Lynch Ichigo.
First he stayed in the shadows at the beginning, not lodging his usual vote:sasaki. Then, he starts acting overtly analytical and helpful. His behavior's off, I say take him out.
Printable View
Lynch Ichigo.
First he stayed in the shadows at the beginning, not lodging his usual vote:sasaki. Then, he starts acting overtly analytical and helpful. His behavior's off, I say take him out.
Vote: Crazed Rabbit
As I have to trust 2 assesments on GH's value, he is an experienced player who voted for him (first I think) last round.
All three deaths so far have been experienced players who have also been major game hosts. I personally believe that it is better for the mafia to leave veterans alive, as experienced players tend to be viewed with more suspicion than newbies. It is easier to hide when there are many possible suspects. I therefore think it is more likely that the mafia are newer or less experienced players... at least whichever of the mafia have been killing so far.
I will reserve my vote until I hear more.
I've been active the entire game. I did vote Sasaki, just because I didn't do it how you expected isn't my fault. I don't know how that's bad, could you explain it to me?Quote:
Originally Posted by makaikhaan
Vote: CrazedRabbit
I want to know why, seeing as GeneralHankerchief failed to be lynched yesterday - that he was a priority for death last night - considering he hasn't even been active.
That simply reeks of the people who bandwagoned him having the same opinion as the Mafia.
FOS: KukriKhan
On the other hand, there is the argument it may be a set-up.
(As for the bit about the electro shocks and body-shaving - Andres has a wil imagination - we can't believe all the things he puts up for truth!)
Most people haven't done enough for me to have an opinion on them yet. Most of the day 1 votes were simple random choice votes. The following have posted enough to merit comment:
Glenn gives me an innocent feel because he talks so much and puts his opinion out there. He is playing just like he did when he was a townie. I haven't seen him play as mafia though.
Privateerkev has posted a lot but I don't have any feeling on him. I think he makes mistakes in judgement but can't tell if that's new-town player or new-mafia player.
TinCow is too cautious for my liking and backed off a shade too strongly.
I don't like Ichigo's vote here. His post count seems up from pre school mafia and his posts also seem cautious. I don't like his going after glenn in post 288. Glenn's posts are easy to pick on and a tempting target for mafia.Quote:
Vote:Sasaki
I don't like the fact that he revealed that he was blocked by the prostitute.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ichigo
Quote:
Originally Posted by PK
I don't like that Ichigo is saying he thinks Prole and TinCow are innocent based on analysis of their posts. The number of posts is small so far and neither of them has done anything that strikes me as innocent. He also makes no mention of thinking they are innocent in his initial post where he merely went after glenn's reasoning. If he defends those he thinks are innocent why didn't he defend prole from her other voters? His post strikes me as an overly defensive reaction to PK (who only said it was ironic not suspicious).Quote:
Originally Posted by Ichigo
Vote:Ichigo
I'm not willing to draw conclusions based on the deaths of experienced players. It's happened in several games and I don't believe any correlation has been found. Not a fan of people making claims about it since that's the kind of things I used to do in my first couple games as mafia.
So you think the kills point to someone other than yourself, because you believe it's bad for the mafia to kill experienced players? As I said I don't like this reasoning.Quote:
Originally Posted by TinCow
Damn, not even a visit from the prostitute before I went. :laugh4:
I'll still be around, don't worry town.
You are quite correct Sasaki - lynching solely on the evidence of night actions is not enough - however my vote remains on CrazedRabbit until he can explain the coincedence.
Vote:Ichigo
Been acted very defensive lately, and been defending people I believed may be wise to watch out for.
Wait.. I have reread the last few pages.
I should have more faith in the strategic ability of the Mafia - killing GH would have been to obvious a move - especially if CR was a criminal.
For now I change my vote in favour of the greatest and most sensible evidence.
Unvote: CrazedRabbit Vote: Ichigo
Woohoo for 100 posts:laugh4:
I was not aware that I band wagoned GeneralHankercheif, I just wanted get more game related discussion's.
Vote:Abstain for now
As I said, I thought it more likely, not that it's absolutely the case. It's quite possible that it's an experienced player doing exactly that to confuse us. However, I prefer to stick to the simpler explanation until I see evidence to the contrary. It's just a hunch, though at this point in the game, I see no reason to count anyone out.Quote:
Originally Posted by Sasaki Kojiro
Why not? I was a detective in preschool mafia, so I tried to stay under the radar, and as far as my posts being cautious I have nothing to say to that because I'm not being cautious, maybe some examples Sasaki? I didn't pick on Glenn, never did I accuse him of anything or vote for him. It wouldn't make sense for me to go after Glenn and then not use that against him.Quote:
I don't like Ichigo's vote here. His post count seems up from pre school mafia and his posts also seem cautious. I don't like his going after glenn in post 288. Glenn's posts are easy to pick on and a tempting target for mafia.
It's a gut feeling based on how I perceive their posts. The feel I get from their posts doesn't make me suspicious of them, but that doesn't mean I'm completely convinced they're clean. Why would I? The only reason Prole and TC were brought up was because PK hinted at them working together, so why would I waste space saying the same thing twice. Easy, I probably wasn't around then. He says one thing and means another, it's not a far jump from being ironic to him becoming suspicious of that fact.Quote:
I don't like that Ichigo is saying he thinks Prole and TinCow are innocent based on analysis of their posts. The number of posts is small so far and neither of them has done anything that strikes me as innocent. He also makes no mention of thinking they are innocent in his initial post where he merely went after glenn's reasoning. If he defends those he thinks are innocent why didn't he defend prole from her other voters? His post strikes me as an overly defensive reaction to PK (who only said it was ironic not suspicious).
Vote:Ichigo
Where have I been defensive? Why don't you point out a couple of posts? That may be your opinion, but I'm an entirely different person with different thoughts. ~;)Quote:
Vote:Ichigo
Been acted very defensive lately, and been defending people I believed may be wise to watch out for.
What evidence? You've failed to point anything out. You're just bandwagoning claiming to be supporting "evidence". I think you and 00jebus are mafia.Quote:
Wait.. I have reread the last few pages.
I should have more faith in the strategic ability of the Mafia - killing GH would have been to obvious a move - especially if CR was a criminal.
For now I change my vote in favour of the greatest and most sensible evidence.
Unvote: CrazedRabbit Vote: Ichigo
Based on the evidence that you have been acting strangely, even to me - and that so many - not just two - but a number of experienced players have noticed the oddity of your behaviour.
I will prove I am not bandwagoning by two things;
First, to speak in your defense, I say to Sasaki that I don't recall Ichigo attacking my posts, but he was instead attacking PrivateerKev. In any case - it should be known that he wasn't as aggressive to me as was shown.
Secondly, I have the promise that the vote will be changed as soon as I have reason to believe I had something worthy of investigation in CrazedRabbit and KukriKhan.
Since when KukriKhan is a suspect? I think he hasn't post yet?
Kukri voted GH, and said also that he was going to jump on the bandwagon without a reason.
He later changed his vote.
Merely 9 (make that 10, now) posts to your 8. :beam:Quote:
Originally Posted by Caius
Could you quote some posts and explain why they're strange and oddity in my previous behavior?Quote:
Originally Posted by Glenn
This is strange. Seems like just an attempt to make you seem innocent. No one would defend someone they thought was guilty and worth voting for. It doesn't make sense.
I wasn't attacking PK, I was pointing out the fact that prole and TC working together so obviously, would be highly unlikely.
I change the tense to make that a correct statement: " Kukri voted GH, and later explained that he jumped on the bandwagon without real reason [to stimulate conversation]Quote:
Originally Posted by Glenn
He later (hours before the lynch deadline) changed his vote."
There ya go. Fixed. No charge. :2thumbsup:
I'm sure this will just raise more eyebrows from people who think that I'm somehow working with Prole and Ichigo, but I've got to agree with Ichigo here. Glenn is has been going after people pretty aggressively, considering there's almost nothing to go on. His reasoning has been poor and he's acting like there's more to it than there really is.
(To Ichigo)
If you mention that it seems to make me appear innocent, then there must be some proof of my innocence therein - because I attempted only to use moderation in how I view the different players.
Especially in matters concerning whether they live or die.
Tell me, then - and I will remove my vote so long as you are willing to keep yourself out in the open - why Prole and TC are so obviously working together.
You have then seen evidence of them working as a team also - but think it too obvious?
I didn't defend you - in the words of most American idealists - I was defending truth. You didn't attack me, and I wanted to make that clear.
Else you could end up lynched for false reasons.
And on that note, until I am more convinced. Unvote: Ichigo Vote: Abstain
Don't you recall last game where Glenn hounded prole near incessantly with some rather preposterous claims? :dizzy2:Quote:
Originally Posted by TinCow
I'm finding it a bit odd that Glenn and Sasaki seem to be so chummy. They both seem to believe each other innocent based on nothing, now their ganging up on Ichigo.
Also, Sasaki, why did you reveal that you were blocked by the prostitute? I can't really see the reasoning for this and would like it if you could enlighten me.
I'm getting some really bad vibes from some players. But, when only a few people take the spotlight many of the others (guilty or not) can slink around in the shadows, which is never good. More thoughts coming soon.
Your post count has been down in general in recent games (capo etc). Your posts this game have an air of someone trying avoid a negative reaction. It is easy for mafia to make a pro-town appearance by pointing out mistakes in one of glenn's posts. Everyone makes mistakes, pointing them out is easy. Actual analysis is much harder to fake.Quote:
Originally Posted by Ichigo
None of this is particularly significant. It was clear that this was your claimed reasoning from your original posts.Quote:
Originally Posted by Ichigo
Wow, seems like a lot happened last night. Let's look at what details we do have.
First, here are the mafia roles in Andres's first post:
Spoiler Alert, click show to read:
Spoiler Alert, click show to read:
GH was garroted and not smothered with a pillow. I don't know if that is significant and we won't know if killers have a signature style unless there are more killings. But regardless, I believe GH was killed by one of the Carelli's.
Now, makaikhaan's death seemed strange to me. The reference to family makes me wonder if makaikhaan was a Carelli mobster and was killed by Taketsi. Now, this would mean that Taketsi would have had to have gotten very lucky in his investigation on night one but it is possible.
Not long ago, makaikhaan made this post:
Therefore, I wonder if Ichigo is Taketsi and makaikhaan is trying to get revenge by getting us to lynch him.Quote:
Lynch Ichigo.
First he stayed in the shadows at the beginning, not lodging his usual vote:sasaki. Then, he starts acting overtly analytical and helpful. His behavior's off, I say take him out.
I want to know what the rest of you think of this theory.
Since The Stranger is seeming to be having OOC real life issues with time, he is no longer my number one suspect. But with this new information, Ichigo has now moved into that spot.
vote: Ichigo
@ The Stranger: I'm satisfied for now, my FOS shall be removed.
For now Vote:Abstain
In addition, I believe that PK has a point about MakaiKhaan's death.
Edit: Upon rereading Andres' update, this could be the case. As, afaik, there is only the three 'mafia' characters, it makes sense to be one of them killing another. With regard to Khaan's comment though PK, I don't believe that that is the case. ie: I think Khaan is just giving his opion.
This isn't true.Quote:
Originally Posted by Tratorix
Two mafia groups and one kill. If I was the prostitute and had blocked someone I would wonder if I had stopped a kill and if that meant my target was guilty. It's possible the prostitute would have revealed themselves to make that accusation. It was best to avoid that as we would have lost a pro town role.Quote:
Also, Sasaki, why did you reveal that you were blocked by the prostitute? I can't really see the reasoning for this and would like it if you could enlighten me.
PKev, you have a decent theory but I see a problem with it. I don't believe there is any way that makaikhaan could have known who Taketsi was.
I admit it is a big hole. But if makaikhaan is indeed mafia, why would he be trying to get us to lynch Ichigo? I guess it could be because he's just trying to help his Carelli buddy. Or my hunch could be right and it could be for revenge. Perhaps Andres gave a clue in his night response PM to makaikhaan.Quote:
Originally Posted by woad&fangs
Of course, the person who killed khaan could be the strange black cloak figure. We have no idea what that person's motivations are.
Or, there could be a role out there that we know nothing about. A serial killer perhaps?
It could be the black-cloaked figure I suppose but I'd then be confused by the family reference.
Maybe it was a bit of an exageration, but I still find it odd that you both seem to have posted that you believe the other to be innocent( at least on first impressions) while you were at each others throats for most of Capo.Quote:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tratorix
I'm finding it a bit odd that Glenn and Sasaki seem to be so chummy. They both seem to believe each other innocent based on nothing, now their ganging up on Ichigo.
This isn't true.
Actually, no. I'm sure you're right, but I don't recall what Glenn did in Netherworld. All I can remember of him is from Capo II, where he threw around accusations like buckshot, most of which ended up being completely off the mark. This feels similar to his behavior in Capo II, where Glenn had a special role. However, I really do not have enough game time to make judgments based on peoples usual behavior. At this point, I'm frankly not buying any argument against any of the potential lynchees. I feel like the mafia are just sitting back and letting us rip into each other. I think they'll join in as bandwagons, so I will wait and see who that turns out to be.Quote:
Originally Posted by Sasaki Kojiro
I was new in Capo, nobody understood my writing style or why I sometimes made stupid conclusions due to how I often have to rush through my statements.
I am trying to remedy this, and this game I think I am more sensible in my reasoning.
I am reading through everyone's post history, especially TC's.
One thing I can note, but can not as yet analyse - is that apart from Ichigo's self-defense - every attack, or vote made by him have absolutely no sensible reason behind them.
An example is how he voted for 00Jebus because he voted randomly on the first round for Ichigo. Strange?
Another example is how he then linked 00Jebus to me because we voted for Ichigo at the same time, I can say honestly this was coincedental - look at the posting times and you will see I was writing my message when 00Jebus was voting.
It seems to be an under-the-radar case of simple retaliation, the kind of thing one would expect from pevergreen.
But I'm not voting again yet - I want to stand back for a moment while all these posters come in with their theories.
TC I was not in Netherworld, I was absent from the forums.
It's too bad townies only have teh Lynch for a weapon. If we could form vig teams, it'd give us something to do while we wait for detective results to get revealed, if they ever do.
Ok, so from what you guys are saying, "strange" indicates two things, the different or the unknown. So either the black-cloak guy or Taketsi.
The family reference could be: Taketsi killing the Carelli, the black cloak guy killing the Carelli or Taketsi, or the Carelli killing the Taketsi.
Now, 'khaan's reply to the "family" quip was, "Huh?". Maybe Taketsi, attacked the wrong person? I would have thought that if any of the Mafioso roles attacked each other there would have been a fight, or at least more resistance that 'khaan put up.
I think I need to make it more clear that my vote towards Ichigo is because I think he is acting suspicious and defensive. It's not just because khaan made a comment.
Perhaps Ichigo is not mafia. But I believe he is being defensive for some reason. Maybe some lynch votes will convince him to come clean with us.
I still suspect that khaan is mafia but that could be quite separate from Ichigo. Khaan commenting on Ichigo could just be him giving his opinion like Gaius said.
I was referring to capo.Quote:
Originally Posted by TinCow
As for mafia sitting back, this is often cited. But you certainly wouldn't expect me to sit back as mafia--it's really dependent on the person, usually the have to maintain their style. And even if they wanted to sit back, they don't always have that choice. It's also really simple to not join a bandwagon and I doubt that they will be found by that.
:no:
The reason I have removed my vote of Ichigo is because I believe he is being defensive for the reason that he is on the short list for being lynched.
Really, we all have a right to defend ourselves, especially when a bandwagon forms against us - well-reasoned or not.
We would all be defensive in Ichigo's case, so that is by far not enough to kill him.
That is why I am looking for foolish or disregarding behaviour which is not signature of his playing style.
Can anyone here give a testimony of Ichigo's playing style, and the differences he is making from his norm?
More than one would be good.
I get the feeling that khaan's killer knew him or knew of him. Where khaan did not seem to know his killer.Quote:
Originally Posted by Rythmic
Taketsi can investigate people to find out if they are Carellis. Therefore, I think he would only kill a Carelli if he investigated him first. And if Taketsi is just killing random townies, I don't think he would make the comment about "family". Also, Taketsi is famous for being "cruel". Stringing the guy up and letting him hang for a bit before dropping him sounds cruel to me.
Since the Carelli's can't investigate, I don't think they would target Taketsi directly. If they hit him, it would just be because they assumed he's another townie. So I don't see them saying the "family" comment.
As for the black cloak guy, we don't know anything about him so we have no was of knowing if this was him.
Because of all of this, I believe that the killer was Taketsi and was acting on an investigation he did the night before.
It is just a guess but it's the best I got right now.
No, I wouldn't expect you to sit back, but you're at the bottom of my list of suspects at the moment. Contrary to some of the others, I very much approved of you posting about the prostitute PM you received. It was a pro-town thing to do, and it's a big positive in your favor now that Andres has confirmed that he is sending those PMs.Quote:
Originally Posted by Sasaki Kojiro
I wouldn't sit back either, but I just don't get enough of a mafia vibe from any of the major posters at this point. At this point in the game, I'm just trying to avoid lynching townies while I wait for the pro-town roles to do their jobs.
Well, at the risk of looking like a fabricating criminal - and at the risk of someone drawing lines between me and Sasaki once more - I quote the PM I received from Andres last night..
"Night 2 - a sweet night
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
You were alone in your room, reading an old newspaper.
The smell of perfume caught your attention.
A voice, the sound of an angel, said to you: "Hi honey, shall I make your night a bit more interesting?"
Angelica came near. She was H-O-T.
You begged her to shave off all your body hair. You also begged her not to give you electro shocks, secretly hoping that she would ignore that last request.
A night without body hair and electro shocks going through your nostrils was all you ever dreamt of.
Andres."
------------------------
I am not proud of the fantasies he discovered for me!
Wait a moment - when did Andres post that he was looking forward to what he could write up as my fantasies?
If he wrote that at night - it could well be proof that I am innocent!
In any case - those of you who assume this quote as truth - will know that I cannot possibly have taken part in the three maximum killings.
There is a prostitute out there who can prove that, though I don't expect them to come forth yet - they can prove I am innocent.
Just to clarify the 'family' comment was:
The Carellis would have no idea what Taketsi was on about as I think they are merely lackeys in the power structure of their family. On the other hand Taketsi knows exactly what hes doing in Taormina, removing a threat to the prestige of his family.Quote:
Originally Posted by Andres
Also, as mentioned, the Carellis have no way of investigating to find Taketsi, all they can do is kill everyone... right?
On the evidence we have it would seem that MaKaiKhann was a Carelli. However apart from confirming that one possible killer is down, how does this help?
Well, we need to keep this in mind when Khaan comments. After his death, he posted a very strong post against Ichigo telling us to lynch him.Quote:
Originally Posted by Gaius Scribonius Curio
This could be for a few reasons.
1.) Ichigo could have been the yakuza and Khaan was getting revenge.
2.) Khaan is just helping his Carelli buddy by throwing suspicion on a townie.
3.) It could mean nothing and khaan just could have been a townie.
I'm leaning towards 2 without discounting 1. But I do think Ichigo is hiding something. He has been lurking for almost an hour since I first posted my vote. And he is online and reading this thread right now.
For all this speculation on who was what in the killing;
It all depends on one thing.
That the Mafia and the Assassin and all the bad guys knew exactly who was who and took to each other with amazing skill very early in the game.
I doubt very much everything will occur so neatly for them.
In the same way nobody takes all their evidence from the reasonings of another player - nobody should take all their evidence from the host's reports either.
Alright, that makes sense, Taketsi killed a Carelli. Thanks for clearing that up for me.Quote:
Originally Posted by Privateerkev
I must say, I don't envy the detective. Seems like a tough job.Quote:
Originally Posted by KukriKhan
I love how highly you think of me.Quote:
Originally Posted by Glenn
I vote OMGUS votes early, as I have nothing to go on.
Continual *****ing about me will just make me vote you again and again or just quit mafia.
:bow:
Not all of them. For my theory on Taketsi killing a Carelli to be correct, just requires one thing. And that is for Taketsi to have investigated Khaan in Night 1. Maybe something Khaan said tipped him off. Maybe he got lucky. Maybe he is a veteran who knows Khaan is a veteran. Either way, if he did investigate Khaan, and found out he was a Carelli, it would make sense to whack him as soon a possible. Taketsi wouldn't want the Carelli's taking him out by accident by assuming he is just another townie. Plus he has to kill the Carelli's for his victory requirement. Of course he could just leave Carelli's alive so they kill more of us for him. But that still risks them killing him by accident.Quote:
Originally Posted by Glenn
No, it means I think you're trying to fabricate an air of innocence to make yourself seem innocent.Quote:
Originally Posted by Glenn
Yet again I ask you what posts you're referring too.Quote:
Your post count has been down in general in recent games (capo etc). Your posts this game have an air of someone trying avoid a negative reaction. It is easy for mafia to make a pro-town appearance by pointing out mistakes in one of glenn's posts. Everyone makes mistakes, pointing them out is easy. Actual analysis is much harder to fake.
I did not point out mistakes in Glenn's posts, I asked him questions.
As to your theory PK I cannot disprove what you say. I can only say I am not a killer.
Of course, but with a great many players, and not alot of posts from Khaan, it would still require alot of luck.
But let's not speculate on this too much, or we will be accused of WIFOM.
PK, have we in your opinion enough evidence to lynch Ichigo?
I believe you.Quote:
Originally Posted by Ichigo
unvote Ichigo; vote Abstain
I still think Khaan is mafia. But I think he is trying to get us to lynch Ichigo to cover his comrade.
I voted to get you talking. And to start conversation on my theory. I still don't know what is going on but I am convinced for now you are not Mafia.
vote: Glenn
Because frankly I don't like the cut of his jib.
CR
Vote: Glenn
Never trust anyone when they say that, everyone will always say that.
With one or two exceptions.
Is Glenn the next verbose player that is going to get band-wagoned on?
I have seen nothing in his posts that lead me to believe he is mafia.
Unvote: Sigurd; Vote: Crazed Rabbit
Both Carellis and Taketsi were active last night. Glenn was blocked by the prostitute(unless he has the IQ of a chickpea and felt the need to fabricate an alibi that is ridiculously easy to disprove). So, annoying as Glenn may be, he is innocent and it is silly to vote for innocents.
And O my :daisy: :daisy: :daisy: I'm internally narrating everything I think or read in the voice of Yahtzee the game reviewer. :freak:
Ichigo, what is the difference between someone with an air of innocence and someone with a fabricated air of innocence.
When the latter has innocence fabricated by his nature, and the one has his nature fabricated by innocence?
And quite frankly sir, your reasoning is non-existent. W&F, raises an excellent point, atm Glenn is innocent. Do you have proof to the contrary?Quote:
Originally Posted by Crazed Rabbit
FOS: Crazed Rabbit
CR's posting history:
Spoiler Alert, click show to read:
Spoiler Alert, click show to read:
Spoiler Alert, click show to read:
Spoiler Alert, click show to read:
Your acting suspicious...
vote: Crazed Rabbit
Fabricate-To concoct in order to deceiveQuote:
Originally Posted by Glenn
I'm convinced.
Vote: Crazed Rabbit
I await your defence with interest.
Can't say I didn't see this coming...
Okay, it's simple - I would never post like this if I was guilty. It's not WIFOM because what I've done can only really make me look guilty; it can only increase (significantly) the chance of myself being lynched. I win often when I am mafia, because I don't do this sort of stuff. Even making this argument that no mafioso would post these things does not make this WIFOM - I am still much more likely to get lynched than if I hadn't written those oddball posts (I'd estimate 1/3 to 1/2 chance of me getting lynched this round, but that might be lowballing it. If I hadn't put that last post up I would be nearly completely safe).
CR
PS- What's funny is everyone ignoring pever's quick (11 minute) bandwagon on my obviously without substance vote on Glenn.
Unvote: CR; Vote: Curio
You're third on a fairly weak bandwagon. Could you please explain what has caused you to change your opinion of CR?
??!
What kind of defense was that CR?!
That was terrible, I have respect for you as a Mafia player!
Pevergreen was ignored because he is like those little fish that scavenge off the backs of Whales, and in this case, Bandwagons.
There is substantial evidence conclusive enough that suspicion should at least be raised against CrazedRabbit, especially considering everyone was happy to kill off Ichigo for far less.
FOS: W&F and CrazedRabbit
Vote: Omanes Alexandrapolites
A player whom seems to be involved thoroughly in most games, and is extremely good at playing the criminal - I have a nasty vibe coming from him - and instead of leaping on all the bandwagons that come my way, I would prefer to seek out those who deserve attention.
Tut tut, my suspicion of CR, whilst it hasn't been announced in thread has been persisting for a while, and while I was searching the forum for CR's previous posts, looks like PK beat me to it. Theres no point in posting the same (albeit fairly weak) evidence twice. If you'll turn your attention to the thread, I had an FOS on him before I went of searching. What's this third on a bandwagon thing anyway (I'm new).
Edit: In other words, I was trying to put pressure on CR to explain himself. As of yet I'm still not satisfied, so my vote shall remain. Honestly,
I don't buy it... I'm sorry.Quote:
Originally Posted by Crazed Rabbit... or the jist of it anyway
So CR, is there an explanation for your posting history then? Or is just strictly to not get lynched?
I don't know how you post in other games. But, when I made my vote, you had made only 4 short posts since the game started. Two of those were votes for little reason. Or at a least poorly explained reason. Hence, my suspicion.Quote:
Originally Posted by Crazed Rabbit
As for pever, there seems to be some OOC tension between the two of them. I didn't want to make it worse. I hope that we can all ~:grouphug:
It's just a game. :yes:
The third is guilty.Quote:
Originally Posted by Gaius Scribonius Curio
CR hasn't done anything incriminating in my book.
Thanks for the enlightenment!Quote:
Originally Posted by Caius
On what pretext?
I want to explain further my vote on OA, so that it is neither ignored or taken as my wish for him to die.
I have no evidence linking him to guilt, however Omanes, when I PMed him asking advice and his opinion on players in the thread, responded in a manner that I found disjointed.
What I am saying is he is either not interested in this game, or he is lurking.
And in every game Omanes lurks within, he is a Mafioso, when he plays a townie he always comes forth with large analysis and opinions.
He is too good a player to do otherwise, and I think more attention should be paid to Omanes and the other lurkers like him.
FOS: Omanes Alexandrapolites
Unvote: Omanes Alexandrapolites Vote: CrazedRabbit
It is doubtful I will change my vote again, especially if things remain as they are and no great events occur.
(Where have all the tallies gone... long time.. ago?
This has been going on since Glenn started playing mafia. No idea how or why it started, but they've been at each other's throats ever since.Quote:
Originally Posted by Privateerkev
Nothing I'm aware of.Quote:
Originally Posted by Privateerkev
vote tally:
Crazed Rabbit: 4 (00jebus, Glenn, Privateerkev, Gaius Scribonius Curio)
Ichigo: 2 (Sasaki, {BHC}AntiWarmanCake88)
Glenn: 2 (Crazed Rabbit, pevergreen)
Gaius Scribonius Curio: 1 (woad&fangs)
00jebus: 1 (Ichigo)
Abstain: BananaBob
Someone please double check this. There have been a lot of vote changes. :dizzy2:
Well from my experience, this is how CR often plays.
Really what's the point of the wagon on CR? Seems to have sprung out of nowhere. You guys should switch to Ichigo.
:daisy: Large mistake.
Correction pending.
Why?Quote:
Originally Posted by Sasaki Kojiro
Actually, 00jebus's vote on CR this turn was one of the first votes since the summary post was put up. It quickly got buried and then we voted for CR later partly because of his vote on you.Quote:
Originally Posted by Glenn
FoS: Ichigo
I was just a simple townie, with nothing to hide. I have been given no PM by Andres with any kind of information about my death. I think Ichigo should by lynched because I genuinely think he's mafia and hiding something, and I'm gonna keep hounding him until this game is over or else he's proven innocent. His actions starting this game off were severely off character, in my opinion, as he does not generally try to be 'analytical' so early on, and being so 'helpful'. He's been more active than usual, even when you take out his defensive posts. He only voted Sasaki after I pointed out the fault in his posting style, indicating he did it purely to try and get me off his tail. Someone please investigate Ichigo tonight if he's not lynched here. If he's innocent, he'll have nothing to hide.
Because you ordinarily wouldn't even bother asking why.Quote:
Originally Posted by Ichigo