The Godfather, Part 3 [Concluded]

Ok. Why don't you respond to my allegations against you, and we can discuss it.

Your life is on the line, and I'd like to hear an actual defense for a change. Give me two minutes to prepare questioning. Stay put, my friend.

Its been more than 2 minutes! ATPG is scum!!!

:clown:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Askthepizzaguy

I looked up "inscrutable" in the dictionary to make sure it was the appropriate term. Here's what Dictionary.com said:

---

:laugh4::laugh4::laugh4::laugh4:true....I wonder why Reenk under pressure as a townie always gets HUGELY "I am going to kill myself and screw town while I am at it.."...........Sasaki? TinCow? you guys would know Reenk better then us...:smash:

Lynch ATPG!!

Like i said Shlin28 and Reenk are my top candidates... i can't help but feel the godfather is making it through the game without any suspicion on him... trust no one!

Okay, shlin28; these are the questions I want answered before I could even begin to be convinced you aren't a total scumbag:


1. Why were you active 5 nights out of 6? Were you sending in your kills or discussing things with your fellow mafioso?

2. If I checked, would I find you were active on the Org on the missing night?

3. Why haven't you offered to be lynched at any point if you failed to bring the mafia to justice? That's Step One of being the Chief of Police. I did so when I campaigned for the office.

4. Your initial campaign was designed to specifically target "overanalytical zealots" and you promised to reign without rhyme or reason. Do you know why I think that's especially scummy? That's a rhetorical question, but you absolutely know that you were stating that specifically to get town on your side (fun) over mine (analysis).

5. Why was your analysis and suggested suspects off-target all game or nonexistent?

6. Why did you consistently defend TevashSzat, as soon as he became a legitimate suspect, even before he "revealed"?

7. Why did you defend him even after he stopped posting?

8. Why did you defend him all the way up until the point where it was obvious he was a goner?

9. Why do you and Sasaki seem to agree on everything, but you consider him to be a scumbag?

10. Why did you bother posting your less than 10 minutes-long analysis when you KNEW it was worthless? You even admitted you had nothing to report.

11. Why did you say it was a "bad omen" when the CoP actually does some work? All townies, yourself included, should be hard working.

12. I simply refer you to the quote:

Quote:

---

I piled a mountainous case at your feet when Tevash was on the block, and even before the detective reveal, you defended him up and down. Then you defended him some more. When what, 5 or so people voted Tevash you suddenly got an epiphany: Tevash must be scum. Then, Sasaki mentions how easy it is to do a detective reveal and post a role pm, and you jump out of your pants to assume that Sasaki was scum.

But only when it is too late, when the course of the game has already been decided, have you decided to follow the flow of the mighty river. You fought tooth and nail for Tevash, and then dropped the pretense when Tevash was doomed. These sudden changes in belief about scummy or innocent, conveniently placed to make you look like you agree with town's position, boggle my mind.

You aren't a townie, shlin28; if you were, these epiphanies would happen at a more logical time, instead of as a virtual bandwagon. You want to keep your buddies alive, admit it.

---

Click this link. You have some 'splainin' to do. :laugh2:



For reference only, don't click. It's a repost of my allegations above.

Spoiler Alert, click show to read: 

Day One voting closed at 2-3-09, at 1453 hours.
People active that night and still a suspect:

Quote:
Shlin28 (most of the night), 777Ares777, Chaotix27, QJC, WhiteEyes, Beefy, LG, Gaius, Andres
TinCow, YLC, Seamus, ATPG, Tevash, Lord Winter, Rythmic
Day Two voting closed 2-5-09 at 1553 hours.
Day Two A voting began at 1729 hours on 2-5-09.
Day Two A voting closed 2-6-09 at 1432 hours.

People active that night and still a suspect:

Quote:
Shlin28 (again), Ares (2), Gaius (2),
ATPG, Sasaki Kojiro, Lord Winter, Beefy, boudica, LG

Day Three voting began at 1300 hours on 2-7-09
Day three voting closed at 1300 hours on 2-9-09

People active that night and still a suspect:

Quote:
Chaotix (2), Beefy (2), LG (2), Gaius (3), WhiteEyes (2), Andres (2), QJC (2), Ares (3), Reenk
ATPG, Sasaki Kojiro, Seamus Fermanagh, TinCow, boudica , Jolt, Sigurd, Khaan,
Day Four voting closed at 1400 hours on 2-11-09, pms taken since.

People active that night and still a suspect:

Quote:
QJC (3), Andres (3), LG (3), glyphz, Shlin28 (3), Ares (4), Gaius (4), White Eyes (3) Beefy (3), Reenk (2)
ATPG, Sasaki, TinCow, YLC, Jolt, boudica, Seamus, Rythmic
Day Five voting closed at 1400 hours on 2-13-09.
Voting re-opened due to tie between ATPG and TS.

People active during that phase and still a suspect:

Quote:
777Ares777 (5), QJC, (4) WhiteEyes, (4) Reenk (3), Beefy (4), taka, Chaotix (3) Gaius, Shlin28 (4), Andres (4), glyphz (2)
Sasaki, TS, Jolt, Seireikhaan, Ignoramus, Seamus, Lord Winter, YLC, Rythmic
Day Five A ended at 1535.

People active that night and still a suspect:
Quote:
Shlin28 (5) (most of the night, defending Tevash), Reenk (4), glyphz (3), 777Ares777 (6), WhiteEyes (5), Beefy187 (5), QJC (5)
ATPG, Seireikhaan, Sasaki, TinCow, Seamus, CountArach, YLC, Sigurd,

Post 987-
Quote:
"ATPG... Tevash investigated YLC on NIGHT 4, AFTER YLC got scummy, so what is this focus on Tevash's inactivity on the 3rd night? His vote for YLC on Day 3 were valid and quite sensible at the time, as he (claimed) he had no results at that moment. His actions afterwards... meh. It does seem odd, but it still does not detract from the fact that as he is a potential detective, he should not be lynched last day phase. Why couldn't YLC be the Godfather anyway? Its a 1 in 28 chance, he is no more likely to not be a Godfather than me... Anyhoo, got to go now, be back in 3-4 hours. I hope you'll still be online then ATPG! "
Focusing on the wrong parts of my analysis. The point was he investigated YLC, cleared him, and promptly and without thinking FoS'ed YLC. THAT MAKES NO SENSE!!!

Post 1009-
Quote:
"Wow, that was... dramatic. As for Tevash, even I (one of his defenders) would say that he needs to be watched, but certainly not lynched immediately"
Stop defending Tevash! Let Tevash defend Tevash!

Post 1017- (Reenk Roink)
Quote:
"2 kills. Sasaki among them. Boy were all you lot wrong (points at TinCow and Atpg). Edit: Vote Seamus. Reenktuition says you killed Sasaki as he was one of the innocent looking enemies of you."
Quick to jump to the conclusion that the mafia still have two murders. Votes Seamus (innocent/vigilante, most likely, in my book.)

Post 1018- (Lord Winter)
Quote:
"Hah, I told you I was innocent."
(15 minutes after the night writeup was done.)
He was clearly lurking in the thread, NOT doing town's work. Then he scummily defends himself, and after only very light questioning by me, runs away like "a chihuahua engulfed in flames" as I said earlier.

Post 1026- (Shlin28) (1455 hours)
Quote:
"I think the nude unicyclist is either a vig or a SK - looking in the write-up, I would say that Sasaki said something that triggered the said attack. *Digs up Sasaki's posts* Also, Tevash survived, next round - I suggest we wait for his results and his role PM before lynching him."

What were your conclusions that you gained from digging through Sasaki's posts? Again wanting more time before Tevash gets lynched.

Post 1028- (Shlin28) (1505 hours; after 10 whole minutes of analysis)
Quote:
"My quick perusal of Sasaki's posts revealed nothing that strikes me as the kind that would lead to serial killer kill. I seem to remember one in Capo where a SK will kill someone if they say they are "innocent", could be something similar here? The killer here is clearly deranged and thinks Sasaki will lead to "doom"... exactly the kind of SK who will kill due to a keyword."
Wow. Nothing revealed after a whole ten minute? and that doesn't even include the time it took to type all this deep analysis up. Astonishing. Thought provoking. Invaluable data.

Pardon, I know the sarcasm isn't necessary. But think about it. Why should we consider any analysis that someone spent no time on, which concluded NOTHING?

Chaotix27- post 1029-
https://forums.totalwar.org/vb/showpo...postcount=1029
Quote:
"Well, that was certainly an awesome write-up. I see only one flaw: unicycles don't have handlebars. Joking aside, I do not believe that the unicyclist is out enemy. If you read closely, it seems that he believes he was saving the town by killing Sasaki. Additionally, in the opening write-up, the nude unicyclist was present before the mafia arrived. Thus, I believe the unicyclist is our "special twist"- he is a vigilante. We also have to consider the boom box guy. I believe he is either the investigator or another "twist", perhaps a roleblocker or a protector. Vote: Reenk"
That's likely the correct analysis of the writeup. Seems to me Chaotix isn't trying to color the writeups, and most likely innocent.

777Ares777- post 1039-
https://forums.totalwar.org/vb/showpo...postcount=1039
Quote:
"I think the unicyclist is cleared relatively well, so hoping your innocent I suggest killing someone like Taka, lurking, and have been known to win as mafia before whilst doing it.
vote:tevashszat Until we get a role pm + analysis of atpg's evidence against you, You were voting for people you had supposedly cleared of suspicion"
Thank you, Ares. And since you don't WANT the job, you would make an excellent CoP.

Shlin28- 1106
Quote:
"Okay, after reading through thread... I seriously now consider Igno as a detective... see this post:
https://forums.totalwar.org/vb/showth...15#post2136815
Doesn't this just scream detective at you?
and this after he died:
https://forums.totalwar.org/vb/showth...51#post2139551
Only a detective would do that.
I say we lynch Tevash now!"
Right. TinCow and I both pointed out that his sudden reversal was made when the fate of Tevash had already been decided. Too late, pal.

Shlin28- 1108
Quote:
"*sigh* Its a bad omen when the CoP actually does some work..."
No. No shlin. It's a bad omen when the CoP does no work.

Shlin28- 1116
Quote:
"That clinches it, Sasaki MUST be scum!
That means we only got the Godfather left! YEEHAW!
*Fires pistol into the air*"

I piled a mountainous case at your feet when Tevash was on the block, and even before the detective reveal, you defended him up and down. Then you defended him some more. When what, 5 or so people voted Tevash you suddenly got an epiphany: Tevash must be scum. Then, Sasaki mentions how easy it is to do a detective reveal and post a role pm, and you jump out of your pants to assume that Sasaki was scum.

But only when it is too late, when the course of the game has already been decided, have you decided to follow the flow of the mighty river. You fought tooth and nail for Tevash, and then dropped the pretense when Tevash was doomed. These sudden changes in belief about scummy or innocent, conveniently placed to make you look like you agree with town's position, boggle my mind.

You aren't a townie, shlin28; if you were, these epiphanies would happen at a more logical time, instead of as a virtual bandwagon. You want to keep your buddies alive, admit it.


Sasaki Kojiro- 1214
Quote:
"The case on shlin is well thought out but I'm not feeling it in my gut...hard to say. The town is kind of hacking away randomly at this point."
Good point, Sasaki. I highly encourage town to think with their gut, not with thoughts and evidence. That will surely cut down on the random hacking.
Sorry, Sasaki, you had that one coming after your brutal dismissal/ignore of me earlier for no reason.
No hard feelings, but you're no townie in my book after your performance since I accused Tevash, and your scummy defenses of shlin28.

I can answer 6 and 11

6: I don't think God Father will actually bother to defend clearly scum looking player especially if he is indeed part of his crew.

11: Joke? :clown:

1. Why were you active 5 nights out of 6? Were you sending in your kills or discussing things with your fellow mafioso?

Let's see... GH ends each phase at 7-8 PM in the evening my time, which usually is my most active time on the Org. So on any given day, I could be counted on to be active during those times.

2. If I checked, would I find you were active on the Org on the missing night?

Which night phase was that?

3. Why haven't you offered to be lynched at any point if you failed to bring the mafia to justice? That's Step One of being the Chief of Police. I did so when I campaigned for the office.

The CoP is just an invincible townie, nothing else. So, I am only behaving as a normal useless townie as I always do. The only thing you can measure success as a CoP is the awsomeness of your lynch write-ups.

4. Your initial campaign was designed to specifically target "overanalytical zealots" and you promised to reign without rhyme or reason. Do you know why I think that's especially scummy? That's a rhetorical question, but you absolutely know that you were stating that specifically to get town on your side (fun) over mine (analysis).

It's the first round... all the posts are like that... Also, at that point in time it looked like RR and Andres and TC were the ones who were going to win, so I posted a totally nonsensical campaign because I thought I have no chance of winning. Note that when I started to get votes I abandonned the initial campaign promise, and focused on vague ideas such as "change" and "hope" (totally original BTW).

5. Why was your analysis and suggested suspects off-target all game or nonexistent?

Just being my normal self... sorry.... Sometimes I get a flash of inspiration and spend all my time standing for that point... but most times... :sweatdrop: If you are going to lynch me, I believe that this is the only valid reason to do so.

6. Why did you consistently defend TevashSzat, as soon as he became a legitimate suspect, even before he "revealed"?

Well... as I said before, I have always be against you in pratically all the mafia games (Lunar Whale, Family Guy, Whispers in the Night etc), mainly because I don't like people who control all aspects of the town, especially as it allows the mafia to hide under your influence. More importantly, I have reasons to believe that your system (a fantastic piece of work!) and your analysis have flaws and cannot find the mafia EXACTLY. At least we know how exactly "Holmes" works (counting posts and other stuff that I forgot), yours? Not so much. Furthermore, in Whispers of the Night you pointed me as being mafia when I was a detective. When you accused Tevash here, I made the leap of logic and htought that Tevash could be a detective, hence his deviation from the norm.

7. Why did you defend him even after he stopped posting?

A: He could actually be a detective.
B: He is in the wrong timezone to respond. I think.
C: I believe your accusations against him are wrong.

As for my later 180 degrees turn regarding this issue, I know of no other way to convince you...

More answers to be editted in (otherwise ATPG might accuse me of being away for a "20 minute breakfast" again! :clown:)

8. Why did you defend him all the way up until the point where it was obvious he was a goner?

See above.

9. Why do you and Sasaki seem to agree on everything, but you consider him to be a scumbag?

THAT WAS NOT DELIBERATE! THERE WAS NO SECRET SCHEMING! NO COMMUNICATIONS! NADA!

10. Why did you bother posting your less than 10 minutes-long analysis when you KNEW it was worthless? You even admitted you had nothing to report.

... at least I was trying.

11. Why did you say it was a "bad omen" when the CoP actually does some work? All townies, yourself included, should be hard working.

Was a joke.

12.

So you think it is impossible for those things to happen naturally? Well they did happen naturally.

Lengthy rebuttals in spoiler.

Spoiler Alert, click show to read: 

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by shlin28

1. Why were you active 5 nights out of 6? Were you sending in your kills or discussing things with your fellow mafioso?

Let's see... GH ends each phase at 7-8 PM in the evening my time, which usually is my most active time on the Org. So on any given day, I could be counted on to be active during those times

---

I'll even do the legwork to confirm your story. You are being scrutinized, my friend.

Quote:

---

2. If I checked, would I find you were active on the Org on the missing night?

Which night phase was that?

---

Don't. You know which phase it was. You even knew which night I was referring to when I talked about Tevash's activity on the org but inactivity on the thread. You aren't fooling me, so please just answer the question.

Quote:

---

3. Why haven't you offered to be lynched at any point if you failed to bring the mafia to justice? That's Step One of being the Chief of Police. I did so when I campaigned for the office.

The CoP is just an invincible townie, nothing else. So, I am only behaving as a normal useless townie as I always do. The only thing you can measure success as a CoP is the awsomeness of your lynch write-ups.

---

WRONG. The only thing you can do to measure success as a CoP is to analyze how on-target you've been all game, how many people you've questioned, how many new suspects presented, how helpful in general have you been, and if you've been defending scummy people. You absolutely need to be replaced as the CoP and you know it.

Quote:

---

4. Your initial campaign was designed to specifically target "overanalytical zealots" and you promised to reign without rhyme or reason. Do you know why I think that's especially scummy? That's a rhetorical question, but you absolutely know that you were stating that specifically to get town on your side (fun) over mine (analysis).

It's the first round... all the posts are like that... Also, at that point in time it looked like RR and Andres and TC were the ones who were going to win, so I posted a totally nonsensical campaign because I thought I have no chance of winning. Note that when I started to get votes I abandonned the initial campaign promise, and focused on vague ideas such as "change" and "hope" (totally original BTW).

---

I don't accept that explanation. TevashSzat even agreed with you about overanalytical zealots, and you defended him. The link between you and Tevash is patently obvious.

Either try again, or I'm dismissing that explanation as bogus.

Quote:

---

More answers to be editted in (otherwise ATPG might accuse me of being away for a "20 minute breakfast" again! :clown:)

---

I'll check for updates and counter your arguments as I see fit. So far, you aren't doing well.


______________EDIT 1_________________

Activity today between 0619 and 0550
Activity 2-19 between 1610 and 1159
Activity 2-18 between 1407 and 1202
Activity 2-17 between 1557 and 1156
Activity 2-16 between 1414 and 0542
Activity 2-15 between 1505 and 0448
Activity 2-14 between 1650 and 0820
Activity 2-13 between 1153 and at least 1135, but that's as far as I am easily allowed to track your activity by doing a search, and I've made my point.

You have a usual time, to be sure, but you're also leading a double life today, on 2-16, on 2-15, and on 2-14.


I believe I have proven you don't have a "usual time", because if that's the case, you have TWO "usual times", which indicate to me that you are intentionally throwing off your routine to be here both day and night. Otherwise, you don't HAVE a "usual time".



_____________EDIT 2___________________

Quote:

---

5. Why was your analysis and suggested suspects off-target all game or nonexistent?

Just being my normal self... sorry.... Sometimes I get a flash of inspiration and spend all my time standing for that point... but most times... If you are going to lynch me, I believe that this is the only valid reason to do so.

---

Very well, then you accept that we have a valid reason to lynch you. Quit squirming.

Quote:

---

6. Why did you consistently defend TevashSzat, as soon as he became a legitimate suspect, even before he "revealed"?

Well... as I said before, I have always be against you in pratically all the mafia games (Lunar Whale, Family Guy, Whispers in the Night etc), mainly because I don't like people who control all aspects of the town, especially as it allows the mafia to hide under your influence. More importantly, I have reasons to believe that your system (a fantastic piece of work!) and your analysis have flaws and cannot find the mafia EXACTLY. At least we know how exactly "Holmes" works (counting posts and other stuff that I forgot), yours? Not so much. Furthermore, in Whispers of the Night you pointed me as being mafia when I was a detective. When you accused Tevash here, I made the leap of logic and htought that Tevash could be a detective, hence his deviation from the norm.

---

This is the exact same defense you used earlier. I thought it was plausible, but frankly, you "suddenly" believed Tevash was guilty only when he was doomed.

________________EDIT 3_______________________

Quote:

---

7. Why did you defend him even after he stopped posting?

A: He could actually be a detective.
B: He is in the wrong timezone to respond. I think.
C: I believe your accusations against him are wrong.

As for my later 180 degrees turn regarding this issue, I know of no other way to convince you...

---

Finally.

A. That's looking increasingly unlikely.
B. No he was not. He's been online at night almost as much as YOU.
C. I believe you're the Godfather.

As for your 180 degrees turn, YOU HAVE NO DEFENSE.

________________EDIT 4___________________

Quote:

---

8. Why did you defend him all the way up until the point where it was obvious he was a goner?

See above.

---

Right, no reason. Gotcha.

Quote:

---

9. Why do you and Sasaki seem to agree on everything, but you consider him to be a scumbag?

THAT WAS NOT DELIBERATE! THERE WAS NO SECRET SCHEMING! NO COMMUNICATIONS! NADA!

---

Very convincing.

Quote:

---

10. Why did you bother posting your less than 10 minutes-long analysis when you KNEW it was worthless? You even admitted you had nothing to report.

... at least I was trying.

---

Not very hard, my friend.

Quote:

---

11. Why did you say it was a "bad omen" when the CoP actually does some work? All townies, yourself included, should be hard working.

Was a joke.

---

Yes, as were your reasons to defend Tevash, then suddenly reverse yourself when he was doomed.

Quote:

---

So you think it is impossible for those things to happen naturally? Well they did happen naturally.

---

And you're naturally a good candidate to be the Godfather, especially given your vehement defense. If you were a townie you would have dropped it a long time ago. Clearly the game hinges on your lynch, or at least YOU believe it does.

Anything else, shlin?

Quote:

---

Don't. You know which phase it was. You even knew which night I was referring to when I talked about Tevash's activity on the org but inactivity on the thread. You aren't fooling me, so please just answer the question.

---

There is a search function, so I can totally find out which night Tevash was inactive (which is what I did), even though I might not be there. Also, he has 18 posts, which is not hard to read all at once to find out his activity. Me? eighty-somethign posts here, kinda hard to remember...

Nevertheless, I will look through my posts... *sigh*

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by shlin28

There is a search function, so I can totally find out which night Tevash was inactive (which is what I did), even though I might not be there. Also, he has 18 posts, which is not hard to read all at once to find out his activity. Me? eighty-somethign posts here, kinda hard to remember...

Nevertheless, I will look through my posts... *sigh*

---

Don't bother, I already did for you.

Besides, you should KNOW which night you weren't here. It was the only night you weren't here.

And proof of your activity is above this post.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Askthepizzaguy

You have a usual time, to be sure, but you're also leading a double life today, on 2-16, on 2-15, and on 2-14.

I believe I have proven you don't have a "usual time", because if that's the case, you have TWO "usual times", which indicate to me that you are intentionally throwing off your routine to be here both day and night. Otherwise, you don't HAVE a "usual time".

Anything else, shlin?

---

That is only for this week, because I (and all the other teenagers in Britain) have a one week holiday. So I can get online in my mornings.

I still don't feel trustworthy about Glyphz and Taka, both lurked to mafia victories in the past.

When's Glyphz and Taka gonna be WOG'ed?

I don't see anything against Andres, there's no case against him.

The battle appears to be between Reenk and Shlin. APTG seems bent on lynching Shlin this round, and I have to say, Shlin has put up a awfully big fight to stay alive. Not that I see anything wrong with that.

There's still an awful lot of discussion going on, I will vote later.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by shlin28

That is only for this week, because I (and all the other teenagers in Britain) have a one week holiday. So I can get online in my mornings.

---

Convenient.

Please respond to my rebuttals, because I am still not satisfied with your answers.

Should I become satisfied, maybe I will ask town to lynch Reenk instead of you. (Not that it matters what I say, I am dead, and town can lynch whomever they please so far as I am concerned) If you want to survive, go ahead and state your defense further.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Quintus.JC

I still don't feel trustworthy about Glyphz and Taka, both lurked to mafia victories in the past.

When's Glyphz gonna be WOG'ed?

I don't see anything against Andres, there's no case against him.

The battle appears to be between Reenk and Shlin. APTG seems bent on lynching Shlin this round, and I have to say, Shlin has put up a awfully big fight to stay alive. Not that I see anything wrong with that.

There's still an awful lot of discussion going on, I will vote later.

---

Glyphz post count is only 2 under Gaius and Chaotix

Taka however is way under..

:laugh4: How can it be convenient? That the government conveniently placed a holiday on this week to help me play better in a mafia game as the Godfather?

:clown:

*Goes back to answer ATPG's questions*

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Askthepizzaguy

The Godfather won't be voting for himself to tie the game unless he has giant brass balls.

---

Fixed your statement. I hope Reenk (courteously) realizes that it's a compliment when I say that he fits the above profile.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by shlin28

:laugh4: How can it be convenient? That the government conveniently placed a holiday on this week to help me play better in a mafia game as the Godfather?

---

LOL-

With you, shlin, I am convinced anything is possible. :tongue2:

But it's CONVENIENT that you are here both day and night, and almost every night, and I proved that you don't have a "usual time" which was your defense why you were here almost every night.

So your defense isn't a defense, it's an excuse which doesn't stand up to scrutiny.


PS- I am having fun, shlin, and I hope you are too. Come on, you know you delight in having the spotlight on you and being able to fight for your life. I would love such questioning if I were mafia... it's a heck of a lot better than "ATPG IS SCUM LYNCH HIM NOW!!!!" which you can't really defend against.

Better reasons are being presented here for your execution than any before, so you should feel honoured I am not asking town to just blindly trust me. I am at least doing you the honor of giving reasons and asking for a defense.

:bow:


@TinCow: Brilliant!!! Exactly what I would do if I were the Godfather. But I do that every game basically, either by vote or by making myself suspicious on purpose.

EDIT: Shlin28- I posted a rebuttal to number 7 as well. Please respond.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by TinCow

Fixed your statement. I hope Reenk (courteously) realizes that it's a compliment when I say that he fits the above profile.

---

Its more fun to play that way.. Just ignore victory and glory. Go for fun :yes:

But if you think of what kind of things the grunts will say to you if God Father goes suicidal, I wouldn't dare..

Sorry bout the double post, but shlin and I have done several back-and-forths in a single post, and now it's time to start fresh.

Please agree to stop editing the above posts, and follow along from here.

I responded to all the points up to 12, shlin. Do you have anything further to add?

Quote:

---

As for your 180 degrees turn, YOU HAVE NO DEFENSE.

---

Of couse I have no defence, because I changed my side NATURALLY. If you don't believe me, so be it.

PS: This is the best fun I had as a townie for a long long time :smash:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by shlin28

Of couse I have no defence, because I changed my side NATURALLY. If you don't believe me, so be it.

PS: This is the best fun I had as a townie for a long long time :smash:

---

Good. So you have no defense and you're having fun.

shlin28, you already "voted" for yourself even though you cannot vote. So, you agree to be lynched. If this is the case, please shake hands with me and say "good game". Otherwise, answer my rebuttals.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ATPG

Grand Inquisitor

---

Now that's more like it......:yes::smash::clown::beam::2thumbsup::laugh4::dizzy2::egypt:

I have to admit, while doing the analysis is fun, if people would do more inquisitorial-style strategies and post defenses and rebuttals before we randomly lynch people, we would all get more fun out of these games.

:bow:

I only had the title "Ultimate Town Protector" because TinCow said I acted like I was one. I thought it was a great way to mock myself.

Grand Inquisitor is more accurate, indeed.



Blatant AD for the Capo de Tutti Capi III game. Please follow the link and sign up for an invitation. Let's get Seamus' game the 120 players it deserves.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Askthepizzaguy

Good. So you have no defense and you're having fun.

shlin28, you already "voted" for yourself even though you cannot vote. So, you agree to be lynched. If this is the case, please shake hands with me and say "good game". Otherwise, answer my rebuttals.

---

I said all I can so yes.

*surrenders to the Mighty Inquistor ATPG*

Grand Inquisitor? He's done this before in Lunar Whale, and he grilled me for good. I've never been put under so much pressure in the first round before. :scared:

Keep on grilling, someone's bound to make a mistake and say something they aren't supposed to say. :thumbsup:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by shlin28

I said all I can so yes.

*surrenders to the Mighty Inquistor ATPG*

---

Thank you.

Thank you for tolerating me, everyone. Let's lynch shlin28 and hopefully, you won't have to hear anything else from me for a long time.

:shakehands: with shlin28.

I really hope I am correct about you... I have done so much for this game and I am getting a little weary of my task.

:wall: :shame: :sweatdrop:


@QJC- Thank you. I believe shlin already cracked under pressure, so... hopefully he's the Godfather, and if not, I still believe we would only have one more to go. But I predict the game ends here. Otherwise, I am throwing this computer at the wall.

:clown:

I bet 10000000000 trillion dollars that the game will not end when I'm lynched.

:2thumbsup:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Gaius Scribonius Curio

I'm inclined to side with ATPG on this one, Shlin is certainly a better choice than Reenk. As unlikely as it sounds Reenk does make a legitimate point that due to a twist being an inherent part of the game, we can not be completely sure of anyones innocence. That said I do believe that Tincow is most likely innocent.

His post against Shlin would definitely seem to have a lot of weight behind it, whereas Reenk's behaviour in every game I've played with him in has been fun, at times somewhat crazy, absolutely impenetrable, and particularly very intelligent. :bow:

As such for the moment; Vote: Shlin although I would be interested to hear what Seamus has to say on the subject.

---

Unvote : shlin28
Vote : Gaius Scribonius Curio

I don't like that post. It has "scum" written all over it. That and your lurking.

I think Shlin is holding on well, but very few could keep up with the amount of accusation you're hurling at him. I think Shlin would make a fine lynch this round, but I have to say he didn't seem 100% guilty to me.

Quote:

---

I bet 10000000000 trillion dollars that the game will not end when I'm lynched.

---

I'll take that bet.

Spoiler Alert, click show to read: 

:sweatdrop:

Quote:

---

shlin28: 3 (Taka 1278, Beefy187 1283, Gaius Scribonius Curio 1285)
glyphz: 1 (WhiteEyes 1266)
Reenk: 2 (Chaotix27 1273, Reenk Roink 1279)
Gaius Scribonius Curio: 1 (Andres 1318)

---

Please recheck my tally.

Quote:

---

I think Shlin is holding on well, but very few could keep up with the amount of accusation you're hurling at him. I think Shlin would make a fine lynch this round, but I have to say he didn't seem 100% guilty to me.

---

Fair enough. But I would have nothing to accuse him of if he wasn't legitimately acting out of sorts.

If he were a townie, he would not act like the game hinges on his life, as he just did.