Self explanatory, eyemo...Quote:
Originally Posted by Sasaki Kojiro
Printable View
Self explanatory, eyemo...Quote:
Originally Posted by Sasaki Kojiro
No it isn't. If it was I wouldn't have responded with "what?", obviously.Quote:
Originally Posted by ShadeHonestus
I hate his name, too complicated to write.
I shall name you: Jabba
Jabba the hut :yes:
Good work, we found the mafia: Andres
Vote: Andres
Have no intentions of jumping on a bandwagon myself, even if it is against Andres,
so I will have to say for now,
Vote: Abstain
Maybe, maybe not....take it at face value and if that for you is jibberish, then let it be jibberish. I need not defend my vote at this point past the fact that your statement of all that has happened at this early stage, to me, was the most telling. :smash:Quote:
Originally Posted by Sasaki Kojiro
Yes you do. That's how we play this game, votes that pretend to be serious require explanation. Generally mafia have a harder time explaining there votes since they are only pretending to find people suspicious.Quote:
Originally Posted by ShadeHonestus
Pretend to be serious? Then why have you failed to explain your lack of research when leveling the accusation at Redleg, which by the way was a general accusation that was at the same time safe for you.Quote:
Originally Posted by Sasaki Kojiro
What would you have him do, Honestus? Vote based on username alone? There
is very little to go on at this stage, clearly. Inactivity explaining the lack of a
second kill does seem plausible. There are a number of candidates for a vote,
then.
By what I saw, he was active at the time prior to the kill post. What you would have me do, bandwagon, abstain without reasoning? I see a clear and present point and I base my current vote on it.
Ultra, how much of these kills do you write?
Vote: Motep
Mainly provoking some discussion. Subject to change depending on Ultra's answer.
In any case, is he obliged to tell us?
If it were the case that the killer writes it, I would
be inclined to think that Motep is not the killer for
this particular murder, based purely on previous
interactions. [Not that I have a lack of faith in your
writing ability, suhgao.]
I've avoided checking to see how recently someone was online since I can see through invisibility mode. In any case, my reasoning is clearly explained.Quote:
Originally Posted by ShadeHonestus
You continue to evade this:
By "setting the groundwork" I'm assuming you mean to propose that I deliberately didn't send in a kill to prove my innocence. Since one mafia did get the kill in, and since most people have been online, this is clearly not the case.Quote:
Or maybe somebody is setting the groundwork for their own deniability.
Vote: Sasaki
You'd think in leveling a direct accusation rather than a general question for discussion, you would have checked, regardless.Quote:
Originally Posted by Sasaki Kojiro
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sasaki Kojiro
"Setting the groundwork" for you to deny being the missing vote as per your very recent activity and quickly putting the focus on this issue. (at somebody else's expense without due diligence)
Not not really. Redleg usually uses invisible. Wouldn't be ethical.Quote:
Originally Posted by ShadeHonestus
What missing vote?Quote:
"Setting the groundwork" for you to deny being the missing vote as per your very recent activity and quickly putting the focus on this issue. (at somebody else's expense without due diligence)
Not ethical to look, even at post activity, but ethical to vote on his activity. Not to mention that knowing that he usually uses invisible, would this not surrender him innocent from the inactivity that you accuse him of as a basis for your vote? http://www.freewebs.com/handbacon/33.gifQuote:
Originally Posted by Sasaki Kojiro
Missing "kill" that you eluded to, I misspoke in stating "vote." But I doubt anyone thought I meant vote as opposed to kill as that was the only object in the discussion.Quote:
Originally Posted by Sasaki Kojiro
[edit]
Going to bed and I never use invisible so don't anyone misconstrue my inactivity to shade their purpose...(name pun not intended)
No...Quote:
Originally Posted by ShadeHonestus
I thought you might have meant that, but was unsure since I specifically addressed that in my post. One of the mafia was here in time, so no one who has posted recently can be removed from suspicion.Quote:
Missing "kill" that you eluded to, I misspoke in stating "vote." But I doubt anyone thought I meant vote as opposed to kill as that was the only object in the discussion.
[edit]
Going to bed and I never use invisible so don't anyone misconstrue my inactivity to shade their purpose...(name pun not intended)
Quote:
Originally Posted by rdeče.jabolko
I agree. But right now I want to hear both of them say something.
We're gonna need more than four-five people talking to get anything going.
Unvote:Sasaki
Vote:doc_bean
Vote: pevergreen
Blatant bandwagon against Andres. Also the length of time it took to get the kills in could be a reflection upon pever's unusual timezone. (And mine too, admittedly).
Well you can't really use that as a reason. What if UW took a while to write the kills? etc. There are many other factors that could be reasons why the kills were late.Quote:
Originally Posted by CountArach
I am lost, and see no clear suspect. Right now we are in the stage where we just random vote and bandwagon. I wait for more suspects or any more clues.
Vote:Abstain
1. Vote : Ichigo
He's too eager to see innocent townie blood. – Andres
2. Sasaki vote blank
3. Andres changes vote to Sasaki for blank
4. BZK murdered
5. Ichigo votes Sasaki as he always does (no reasons)
6. Cauis votes abstain - Better than lynch someone who we doesnt know if he is mafia
7. Andres - Vote : Omanes Alexandrapolites the Idiot
He seems like the Sprinkled Donuts-type to me.
8. Sasaki votes redleg for not being active
9. Stig votes rdeče.jabolko to get rid of the name
10. Andres votes rdeče.jabolko same reason as Stig but – “Unless he changes his user name, my vote will stand.
11. Shade votes Sasaki - Or maybe somebody is setting the groundwork for their own deniability.
12. Ichigo calls Andres vote Bandwagon
13. Stig unvotes rdeče.jabolko and votes Andres as bandwagon
14. PG votes Andres for stupid unreasonable bandwagon
15. rdeče.jabolko votes abstain – doesn’t want to bandwagon
16. Argument of Sasaki and Shade over shades vote, rdeče.jabolko takes a jab Shade
17. GH votes Motep per the write-up pending the answer from Ultra of how much Ultra writes himself
18. More arguing from Sasaki and Shade, GH takes Sasaki’s side for a bit
19. Ichigo gets rid of his Sasaki and votes Doc_bean for discussion
20. CA votes PG for blantant bandwagon on Andres, and timezone difference for delay of writeup, says it could be him as well
21. Warluster votes abstain
22. PG summerises, unvotes Andres, votes Caius for write-up, pending same as GH
My summary of game so far. Might keep them up, i found that fun.
Current to post #112.
Unvote: Andres
Vote: Caius
The kill write up looks like the one you sent me in M&M, pending vote same as GH.
Hey, we were just kidding. If you truly feel offended, I hereby apologise, jabolko :sorry2:Quote:
Originally Posted by rdeče.jabolko
Unvote : Rde, rdce.jobalk..., eh, erhm, you know who I am talking about !
Vote : ChuggtheSquirrel
Explanation: well, not as difficult as the other guy, but also a pretty difficult username.
Just call him Chugg.
Sounds reasonable.Quote:
Originally Posted by pevergreen
Unvote : Chugg
Vote : CountArach
Because he confessed!
:laugh4:
I'd hesitate before using timezones as conclusive proof of anything, as it's more than possible to use them for misdirection
Following that short summary, I have to say another episode of the initial voting sticks out for me. Namely the sprinkled donuts. No, this is not due to any liking I may have for them, but rather that it smacks of the pizza pie reasoning I recall being used by Lemur in the orignal games. Not terrible because all Lemurs must die, no, but simply such repeated practice of grasping for any reason however inane may indicate guilt. [Especially as we are now able to abstain.] If this were a later stage in the proceedings, I might yet be inclined to vote for Andres, but it does seem too naïve a mistake.
{Pizza pie or spicy meat-a-ball? I forget.}
Well, all my previous tactics as a townie ended up in getting me lynched while being innocent, so yet again, I am trying something new.Quote:
Originally Posted by rdeče.jabolko
Off course, this 'new tactic' might get me lynched in the first round, in which case I will have to try something else in the next mafia game :laugh4:
It's all about adaptation, eh?
I know i tend to make myself too much of a target (and certainly sasaki seems to have a vendetta against me :laugh4: ) so i'm going to try to lay a little bit lower in this game.
Vote: Abstain...for now :beam:
<
<
<
Maybe a new avatar will help. Doesn't this guy look innocent?
If it doesn't work, I'll pick one of those inquisitor avatars...