The test game is ready to go:yes:
Printable View
The test game is ready to go:yes:
Sry for double post but this is important.
If people will download the WotB mod then DO NOT use the trivial script. Just create a new shortcut and add -mod:EB -show_err in it's target path.
Sorry, but I don't understand the script thing you explained.
:no:
Use the shortcut that was placed on your desktop after the installation, not the shortcut originally called "EB Single Player shortcut". That loads up a script that automatically replaces a file we absolutely need. And if it's replaced, we don't have it. So don't use that shortcut.
Cool, thx. :yes:
A little friendly :bump: just to keep us in the first page :yes:
Don't want people do forget us! :laugh4:
That's true but this way you can play the WotB and regular EB in the same time..
But those edu and edb files are actually important to the one who pushes the end turn button..
Since we are near the start of the game then I'll post here the rules of it..
They can still be changed..
Spoiler Alert, click show to read:
wow it has more rules than Monopoly :dizzy2:
I'm going to need to print that :sweatdrop:
I think that Monopoly had more rules!:inquisitive:
Anyway.. I would appreciate if you people would check the spelling of the rules and if there are some 'loopholes' in it..
These are rephrased LotR rules that we are usin here.. So most of the credit goes to TinCow who wrote the LotR ones:bow:
*LotR - Last of the Romans and not Lord of the Rings :laugh4:
Wow this project sounds awesome!
Count me in! I would prefer KH, though.
It's a bit late to change the faction.:no:
But I'll sign you up though... :yes:
Now.. I was thinking..
EB have the multiplayer option.. Perhaps we can put the 'Civil War' part from LotR in the rules too..
We have Satrapies.. Most of the time they were pretty rebellious in history.. right?
So.. this is the perfect way to bring the 'Civil War' in the game.. Player versus Player fights and so on..
Now I would like to know what people would think about this..
Do you people want 'Civil Wars' to be in WotB?
Hmm... Civil wars are a must. The way to do them, though, can be debated.
What I must point out before the way a character-vs-character battle is conducted is that the armies used in that battle will be the armies of the character in game. Therefore, if Character A has 6 units in game and Character B has 12, Character B will be advantaged.
Also, the number of men in a unit will be those in game. If Character A has a unit of Pantodapoi (240 men maximum, I think) and he lost 40 of them, in the civil war battle his unit will have 200 men. See what I mean? Representing this is very difficult (if not downright impossible) in a multiplayer battle.
That's why alternate solutions have been found: tabletop battles, abbreviated tabletop battles, etc. And those solutions have always worked well enough...
Now that I've read the rules again, I propose adding a Civil War section (the content of which can be determined in this thread), and adding a rank: governor (the Seleucid equivalent). He'd govern one city directly, and would be above Strategos. He'd have basically the same powers, but can run for Chancellor. Also, I propose the Strategos Hetairos section be changed: he'd need to be in direct control of a city, and can propose up to 1 edict and 1 charter amendment.
Thoughts?
Yes, to civil wars. Yes, yes, YES!!!! :crowngrin:
id be interested in it! so will we get to fight our own characters battles?
I propose the KH or Baktria or Selucids for the faction we use
the faction has already been decided. It is AS.
Foot
Yes.. Faction is decided already.
Edited the first post.. Celtic_Punk is joining too..
We have 26 people interested so far and we try to get this thing started in the next week probably:yes:
Don't want to delay it anymore or people would loose interest..
Anyway.. these are the 'Civil War' rules that will be added to the rest of the rules..
Spoiler Alert, click show to read:
I would like to know what you think of them..
They are changed LotR 'Civil War' rules..
Since looks like a Civil War will be soon brake out in LotR then we can see how this 'Civil War' thing work out in there..
For more information on the civil war battles played in previous games (WotS and KotR), check these links out:
- The Battle of Ancyra (WotS)
- The Battle for Rome (which ended WotS)
- The Battle of Bern (KotR)
- The Battle of Staufen (KotR)
- The Battle of Trent (ending KotR)
These five battles will be the examples Ibn-Khaldun and I take to conduct the PVP battles (unless a better method is found).
Looks good.
I just thought about something, what if another satrap wants to help his buddy, or a general from another satrap wants to help, directly by showing up with his own army and participating in the war, or by just sending troops to help boost numbers?
and another question, since Avatars can die of old age, what do you do then? Do you pick another guy and continue? or do you sit out forever? or just a few turns till a new guy appears? or do you take control of his son? or his son's son?
itd kinda suck to get handed an Avatar thats like 40 and have him die, then just sit around watching the wheat grow in Elysium
Yes you will get to pick another avatar if your old one died..
If there is no FM available then you we will recruit RGB for you..
If you mean the Civil War then you have to make a Declration of War before you can help another Satrap.
If you are just a Strategos under Basileus then all units that you command belong to Basileus. This means that Basileus can take all units away from you and also this means that you can not join the Civil War against Basileus.
Just sending troops is not possible. You either have to join the Civil War as the attacker or the defender. Or you can stay neutral.
So say Satrap A attacks Satrap B, and Satrap C is good friends with Satrap B, he can join the civil war himself, and throw all his eggs in the basket. but he cant send a phalanx to help? I think if you allow this kind of aid, itd add an interesting element to the civil war aspect of the game. since you could be reluctant to enter the civil war as it could negatively affect your future, but not helping your friend could break an alliance. - more realistic feel to the civil war
Also, can the King call an end to hostilities? like if the Persians were making an offensive, and we needed to focus on holding the northern border? like a forced ceasefire while more important things are considered?
sorry for all the questions, but someone's gotta ask em :chinese:
It is good that someone is asking questions like these:yes:
If Satrap C wants to help Satrap B then he must make a Declaration of War against Satrap A to be able to give aid to Satrap B. After he makes the declaration he can send armies to help Satrap B.Quote:
So say Satrap A attacks Satrap B, and Satrap C is good friends with Satrap B, he can join the civil war himself, and throw all his eggs in the basket. but he cant send a phalanx to help?
If you are fighting against Basileus then things will be whole lot different because if the Chacellor is a good friend of the Basileus then Chancellor can end all building/recruitment in your Satrap.
Also we have our sub-forum in Throne room.
You can find it here
I'm sorry to spam but...
Hi,
'Will of the Basileus' have a new forum in the Throne Room. If you are still interested of this game then confirm your interest in the Signup Thread there.
The link for the WotB forum is here.
I hope to hear from you soon. :bow:
Just a little bump in case anybody is interested in joining this. Click the link on the post above to check out the sub-forum. Sorry for spamming but I thought this would be better than a new thread.