed to not stop the development of my settlements
what do you know about diplomacy ,you are just a puppet faction. first of all you were playing with HRE .then you moved without asking for a new player for egypt.Quote:
Originally Posted by Tonno
immediately after that you start giving money to the Turks in order to get powerful .and now is giving me this arrogance like he is a master of what. every time lessons and accusations.
i get it Khwaresmians are almost done they have only 5 FM and none with more than 3 starts. no +mov point no dread no NF nothing.
i was expecting some u turn actions here but like there is gang hungary-kiev-turk-egypt so i m here alone.
the challenge is gone
Emproment was the first one (as I thought England was the closest to death) I asked to take over Egypt. Just to be clear. He refused.Quote:
Originally Posted by yuonyuon
I asked Tonno, only after he mentioned that his faction might die soon (I didn't even think his faction was so close to death by the ss that were posted in the thread).
I see only one person making accusations. I got money from Egypt in exchange for Baghdad. They didn;t come for free. Same way Hungary is not attacking me: I gave him settlements as a gift.Quote:
immediately after that you start giving money to the Turks in order to get powerful .and now is giving me this arrogance like he is a master of what. every time lessons and accusations.
I have not been greedy and prepared myself so that I wouldn't be ganged on all side. This is my merit, as unlike you I was fully aware of the many weaknesses the Turks had and I intervened in time, establishing good relations with the factions available to that, and punishing the ones who were plotting against me, and for which there was nothing I could do but fight them.
Why do you start crying for help now...?Quote:
i get it Khwaresmians are almost done they have only 5 FM and none with more than 3 starts. no +mov point no dread no NF nothing.
i was expecting some u turn actions here but like there is gang hungary-kiev-turk-egypt so i m here alone.
This is what you wrote in a pm:
Now you cry saying that only by gang-banging me by every side you could win against me?Quote:
Originally Posted by yuonyuon
lol..
It's true, I don't know anything, but for sure I will not look into your advice.Quote:
Originally Posted by yuonyuon
TO hell with it, I don't have nerves for a kid posts like this.
well that was my best army you defeated this turn .i guess i toke over the Persians to late.Quote:
Lets face it, without Egypt Turks can't do nothing against Kwarezm
i m not a bad loser but what i hate the most that you played "shady work" with Egypt,Kiev,Hungary .thing that i was accused i did with Durex .
if can i get Castile back i will be happy to continue otherwise in less than 5 turns kwaresmians are done. i can t beat 2 FM with 8-9 stars NF in any way with my crappy generals. that a fact.
So what is going on with France?
Jiub has not been seen for weeks and things need discussing.
i m willing to take a faction far away from gang-ers. if there is any free spot.
Ask Auran if he wants to give up Castille . In alternative if Jiub doesn't come back we might give you France.Quote:
Originally Posted by yuonyuon
In any case as we might need 2 players, even if Yuonyuon move to one of the 2 ,we might still need another player. So pls if anyone know someone to join, and reliable to play, pls invite him.
so look what i propose since my chances with Persia are drooping every turn:Quote:
Originally Posted by sonnet
i will take Castile and durex France.
also i might continue with Persia
Lets see if anyone disagree (if anyone disagree pls give a reason) with you 2 taking over the 2 factions. Or if you have any request (i.e:like having the players respecting their alliances for at least 5 turns or such)Quote:
Originally Posted by yuonyuon
@yuonyuon: did you ask Dur3x (before making this proposal)?
yes he wanted to take moors but was taken by puddingkip.Quote:
Originally Posted by sonnet
edit: he want s to join but first let s see what factions are available. i see there is allot of subbing of France castle, hre ,moors.
Moors have a player.Quote:
Originally Posted by yuonyuon
HRE has been inherited by England.
Only available factions might be Castille and France.
Quote:
Originally Posted by sonnet
i will be happy to take Castile backQuote:
A player who fail to play twice in a row without explanation might be substituted.
edit :well there is an explanation but ....
Hello,
I would like to take France with cleared save, please.
How about we wait for responses from Jiub and Auran.
Jiub has not responded to any of my messages for weeks now.
EDIT: It looks like he hasn't even visited this website in weeks either.
Jiub will come back. He isnt the type of person that will dissapear just like that.
If someone gets France, he will use the current pass, you wont get a cleared save because the kwarezm situation may happen again.
Always in game situations dictate the faction distribution.always.Quote:
Originally Posted by Gaius Octavius Caesar
then good luck subbing 4 factions for 3 times in a row and after that call this a interactive HS .
France destroyed England but now is losing after he left .Castile again is in bad shape .all because of subbing.some player took advantage of that.
if my offer is valid. i hope to get a message , and i will still play with kwarezmians even i find out i m alone so no problems in the east side of the map.
If anyone is willing to wait, I'm willing to wait too.Quote:
Originally Posted by Gaius Octavius Caesar
The only issue is that some factions (like England ) is willing to make diplomacy.
Is @Lord Luka willing to make diplomacy on behalf of France? After all if Jiub named LL as subber, it means he trusted his judgement.
If LL is willing to make diplomacy until Jiub gets back I see no problem with it.
@yuonyuon you can take Castille.
and possibly stop talking about things you don't know. France was already losing ground while Jiub was still playing. Subbing has nothing to do with it. Actually LL moved quite well. And since you proved already you're not much competent, maybe you can keep a bit more silent and learn form others.