It was kukri's reason :thumbsdown:Quote:
Originally Posted by CountArach
Printable View
It was kukri's reason :thumbsdown:Quote:
Originally Posted by CountArach
...and naturally we can't have the same reason as someone else ?
Ofcourse not, that makes you suspicious :inquisitive:
Current Vote Tally:
Sasaki 1 (Seamus)
Pevergreen 1 (Tom Hagen)
Motep 2 (Orb, Stig)
Orb 1 (Motep)
GH 2 (AtPG, Crazed Rabbit)
Sapi 1 (Hughtower)
Drisco 1 (Byzantine Knight)
Ichigo 2 (KurkiKhan, Count Arach)
Abstain 7 (Andres, Redleg, Sir Boo, GH, Ichigo, Sapi, Pevergreen)
:laugh4:
It does though, but what if we get convinced?
@pever - too bad; make up another incorrect theory and stand by it :beam:
Vote: Abstain
There are currently no reliable leads. Actually, in any mafia game, or at least the one that I have played, CTDC, there never really are during the first day phase.
Spoiler Alert, click show to read:
Redleg - you argue like you think you're Sherlock Holmes, but you actually read like Elmer Fudd. Let concision & precision be your watchwords. Please.
sapi's defense was what? He lives in Australia? So do pevergreen & Arach. Lurking doesn't help the town. No matter the timezone.
@hugh - perhaps i prefer to wait until, as omanes says, there are actually reliable leads to go on?
Public speculation helps no one - i only come out when i am sure of what i am saying
Spoiler Alert, click show to read:
Quote:
Originally Posted by HughTower
That is an illogical statement - one of a personal nature. So I must ask what are you attempting to hide with your personal attack on me? Are you a suspected Jotun that has been identified because of the very nature of your statement. Is this because you don't want anyone to actually review statements made and have discussion about what that individual actually meant?
If I was to take this postion that you proposed - then the precision is alreadly there - the brevity of the discussion does indeed need a little work - but by the very hostile nature of your post - well we must assume that you to are attempting to hide something from the rest of the gathering. But since its early in the gathering rethoric is as an important as brevity.
Edit: I don't think I am Sherlock Holmes - I think the way I think - I am just me. If you don't like it just place me on Ignore. If you wish to make it personal - there is always the Holmgang.
Ah screw it- Vote:Abstain
Im lost here, and i do not feel like sifting through all of these pages.
Man, way to early to slog through all of these opening pages.
Vote: CountArach for pretending there's 'actual evidence' in the first round.
He just said he agreed, he didn't say why he agreed. It's too easy for mafia to avoid comment in that manner. Or by saying "there's nothing to go on" :stare:Quote:
Originally Posted by sapi
Welly, welly, well.
Hagen was the one who started the in-depth review of the death particulars by pointing out that the repetition of the mode of death was unusual for a "night summary" in these games.
Chaining out from that, as I did, can only lead to tentative thoughts. I remarked that one death seemed more "supernatural" than the other.
Others focused on the Broadsword issue, linking it to the chatroom and efforts to frame Disco (or that he made a mistake). Too much WIFOM to go further down that path, and Husar is quite correct in suggesting that the simplest explanation -- remember Lord Occam's shaving principle -- is that an unspecified kill order was written by Siggy as involving a broadsword -- hardly shocking in a Norse saga.
Does the manner of death and the one clearly being depicted as arising to Valhalla matter? Possibly, but we'll need at least one more "night summary" to start fleshing this out.
Kukri tried to use the post count approach to make his first round efforts less of a random essay. So far, Ichigo, Sasaki and Redleg are indeed racking up the posts here. This is, however, not unusual for them and all three get "caught up" in arguments. If we continue to see the arguments but discern that none of it is moving "forward," then we might be looking at 1 or more mafiosi using a White Noise strategy. So far, however, all three seem to be close to their baseline in posting "tone." Redleg is a terrier and doesn't back down; Sasaki is the master of verbal jujitsu, but he'll re-idrect a conversation to learn more as readily as to defend himself; Ichigo always comes off a little "frenzied" in the early rounds.
HughTower has tossed out a couple of posts with a bit of an "edge" to them, including some personal jibes. Why? Going after me for what seemed an early bandwagoning effort was fair enough, but why the shot at Redleg? Is HughT looking for a duel because he has a high Holmgang value?
Sapi, I don't like the semi-lurker thing either. Don't know enough of you as a poster to evaluate it.
For now, Unvote: Sasaki.
Purely to get someone's attention and increase the posting discussion,
Vote: Kagemusha
Totals:
Spoiler Alert, click show to read:
I just told you that this kind of behaviour got a mafioso lynched and you simply continue with it.:inquisitive:Quote:
Originally Posted by ByzantineKnight
It's funny that I accepted what Sasaki said as an answer because he agreed with my thoughts while you jump on him and have a loooong argument over points I partly didn't even understand only to come to a similar conclusion to the one I had(or didn't you? so many posts...):juggle2:Quote:
Originally Posted by Redleg
I would be careful with suspecting people to have something to hide, we started with 32 players and EVERYONE of them had a role, so even you have something to hide. Besides, you can easily end up with more suspects than actual mafia.Quote:
Originally Posted by Redleg
It's about those who have something evil to hide, they are the only ones(notice the missing apostrophe Ichigo~;) ) of importance.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Proletariat
He just used Kukri's argument because he could agree with it.Quote:
Originally Posted by CountArach
That may make him a bandwagoner of sorts though.
If you look back at my first quote, you may grasp the reason for the following.
Vote: ByzantineKnight
Perfectly logical & perfectly personal.Quote:
Originally Posted by Redleg
To answer your questions in order:Quote:
Originally Posted by Redleg
I am hiding nothing - au contraire I am revealing my belief that your length of your posts do nothing to convey your argument. I am not a suspected, or real, Jotun. No, it is not.
Why must we? That is not the sole logical conclusion, and, indeed, it is a fine example of the aphorism: "To assume is make an ASS out of U & ME". A good example of your imprecision in itself.Quote:
Originally Posted by Redleg
So, to put it another way, spam is as valuable as silence?Quote:
Originally Posted by Redleg
Imprecise again. I stated that you argue 'like you think you are Sherlock Holmes'. This is different from saying 'you think you are ....'. It is a comparative construction known as a simile, and can always be identified in English by the words 'like' or 'as'. It is descriptive in nature & should never be taken literally.Quote:
Originally Posted by Redleg
I will not deconstruct your posts again in such a fashion. I only have done this make my point about your argumentative style.
Btw, I'll see you at the OK Corral anytime you want, Big Boy:whip:
Why the vote CA? What have I done that makes you suspect me now?
Deconstruct away there, knucklehead, that's part of the game. However if if you want to resort to name calling I can play also. Its really a rather simple thing to do.Quote:
Originally Posted by HughTower
Right back at you with the name calling.:whip: :whip:
---- Voting Closed ----
Personally, I think all three of the major posters have just been caught up in their usual large arguments, but none of them are the Jotun. Since I've really just skimmed the thread, I'm not going to vote based on something I haven't fully dissected.
Unvote: Abstain
Vote: Crazed Rabbit
For being the second person to vote for me with no reason.
-edit- Aw c'mon Sigurd, let mine count.
Alright.. you just made it GH...
I will make a count of votes and write the lynch session.
I do believe it's a four-way tie.Quote:
Originally Posted by Sigurd Fafnesbane
Ah, so what happens now?Quote:
Originally Posted by Ichigo
All depends on Sigurd. It's usually a re-vote.Quote:
Originally Posted by Omanes Alexandrapolites the Idiot
The afternoon was nearly over when the retinues returned to the Hovgod by the runestone. Most were still upset about the 2 dead men that now lay at the Hovgod’s feet. A blanket covered each of them and they were ready to get their burial.
“Now?” asked the old man. “Have you talked it over and reached a conclusion?”.
The crowed seemed to quiet a little and no-one wanted to answer the old man. “Well, shall we stand here all day looking at these poor sods? You there!” He pointed a gnarled finger at a man that had GH embroidered on his cape. “What have you all decided?” The man with the cape said nothing but handed him the tally from the voting. The old man took a quick look at it and shook his head.
“I gave you a simple task and yet you have no one particular that you suspect more than another?
This only tells me that most of you didn’t want to participate. 7 of you kept your peace and 8 of you was afraid to hurt someone’s feelings by not actually placing a vote?
Then you give me a four way tie with 2 votes on each?
I am ashamed of you. I can do nothing other than send you to your beds.
But first we need to see your comrades off to a better world.
And if you didn’t catch what I just said: THERE WILL BE NO LYNCHING TODAY”.
The men and women in the crowd all looked at their feet. They had not been able to bring forth any candidates. But how could they?
There was nearly no clues and the killers hid well amongst them.
They all hoped that no-one would be killed this coming night.
****
The two pyres were lit and smoke rose to the sky. Hopefully those two warriors sat at the table of Odin right now, enjoying good food and drink. After, they would fight the Jotun with the other Gods and yet again have a feast to celebrate their victory.
Voting:
No vote : 7 (CF, Dutch, Jim, Kage, Kralizec, RR and Warluster)
Abstain : 8 (Andres, Ichigo, Lord Motep, Omanes, pevergreen, Redleg, sapi, Sir Boo)
GH : 2 (AtPG, CR)
Disco : 1 (ByzantineK)
Ichigo : 2 (CountA, Kukri)
Sasaki : 1 (Disco)
Crazed Rabbit : 1 (GH)
sapi : 2 (HughT, Sasaki)
ByzantineKnight : 1 (Husar)
Lord Motep : 2 (Orb, Stig)
CountArach : 1 (Prole)
Kagemusha : 1 (Seamus)
pevergreen : 1 (Tom H)
Murdered:
Destroyer of Hope
Sir Moody
Still Alive:
Alexander the Pretty Good
AndresTheCunning
ByzantineKnight
Caius Flaminius
CountArach
Crazed Rabbit
Discovery1
Dutch_guy
GeneralHankerchief
HughTower
Husar
Ichigo
JimBob
Kagemusha
Kralizec (Fenring)
KukriKhan
Lord Motep of Kendermore
Omanes Alexandrapolites the Idiot
Orb
pevergreen
Proletariat
Redleg
Reenk Roink
sapi
Sasaki Kojiro
Seamus Fermanagh
Sir Boo
Stig
Tom Hagen
Warluster
Pm me please... you have to 21:00 GMT+1 tomorrow (deadline)
Oh.. I almost forgot.
You can now challenge another player to a Holmgang...
The result will be narrated with the kills tomorrow.
Good luck!! :beam:
So we can challenge people now. Interesting.Quote:
Originally Posted by Sigurd Fafnesbane
I hereby challenge Luigi de Fatlington to the Holmgang. Oh wait, he's not here. In that case, I challenge Caius Flaminius. He hasn't said one word since he signed up. Lurking will not be tolerated.
He's on vacation.Quote:
Originally Posted by Tom_Hagen
Okay, Withdraw challenge: Caius. Challenge: Kagemusha.... somebody is going to duel me. We're not letting the Jotun get a free round in.Quote:
Originally Posted by Ichigo
Kagemusha is around, and he hasn't had anything to say. What's more, he's a chatroom regular, so he's suspicious on two counts.
You seem to be really eager to fight someone.:inquisitive: Is your Holmgang stats that high?Quote:
Originally Posted by Tom_Hagen