Printable View
:laugh4:Quote:
Originally Posted by Omanes Alexandrapolites
Are you guys drunk? :inquisitive: I never said "Sarathos was not guilty", I only said "I doubt it was Sarathos"
Also, FOS: Omanes he bandwagonned me when "it was sure that I'll be lynched" and just followed the illogical of other voters on me.
I'm very tempted to vote Omanes, especially after:
But I will wait a bit longer to see Omanes' and Proletariat's reactionQuote:
Originally Posted by Stig
Vote : Sasaki.
We had only one kill attempt last night. You haven't been around for several days.
What happened? The same as in Stigs' game? Was your pm too late?
I won't say to much about this:
But I'm stunned how easely people bandwagon, take the bandwagon on Tran, all he said was:
"I doubt it was Sarathos"
How is that scummy?
As my mafia game will teach you, bandwagoning does not help the town, yes the town might win, but if you don't bandwagon and discuss on multiple possibilities the town will win much easier.
Just blindy going after someone is not a good tactic.
Unvote: Tran
Vote: Stig
Is it just me, or is Stig just acting a tinsy weensy bit suspitious and different. He seems to be taking advantage of one thing which I suggested, lynching the traitor TS, which, if he viewed the past, he would realise that it was not even my primary suggestion. He also neglects the fact that I placed a vote upon Tran as a pressure measure, not as an anti-mafioso measure. We have a spy by the tail here.
Away to school for 10 hours and look how many posts was added...
Why do you suspect Sasaki is a mafia? Do you immediately jump to conclusion, just because he's away for sometime??? :dizzy2:Quote:
Originally Posted by Andres
And a question from a noobie, does duelling gain anything for the person who duels?
It's day one. Don't expect a decent reason. Besides, apparantly, the mafia only managed to get one pm in at time.Quote:
Originally Posted by shlin28
There's absolutely no reason why they would restrict themselves to one kill on night one.
The only logical conclusion is that two of the mafiosi haven't been online and thus didn't manage to pm their actions for the night to the host.
Hence my vote for Sasaki.
:laugh4:Quote:
Originally Posted by Omanes Alexandrapolites
Is this the best defence you have against my vote, surely you can do better.
I vote you as I announced, you tried to get rid of TS in an easy way (even tho everyone would agree).
And 3 votes on Tran because of bandwagoning isn't pressure voting, 1 even 2 votes will easely do.
You simply followed the people in front of you because you needed a target, you could have easely asked Tran for an explanation without voting.
By your logic, that would also apply to Ichigo, Xdeathfire, Roadkill and Killfr3nzy. (Yes, i took the time to check...)Quote:
It's day one. Don't expect a decent reason. Besides, apparantly, the mafia only managed to get one pm in at time.
There's absolutely no reason why they would restrict themselves to one kill on night one.
The only logical conclusion is that two of the mafiosi haven't been online and thus didn't manage to pm their actions for the night to the host.
Hence my vote for Sasaki.
Anyone of them could be mafia.
True. But I can only vote one at a time...Quote:
Originally Posted by shlin28
I would gladly Vote : Ichigo, Xdeathfire, Roadkill, Sasaki and Killfr3nzy, but I'm afraid the host will not except it.
So I started with Sasaki.
On second thoughts. Omanes is starting to sound scummy.
Unvote ; Vote : Omanes
Which gives Andres a 20% change, remember?
Atleast we can say one thing:
there's no reason why the mafia would only kill 1 person, so going by that proper logic either: Ichigo, Xdeathfire, Roadkill, Sasaki or Killfr3nzy is mafia.
It's even better, imo: there are 3 spies. Only 1 of them sent his pm with the night orders in time.Quote:
Originally Posted by Stig
Which means: 2 out of those 5 can be mafia.
Unvote ; Vote : Killfr3nzy
shouldnt we keep a tally?
Stig, your logic of absent players would also mean that there are either 2 or 4 mafia (more than 4 would be a bit odd) because with 3 if the absent player didn't got his pm in on time, the other player couldve sent it in. So either there are 2 mafia, and both need to send in their kills, or there are 4 mafia and they send in their kills in pairs of 2.
So study the write up to see wether there were multiple attackers or not.
Just thought of something, Andres' way of voting is not right, because there could be people who didnt log on until after the write-up was finished, but now on their displays they were last on at that time, when they could have been away before the write-up was finished.
Confusing? Yes, even i dont understand it.
And will someone please answer my question on duels?:embarassed:
sofar i know you gain 2 things, you k.o. your opponent for the night and you gain fightingvalue (apparently not the same as score, value can increase score can't) though i have no idea wat the value does...
Andres how do you know there are 3 mafia...
Quote:
Originally Posted by pevergreen
*sigh*
Nobody ever bothers to read what's in the thread :no:
:bigcry:
hehehe :P sorry, but pever should put it all in one post, not spread it out around the thread, besides alot of things aren;t properly explained.
Allright new theory, none of the mafia sent in their PM and Andres was attacked by a role nonmafia (pever said other groups can attack).
Or The mafia played a smart scheme, by getting one of their players (andres) protected and than attack him, making him seem innocent. because he was attacked by the "mafia"
Vote: The Stranger
For not having seen what pever said, despite him saying he'd be a very good townie. Or something like that.
A good townie must read everything.
Is this the best defence you have against my vote Stig? It's not very detailed or inventive, nor does it explain much.Quote:
Originally Posted by Stig
Andres agreed and, if I hadn't brought it up, somebody else would have.Quote:
Originally Posted by Stig
It only forces the person to talk if they believe that a bandwagon may be approaching. It served it's purpose.Quote:
Originally Posted by Stig
BTW, I edited out some information within the post since I no longer see it's suitability for the situation.
By the way, pever, you put down GH as a player. He isn't.
And, TS, what things aren't properly explained?
Wait, Omanes, what oncoming bandwagon? Did I miss something? Andres voted Killfrenzy, in case you didn't notice. So, for now you're in the clear.
What's with all the editing.Quote:
Originally Posted by Omanes Alexandrapolites
First your post said "nevermind", than it said something about "Checking the rules", than, looking at Warmasters' remark, you said something about an oncoming bandwagon against you and now you edited it once again.
:laugh4:
You are acting very suspicious my friend. Afraid of saying something wrong? Which is typical mafia behaviour.
Sorry, but last time I saw you posting with so much caution, you were mafia.
Unvote ; Vote : Omanes.
And to this vote I will stick.
Meh. I want my edit button back. I wanted to use the inquisitive smiley.Quote:
Originally Posted by Andres
:inquisitive:
If I was mafia, do you think I would risk it again Andres? It was only the town's suspicion of another player that saved me last time I did this.
If you were not mafia, would you be so cautious about what you are posting?Quote:
Originally Posted by Omanes Alexandrapolites
It depends upon the importance of my role and the likelyhood that the mafia would want to kill me if they found out about its abilities.Quote:
Originally Posted by Andres
Well, it's hard to tell with your editing-spree, but IIRC, you didn't mention anything role related in your posts...Quote:
Originally Posted by Omanes Alexandrapolites
:inquisitive:
Your explanation is not satisfying. Sorry.
His role, the bit that was edited out in favor of attacking Stig, was Noble Squire. Or so he said. Noble Squire was just about the same as townie.
Because Omanes has been acting scummily, I will Unvote, Vote:Omanes.
Warmaster, I have no clue what you are talking about... it's lame and smells of the usual votes against me... He's TS i dont need a good reason to vote...
I vote Omanes...on the second hand i wont bandwagon and unvote ; vote: abstain you can abstain right?