Re: AW: Re: AW: Swords in the Moon
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TinCow
Voting Sasaki is a bad idea, IMO. The ninjas last night went for high-profile targets, with Little Grizzly and Reenk for sure. While both Louis and Sasaki have been involved in regular discussions, Sasaki has been higher profile and Louis' death looks a lot more like the killer everyone is calling the serial killer. If we notch up the hit on Sasaki as the third ninja attack, we have LG, Reenk, and Sasaki as last night's ninja targets (which would also make Sasaki not a ninja, and thus a bad lynch choice). That group is not a coincidence; the ninjas are now playing with us with their kill choices. On N3 the pever triumvirate, on N4 an entire group of high-profile players. This indicates a well-coordinated group who are paying a lot of attention to the forums.
On re-reading my own post re: Sasaki, I have realized there is a problem with it. I stated the above on the basis that Sasaki was attacked by a ninja, which would make the kills a coordinated trio of hits like in the previous pever massacre. However, as I stated later, the pever massacre included the 'messy' killer whose affiliation is unknown at best. As a result of this, I'm not quite as sure anymore that Sasaki's protection is quite so innocent as it initially seemed.
I recommend that whoever protected Sasaki contact CountArach and inform him of that fact. Under the circumstances, there aren't many good reasons for a pro-town doctor to withhold this information from a player who is stated as a pro-town player in the very rules themselves. If CountArach gets this information, he can simply inform the rest of us that Sasaki's protection was innocent and not the result of a mafioso power.
I still think it's a bad idea to vote for Sasaki at the moment, but his protection needs to be explored and we eventually need to get some kind of verification on this one way or another. The town needs to make sure this incident is not forgotten and if we do not see any info on it within the next day or so, pressure should be applied via votes.
AW: Re: Swords in the Moon
Ok, let me try to translate this:
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Yoyoma1910
When gazing at the stream,
One may see themselves.
But do not be fooled!
The water is not flesh:
It is but water.
Confucius say: Haudegen´s Haiku Theories are crap.
Ok, point taken.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Yoyoma1910
In some regions,
Each wall is made of many stones
Set upon each other, interlocking,
To be strong and complete.
If a stone is removed from the wall,
Is it not then a different wall?
Does it stand as it did before?
Confucius say: I don´t want to alter my writing style.
Hey, we all want to be unique. But IMHO this doesn´t make you free from the burden of trying to support the town.
Re: AW: Re: Swords in the Moon
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Haudegen
Ok, let me try to translate this:
Confucius say: Haudegen´s Haiku Theories are crap.
Ok, point taken.
Actually I was saying that my poetry (which lately hasn't been haiku) has not been focused at you, as you seem to imagine.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Haudegen
Confucius say: I don´t want to alter my writing style.
Hey, we all want to be unique. But IMHO this doesn´t make you free from the burden of trying to support the town.
And here I'm stating that you removed the vote section of one of my posts, which caused it to loose it's meaning.
AW: Re: AW: Re: Swords in the Moon
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Yoyoma1910
Actually I was saying that my poetry (which lately hasn't been haiku) has not been focused at you, as you seem to imagine.
And here I'm stating that you removed the vote section of one of my posts, which caused it to loose it's meaning.
Well, ok.
It´s been a pleasure doing conversation with you, sir!
unvote: Yoyoma1910
