Abortion

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by RoadKill

You just had to point that out didn't you..

---

What, the age? I don't consider that an insult - just that you'd know that the sperm is, as of yet, not a human, and not capable of becoming one in it's current state and location. Therefore, not murder - though murdering someone who kicked you there might not be out of your mind. ~;)

@TuffStuff - I was thinking more along the lines of the rope scenario. Sorry if I came over a bit strongly saying kill, I was thinking more along the lines of allowing them to die (eg one at the bottom of the rope letting go).

I really don't know whether or not it would be right to allow several people to die, just because you didn't kill another.

Although the act of killing (at it again, I mean allow to die) in itself would probably make it wrong.

Maybe the only right thing to do would be to do a Bruce Willis and volunteer yourself to get left behind, or in this case let go?

But then you'd have to be at the bottom of the rope anway.:dizzy2:

Can I make it clear though that I wouldn't kill anyone who didn't want to be killed. I wouldn't stab and ice-pick into a mountaineer and eat his flesh in the starving scenario. Not just because its disgusting but because I would never do that if it wasn't agreed to. Nor would I stamp on his hand to make him let go of the rope.

I'd ask them if they were willing to let go of the rope. They let go in their own time (preferably before it snaps), and they choose to sacrifice themselves. If they couldn't summon the courage to let go, I wouldn't make them.

In the starving scenario, I wouldn't even considering deliberately letting anyone die, unless they absolutedly insisted on it. But then thats basically suicide. I would just share what food we have, since in this scenario its impossible to calculate what exactly is needed for each individual to survive.

This is hard work.:sweatdrop:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Caledonian Rhyfelwyr

I'd ask them if they were willing to let go of the rope.

---

I would also. If they refuse, try the icepick suggestion. ~;)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Caledonian Rhyfelwyr

@TuffStuff - I was thinking more along the lines of the rope scenario. Sorry if I came over a bit strongly saying kill, I was thinking more along the lines of allowing them to die (eg one at the bottom of the rope letting go).

I really don't know whether or not it would be right to allow several people to die, just because you didn't kill another.

Although the act of killing (at it again, I mean allow to die) in itself would probably make it wrong.

Maybe the only right thing to do would be to do a Bruce Willis and volunteer yourself to get left behind, or in this case let go?

But then you'd have to be at the bottom of the rope anway.:dizzy2:

Can I make it clear though that I wouldn't kill anyone who didn't want to be killed. I wouldn't stab and ice-pick into a mountaineer and eat his flesh in the starving scenario. Not just because its disgusting but because I would never do that if it wasn't agreed to. Nor would I stamp on his hand to make him let go of the rope.

I'd ask them if they were willing to let go of the rope. They let go in their own time (preferably before it snaps), and they choose to sacrifice themselves. If they couldn't summon the courage to let go, I wouldn't make them.

In the starving scenario, I wouldn't even considering deliberately letting anyone die, unless they absolutedly insisted on it. But then thats basically suicide. I would just share what food we have, since in this scenario its impossible to calculate what exactly is needed for each individual to survive.

This is hard work.:sweatdrop:

---

I would probably go through the same motions. I wouldn't be able to live with myself if I killed a man and could have traded spaces.

In my opinion if I was a women, I would not even consider abortion. You never know who will be coming out of your vagina, maybe Bill Gates, or even a Brad Pitt.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by RoadKill

In my opinion if I was a women, I would not even consider abortion. You never know who will be coming out of your vagina, maybe Bill Gates, or even a Brad Pitt.

---

If I were a woman, I'd rather have Brad Pitt going into my vagina if you ask me.
Bill Gates, on the other hand..

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Adrian II

Bill Gates, on the other hand..

---

I think that on this forum, you don't want to finish that sentence. :laugh4:

Spoiler Alert, click show to read: 

As if he hasn't screwed us enough with Vista. :no:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Evil_Maniac From Mars

I think that on this forum, you don't want to finish that sentence. :laugh4:

Spoiler Alert, click show to read: 

As if he hasn't screwed us enough with Vista. :no:

---

HHAHAHAHAHA!!! You guys crack me up.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Adrian II

If I were a woman, I'd rather have Brad Pitt going into my vagina if you ask me.

---

When I opened this thread this isn't even close to what I expected to read...

Or you could be giving birth to Hitler. How about that?

:laugh4:

If were a woman i would ask all you guys to shut up as it is noe of your business!!! :sweatdrop:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Furious Mental

Or you could be giving birth to Hitler. How about that?

---

Yah.. That would suck..

"HITLER!!! DO YOUR HOMEWORK!!!!"

"NO! SCREW YOU MOM!"

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Fragony

A child after 22 weeks, and don't click if you don't want to be as disgusted as I currently am. Really, why are we allowing this? There are so many people that would do everything to have a child but they have to use the extremily cynical trade that is the adoption (and organ) industry and all the victims it makes. I am not religious, come from the dutch biblebelt but it never clicked with me. But when something is right it is right and this is so very very wrong.

EDIT: We've been here before and it has been very clearly ruled that pictures of late term abortions are not suitable for this site. Picture removed. BG

That is not a foethes it's a baby.

---

Argeed. I mean, if you don't want a kid, Don't Have Sex or if you do, use condoms/birth control. If you don't want the kid, put it up for adoption. Is that that hard to do?? :juggle2: :shame: