Mafia VI: Night of the Day of the Dawn of the Return of the Mafia [Concluded]

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Ichigo

Night doesn't happen until after someone is lynched.

---

Right I didn't know that ... strange night-day cyclus tho ~D

Quote:

---

Annoyance.
Hurts villagers.

People may give him props for pushing for my lynching in Mafia V, but also remember that it was Kommodus' recommendation over anything, and by the end, I could have survived that round but made the decision to die. Also remember that in that very game, he got detective Banquo's Ghost lynched, and fully believed me that I was detective...

*No offense Sasaki, but you are a divisive figure in these games.

---

Has saskii's not helped the town by at the very least drawing out Mafiosos who have been lurking and promoting discussion. Both which are good for the town. It is a fact that sasski's method lynches innocents as well as Mafiosos but that is the fact of the game. Still he does far more to help then damage.

Quote:

---

Seamus can't be guilty this game. I knew his behavior as a townie and as a Mafia. I vote Sasaki for the abovementioned reasons as well as the fact that I never got to punishing him for being Perma-Listed...

---

Can you say that for certain? Isn't it a little early to tell his behavior after only one round?

For a weak vote reason and the above.

Unvote: abstain
Vote: Reenk

Voting over.

I will now tally the votes.

The voting box drew quite a lot of traffic during the phase in which the villagers of the Frontroom were to choose the guilty party. This was not due to congestion (several people didn't bother to vote); no, this was due to people repeatedly going back up, shuffling through the box to find their vote, crossing the name out, and writing a new one on. Several people did this so many times they scrunched their vote in the corner in ridiculously miniscule writing. Obviously, this did not put the villagers in Chief of Police Beirut's good graces.

After an exhaustive tallying process (it took about an hour, and he was sinking in sweat once it was finished), Beirut finally read the results to the assembled crowd.

"Gentlemen," he began, "By a squeaker, you have sentenced HughTower to death by mummification."

A collective sigh of relief could be heard, but it was quickly drowned out by a scream of terror emanating from Hugh's general direction.

"No, no, please. I accept my fate, but PLEASE don't mummify me! That's inhumane!"

Beirut corrected him. "It's not inhumane, it's justice. Now be quiet and accept your fate." He turned and addressed the crowd. "Hey guys, what step of mummification do you want to see first? I'm not particularly choosy."

"The BRAINS! The BRAINS!" The crowd's preference was clear.

"Very well. I shall now remove Hugh's brains from his nose." Beirut took out a long, silver instrument and held it up for all to see. The crowd cheered. Hugh fainted and would have hit the ground had he not been lying on an operating table (for that was the only word for it).

This was most likely a blessing as he was not awake to witness the breaking of his nose and the Frontroom's Chief of Police shoving that long silver instrument up it. Thankfully, he had long departed the world when the other steps were taken.

Once the process was completed, Beirut sent the villagers home with a few words.

"Remember mafia, there's more of this sort of thing to come if you continue your killing spree. Hopefully we have gotten one of you already."

Here is the vote summary for Round 1:
HughTower: 5 (Sigurd Fafnesbane, Kagemusha, Xiahou, Seamus Fermanagh, Ichigo) :skull:
Sasaki Kojiro: 4 (Redleg, Stig, sapi, Reenk Roink)
Sigurd Fafnesbane: 3 (HughTower, Orb, AndresTheCunning)
Reenk Roink: 3 (discovery1, Destroyer of Hope, Pannonian)
pevergreen: 3 (ByzantineKnight, Sir Moody, Caius Flaminius)
Redleg: 1 (Crazed Rabbit)
AndresTheCunning: 1 (Kommodus)
Orb: 1 (Sasaki Kojiro)

Abstain: 6 (Zalmoxis, Dutch_guy, CountArach, Rythmic, ChuggTheSquirrel, pevergreen)
Didn't vote: 6 (Fenring, Lord Motep of Kendermore, Sir Boo, JimBob, Ignoramus, Warluster)

~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Still alive: (32)
Kagemusha
Sasaki Kojiro
discovery1
Xiahou
Stig
Fenring
Lord Motep of Kendermore
Sir Boo
Ichigo
Pannonian
Crazed Rabbit
Redleg
Reenk Roink
JimBob
pevergreen
Ignoramus
CountArach
Rythmic
ByzantineKnight
Warluster
AndresTheCunning
sapi
Sigurd Fafnesbane
Sir Moody
Seamus Fermanagh
Dutch_guy
Caius Flaminius
Orb
Destroyer of Hope
Zalmoxis
ChuggtheSquirrel
Kommodus

Killed:
UltraWar
Omanes Alexandrapolites the Idiot

Executed:
HughTower

~~~~~~~~~~~~

ANNOUNCEMENT: Please keep track of your own votes. I.E. when you unvote, actually put the person's name who you are unvoting down. I've noticed that this has become somewhat of a trend, but I don't like it.

PMs please.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Kommodus

Pevegreen and Reenk Roink are suspicious because of the way they've attacked Sasaki in spite of the proven results his methods produce. Pevergreen hasn't known Sasaki as long, so I guess this isn't quite as relevant for him.

---

I'm going to have to disagree with you. If I suspect and interrogate 16 of the 32 people in the game, I'm bound to get a Mafia. Sasaki Kojiro's methods do more harm than good. I already gave one anecdote of Mafia V. Should I bring up more?

This point's also addressed to you Destroyer of Hope. You called my vote reason weak, but the person you defend (Sasaki Kojiro) actually gives much weaker arguments. My argument goes on what I've seen Seamus Fermanagh do as both Mafia and townie. I only have one round of evidence because there has only been one round. I'm afraid you'll be Listed next round. You voted for me and are guilty of what you accuse me of. Suspicious. We'll have to put Sasaki Kojiro to the backburner right now and ignore his comments.

*checks in from the Charlotte airport*

Almost home. Anyway,

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Reenk Roink

I'm going to have to disagree with you. If I suspect and interrogate 16 of the 32 people in the game, I'm bound to get a Mafia. Sasaki Kojiro's methods do more harm than good. I already gave one anecdote of Mafia V. Should I bring up more?

---

Well, I guess it's all a matter of judgement and preference. I know Sasaki gets a lot of innocent people lynched; heck, he's gotten me lynched at least once as an innocent. And it's true that some people take more offense to his behavior than others. However, it's my judgement that his methods are still quite successful in exposing mafia. You've got your way of looking at it, and I've got mine.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by AndresTheCunning

This smells like meatballing too. But at least you are not jumping on a bandwagon. I would like you to elaborate a bit though.

---

It was various little things... the time at which you chose to jump in... the length of your first post... the person you chose to go after... your refutation of Rhythmic's assertion. When you've played a bunch of these games, I think you sort of develop a sense about how mafia tend to behave. Like I said, I'm probably wrong; I'd rather have concrete analysis to go by, but I don't have that yet.

Who Posted?
Total Posts: 156
User Name Posts
GeneralHankerchief 14
Sasaki Kojiro 14
Ichigo 10
HughTower 9
Stig 9
Pannonian 8
discovery1 6
Seamus Fermanagh 6
pevergreen 6
Reenk Roink 6
AndresTheCunning 5
Sigurd Fafnesbane 4
Redleg 4
Dutch_guy 4
Xiahou 4
Kagemusha 4
Rythmic 4
Sir Moody 3
Destroyer of Hope 3
Omanes Alexandrapolites the Idiot 3
Caius Flaminius 3
Kommodus 3
Zalmoxis 2
Orb 2
UltraWar 2
ByzantineKnight 2
sapi 2
Don Corleone 2
Crazed Rabbit 2
CountArach 2
ChuggtheSquirrel 2
Ignoramus 1
Warluster 1
Lord Motep of Kendermore 1
JimBob 1
Sir Boo 1
Fenring 1

this can help us.

I think its still too early to draw opinions from that. Maybe later in the game?

err how can that help us exactly Caius? Are you just trying to appear helpful?

@Reenk: don't make a fuss over discussion comments. For example, the above comment directed towards Caius is not an accusation, it's a simple question. He answers, and this helps us get a read on him. I suspect you're just trying to not appear inconsistant with your loki character however.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by GeneralHankerchief

"Gentlemen," he began, "By a squeaker, you have sentenced HughTower to death by mummification."

---

Thats scary! Remind me to never go near you with the "long silver thing"!!

I think he'd rather be killed, then mummified, but seeing as he didn't have a choice, do it in style, huh? :laugh4:

Quote:

---

This point's also addressed to you Destroyer of Hope. You called my vote reason weak, but the person you defend (Sasaki Kojiro) actually gives much weaker arguments. My argument goes on what I've seen Seamus Fermanagh do as both Mafia and townie. I only have one round of evidence because there has only been one round. I'm afraid you'll be Listed next round. You voted for me and are guilty of what you accuse me of. Suspicious. We'll have to put Sasaki Kojiro to the backburner right now and ignore his comments.

---

Your reason for voting for Sasaki was that he is a bad townie, not suspious. Such a vote to lynch a bad townie is a waste as it gives us one last chance at lynching a mafiosto. At the very least you are hurting the town, at the worst you are trying to get rid of a valuable player. And such is at the very least a warrent for a vote.

Now who wants to play 'guess the soon to be dead townie'?

Is this some kind of trick? :inquisitive:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Zalmoxis

Is this some kind of trick? :inquisitive:

---

hehehehehe

http://photos-680.ak.facebook.com/ip...07680_4396.jpg

General:

Please wog disco for that screenie violation.

Somewhere, somehow that MUST be a violation....warning points....something...







:wiseguy:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Seamus Fermanagh

General:

Please wog disco for that screenie violation.

Somewhere, somehow that MUST be a violation....warning points....something...

---

Lol!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by discovery1

Now who wants to play 'guess the soon to be dead townie'?

---

Is this a Tell?

Should we vote for your lynch in the next round?

Add that with the attempt to blind us with that screen shot - my eyes still hurt everytime I see it.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by discovery1

http://photos-680.ak.facebook.com/ip...07680_4396.jpg

---

Gah, those new smileys are ugly...

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by AndresTheCunning

Gah, those new smileys are ugly...

---

:laugh4: :laugh4: :laugh4: :laugh4:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Seamus Fermanagh

General:

Please wog disco for that screenie violation.

Somewhere, somehow that MUST be a violation....warning points....something...







:wiseguy:

---

HAHAHA! Great one Seamus! :laugh3:

God preserve me! Oh, somebody just did.....

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Ichigo

Unvote:whoever
Vote:HughTower

---

Everyone else gave a reason. Why didn't you? Cat got your tongue?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by HughTower

God preserve me! Oh, somebody just did.....

---

:laugh4:

I might just reduce the font size in my sig to fit that one in.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by HughTower

God preserve me! Oh, somebody just did.....



Everyone else gave a reason. Why didn't you? Cat got your tongue?

---

HughT:

It wasn't just you. Ichi flashed his vote around repeatedly -- as in at least 4 changes -- adding it to whoever seemed to have a few votes piling up...except Sasaki, who he did not vote for following his traditional opener.

GH - :bow:

Ichigo - Why are you flashing your vote around?

Challenge: Disco
:bounce:

:laugh4:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by HughTower

GH - :bow:

Ichigo - Why are you flashing your vote around?

---

Is there some kind of rule that I can't? I voted you cause you seemed guilty. The fact that you went after Sigurd for something so trival as whether bulls are colorblind or not, seems just pointless. You made a big deal out of nothing it seemed like you were insulted, who would get that crazy over something so stupid?:no:

Oops.

Real life today has been hectic, I forgot to put the kills up. They'll be up in the morning EST.

Apologies, completely my fault.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Ichigo

Is there some kind of rule that I can't?

---

You've been playing Mafia for longer than I - you tell me.

• You changed a vote without giving a reason to the candidate who was most likely to be lynched (aka bandwagonning).
• You have consistently added to your vote in the last voting round to whoever looked most likely to be lynched at any one time.
• You act as if your sole objective is that someone dies in the lynching round.
• This mirrors the Mafia objectives.
• This is also a logic you'd be familar with.

Why?:juggle2: