if gibson is under suspicion than so must reenk... theyre like two templars on one horse.
Printable View
if gibson is under suspicion than so must reenk... theyre like two templars on one horse.
Vote: gibson
I noticed that guilt/failed kill disparity while compiling my list. It's the strongest evidence so far this round.
ExplainQuote:
Originally Posted by The Stranger
You are the most suspicious, even though you are dead.Quote:
Originally Posted by The Stranger
You got me killed :furious3:
Well ATGP where is this FBI detective result concerning you? All ive heard today is bunch of blah, blah, blah coming from you without no results to hang scum what so ever. All ive seen is bunch of campaign posts from you with empty phrases. Not really convincing, not very convincing at all...
Vote: Gibsons
Select: Reenk Roink
Lets see, ATPG has been the source of EVERY SINGLE LYNCH in the game, PROMISED that an FBI investigation would be revealed that would PROVE him townie. Now he's pushing to gain even more security. All I am seeing is someone that is slowly trying to gain as much control over the game as possible. Personally I find that very very dangerous. Its not lynch worthy, but I think it certainly requires some attention. Meanwhile we all seem to be forgetting that he participated in a TWO PERSON night kill with GH which he claims red text explains. I just don't like where any of this is going at all.
Select: Reenk
Vote: Abstain
Getting a vote in before leaving for the day-job (and afk time).
vote: gibson
Why no protection groups? No one is worth protecting.
Hey that reminds me. Wasn't there some kind of serial killer in some game (was it capo II?) that had to target anyone who suspected him? Maybe it's something like that?Quote:
Originally Posted by Shinseikhaan
Also wasn't there a serial killer in the previous capo (or was it a different mafia game?), which couldn't lie? That would explain AVSM's behaviour.
Either way I checked, but I went back till page 17, and didn't see Reenk suspect AVSM. So probably I'm just seeing ghosts here or something.
vote: Craterus
select: Reenk Roink
Great no one is explaining their votes.
Big FoS: everyone not explaining their votes
So Craterus what makes you vote yourself?Quote:
Originally Posted by Craterus
Oh! Guilty is only when it's successful. That's easy! I was part of the vig group on Quintus.JC. As a townie, I wanted to become a wiseguy as fast as I can so then our vig group could be consolidated and only need 3 people - the smaller the group, the less info gets to mafia. Cheers!
Vote: AVSM because ties are too beautiful and too rare to pass up.
Ok besides him. But I also meant selections.
So, Kagemusha, what have you been up to the previous nights?Quote:
Originally Posted by Kagemusha
Meh, it's a farce. Whoever ATPG wants lynched gets lynched. Not necessarily a bad thing but it leads me to place little importance on my own vote. Ah, sweet democracy.
Vote: Abstain
Select: Reenk
Is it just me or is today is more muted?
Protecting people. Not killing like you suggest should be done.:whip:Quote:
Originally Posted by Andres
Protecting? Like everybody else? Fatlington must be the safest city in the universe with all this protecting going on. Anyone can vouch for you? You have something less vague than "protecting people"?Quote:
Originally Posted by Kagemusha
And why are you against killing scum?
There are people that can vouch for me. Not as if i would tell you who they are as i suspect you to be a Don. Its enough for me that those people know. Im against vigilante kills because you are more likely to breed scum then get rid of them by doing so.:yes:Quote:
Originally Posted by Andres
So, you are not willing to tell us what you were up to the previous nights.Quote:
Originally Posted by Kagemusha
Who us? Im not willing to tell you.:smash:Quote:
Originally Posted by Andres
Us : the town. This being the public thread and all.Quote:
Originally Posted by Kagemusha
How exactly is "I have been protecting A with X and Y on N1, 2 and 3" going to hurt town?
Telling nothing is better than lying, because you can get caught on a lie. Nothing is just... nothing. If you don't say anything, you can't lie. And that's exactly why I am always suspicious of evasive answers.
You are evading a simple enough question for no good reason, Kage.
If it's too sensitive, pm or let a trustworthy person pm me. Or better, if you're innocent and it is confirmed and all, why don't you let ATPG or Reenk post "Kage is innocent"?
Everything is better than evading, Kage.
:inquisitive:
Why did you attack QCJ on N1? Without any additional info? :inquisitive:Quote:
Originally Posted by gibsonsg91921
Im not really up for your fishing Andres. I have no intention of sharing anything with you as i believe you to be possibly scum. Im sure i have been investigated by now after my unclear result claimed by ATGP. That enough for me.Quote:
Originally Posted by Andres
Vote: gibsonsg
Well. If anything he's the better of the two front running options.
Select:Reenk Roink
Vote:Abstain
Need to read lots and lots more pages :confused:
Select: Reenk
Vote: Abstain
Kage is putting up an overly defensive stance here but I don't trust Andres either. I'll vote later
You'd think that.Quote:
Originally Posted by Psychonaut
And killing Quintus, with all apologies to someone who got snuffed the first night of a great game, was totally random. My vig group leader supplied a target, and we got him. Early on in the game, it's good for a vig group to show a little force and kill someone randomly so people who think of switching to mafia know the night isn't their friend either.
I just got bandwagoned the bejesus out of me, I'm hoping all the town players take note of who is voting for me and who they are unsure are their allies.
Alright, that's horrible. You join in a random vig group to scare people off from becoming mafia? :dizzy2:
Unvote: Abstain, Vote: Gibsong
Who else participated in the kill with you?Quote:
Originally Posted by gibsonsg91921