Vote: Memnon
No reason, just picking at random again.
Printable View
Vote: Memnon
No reason, just picking at random again.
There is no police misconduct going on here. I claimed right before the lynch write up. You can trust your police, you were right to lynch me as you disupted my vast criminal network
it seems that Edse was attacked by 8 people and survived...? yet the writeup suggests that he survived because there werent enough. maybe two groups of 4?? and whats with ishaels revenge?Quote:
Two pairs of shooters opened up on edse as he idled at the red light.
Edse had just stopped the car when someone behind him in his blind spot shouted
“Ishmael’s revenge!”
and started hammering away. Three other gunmen chimed in and the shots shattered windows and caromed off the armored sides of the car. edse hunkered down and slammed his foot on the accelerator, racing through the intersection blindly to avoid the deadly hail of gunfire. All it would have taken was one car stopping in front of edse to prevent his escape and sooner or later the firepower – even by ricochet – would’ve got him. Instead, edse made good his escape.
Montmorency: 12 (Cahoma, Yaropolk, Renata, Sprig, Beefy, FrozeninIce, BRay, W&F, Seon, Memnon, Sturmhauke, Choxorn)
Clitsome: 2 (Andres, Diamondeye)
AggonyKing: 2 (Sasaki, Gibsonsg)
Memnon: 2 (OTLD, Fyremarble)
Neri: 1 (Johhog)
Johhog: 1 (ATPG)
Sasaki: 1 (Jolt)
Renata: 1 (visorslash)
Jolt: 1 (landlubber)
Romanic: 1 (Ironside
Abstain: 3 (Diana, Gamezrule, Erebus)
:stare:Quote:
Originally Posted by fyremarble
Unvote; Vote: fyremarble
No reason, just picking at random again.
It is weird but not unheard of. I and a few others received a result night 1 of me (failing to) protect Earthling, which I certianly did not order.Quote:
Originally Posted by The Stranger
Unvote:Montmorency; vote: Clitsome
strange...
i doubt seamus would be making such mistakes repetitive. something else seems to be going on...
Montmorency the bandwagon of the day?
Vote: Sprig Your initial vote on Montmornecy was scummy as hell and you don't even bother to give a reason for your switch to Clitsome. What's your deal?
Hard to disagree with that. However...Quote:
Originally Posted by Diamondeye
Vote: Diamondeye - again.Quote:
Originally Posted by Diamondeye
You're going to have to do better than that, I'm afraid. :stare:
Unvote; Vote: Diamondeye
It seems to have been two groups of three, one of them being communists. So in fact I was attacked by 3 groups. Why did you have to choose the most paranoid around here? I won't be able to sleep tonight.Quote:
Originally Posted by The Stranger
I didn't allude to being a doctor, Ishmael made that leap on his own.Quote:
doctors can attack ppl anyway but he now claims hes not a doctor.
whats strange however is that he claims he protected you on his own and then says cuz i am to the ishmael alluding that he might be a doctor. also that he gets credits for a protection he never did according to himself is weird, but it might be due Seamus making a mistake or due some red text? i dont know...
A. Pizza was right and Seamus made a mistake; there should have been a group described.Quote:
So I think the real quesion is, why did the attack on Pizza function if you attacked him all alone?
Seamus would have had to either notice that there was a group to credit for the attack, remember to give pt credit, but then forget to write it in. Or, he would have had to see that only one individual was attacking, and then accidentally credit the pt group. Both seem like unlikely oversights, even for a game of this size.
B. Even failed attacks trigger protections. Whether there are 4 attackers or only one doesn't affect this.
Regarding DiamondEye: many other individuals have voted me for "reasons [they] don't have" - as they have been doing for a while. They're not all scum, surely. Diamondeye and Sprig have both been voted; what distinguishes them from each other and the rest of the described mass?
He also did it for Clitsome.
Montmorency: 11 (Cahoma, Yaropolk, Renata, Beefy, FrozeninIce, BRay, W&F, Seon, Memnon, Sturmhauke, Choxorn)
Clitsome: 3 (Andres, Diamondeye, Sprig)
AggonyKing: 2 (Sasaki, Gibsonsg)
Memnon: 2 (OTLD, Fyremarble)
Diamondeye: 2 (Winston Hughes, visorslash)
Neri: 1 (Johhog)
Johhog: 1 (ATPG)
Sasaki: 1 (Jolt)
Jolt: 1 (landlubber)
Romanic: 1 (Ironside
Sprig: 1 (LazyMcCrow)
Abstain: 3 (Diana, Gamezrule, Erebus)
I find this a weird reasoning. First voting for Montmorency and than unvoting him because there is a possibility he's innocent (that's always a possibility). Did Sprig want to vote for mafia to improve his voting record and later realized that he may help lynch a family member?Quote:
Originally Posted by Sprig
Vote: Montmorency
FOS SPRIG
Hmm admittedly Monty's explanation is rather shaky, especially the part where he redacted his protections of Sasaki and Craterus. It almost seems to imply that he had something to hide/was afraid of revealing.
However, the situation about his solo protecting/vigging or whatever is going on seems odd and a tad unclear, I guess I'll wait for Seamus to clarify on that part.
Not sure whether Tincow's comments post-death to look at his alive activity in thread to determine his investigation targets has any significance to Sigurd or just limited purely to MRD.
Anyway:
Vote: TLD
Posts strike me as hiding behind a veneer of contrived 'analysis', or maybe its just that he's more muted thanhis normal spammaliciousnessusually the case and lacking his signature outspoken all consequences be darned style.
Quote:
Good reasoning
vote: Memnon His name starts with an M.
Quote:
So to "cure" this problem you vote for the guy with the strange name... again?
Seems like generally a wave of short safe posts that comment upon anything that will probably result in little fuss.Quote:
Nice wagon you got there. Now who on there is scum? Please raise your hands
I am actually trying to create fuss with these posts. People vote others on zero reasoning and I want them to speak up about this.
The reason I'm notspammingtalking as much as usual is because I try to respect this.
If it's public demand I will gladly resume my usual style of posting :yes:
I am not trying to fly under the radar, I am trying to bring things up on the radar, like Memnon's and DE's vote today, same goes for fyremarble's vote ON Memnon. We are several days into the game and this random votes with random reasons thing has to stop!
where do you see 2 groups of 3.Quote:
Originally Posted by edse
i see one group of 4 and the write up mentions one person saying ishmaels revenge and then opening fire after which 3 more gunmen also open fire.
where is the other group of 3? if there are three groups its 4 ppl, 1 person and 3 ppl. but think the 1 and 3 are the same group so 2 groups of 4.
You are right, I read "two pairs" as "two". So one communist group of 4, one normal group of 4 and then one group of 5 that almost killed me.Quote:
Two pairs of shooters opened up on edse as he idled at the red light.
Edse had just stopped the car when someone behind him in his blind spot shouted
“Ishmael’s revenge!”
and started hammering away. Three other gunmen chimed in and the shots shattered windows and caromed off the armored sides of the car. edse hunkered down and slammed his foot on the accelerator, racing through the intersection blindly to avoid the deadly hail of gunfire. All it would have taken was one car stopping in front of edse to prevent his escape and sooner or later the firepower – even by ricochet – would’ve got him. Instead, edse made good his escape.
I understand why the commies would like me dead but not the other two groups. Probably groups organised by two different persons, one most likely being Xenoneb's as I early bailed on that one. The failed 4 person group could be fubbleskag's.
My comments were simply that if people read my posts and connect the proper dots, they will find at least some of my investigation results. As far as I am aware, it would be against the rules for me to confirm whether anyone has figured out what my results were, so there's not much more I can say than that.Quote:
Originally Posted by Death is yonder
Yes, I continue to believe that Sigurd is scummy and should be disposed of. I do not buy Sigurd's 'fun' defense, nor am I inclined to spare someone I think is scummy simply because they are entertaining. I still believe Sigurd is a mafioso or, at best, a wiseguy/townie who has committed himself to becoming a mafioso. Even if he did not start as a mafioso he is now such an obvious recruitment candidate that his starting status really seems somewhat irrelevant.
I'll go along with that reasoning TinCow.
vote: Sigurd
All right, tbh I have only read something like four pages totally in this game, and someone expressed suspicion of Neri in a post a couple of posts above mine. Let's join a better wagon though!Quote:
Originally Posted by Askthepizzaguy
UNVOTE: Neri
VOTE: Montmorency
Montmorency: 13 (Johhog, PeasantPhill, Cahoma, Yaropolk, Renata, Beefy, FrozeninIce, BRay, W&F, Seon, Memnon, Sturmhauke, Choxorn)
Clitsome: 3 (Andres, Diamondeye, Sprig)
AggonyKing: 2 (Sasaki, Gibsonsg)
Memnon: 2 (OTLD, Fyremarble)
Diamondeye: 2 (Visorslash, WinstonHughes)
Johhog: 1 (ATPG)
Sasaki: 1 (Jolt)
Jolt: 1 (landlubber)
Romanic: 1 (Ironside
Sprig: 1 (LazymcCrow)
TLD *Oh! TheLastDays?*: 1 (DIY)
Sigurd: 1 (BSmith)
Abstain: 3 (Diana, Gamezrule, Erebus)
Uhhh - no - that just stinks worse. unvote, vote: JohhogQuote:
Originally Posted by Johhog
investigation results sent; results sent; promotion offers sent.
Intend to keep to deadline if possible. PM if this is a real problem.
Thanks for your patience.
vote: Sigurd
I think there is merit to the case against him by TinCow a couple Days ago...or a Day ago? I can't read my own handwriting...
After reading through all of this, I'd either want to vote Yaropolk again, because he still repeats the same thing again and again wthout posting much else, or take TC's advice and vote Sigurd. The Montmorency case is shakey but believable, and if he hasn't been scanned up and down by now...
Vote: Sigurd
vote:Montmorency
What're you saying, exactly? 'revealed doctors…' Helping a claim, maybe? It should already be known, who doctors are. At least the ones generated by askthepizzawiseguy's schemes.Quote:
Originally Posted by Ishmael
I agree. Someone coming out of the woodwork to vote someone who probably won't answer back is über-scummich.Quote:
Originally Posted by Visorslash:stare:Quote:
Originally Posted by fyremarble
Unvote; Vote: fyremarble
No reason, just picking at random again.
What?Quote:
Originally Posted by SisterCoyote
That I didn't read the thread? :inquisitive:Quote:
Originally Posted by LazyMcCrow