Perhaps the Beziers solution?
:devilish:
Printable View
Perhaps the Beziers solution?
:devilish:
I guess you aren't very good at it then, since I still got zero, besides anger wrapped in a moral appeal. If these articles are alarmist, untrue, show me.Quote:
Originally Posted by Tribesman
On the subjects of Islam , immigration and intergration your fears seem to have interrupted the chain of rational thought .
That is fun to say isn't it, irrationality, great for scrabble, but in a discussion when you call someone irrational you ussually say why, and bring something to the table that shows why. I still have nada. I fear a country with no sense of direction, multiculturalism is a self-denying profecy, for a multiculturalist the outcome must be a 100 whatever the sum. Very rational. Go there! where? I dunno I hoped you knew.
oooooo thats a hard one ...try post #11Quote:
if these articles are alarmist, untrue, show me.
another hard one , a real struggle that will be .:dizzy2:Quote:
That is fun to say isn't it, irrationality, great for scrabble, but in a discussion when you call someone irrational you ussually say why, and bring something to the table that shows why.
So ......a woman is gang raped and murdered , you say she was a dumb american MTV loving bitch who wanted a bit of rough but got more than she expected ....... another woman is gang raped and you say its because the rapists were muslims and that is what they do ...rational or irrational ?
A bloke gets no charges put against him because there is no evidence , you say its because he was a Muslim and the police and judges won't prosecute Muslims.......a bloke gets caught red handed , there is a pile of evidence and even his friends testify against him , you say he is innocent and was only prosecuted because he isn't a Muslim....rational or irrational ?
A group gets some grants to subsidise those parts of a construction project that are grant eligible , you say the dutch taxpater is paying for the whole project because they are Muslims .......lots of groups get the same grants for those parts of their projects that are eligable for grants and you say .....errrrr......nothing ....because they are not Muslim...rational or irrational ?
Does that bring enough to the table ?
Would you like some more of your posts to remind you what you have claimed on this forum ?
Or should I just finish with your "I am going out to beat up some immigrants this weekend , they need to be taught a lesson" post ?:thumbsdown:
That's the post where you say it's rubbish right.
No Tribes, that, again, brings absolutily nothing to the table, yet another moral appeal. Several. If you want to discuss me fine, start a thread, but right now we are discussing the article in post 1. About that particular example, guy wasn't caught red handed, he was arrested at home. The judge even said the punnishment was so high because he wanted to stress the multicultural society, he said so in the verdict, tribes.
Ah well let's play. Mosk was funded with fraud, city bought their ground and gave it back, 2.000.000 euro there you go. Illegal as heck. I can give you a little background if you want, the moderate council of the time insisted they needed the money to prevent the hardliners from taking over, nothing but blackmail. They got the money and the hardliners took over anyway. It is doubtfull the mosk will ever be build.
About that rape, no idea what you are talking about, sure you have it somewhere in the Fragony files but I am kinda lost, not only on this particular example but also about what the hell it has to do with the subject.
About beating up, I was wrong but I was upset. How long was that ago? 2 years? Was during the Paris riots I believe (or van Gogh, forgot) and there was talk of the same thing happening in Rotterdam that weekend, but it never happened.
ps, wasn't it at the same time you were going to teach me a lesson and I gave you my adress and phonenumber and how best to get here? (schiphol amersfoort, about 40 minutes, nice route by the way, lots of water very pretty)
YepQuote:
That's the post where you say it's rubbish right.
It brings everything that is needed ....if half the mosques are talking about Jihad then what are the other half talking about ?Quote:
No Tribes, that, again, brings absolutily nothing to the table
Are they not mosques?
Jihad is part of islam isn't it , do these moques not talk about it ?
Do they talk about the lesser or the greater ?
Do they talk about the Shia or Sunni Jihad ?
One good thing in the article is that it quotes something ...about Jihad being a taboo word ....thats true , due to the alarmism associated with the word .
Oh so if the police acting on information about a planned firebomb attack raid a house and find the racist git with firebombs he hasn't been caught red handed because he was at home:laugh4: :laugh4: :laugh4: :laugh4: :laugh4:Quote:
About that particular example, guy wasn't caught red handed, he was arrested at home.
The judge said that the sentance was towards the higher end of the possible scale because racist attacks must not be tolerated .Quote:
The judge even said the punnishment was so high because he wanted to stress the multicultural society, he said so in the verdict, tribes.
No thats OK Frag , thanks for the offer , but I shall just wait for your next attempt in a long line of "muslims gonna get ya" topics :2thumbsup:Quote:
If you want to discuss me fine, start a thread,
Will I have to wait long ?
Hey if you try the Daily "hate" Mail instead of the Times you should be able to post several every day .~;)
I was the american student raped and murdered in Aruba , what it and the others have to do with the subject is to show a pattern in your thought process...everything is different to you if it is Muslims involved .Quote:
About that rape, no idea what you are talking about, sure you have it somewhere in the Fragony files but I am kinda lost, not only on this particular example but also about what the hell it has to do with the subject.
That isn't illegal , that is town planning and provision of community facilities in a run down area , it is normal , you have an issue with it purely because of the religeon involved .Quote:
Mosk was funded with fraud, city bought their ground and gave it back, 2.000.000 euro there you go. Illegal as heck.
Hey Frag get it right , the quote was "if you cannot introduce a racist to a reasonable point of view then introduce his head to the floor"Quote:
ps, wasn't it at the same time you were going to teach me a lesson
Those are fascinating questions indeed, quite philosophical, let me fetch my pipe. If I didn't know any better I would think that I would be interested in them, but alas I am not. If the muslims are unsure about what it is why should I know? Now let's get back to article, you can call it suzie if you want, I'll just call it +/- half the mosks in brittain teach the hardline version of islam which tells muslims to shed blood in the name of the prophet. Maybe that is rubbish, but you seem to have a little difficulty in proving that. Back on track, no need to thank me I am therefore I can.
I was the american student raped and murdered in Aruba , what it and the others have to do with the subject is to show a pattern in your thought process...everything is different to you if it is Muslims involved
Oh, Hogaway. You know two of the suspects are black right? If you want to nail me here you could do with a better example. Most gangrapes are done by muslims(here at least), since you are burdening yourselve with the greater meanings, go for it.
That isn't illegal , that is town planning and provision of community facilities in a run down area , it is normal , you have an issue with it purely because of the religeon involved .
It's legal when it is done legally. And, it wasn't.
Oh so if the police acting on information about a planned firebomb attack raid a house and find the racist git with firebombs he hasn't been caught red handed because he was at home
Indeed, that is what red handed means you know. Caught in the act. He wasn't. Why is that so hard for you?
Hey Frag get it right , the quote was "if you cannot introduce a racist to a reasonable point of view then introduce his head to the floor"
Hmm I guess you don't remember it. I wonder why.
were they black Muslims ?Quote:
Oh, Hogaway. You know two of the suspects are black right? If you want to nail me here you could do with a better example.
Then undoubtably you can provide details of the convictions:laugh4:Quote:
It's legal when it is done legally. And, it wasn't
:laugh4: :laugh4: :laugh4: :laugh4:Quote:
Indeed, that is what red handed means you know. Caught in the act. He wasn't. Why is that so hard for you?
He was caught in the act of those crimes he was charged with and convicted for :idea2: You claimed he was innocent:dizzy2:
My memory is fine frag , you took the quote as being a threat to you ...I was ever so scared when you said you did kick-boxing I was so scared I nearly wet myself laughing :laugh4: :laugh4: :laugh4: :laugh4: :laugh4:Quote:
Hmm I guess you don't remember it. I wonder why.
Ahh, it's getting shorter and shorter, since we aren't discussing the subject anymore this thread could just as well be closed.Quote:
Originally Posted by Tribesman
I don't know if they were muslims tribes.
Nope can't give details of convictions, there weren't any. Why that is I'll leave to your imagination.
Afraid not tribes, look for the thread 'Dearest Fragony' in the archieves :yes:
Thanks for the memories,
-xxx- Frag
ow, missed one. Which act?
Ah so if you don't know they are muslims you don't make an issue of it :idea2: in fact you did the opposite and blamed the victim .Quote:
I don't know if they were muslims tribes.
:laugh4: :laugh4: :laugh4: :laugh4: Frag it is your imagination... the whole mosque building finance topic and the way you presented it was your imagination running riot .Quote:
Nope can't give details of convictions, there weren't any. Why that is I'll leave to your imagination.
Oooooo thats a hard one , but since you couldn't remember the judges summing up correctly I suppose you cannot remember the charges either...so ....consipacy to commit an act of terrorism , incitemet to racial hatred , illegal possesion of explosive devices , illegal possesion of explosive devices with intent...but hey you said he was innocent because he wasn't a Muslim:oops:Quote:
ow, missed one. Which act?
See the pattern .
Explosives huh, you mean a molotov cocktail, I think you are confused with the case of Samir A. He was charged with attempted arson, that's it, he got max penalty because of his motives(was 2,5 years not 3 my bad). Now I am not sorry to see him in jail mind you, but to put it into perspective, nobody ever got charged for burning down churches. I started that thread because of the obvious double standard of the legal system.
Read up on the Samir A case and look for similarities, quite interesting.
Frag it is your imagination... the whole mosque building finance topic and the way you presented it was your imagination running riot .
Was a removing of a christian warmonument topic. Someone took offense.
but hey you said he was innocent because he wasn't a Muslim
See the pattern .
:laugh4: :laugh4: oh man you finally really lost it, there a straw grab it while you can.
God why even react.....
I suspect that we have drifted somewhat.
:closed: