More information from the conversation.Quote:
Originally Posted by Andres
It wasnt finished at that point, I still dont think it is now.
Enjoy your pm's :bow:
Printable View
More information from the conversation.Quote:
Originally Posted by Andres
It wasnt finished at that point, I still dont think it is now.
Enjoy your pm's :bow:
Because it's interesting to see who the mafia hit tonight. Also, a lot of people havn't voted yet....things can still change
Whacking me night 1? Not very nice W&F.Quote:
Originally Posted by Woad&Fangs
Glen PM conversation:
4 hours later:Quote:
Originally Posted by pevergreen
Quote:
Originally Posted by pevergreen
Thats part of it.
People are very afraid to commit. heheheh
You've got mail ~;)Quote:
Originally Posted by Moros
I got exactly 1 (one) pm from you in which you proposed to become the town's coordination center.Quote:
Originally Posted by pevergreen
Now, pevergreen, if you are going to be our coordination center, then you'll have all the valuable information. Tell me, why should we trust you and give you such an important position?
Why not waiting until somebody gets killed by the mafia or succesfully protected, because at that stage we will have a confirmed innocent.
Right now, you might as well be mafia scum who is going to get alot of important information.
I don't trust you pevergreen. Sorry. I prefer to wait until we have a or a few confirmed innocent players. Until then, you won't get anything from me.
A doctor who is going to kill another player?Quote:
Originally Posted by pevergreen
Assuming this pm quoted by pevergreen is genuine (isn't it woad&fangs insead of Woad&Fangs?), I would like to know, woad&fangs, why would you want to kill pevergreen? How can you possibly be sure of his guilt?
A vigilante killing random players is as dangerous as a mafioso...
Would you like who that was sent to Andres?
I left it out originally.
God knows how I'm going to keep up with this game. I'm at college atm and it's pretty rare that I have the opportunity to check the .Org while I'm here.
Anyway, I don't have very long but I'd like to say that I think forming these vigilante groups is dangerous at this stage. I've already been approached twice and asked to put my trust in a group of unknowns(their names would not be revealed until my participation was definite). As I understand it, if one group member backs out, there's a chance the others could die. Seems a bit risky to me, especially when the target is fairly likely to be innocent anyway. Therefore, I won't be joining any vigilante groups in this night phase and I think the people forming them right now are suspicious.
Thats a good call indeed Andres, it should be indeed woad&fangs with no capital letters. What do you have to say in this little thing pevergreen?Now that i remember, did we had certain roles in Capo I, who´s main job was to try and kill the other, maybe woad and pevergreen are these roles?Quote:
Originally Posted by Andres
Is it allowed to quote pm's then? I guess I misread the rules. Anyway I replied Andres.
Got pm's from pevergreen and Glenn too. Some guys are putting a lot of time in this it seems.
I copy pasted from a pm into word. The QUOTE tags around W&F's post are manual.
If it should be woad&fangs, my mistake. I automatically put Woad&Fangs.
I got pounded for this in Capo 1. It was manual, therefore, not perfect.
And you were mafia in that game ~;)Quote:
Originally Posted by pevergreen
Tsk, tsk, tsk...
From the rules, "Rules Pertaining to Gameplay by dead players, Screenies, etc.".
Clearly implying living players can quote PMs. Also, from the code of ethics.Quote:
Originally Posted by Seamus
Living players can quote PMs, dead players can only quote PMs that are already public, screenshots are a no-no for everyone.Quote:
Originally Posted by Seamus
Meh. If you got pounded for it, then why do it again? I know I did that with CTDC I and got lynched or almost (not sure anymore) because of it. While I was detective. However since I would never do the quote manually again, so would any sane person...
yeah I noticed when I checked them. Thanks anyway!:egypt:Quote:
Originally Posted by Pannonian
It seems that in pevergreen, we have found our first real scum.:whip:
I'd still like to hear from woad&fangs though...
w&f, is pevergreen lying or not?
BTW w&f, it's in your interest to tell the truth, wether the claims are true or false.
Does anyone have a tally of the current vote? I've lost track.
Pevergreen might have or might not have changed the pm, but I don't think someone would make this up for some kind of reason.
wtf...err...w&f please tell us. Being silent pobably will only make you a possible lynch.
I'm curious as to what woad&fangs has against pevergreen, although I'm not entirely sure I can trust pevergreen either - I'm weary of the true intentions of players who seem willing to form up vigilante/protection groups so early on in the game. Going on a recent PM of his, pevergreen is trying to do that exactly.
So, woad&fangs, why are you trying to kill pevergreen? As Andres has said, fanatically random vigilantes are helping the mafia more than the town. Also why are you trying to form a protection group at a time so early on in the game when distinguishing between the innocents and the guilty players is practically impossible.
The latter question I also pose to pevergreen, although I do have fewer doubts over his intentions, since I am sure that he sent the PM to more than a few people (if he was mafia, this would make manipulation very difficult).
I'm not being silent. I've been asleep. I didn't check to see that they were word for word 100% accurate but the gist of it looked correct. As I've explained to several of the people I contacted, I have a personal grudge against Pevergreen and I wanted to deal with that. No strategy, just me wanting to kill him in the game. I guess that that plan is out the window now.
I didn't receive any from Glenn... any thoughts as to why, moros? suspiciouss..Quote:
Got pm's from pevergreen and Glenn too. Some guys are putting a lot of time in this it seems.
not as suspicious as woad&f though.. a personal grudge? give me a break :P:dizzy2:
intresting!!:book:
Anyone else you hold a grudge against? If so, you might be as dangerous for the town as any other mafioso...Quote:
Originally Posted by woad&fangs
W&F what if pever was a doctor or a detective... then you just wouldve rid the town of a valuable person just because you are mad... control your self man...
Please, don't spam. Thnx in advance - Andres
this game is tooooo slow...
Bruh? :dizzy2:Quote:
Originally Posted by Andres
Have you forgotten that there are five families??!?!
In this game, death means nothing. At least, not until Seamus reveals the roles several days later, and by that time the issue will most likely be moot.
5!!!???!!???!?!?! families...
omg... this asks for a drastical different approach... i wonder how many wolfs are there... SASAKI!!! HOWL IN THE WIND MY FRIEND... I'm coming to get some WOLFS!!!!!!!! lads lock and load...
It's cool though, our enemies might kill each other. That would certainly help.
It's quite difficult though, so much things that can happen, and nothing you seem to know is really true.. hmm.. will be hard to pick a lynch.. :S
Quote:
Originally Posted by Andres
Quote:
Originally Posted by Glenn
Please... I know English is not our first language, but its pressure. Geez!!! :beam:Quote:
Originally Posted by Moros
hard... bet the reason will either be alphabetical or spamming... as usual...
Meh, at a certain stage we will have somebody who we can trust.Quote:
Originally Posted by GeneralHankerchief
A dead innocent can't quote a pm, but he/she can still tell us what information he/she has and can still somehow coordinate the town's actions.Quote:
Originally Posted by Seamus
It's safer to wait until we have somebody who can be trusted instead of pm'ing all our roles and night actions to an uncertain factor like pevergreen.