I remember them doing that last game... just before promptly backstabbing each other... even though there may be a few mafia I think the town are less likely to take out thier own than the mafia will be...
So they'll thin thier own numbers out...
Printable View
I remember them doing that last game... just before promptly backstabbing each other... even though there may be a few mafia I think the town are less likely to take out thier own than the mafia will be...
So they'll thin thier own numbers out...
Select: Slashandburn
I think Pizza is perfectly acceptable as director but I also think the position should be spread amongst the worthy candidates. Between SlashandBurn and Prole, I trust Slash more.
I'll wait to cast my lynch vote.
Select ATPG
Will sort out lynch candidates after the results come out.
Yes GH is correct.
The Coreleons will rise up again, through time and space!
Major Robert Dump, GeneralHankerchief and pevergreen. The original Coreleones.
[/capo 1]
Still not really feeling the trust on ATPG. Would a second canidate step forward to at least give us another option.
Just a recap of information that everyone actually knows:
DEAD Results: (by day they were revealed, not day they died)
Spoiler Alert, click show to read:
So up through day 8 we have in categories:
Townies: 6
Mafia: 6
Wiseguys: 4
Including day 9 we have:
Townies: 7
Mafia: 8 (+3?)=11
Wiseguys: 4 (+3?)=7
Just FYI- The distinction between wiseguy and wiseguy (rumored mafia) is that in the results, Seamus actually mentioned for those that the rumor was they had joined the mafia, in essence betraying the town. The other wiseguys did not.
Select: slashandburn
I'm not a Don, but I have no way to prove it :sweatdrop:
If I say "The Stranger trusted me" would that make it any better?
That would make it worse.
Plus, I still don't like how ATPG manages to get himself as the complete innocent one.
He can give the co-ordinating job to someone else. Kill him.
Well, that wasn't unexpected.
I am reminded of something I said to ATPG... it was something like this - "Judging by my luck, this vigilante attempt will probably fail, just like all my protection groups."
:sweatdrop:
Of course, because I know I am Townie, I know that RR's source(s) that suggested that I am more likely to be a Don than Beefy/Andres, is wrong, wrong and wrong. Hence, I suggest that others look more deeply into RR. After all, if he thinks I have 20% more chance of being a Don than the others, where is the evidence? Even a little hint of a PM/chat log would do - I am surprised at how many people just willing to take someone's word in this game, instead of asking for some sort of evidence.
*Gets out popcorn*
Vote: abstain
Select: slashandburn
spreading the director's job amongst candidates is probably best, no hard feelings ATPG
Lynch Tally:
abstain: DJGingivitis, Twilightblade
Director Tally:
Askthepizzaguy: 8 (Askthepizzaguy, Splitpersonality, gibsonsg, Xehh II, Diana Abnoba, White_Eyes, slashandburn, El Diablo
Slashandburn: 5 (LittleGrizzly, Reenk, woad&fangs, Beefy187, Twilightblade
Select : ATPG
Vote : Beefy187
Proces of elimination :shrug:
Select: slashandburn
So are we now suspecting either beefy or Andres as the possible don, after shlin's rather inglorious failure?
CR
How about we put both of them in the gallows?
Vote: Andres
Select: ATPG
I started the game as townie and I'm still a townie. It's absurd to have doubts about that at this stage of the game.
ATPG hasn't vouched for you yet as you claimed he would do. So, Sigurd, what have you been up to the previous nights.
I can tell that I was in a protection group last night and there are people who can back that up. How about you?
Besides, Sigurd, don't tell me you missed this post.
The person who was going to vouch for you, confirmed my townie status.
So far, you have been evasive, went by unnoticed in the thread and your only contributions exist in planting seeds of doubt about those who are a) in the townie network; b) confirmed as townies.
Stop being evasive and answer questions.
As I said, I am not going to divulge this in public.
You said you were in a protection group. Well, did it succeed? Have any of your protection group activities succeeded?
TinCow publicly cleared your name with the allegation that you had been a successful member of a vigilante group. His argument does not hold water compared to the previous Capo games. Why would he claim that? All he said was "interesting". Did you instruct him to come forward with this info?
I said the only way to clear your name is to get an investigation result with a guilty result. I haven't seen one yet. And the townie result on you is hearsay. It is a personal interpretation of the actual investigation result from Seamus. It reads "innocent". Another investigation from a different agency on you yielded "questionable". I don't know Andres, why would you have a questionable result? Maybe it is an invitation to make a deeper investigation on you. If luck strikes, as with CR in the last game, there might be a more sinister part to your so called "innocence".
Whatever, Sigurd.
No, I won't disclose the names of those I was protecting with. They can step forward if they want to.
None of the targets I was protecting has been attacked, except pevergreen. Beefy187, shlin28 and myself were in that group. ATPG pm'ed me that I came up as 'basic townie' upon investigation; to me that sounds different then just an 'innocent'. I assumed that he or his contact got complete results about role, for the simple reason that, in fact, I am a townie.
My behaviour behind the scenes as well as in this thread has also been that of a townie.
I will no longer defend myself against your paranoia.
However, the fact that so far you have been evasive when simple questions were asked (what possible harm could there be done by stating e.g. 'I have been protecting N1, 2, 4 and 6; failed to send in orders N3 and vig killed on N5 ~:confused:) remains. I find that scummy, because if you have something to hide, it's easier to refuse to give an answer, because that way nobody can catch you on a lie, than to give an (inevitably) untrue answer. The fact that you have responded to simple questions with planting seeds of doubt and just that, nothing more than that, is also scummy.
So, unless you give at least some info on your night activities, I'm going to vote you instead of Beefy187.
Next to detective results and analysing night activities, there's another tool to find scum: analysing behaviour.
Yours' is scummy.
EDIT: no, I did not ask TinCow to defend me in the thread.
I claimed that because I thought Dons would fail all townie group actions. I was not aware they were treated differently depending on whether it was a protection or vig action. I said "interesting" because the information you provided invalidated one of the reasons I thought Andres was cleared.
I was told a while ago that every person who has shown up as a mafioso had a "loyal" result on a communism investigation. I have not been informed otherwise, and therefore think Andres' "questionable" result means he is a townie who is possibly recruitable by the communists, along with numerous others. As the communists seem to have been neutered as a threat very early on, that doesn't particularly concern me.Quote:
Another investigation from a different agency on you yielded "questionable". I don't know Andres, why would you have a questionable result? Maybe it is an invitation to make a deeper investigation on you. If luck strikes, as with CR in the last game, there might be a more sinister part to your so called "innocence".
Unvote; Vote : Sigurd
Please, answer the simple question. So far, I haven't received a pm nor seen a post that tells us something about your night activities, nor has pizza vouched for you as you claimed he would do.
And AggonyDuck needs to talk as well.