Any particular reason?
Printable View
Because EB is awesome.
It would mean that CA did their research properly & made some better design decisions this time -> Rome2 would then be properly awesome out of the box :rtwyes:
Don't forget that EB was initially launched as an attempt to provide CA with additional historical info to help them make Rome1 not as cartoony/ahistorical as it was shaping up to be.
For Rome2 to eclipse EB2 would in my opinion be the ultimate complement to the hard work & vision of the EB team over the years, proof that proper history can be more fun than burning pigs :bow:
Shamfrul Displray Vuk!
I stopped trying to play vanilla TW games after Europa Barbarorum. :bow:
"Shamefur dispray" you mean?
:chinese:
Spoiler Alert, click show to read:
EDIT whoops! Typed the wrong response and just noticed!
I watched the video. pics just amazing and also music was cool too.
where is the vid?
Screens - awesome.
Music - great.
Describing Arminius as a "German nationalist" - anachronistic.
Tribune at the end of the clip wearing that huge eagle brooch - too Dame Edna!
lol screen 2 is straight out of gladiator =_=
War dogs eh?
Not a separate unit but integrated w/in a Germanic unit = Great job CA!
Separate unit like RTW = Hey CA can you stop with this fantasy rubbish already!?
If CA really has to put wardogs in the game, I hoped for Wolfhounds or Wolfdogs for northern Europe. Instead of Mastiffs, which iirc were mediterranean and brought by the Romani in places like England.
Hopefully it will be one of those "equipment" upgrades they mentioned, like the spatha for cavalry.
If that's the case, this would be the best way to deal with it.
Spoiler Alert, click show to read:
Haha, brilliant.
https://i.imgur.com/DOYiXgX.jpg
Spoiler Alert, click show to read:
Wrong African elephants, though.
CA had a choice. Make the elephants smaller as would be appropriate for the North African forest elephant (extinct since Roman times), or use the African bush elephant with which everyone is familiar. Complaints would arise either way. Correct elephants would get a mere handful of gripes because few people are aware that Hannibal’s beasts were smaller, as opposed to a great pile of grief and disappointment from those ignorant of the historical facts who would cry “The elephants are too small!”.
Remember the Egyptians the first time around? Same deal. It’s expectation management.
VOX.POPVLI.VOX.DEI
My word, some mouthwatering screens on display in here. I want to play, now. Why did I visit this sub-forum?? :D
Ginrmous panorama. Teutoburg this time.
http://wiki.totalwar.com/w/Panorama
I counted toenails on the front foot of the elephant in the video (4), it's based on an African forest elephant. Who are 2.5 metres tall, bush elephants range between 3 and 4 metres tall. Contrast that with the average height of a Roman man being 1.6 to 1.7 metres (and the Carthaginians around the same). And the elephant looks just fine. Look at the driver on it's back. If the model were a bush elephant the human would be 50% the size it is relative to the elephants head. And even I've seen it wrong, CA has some wiggle room. It's an extinct species of elephant, it's average size could have exceed a forest elephants. Historians and archaeologists just assume north African elephants were just like forest elephants.
Looks like it will be a tricky historical battle to win. I seem to recall seeing somewhere that if you fight a campaign battle in the right spot you'll get this battlefield, so if I play as the Suebi I can see myself having an army parked there constantly :beam:.