Spoiler Alert, click show to read:
Printable View
Alright, time for some baseless speculation:
Will episode 9 be full of weddings? Edmure and Roslin, Tyrion and Sansa, Cersei and Loras, Joffrey and Margaery, Littlefinger and Lysa. We have a backlog, may as well get it all done at once!
Spoiler Alert, click show to read:
Talisa's pregnant.
Spoiler Alert, click show to read:
Spoiler Alert, click show to read:
According to the synopsis of the coming episodes;
Tyrion and Sansa will tie the knot in the next one.
Spoiler Alert, click show to read:
And the 9th episode is going to feature the Red wedding, most probably as the climatic scene.
As far as Littlefinger and Lysa are concerned.
Spoiler Alert, click show to read:
Good episode tonight, really enjoyed Tyrions spat with Joff and his dad- "and now my watch begins." Priceless.
Spoiler Alert, click show to read:
I dont know how Im going to wait for the next episode in 2 weeks.
Spoiler Alert, click show to read:
All the wedding and post wedding party scenes were good. Specially Olenna Tyrell figuring out the relations and Tywin talking to Tyrion about performance issues. :laugh:
Also this is probably the first time I actually found a scene with Samwell Tarly interesting.
Spoiler Alert, click show to read:
Well, that was intense.
...Damn...
Unfortunately I already knew due to accidentally seeing spoilers on a GoT world map. But, still R.R. Martin is a sadist. =(
Very graphic.
Spoiler Alert, click show to read:
And I was wrong. This is a lot worse than when Ned Stark loses his head.
And where the hell was Greatjon Umber!
Jesus Christ.
I'm gonna throw up
Pure win:
https://twitter.com/RedWeddingTears
What they don't get is that next weeks will be better. If it is what I think it is.
I'm not quite as sure anymore about whether they'll show that next week or not. I expected that to be the season-ender and a nice cliffhanger, but I saw nothing in the previews that looked like even one shot from the scene in question. It still seems like the logical point at which to end this season, but I expected to see at least one random shot in the preview of what should be a relatively long segment if that event is to actually occur next episode.
Just for those who didn't realise it at first... that song.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kmRWVZ5ny0I
That song was too fitting for the occasion.
It's too soon for Joffrey's wedding. I figured the Yunkai attack would be next week, but they handwaved that so I don't really know how they are going to end the season. I guess Jon Snow at Castle Black, Coldhands, plus some Lannister gloating and other filler. :shrug:
Michelle Fairley did a wonderful job as it all unravelled before her. Roose Bolton shows his true colors. Blackfish takes an oppurtune moment to urinate. Ygritte as a woman scorned. Rickon speaks!
It's going to be interesting to see how they handle the next two seasons.
Spoiler Alert, click show to read:
I have a feeling that they are going to abbreviate AFFC as it is quite boring, possibly integrate it with ADWD. Though GRRM better get to finishing book 6, he only has another 2-3 years before the show outpaces the books, and that would present a big problem.
For me this is proof that Catelyn is even more stupid.
Spoiler Alert, click show to read:
She's a noblewoman, not a ninja.
She could have tried.
It wouldn't have made any difference. She and Robb would still be dead, and Walder Frey has many sons.
Spoiler Alert, click show to read:
Rains of Castamere, now on the list of songs nobody wants to hear at a wedding. ~D
But Karstark would not have gone nuts, and Rob would still be alive.
This, for me, was where it fell off a cliff - I struggled on for two more books before I gave up, but it just got worse.
My major problem with GRRM is that although his characters do have depth he kills them off, or has them act against character, in service to his over-arching plot.
we're repeatedly told how wise Catelyn is, but she repeatedly acts like a munchkin on acid - even insanity doesn't cover some of her actions - and her relationship with Jon simply isn't credible.
Ned's fate in the first book is dramatic and fitting, even if it comes about because he acts against character, but the further in you go the more jarring the divide between character path and action becomes.
Spoiler Alert, click show to read:
Jaime was going to die the night Catelyn sent him off with Brienne, he had just killed Rickard's son in an escape attempt. Rickard was already nuts, having already lost 2(?) sons to the Kingslayer in the battle. The Karstarks would have killed him, and Robb would have had to have taken Rickard's head that much sooner. Robb was stuck either way, and Catelyn just wanted her daughters back alive.
Karstark said it best, "You lost the war the day you married her". With the Freys on their side, they would have had the manpower and free movement across the riverlands.
Would he? I think he would have just gone nuts on jamie instead of the two kids. Rob would have executed karstark for that just as easily so there'd be the same net result, just minus Jamie.
Personally I take a different tack, she is normally quite wise and this was so before the events of the books, but after brandons fall she starts going nuts and throughout the series she goes from: having enough wisdom to make the right decisions regularly, to: having enough to not go bug-splat insane.Quote:
we're repeatedly told how wise Catelyn is, but she repeatedly acts like a munchkin on acid - even insanity doesn't cover some of her actions - and her relationship with Jon simply isn't credible.
I half suspect a less wise person would have become a gibbering wreck after what she went through, that she became mistake prone actually makes me think she got off light.
Well, yeah, in moments of high emotion an stress people crack, when they crack they act out of character and/or make mistakes and in the game of thrones unless someone's covering for you those mistakes get you killed.Quote:
You could write that one example off as a single man cracking, but it is repeated over and over, and more crudely each time. By the time we get to Prince Oberon's death and Tyrian exile it's less character driving plot and more contrivance. Even Rob's death is a precise confluence of convenient circumstances that beggars even a devout man's belief in providence.
I've never ever seen so much rage directed at a TV show ever, half of the stuff on Twitter and Facebook is about Game of Thrones.
people have issues.
A slightly deranged man recently said, "If you thought this has a happy ending, you haven't been paying attention!" :yes:
Martin said that he was going to go somewhere without internet for a week after this episode.
Finally got around watching the episode and I hummed the rains with glee throughout the whole scene ^^
Btw people's reactions are priceless :P
Now I'm actually starting to think, that when the producers said they wanted to do the serie up to this point at least, they probably meant that in the aftermath the audience would just rage quit watching it XDDDDDD
Loved the last episode... didn't see that coming at all...
Incredible.
I happen to dissagree.
Rob lost the War when he listened to Catelyn and gave Bolton command of the Foot rather than the Greatjohn.
The Greatjon was loyal - Bolton was a known sado-massicist and frankly, it makes no sense that his family still hold the Dreadfort, given that one of his ancestors apparently flayed a Stark. Rob's instinct to give the command to the Greatjohn and keep Bolton with him was correct. The Foot was always going to lead, so what was required of them was a berserk charge and then a commander capable of holding them together afterwards through sheer force of will.
Remember, Bolton was undermining Rob long before the Red Wedding, wasting troops, ceding ground, overstretching.
Remember, Catelyn was also the one who agreed that, frankly, ludicrous bargain with the Freys. Walder Frey had no right to expect the KING to marry one of his daughters during a war, or to pledge to one. Either Catelyn herself, and Sansa, should have been apple inducement, or Edmure. Again, Catelyn's advice to take the deal was wrong. If Rob had refused and offered less, Frey would have taken it. Given their propensity to breed Walder Frey would have been able to calculate that being Uncle to the next King would have put his line more than close enough to the throne to seize it after the War.
It was also Catelyn who caused Jon to the be sent to the Watch, depriving Rob of a capable Herald and reliable bodyguard, even a titular Commander to replace Bolton.
The only instance where Catelyn was correct was regarding Theon, but even there a lack of her malign influence might have made Theon loyal enough to refuse his father - something he clearly did consider.
What was the alternative? The Freys had him over a barrel, and if Robb either kept it in his pants or just ditched Jeyne (or really, even kept her as a mistress) it would've been fine. Walder could've comfortably sat out the war if he didn't feel like haggling, and marrying one of his daughters isn't that crazy. Although they are not the head family in the Riverlands, they basically match the Tullys in strength.Quote:
Remember, Catelyn was also the one who agreed that, frankly, ludicrous bargain with the Freys.
lolwutQuote:
It was also Catelyn who caused Jon to the be sent to the Watch,
Jeez did Catelyn do 9/11 too?Quote:
but even there a lack of her malign influence might have made Theon loyal enough to refuse his father - something he clearly did consider.
Rob could have laid siege to the Twins.
Contrary to Catelyn's view, Frey did not hold all the cards.
Ned wanted to leave Jon at Winterfell, Catelyn refused to have him and Ned couldn't take him to King's Landing - the original plan was to set Jon up with a Holdfast on the New Gift, which had been abandoned by the Watch. It's mentioned in one of the later books.Quote:
lolwut
Remember, Catelyn can't stand Jon, she hates him, she's always hated him. The little bit about her sitting up with him when he had a fever isn't in the books - she's about three times the bitch she is in the series.
Due to the way that the castles are on both sides of the river, Robb would've needed to cross the river somewhere else to conduct a successful siege - which would defeat the point of the whole operation. He needed to get across in a timely fashion to destroy one of the Lannister armies before it met up with the other. Besieging the towers or just trying to find another crossing would make it impossible to do that.
Only true if you define "successful" as "reduction of the stronghold" - in this case investment of one side would close the crossing, depriving the Freys of their primary source of income and means to pay their army. Walder would then be in a precarious position because he has created his own Byzantine court - he keeps it in line by picking the winning side.
It's not a question of Rob being able to beat him - it's a question of him being able to make life more unpleasant than Walder can tolerate.
Agreeing to put all your dynastic eggs in one basket is, strategically speaking, too much for an army and a river crossing. Rob would have nothing left to offer, say, the Tyrells or the Ironborn.
there is no singular reason why robb was doomed.
there were a few
-he gave slight to the gods by breaking his vows > freys turned sides
-he got betrayed by theon and lost the north and more importantly his heirs
-he did not deal with the karstark/jaime/catelyn matter appropriately
all these things together, he was losing the war because his men were dwindling, he could not strike at tywin because Edmure tried to be a hero, so bolton added up 1+1 and decided it was time to turn cloaks. he wouldnt have if the North was winning. The freys are just crazy but I doubt he would have killed Robb if he didnt realise that the boy was lost.
Robb was doomed because he was not a main character to the long-term story arc. GRRM's trick was making us think he was, just like he did with Ned. The true main characters are immune to death until the final book. Namely:
Spoiler Alert, click show to read:
yes... ofcourse, if you go meta like that sure. you studied literature for sure no? XD
I've been reading the book series since they launched. Most fantasy series start with the orphan raised by a relative who teaches them some great tricks or they inherit a magic item ie Luke Skywalker raised by his uncle, Frodo is also adopted, as is Rand al'Thor and many more.
All GRRM has done has started at the pre-orphaning stage for some of the characters. Some are already orphans being raised by uncles. Some like the mother of dragons are more along those archetypes.
Spoiler Alert, click show to read:
My wife started reading the books after a friend of hers started raving about the TV series. Our new born daughter was named after one of the characters. I'll let you guess which one at your leisure.
Spoilers:Spoiler Alert, click show to read:
OK, best Red Wedding reaction video on the web (link, not embedded due to scene's bloody throat slashing. so umm, yeah, some violence/gore)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U6AjgR7D3yg
Bravo! :applause:
Got linked this on facebook.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xbEhByk4Icg
So season finale....
Not big on action, but lot of big decisions to set the story for the next season. Tywin and Tyrion were awesome as usual.Spoiler Alert, click show to read:
Next Arya and the Hound. Full of win.
And it all ends with Dany the rockstar :clown:
The Ramsay Bolton scene was hilarious. "You think I'm some sort of savage?" :laugh4: As was Tywin, sending Joffrey to bed without supper. And did anyone else notice the gasps from the ladies when Podrick went to summon Tyrion to the Small Council? His reputation precedes him!
So no big reveals, mainly just clean up and character positioning, but I think they had fun with it.
Spoiler Alert, click show to read:
Compared to The Walking Dead finale; Game of Thrones gets a Bajillion/10
I LOVE this show. One of the best shows on TV today in my opinion.
What do you guys think of Game of Thrones .vs LoTR however?
In terms of books vs books, tv show vs movies, or just general lore vs lore?
TV show .vs. movies and the lore .vs. lore.
in its scope i think LotR (if you include Silmarillion and the Hobbit) is unprecedented. But it is a pretty straight black and white story of good and evil, in that sense Got/SoIaF appeals to me more because alot of times you get new info that can completely change your view of a character. It is more grey. What I like about both is that in magic is pretty much relegated to the background and is of secondary importance (more so in GoT/SoIaF, but even in LotR, Gandalf the mighty wizard often fights with his sword). All in all, i'd say that LotR is the better/bigger Epic, while GoT/SoIaF is the better intrigue/thriller. Im a fan of both.
As for the movies/series, I'd rule more clearly in favor of the LotR movies, almost completely because of the awesome and huge battlescenes in 2 and 3. But for a series GoT is awesome!
GoT has no lore to speak of. It has some 'recent-history', but compared to LotR, the mythos is as good as non-existent and what is there is an unexplained, confusing wreck. At least up until now.
Hopefully with the winding up of the stories some of the mysteries will be cleared up.
OK, as far as I know GoT lore is limited to -
First men come and kill Children of the Forest who spent their time battling giants.
The Others come and kill both the First men and Children of the Forest.
Some unknown hero either from Asshai or Westros somehow manages to kill others. Variations of the legend involve the sword Lightbringer.
Andals come and subjugate first men.
Meanwhile on the other side of the world the Ghiscari Empire is doing something. Then something is happening in Valariya. Ghiscari and Valariya keep fighting. Somewhere in between the Faceless Men begin their work in the tunnels of Valariya.
Ghiscari empire falls. Doom come to Valariya. (What the 'Doom' is is never explained).
Aegon subjugates the Andals and unites the seven kingdoms.
Add to this a few odd tales pertaining to the various great houses about Brandon the Builder and whichever Lannister lost the Valariyan sword Brightroar et cetra and some vague prophesies about the Prince that was promised, Azor Azhai, the Old Gods and R'hllor and that's basically the extent of GoT lore.
Tolkien on the other hand has an entire alternate mythology in his books. Maybe when GRRM finishes the entire story and he explains everything about the Great Other and such similar mysteries he'll have something comparable, but until then everything is too much of a mess.
Isn't Cersei's generally the puss that gets promised?
anyone noticed how arya killed the frey soldier? its how she killed the guard at harrenhal in the books :P
There is an unbelievable amount of depth to the lore and history of the Ice and Fire universe over the previous 500 years or so; pretty much everything since the Targaryian invasion of Westros. The amount of detail on the houses, their histories, and their actions is very very deep. I am including the Dunk & Egg novellas as part of this lore, btw. You are correct that all of the really old stuff is very vague, but I believe that is intentional. That stuff has actively been forgotten by most people living. With the exceptions of some northmen, people in Westros actively believe that all that stuff is myth and legend. Hell, when the books start magic itself is popularly thought to be a myth as well because it had been gone for so long. Tolkein created a world in which immense magical beings live for eons and never forget anything. Martin created a world populated almost exclusively by humans, and humans die quickly and forget easily. Just look at the library at Castle Black. That right there is a storehouse of massive amounts of knowledge about the history of Westros, but no one cares about it. That's why you don't hear much about the Andals or the First Men. People living in the Ice and Fire universe simply don't care, at least not yet. That's not a fault of the writer, that's intentional and it's one of the things that helps to build the world. If you want to compare the Ice and Fire lore to Middle Earth lore, pretend that all of your Middle Earth lore has to be learned from the Hobbits.
In any case, I far more enjoy Martin's very rich recent history than Tolkein's amorphous irrelevant legends. The history that Martin gives us is detailed, explains how the various characters in the world got to where they are now, why alliances exist, and why certain place names are significant. Having read the entire Ice and Fire series, you can look at a map of Westros and know something interesting about pretty much every little town and castle on the map. The same cannot be said for Middle Earth.
thats not really true either, if you read the hobbit and silmarrilion you can do pretty much the same for middle earth, but as you say it is a different approach chosen by each writer. martin has his lore become available through the eyes of the humans living in Westeros, while Tolkien made the lore and legends available as stories in themself which you can read about in the appendix or in other books.