:laugh4: Nice, now I have two votes, neither of them for any good reasons aside from "it sounds like something he would do" or in retaliation. The mafia must be laughing their heads off somewhere.
Printable View
:laugh4: Nice, now I have two votes, neither of them for any good reasons aside from "it sounds like something he would do" or in retaliation. The mafia must be laughing their heads off somewhere.
I highly doubt that. :inquisitive:Quote:
Originally Posted by GeneralHankerchief
General, you are one of the most experienced players out there, I fail to understand why you still take heed of kill methods, and for that matter, descriptions. Plus, taking into account the possibility of a counter vote, which you got, I don't quite understand why you didn't go for Ultra instead. You're, at the moment, getting lynched if the lynchings were to take place now.Quote:
Originally Posted by GeneralHankerchief
Well, prole did say she was hung over ~;)Quote:
Originally Posted by Csar
:balloon2:
Hence the 'going out of his way'. Where did you steal the idea for your kill from, anywho?Quote:
Originally Posted by Csar
Csar needs to be put to death
That's why I didn't vote for her ~;)Quote:
Originally Posted by Dutch_guy
It came to me in a vision:sleeping:Quote:
Originally Posted by Proletariat
What's this sudden obsession with my death? Am I that big of a threat to you and your mafioso buddies?
That is a very good point posted by Dutch_guy, why did General not vote in retaliation on Ultra, yet instead voted for Moody?Quote:
Originally Posted by Dutch_guy
However at the present time in my view shouldn't jump to any conclusions...
Unvote: Csar
Hrm HM HM.
Still nothing to go on at all, so I'll Vote: Sir Moody to try and keep GH around.
Spoiler Alert, click show to read:
:listen: ----- :2cents:Quote:
Originally Posted by Kill #1
~:argue: :argue: :gossip:
:deal:
1) GeneralHankerchief
2) Kommodus
3) Reenk Roink
Vote: General Hankerchief
ok what is with prole - she normally lurks with few posts but suddenly shes rabidly going after csar and then for no real reason unvotes him and goes for me...
unvote: General hankerchief
Vote: Prole
just too odd to ignore
I voted for Sir Moody because I think he's a mafioso, whereas Ultra is just acting like Ultra. Retaliation votes solve nothing.
And yes, I have always paid attention to kill descriptions, especially in the first round. If you don't believe me, examine the last two games (Csar's and Sir Moody's). Even if I'm wrong at least we usually get some valuable information from the host on how much they write, and it starts some discussion.
(edit for slight grammar error)
Well, I didn't state you never paid attention to the kill descriptions (I'm willing to believe you on that) but rather that they aren't as important (mafia catching wise) as many of us thought in the very first few mafia games. Writing style, though, is as you correctly stated an important factor of a kill. And that should be discussed, not the appearance of the murderer - which rarely ever gives us an insight as to who the mafioso might be.Quote:
Originally Posted by GeneralHankerchief
While you may think the murderer, by the appearance of the murderer, is Sir Moody, I'd say the appearance could point to just about any player. Not one name per sé.
:balloon2:
In response to Generals post this does answer a few questions why you didnt vote in retaliation...
After looking up the last mafia game Proletariat was in she did indeed spend most of the time making very few posts until she was killed. However in this mafia she seems to be behaving completely differently. By making a vast number of posts. For now, unless more evidence appears I will be voting...Quote:
Originally Posted by Sir Moody
Vote Proletariat
(Edited to Bold Generals name)
I don't get the difference. Writing style factors in appearence. Sure, there's a lot more to it than that, but the mechanics of that kill (British spelling of "armour", a few spelling mistakes) points to Sir Moody. Besides, it being the first round, there is little else to go on.Quote:
Originally Posted by Dutch_guy
The writing style of the first kill would seem to point to one of the following:
Sigurd Fafnesbane
Reenk Roink
GeneralHankerchief
Divine Wind
They've been the ones who have written odd theme-kills in the past. Obviously the killer could intend for us to think this way. Remember how Seamus used the Bible-references to start a wild goose-chase after those who had biblical knowledge in Mafia V?
As DG says, going by kill description is not the best idea. It's the mafia who write the kills, and they're more likely to try to mislead than give clues.
Going back over Sasaki's rules, it looks like we have four bad guys (including discovery1) and four good guys (3 Masons plus the soothsayer). However, one of the bad guys can't be lynched, which means our chances of killing a good guy may be slightly higher.
Obviously, at any given point we don't know how many good guys are still alive, since they may be killed by the mafia. However, since this is the first turn, I think the odds are pretty good that all of the good guys are still out there.
Also, despite the smaller-than-usual number of players, we may have more chances to lynch the mafia than we think. Remember this rule?
As soon as one of the mafia is lynched, they drop down to one kill per turn.Quote:
Originally Posted by Sasaki Kojiro
All these things considered, I'd like to give the masons one more turn to gather useful information. Until more data is available,
Vote: No Lynch
P.S. Looks like I guessed correctly about Reenk's new mode of communication...
Kommodus makes a good case for not lynching this turn. Numbers are not in our favor.
Vote: No Lynch
According to the opinions stated above both in my post and Kommodus' post, I will join the no lynch crowd.
Vote: No Lynch
Well, since last game (when the difference between US and British spelling was highlighted) I don't even pay attention to those anymore either. It's just to simple for a mafioso to make such a 'mistake' and lead to town astray.Quote:
Originally Posted by GeneralHankerchief
PS: Wouldn't it be better for us townies to lynch a lurker, instead of a somewhat active player ? If it is, that said, not better to vote No lynch this round ?
:balloon2:
Unvote:Abstain
Vote:GH
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kommodus
:wink:Quote:
Originally Posted by Reenk Roink
Adding on to Kommodus's logic
And I doubt that its 'Secret Extra Mafia Members 1-15'Quote:
There will also be other roles besides those listed in this post.
I'm rather of the opinion that a lynch reveals more useful information for the town than no lynch at all. Its as unlikely that we'd lynch someone who is from the pro-town side in a specialist role as it is that they'd be a mafioso. Most likely we'll just lynch a random. And speculation towards their potential lynching can bring out a guilty one into making a mistake to reveal their true identity.
I'm going to say:
Vote: Dutch guy
:gah2:
Thats all?
I will cry.
I was gonna try to write some insightful argument about how it's better to not lynch anyone on round on, but Kommodus beat me to it. I agree with the points he has made. The firs lynches are often random and tend to kill a pro-townie. With the option of no lynch available one should follow that path and encourage discussion some more.
Vote: No Lynch
Encouragment of discussion will occur once I have more time to post.
Hmmm....
All this talk gives me a cunning plan.
Mafia, make room in your in boxes.
And why is that ?Quote:
Originally Posted by Al Khalifah
:balloon2:
Ooooh…
Killing Kage in the first round are we? I guess the Mafia wants to prove something here.
Reading Sasaki’s rules again it seems the graffiti thing is a special power?
Right now I can’t make sense of it.
As far as I know Loki did not have a specific letter in the Fuþark. Is the grafitti referring to the Norse God at all? Is the Loki reference a clue that we are dealing with an encryption here? Like the letters from a certain Loki that have the people of the web chasing this DaVinci code look alike codeword to enter a certain webpage before the time is up .. http://www.vanishingpointgame.com/..
The wording does suggest that we should sit tight and wait for further instructions though.
While we wait another tidbit of information from Sasaki’s rules says Discovery1 will choose his henchmen.
Well.. We now know that the mafia has not been chosen randomly. We have to ask ourselves; who would discovery choose?
I pressed him for this information in the chat .. was it yesterday? .. and he replied:
Prole, Csar and Husar.
I am inclined to believe that he would not name any of his henchmen to me in the chat… or ?
Discovery has been mafia before and has something to prove this time as he is quite hair sore from that experience. I am inclined to believe that he has at least one experienced Mafioso in his retinue, if not two.
Let us think.
1. The Godfather chooses his henchmen, for reference, read the opening post.
2. Reenk indicates Kommodus may be guilty.
3. Kommodus does not mention any of his "methods" and calls Reenk suspicious.
4. Kommodus wants no lynch.
Now the discoman might have chosen Kommodus to get rid of that evil "method" that is supposed to find mafiosi, who knows?
But I'd like some thoughts from others on that before jumping to conclusions.
No suspicions as yet, Vote: Abstain for now.
Very good point.Quote:
Originally Posted by Husar
Pro - Kommodus is an experienced player, with a noted series of methods that have been proven to find mafiosi. Disco might want to harness this ability.
Con - Kommodus has become something of a target for both the mafia and villagers of late (Interficio, anyone?). Would Disco risk K falling under suspicion for managing to stay alive for so long?
My vote still stays.