Renata is one of the last people I expect needs coaching as any alignment.
There's no strategy behind calling out how my top 3 suspects were on that wagon and it was on someone I did not read as wolf.Quote:
I called out your brusque EOD comment that there are scum on the Logic wagon because, well, it would be very rare for there not to be with such a distribution. Generally I was struck by how you didn't advance the thread state with your EOD pop-in, so why do it that way at all? As either alignment it feels like you should be working some grand strategy, but the pop-in didn't feel like any meaningful strategy.
I didn't advance the thread state because I was busy for hours before that end of day elsewhere. I was leaving a legacy read in case the game had no doctor.
I have not built teams yet, I am saying who is individually wolfy before I pre-flip an entire team.Quote:
I'm sure you have good reasons, wrong or right, for suspecting all the same people I have been pinged by (I have no thoughts on Vulgard), but I figure I'll encounter them as I pore over your D1 contributions. Can you lay out in just a paragraph how all their activities fit against each other? What's the grand theory for the Mafia plan?
Probably not, I need to read this game and question all my suspects before end of day.Quote:
Since you're you, can you skim D1 of the last Org game (mini) and discern why Vulgard was the D1 ML? If he's your top suspect this will be relevant.
I have no meta data on Vulgard except I skimmed a recent wolf game of his and found it to be somewhere between similar and not identical.Quote:
What I'm trying to say is, I recall asking you about your Logic case in comparison to his play in the then-previous game (XCOM), and you used that opportunity to deliver a slam-dunk meta case for why Logic couldn't be blue-aligned. My apologies if you did this already yesterday (wrt Vulg).
Not useful really.
I don't think meta is how I crack Vulgard's alignment. It's going to be other processes here, since I don't know him.