Oh yeah - I'd managed to blank that second more gruesome one.
:2thumbsup:
Printable View
Along with Lazy’s #2 above, Nightbringer was one of two players that added a second vote on someone on D1. When he made this vote it put Lazy in the lead for the kill he was, in essence, deciding who to kill on D1. Tuuvi was the other player that did this (tied it though), but he is dead now.
His votes have also been pretty light on any kind of real reason, and he goes out of his way to explain his vote on splitpersonality as a purely defensive move. It may well have been, but we get that. There really is no need to explain that you want to save yourself unless you feel you have to justify your voting for a known (to you anyway) innocent.
I'm a little late but yea I'm already dead. I would say it's suspicious that you're calling for my blood when I'm already dead, but since you've been lynched already, I don't know. :shrug: I'm kinda wondering if you were scum, and ATPG is your partner? But what do I know, this is my first mafia game and I have no clue what's going on :dizzy2:
Pizza's scum, but he's your partner! :stare:
Don't lynch Seon!
I like how the Mafia are killing off everyone I suspected was scum. Next on the list is...Askthepizzaguy.:book:
He needs to be lynched before the end if he is not killed.:evil:
If your not scum, your trying a little too hard to convince me otherwise.
Pizzaguy, do you know what the definition of paranoia is, because why should my comment matter to a mafia who is going out of his way to kill lynchbait?:bounce:
Vote: Arjos
Seon looks pretty guilty, but he's essentially lynched anyway, however this way if we're wrong and he's right I can act like I knew all along.
Writeups may not be that good, but I'm getting through em.
Split's writeup is now up. You can also access them from the opening post.
Tuuvi's writeup is now done.
Riedquat's is now done as well. I will do the other three later tonight.
The write-ups are horrible.
Day over. Orders in. The rest of the write ups will be done later tonight. Sleep tight. :evilgrin:
White_Eyes:D death is now up. 3 more to go. And Seon has been lynched.
Tally:
2 Arjos (Seon, Salmonsoil)
3 Seon (ATPG, Arjos, DaveShack
2 Nightbringer (LazyMcCrow, BSmith)
Alive 8/17:
1. SalmonSoil
2. LazyMcCrow
4. Arjos
7. Nightbringer
8. Jarrema
9. DaveShack
12. Askthepizzaguy
16. BSmith
Dead 8/17:
5. Monty: Lynched Day 1
15. Lewwyn: Killed Night 1
14. Splitpersonality: Lynched Day 2
10. Tuuvi: Killed Night 2
3. Riedquat: Lynched Day 3
13. White_Eyes:D: Killed Night 3
11. Kagemusha: Lynched Day 4
6. Atheotes: Killed Night 4
17. Seon: Lynched Day 5
What'd I tell you quackers? There was a psychiatrist, and you killed him.Quote:
The town did just that, and at the end of the day, the sheriff announced that Splitpersonality was the chosen lynch target, “Well, would you look at that, the psychiatrist is a murderer then. Alright then, get him.” Split, named so for his ability to get into the mind of any person in the town, was quickly grabbed and dragged onto the podium. Scrambling he tried to break free, but the deputy had him in his grip.
Not only that, but the Sheriff is clearly scum, a Serial Killer. He would have activated once you took out the scum team, but now he'll just win as shadow scum without killing anyone because there's no way you are getting the next (and last) three lynches all right.
GIVE IT UP, SHEEP. YOU CANT PROTECT YOURSELVES.
YOU ARE WEAK.
:no:
Let me ask you something, who prescribed to you the drugs you are using, the deceased psychiatrist or was me? I don't remember but eh, I don't remember being a doctor while alive either... anyway, if you could share a bit of that...
Call it morbid curiosity.
Who should we lynch, Monty mah boy?
And if you should be wrong, would you then be eating Crow?
*big fake laughter*
Sorry for my absence everyone. To make up for it, here is my grand achievement! A compilation of the voting histories for everyone's convenience, color coded to show who is still alive.
On an unrelated note, I find it interesting that ATPG has placed such emphasis on saying he has never lurkde as a mafia, while also emphasizing that he has only lurked because of extenuating circumstances.
I'm not claiming it is an act, but could he be using IRL circumstances to strengthen his claim to innocence by doing this?
Day 1:
Monty: 2 (ATPG, Tuuvi)
ATPG: 1 (split)
Nightbringer: 1 (Monty)
White Eyes: 1 (Lazy)
Lewwyn: 1 (Salmonsoil)
Split: 1 (Arjos)
Lazy: 2 (Bsmith, Nightbringer)
Atheotes: 1 (Riedquat)
Salmonsoil: 1 (Lewwyn)
Arjos: 1 (Jarrema)
Day 2:
Tally:
Kage: 1 (ATPG)
Seon: 2 (Lazy, edse)
Salmon: 2 (Daveshack, Split)
Split: 3 (Kagemusha, Jarema, Nightbringer)
Jarrema: 1 (Riedquat)
Atheotes: 1 (Arjos)
Nightbringer: 2 (BSmith, Atheotes)
ATPG: 1 (Tuuvi)
Daveshack: 1 (Salmon)
Day 3:
White_Eyes:D: 4 (edse, Arjos, atheotes, LazyMcCrow)
Riedquat: 4 (Seon, SalmonSoil, Jarema, White_Eyes:D)
Nightbringer: 1 (Riedquat)
atheotes: 1 (Nightbringer)
Day 4:
Nightbringer: 2 (LazyMcCrow, BSmith)
Kagemusha: 3 (Arjos, Seon, atheotos)
Day 5:
Tally:
Arjos: 2 (Seon, Salmonsoil)
Seon: 3 (ATPG, Arjos, DaveShack
Nightbringer: 2 (LazyMcCrow, BSmith)
Currently:
Alive 8/17:
1. SalmonSoil
2. LazyMcCrow
4. Arjos
7. Nightbringer
8. Jarrema
9. DaveShack
12. Askthepizzaguy
16. BSmith
Dead 8/17:
5. Monty: Lynched Day 1
15. Lewwyn: Killed Night 1
14. Splitpersonality: Lynched Day 2
10. Tuuvi: Killed Night 2
3. Riedquat: Lynched Day 3
13. White_Eyes:D: Killed Night 3
11. Kagemusha: Lynched Day 4
6. Atheotes: Killed Night 4
17. Seon: Lynched Day 5
Rhetorical question, or do you have an opinion on it yourself?
I've been posting more as my RL circumstances have made it possible to do so. I'm not sure what relevance it has as to my guilt or innocence. Activity due to RL does not affect what role I was randed, I agree with that much. But why is that your focus?
Am I or am I not guilty? State a position.
I don't feel I know how you normally act well enough to judge, it just seems odd (meaning guilty) to me that you are going through so much effort to explain your absence. Following this by stating that you are always active as mafia makes ti seem to me like you might be using your RL absence to alleviate suspicion that you are mafia. Why else go through so much work when there wasn't much pressure on you?
Basically, it feels like an overreaction to small pressure on you.
HE'S THE SHERIFF
Reading too much into my behavior. I always respond to direct inquiry or suspicion. I don't duck it and pretend I'm not here. It's also not a lot of work for someone like me. I've written more text than some well-known novels simply hosting games, and my walls-o-text are legendary. I haven't actually lifted more than a finger in this game.
It seems weird to me that you'd describe my behavior in this manner, when it doesn't begin to take into account who I am. A generic case made against someone who is hardly generic strikes me as sloppy.
To turn the line of inquiry around, you dropped off in activity and haven't done much actual scum-hunting, only to return for the middle-endgame with a case that doesn't make sense to me. There's just the slightest, faintest hint of poo in the air.
And what's with this "I find it interesting" stuff?
Good lord, man... townies should never phrase things this way. It gives me the creeps.
Well, I haven't played in quite a while, and never really played much, so I don't really know the intricacies of how you play. All I am doing is trying to point out things I see, and let players who are more competent see if there is anything of worth in it. That is why I phrased it as a question.
As to my drop off in activity, I forgot to come check over here when going on the .org. I got used to pms reminding me of things I forgot in hotseat games so once this game slipped my mind it took me a few days to remember.
:inquisitive:Quote:
Good lord, man... townies should never phrase things this way. It gives me the creeps.
Mafia can make all the blunders they like. :wink: