The Half Monty [Concluded]

I bet it´s the vile scotsman, Vote: Slashandburn sounds scottish, doesn´t it?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Romanic

Eh? What's going on here?

Renata voted Zack without giving a reason.
Zack voted Fluffy for being a spammer (superficial reason).
God Emperor voted Zack for strategic reasons (or it seems).
Fluffy omgused on Zack.

@Renata:

I'll echo Zack, why are you voting for him?

---

Because he was the last voter of the day yesterday, and sometimes scum hold their votes a long time so they can see what way the wind's blowing. On reading day one I could see nothing truly worth voting for -- classical hero putting the third and lynching vote on Diamondeye looked somewhat promising until he was emphatic on making sure you didn't forget it -- so I went for the meta in lieu of throwing darts a second time.

Quote:

---

Also, please try to assure me that "Marge is my hero" is not another casual comment like "Miko's been a bad girl". I'm afraid that I'll be hard to convince, but you can try.

---

On the contrary, it's exactly the same kind of casual comment.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Zack

Let's try giving reasons for our votes.

---

I'd like to say "let's not" just because I'm sick and not in the mood, but I already answered Romanic. Still, exactly what reasons do you think could be offered or given after a day like yesterday?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Romanic

@Zack

How is it that you are requesting others to give a reason for their vote, while yours is fluff at best?

---

I meant something more than just Vote: Whomever.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Renata

Because he was the last voter of the day yesterday, and sometimes scum hold their votes a long time so they can see what way the wind's blowing.

---

I hadn't check this site until I voted.

OK?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Zack

I meant something more than just Vote: Whomever.

---

Are you saying that Renata was wrong to vote you without a reason, but your vote against fluffy is fine, for saying he's a spammer? I don't understand how your vote is better. Like I pointed out to GE on day 1, placing a vote without a reason is at least equal (and arguably better), than giving a fluff reason. I understand that fluff reasons have a fun factor on Day 1, but we're Day 2 now.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Romanic

Are you saying that Renata was wrong to vote you without a reason, but your vote against fluffy is fine, for saying he's a spammer? I don't understand how your vote is better. Like I pointed out to GE on day 1, placing a vote without a reason is at least equal (and arguably better), than giving a fluff reason. I understand that fluff reasons have a fun factor on Day 1, but we're Day 2 now.

---

It was just a snarky reply to GE saying "Let's try...", nothing more really. This is the real reason I'm still voting for fluffy.

:wall::wall::wall:
You still missed the point of that comment.
IT WAS SARCASM.
YES I AM A SPAMMER NICE TO MEET YOU.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Zack

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Thefluffyone93

Me, a spammer?
Oh, never in a million, billion years......
Amiright?

---

Immediate squirmy reaction.

---

I see that you haven't played in the last Council of Villains, or you would know Fluffy.

His reaction is something I'd expect from him, and I wouldn't rank it as "squirmy". Coming from Fluffy, that kind of stuff is a null-tell. Also, I don't think it's realistic to see someone scummy for a jokey reaction to your jokey vote.

As for the omgus vote, maybe. It's actually the only thing making sense in your case.

vote: Khazaar

His last vote may be an attempt to swim under the radar. While everyone is talking about Zack/Fluffy, he's casually throwing a vote on slashandburn.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Romanic

I see that you haven't played in the last Council of Villains, or you would know Fluffy.

His reaction is something I'd expect from him, and I wouldn't rank it as "squirmy". Coming from Fluffy, that kind of stuff is a null-tell. Also, I don't think it's realistic to see someone scummy for a jokey reaction to your jokey vote.

As for the omgus vote, maybe. It's actually the only thing making sense in your case.

---

There is nothing better to go off of than a bandwagonning OMGUS at this point in time.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by God Emperor

let's try with a second vote on you
Vote: Zack

---

Why exactly are we voting Zack? All I see is a nice little bandwagon starting to form. In the interest of avoiding that, I'll vote:god Emperor for telling people who to vote for without good reason.

Wait, pizza never specified if we can unvote or not.......
I see no reason for me to keep my vote zack simply
because he did not know about the way I post.

Vote: Fluffy

Bleigh!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Romanic

Are you saying that Renata was wrong to vote you without a reason, but your vote against fluffy is fine, for saying he's a spammer? I don't understand how your vote is better. Like I pointed out to GE on day 1, placing a vote without a reason is at least equal (and arguably better), than giving a fluff reason. I understand that fluff reasons have a fun factor on Day 1, but we're Day 2 now.

---

I hope you noticed the joke in that post :laugh4:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Nightbringer

Why exactly are we voting Zack? All I see is a nice little bandwagon starting to form. In the interest of avoiding that, I'll vote:god Emperor for telling people who to vote for without good reason.

---

What you see is a second vote on Zack.. that in itself should not be grand offense, imo. But the reason was quite simple.. as you noticed, I wrote that I wanted to see how a second vote is being handled by Zack and other parties. I don't think day 1 is enough to place good cases, at least I am not good enough to do that.. so giving another stab in the dark.. what I see is a Zack that get's extreemly jumpy as soon as he sees he is in the lead ; I may naturally be wrong

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by pevergreen

Vote: Fluffy

Bleigh!

---

Oh....
OH THERE BETTER BE AN UNVOTE OPTION.
MUST SWITCH

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by God Emperor

I hope you noticed the joke in that post :laugh4:



What you see is a second vote on Zack.. that in itself should not be grand offense, imo. But the reason was quite simple.. as you noticed, I wrote that I wanted to see how a second vote is being handled by Zack and other parties. I don't think day 1 is enough to place good cases, at least I am not good enough to do that.. so giving another stab in the dark.. what I see is a Zack that get's extreemly jumpy as soon as he sees he is in the lead ; I may naturally be wrong

---

That sounds reasonable, but you could just as easily be scum just coming up with this to cover yourself in retrospect.
(edited for wording)

You better think twice before attacking Marjorie Simpson (nee Bouvier). I'll have my pan, and whatever else I can lay my hands on at the ready.

Now, I don't think Zack is the person who attacked me last night, but it's clear from my poor Bart being brutally picked upon yesterday that someone is out to kill us Simpsons.

So I'm gonna have to go with Vote: thefluffyone93

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Captain Blackadder

As a member of the army who bravely fought for our country I find it offensive that you have voted for a vet.

---

CB comes out early on and claims to be a war vet. Immediately Grandpa Simpson comes to mind.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Csargo

Back in my day we didn't have reason. We would draw straws to see who would be lynched. Whoever had the shortest straw we lynched them. Of course there were no general stores in our little town, so we had to walk fifteen miles to the next town over and get the straws there.

---

Csargo repeatedly comes out with rambling old man stories. Grandpa also comes to mind here. Csargo comes back with this claim multiple times, and CB doesn't speak up after this. I think CB tried to do a false claim early on then bit his tongue.

Vote: Captain Blackadder

CB, if there is another war vet character, then speak up now.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by God Emperor

What you see is a second vote on Zack.. that in itself should not be grand offense, imo. But the reason was quite simple.. as you noticed, I wrote that I wanted to see how a second vote is being handled by Zack and other parties. I don't think day 1 is enough to place good cases, at least I am not good enough to do that.. so giving another stab in the dark.. what I see is a Zack that get's extreemly jumpy as soon as he sees he is in the lead ; I may naturally be wrong

---

:laugh4: "extremely jumpy"

Well, might I just say that Grampa Simpson, Hans Moleman and Jasper Beardly could potentially be candidates for older people in this game, However, I am unaware if either Hans or Jasper were war vets. It is likely that Grampa Simpson is the only one of these three in this game, but one of the others could potentially be here, it really depends on askthepizzaguy's preferences.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Yaropolk

CB comes out early on and claims to be a war vet. Immediately Grandpa Simpson comes to mind.



Csargo repeatedly comes out with rambling old man stories. Grandpa also comes to mind here. Csargo comes back with this claim multiple times, and CB doesn't speak up after this. I think CB tried to do a false claim early on then bit his tongue.

Vote: Captain Blackadder

CB, if there is another war vet character, then speak up now.

---

Now son that is no way to speak to a vet I know you can read my thoughts. Just remember, if I find out you are mafia, your ass is mine. Yes, you heard me. I think words I would never say. Don't just think of World War II there have being more wars.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Captain Blackadder

Now son that is no way to speak to a vet I know you can read my thoughts. Just remember, if I find out you are mafia, your ass is mine. Yes, you heard me. I think words I would never say. Don't just think of World War II there have being more wars.

---

Ok, I know who you are now.

your ass is mine : quote from the Principal in Ferris Bueller's Day Off.

And Skinner is a Vietnam war vet.

Your empty threats bounce off my ears like cheap imitation Chinese star wWars figurines . But I digress. unvote;

vote:Fluffy

Yes, unvoting is allowed, sorry if I didn't specify.




Captain Blackadder:
classical_hero: Fluffy
Csargo:
Death is yonder:
God Emperor: Zack
Johnhughthom: Renata
Khazaar: Slashandburn
Nightbringer: God Emperor
pevergreen: Fluffy
Renata: Zack
Robbiecon: Fluffy
Romanic: Khazaar
Slashandburn:
TheFluffyOne: Zack
Yaropolk: abstain
Zack: Fluffy


Fluffy: 4
Zack: 3
Renata: 1
Slash: 1
GE: 1
Khazaar: 1
abstain: 1
Not voting: 3

Ach, I don't be liking the idea of tossing this fluffy one out just because we said so. I kinna do eet.

Unvote: fluffy

Vote Khazzar

I have the feeling that he is a no good ruffian.

Vote: Zack

Just a hunch.

Guys, Renata did it.