-
Re: Capo di Tutti Capi IV
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TinCow
I still believe Sigurd is a mafioso or, at best, a wiseguy/townie who has committed himself to becoming a mafioso. Even if he did not start as a mafioso he is now such an obvious recruitment candidate that his starting status really seems somewhat irrelevant.
You know, we still have more then half of town to consider...losing two detectives and an FBI agent strikes me as more then coincidence. It most likely was an inside job...I wondered why it was so quiet the first night out.:inquisitive:
I had to spend ten mintues of my life catching up and you didn't even look?:no:
Vote: Johhog
-
Re: Capo di Tutti Capi IV
Vote: AggonyKing since wanting a double lynch for its own sake, especially considering how terrible the lynching record has been so far, does seem quite scummy.
-
Re: Capo di Tutti Capi IV
vote: Clitsome
If a townie were to make a case for lynching Slysnake, he would have at least mentioned the possibility that Slysnake was targeted twice because he was identified by his attackers as scum. Instead, he sound a like a mafioso who doesn't want to get blamed when the lynchee turns out to be innocent.
-
Re: Capo di Tutti Capi IV
Montmorency: 14 (HeroDC, Johhog, PeasantPhill, Cahoma, Yaropolk, Renata, Beefy, FrozeninIce, BRay, W&F, Seon, Memnon, Sturmhauke, Choxorn)
Clitsome: 4 (Andres, Diamondeye, Sprig, CecilXIX)
Sigurd: 3 (BSmith, SisterCoyote, ULC)
Johhog: 3 (ATPG, LazyMcCrow, WhiteEyes)
AggonyKing: 3 (Sasaki, Gibsonsg, Neri)
Memnon: 2 (OTLD, Fyremarble)
Diamondeye: 2 (Visorslash, WinstonHughes)
Sasaki: 1 (Jolt)
Jolt: 1 (landlubber)
Romanic: 1 (Ironside
TLD *Oh! TheLastDays?*: 1 (DIY)
Abstain: 3 (Diana, Gamezrule, Erebus)
-
Re: Capo di Tutti Capi IV
You've got two separate entries for AggonyKing, Stranger. Also, thank you for the tally.
-
Re: Capo di Tutti Capi IV
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Neri
....
talk about hypocrisy.....
anyway vote: Montmorency
-
Re: Capo di Tutti Capi IV
Quote:
Originally Posted by
White_eyes:D
You know, we still have more then half of town to consider...losing two detectives and an FBI agent strikes me as more then coincidence. It most likely was an inside job...I wondered why it was so quiet the first night out.:inquisitive:
An inside job? That implies some kind of betrayal be people in-the-know. Of the three of us I was the only one killed by the mafia, the other two were townie 'vig' hits. I never told anyone my role, so there was certainly no inside job in my death. Whoever targeted me was just smart and/or lucky. If I had to hazard a guess, I would assume I was investigated by a Made early on, found to be innocent, and thus considered a good target since I wasn't recruitable. My hat is off to whoever did it, regardless of the reason; they played smart.
In any case, your post is scummy. There's no basis for calling the detective deaths an 'inside job' as far as I can tell, yet you throw that out there casually and use it as a basis to focus on 'more than half the town' and play down my own feelings about Sigurd. You then vote for Johhog exclusively because he hadn't read the thread. That's a lazy bandwagon, just as bad as not reading the thread. Plus, not reading the thread proves nothing in a game where there are multiple mafias. Skipping over thread details is a mafia tell, but only in games where the mafia know pretty much everything that is going to happen at night. In this game, no scum, regardless of their role, will know even a fraction of what is going to happen at night due to the other families, townie actions, and special roles. Reading or not reading a thread means absolutely nothing here. Your vote looks like an attempt to bandwagon without being on one of the big wagons.
FOS: White_eyes:D
-
Re: Capo di Tutti Capi IV
Results and promotions, just as I'm leaving, and unable to react before the deadline.
:no:
I could really use the fully day. It could help with voter turnout as well.
-
Re: Capo di Tutti Capi IV
Quote:
Originally Posted by
White_eyes:D
You know, we still have more then half of town to consider...losing two detectives and an FBI agent strikes me as more then coincidence. It most likely was an inside job...I wondered why it was so quiet the first night out.:inquisitive:
I had to spend ten mintues of my life catching up and you didn't even look?:no:
Vote: Johhog
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TinCow
An inside job? That implies some kind of betrayal be people in-the-know. Of the three of us I was the only one killed by the mafia, the other two were townie 'vig' hits. I never told anyone my role, so there was certainly no inside job in my death. Whoever targeted me was just smart and/or lucky. If I had to hazard a guess, I would assume I was investigated by a Made early on, found to be innocent, and thus considered a good target since I wasn't recruitable. My hat is off to whoever did it, regardless of the reason; they played smart.
In any case, your post is scummy. There's no basis for calling the detective deaths an 'inside job' as far as I can tell, yet you throw that out there casually and use it as a basis to focus on 'more than half the town' and play down my own feelings about Sigurd. You then vote for Johhog exclusively because he hadn't read the thread. That's a lazy bandwagon, just as bad as not reading the thread. Plus, not reading the thread proves nothing in a game where there are multiple mafias. Skipping over thread details is a mafia tell, but only in games where the mafia know pretty much everything that is going to happen at night. In this game, no scum, regardless of their role, will know even a fraction of what is going to happen at night due to the other families, townie actions, and special roles. Reading or not reading a thread means absolutely nothing here. Your vote looks like an attempt to bandwagon without being on one of the big wagons.
FOS: White_eyes:D
How many wise-guys besides askthepizzawiseguy were in the loop?
-
Re: Capo di Tutti Capi IV
Vote: Johog
Why would you vote Monmorency, just because he has the most votes? You could have read his argument or at least read the last couple pages before just hopping on the bandwagon.
-
Re: Capo di Tutti Capi IV
-
Re: Capo di Tutti Capi IV
:S Between getting ready for uni and a very shaky wi-fi connection, I finally managed to finish reading the thread.
Vote: Sigurd, because he was on my previous list of suspects and someone who has yet to die..
-
Re: Capo di Tutti Capi IV
I don't have time to catch up, too busy, so I'll follow behind someone I value as a scum-hunter (WH).
vote: Diamondeye
Also, without joining the tally leader, which is unnecessary I think.
-
Re: Capo di Tutti Capi IV
Quote:
Originally Posted by
slash and earn
Vote: Johog
Why would you vote Monmorency, just because he has the most votes? You could have read his argument or at least read the last couple pages before just hopping on the bandwagon.
I actually skimmed over it. Skimmed over every page since page 71, also read a couple of pages earlier (around page 40 or something) and I voted a couple of times if you want details.
-
Re: Capo di Tutti Capi IV
vote: abstain
real life calls, don't have time today
-
Re: Capo di Tutti Capi IV
I'm going to Vote: Sigurd again, for the same reasons as before.
-
Re: Capo di Tutti Capi IV
I agree that Johhog is not a smart lynch. A mafioso would know how suspicious it looks to jump on a bandwagon at the first sign of pressure.
-
Re: Capo di Tutti Capi IV
Okay guys. I have two questions. Why is Chatoix a bad lynch? He was/is trying to become a Don. And why is everyone band wagonning on Montmorency so much? He has accounted for every night. Not only that, he did it pretty well.
-
Re: Capo di Tutti Capi IV
-
Re: Capo di Tutti Capi IV
Vote: abstain for now, need a bit of time to catch up.
-
Re: Capo di Tutti Capi IV
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Scienter
I'm going to Vote: Sigurd again, for the same reasons as before.
Why did you kill your husband? Was it because of the life insurance money?
-
Re: Capo di Tutti Capi IV
I SAY.....WOB WOB WOB.
That's right.
I speak techno.
Vote:Chaotix
LIKE A DON BOSS.
-
Re: Capo di Tutti Capi IV
-
Re: Capo di Tutti Capi IV
Vote: Abstain
Too busy with IRL. <.<
-
Re: Capo di Tutti Capi IV
vote: clitsome
Montmorency: 15 (HeroDC, Johhog, PeasantPhill, Cahoma, Yaropolk, Renata, Beefy, FrozeninIce, BRay, W&F, Seon, Memnon, Sturmhauke, Choxorn, AgKing)
Clitsome: 6 (Andres, Diamondeye, Sprig, CecilXIX, Populus, TS)
Sigurd: 5 (BSmith, SisterCoyote, ULC, shlin28, Scienter)
Johhog: 4 (ATPG, LazyMcCrow, WhiteEyes, Slash&Earn)
AggonyKing: 3 (Sasaki, Gibsonsg, Neri)
Memnon: 2 (OTLD, Fyremarble)
Diamondeye: 3 (Visorslash, WinstonHughes, Romanic)
Sasaki: 1 (Jolt)
Jolt: 1 (landlubber)
Romanic: 1 (Ironside
TLD *Oh! TheLastDays?*: 1 (DIY)
Chaotix: 1 (thefluffyone)
Abstain: 6 (Diana, Gamezrule, Erebus, IbnKhaldun, BillMC, Riedquat, believer)
-
Re: Capo di Tutti Capi IV
Dont understand the voting for montmorency. If hes been accounted for then hes a waste of a lynch right now. Meanwhile the votes against clitsome... are because he has a bad name?
I Vote: Sigurd because we have communists out killing people and he has admitted to being communist. Purge em
-
Re: Capo di Tutti Capi IV
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Populus Romanus
vote: clitsome
Why?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
thefluffyone93
.......
Vote:Chaotix
Why?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
The Stranger
vote: clitsome
Why?
This cannot keep up. Stop voting without giving reasons, that's not town behaviour.
-
Re: Capo di Tutti Capi IV
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Oh! TheLastDays!
This cannot keep up. Stop voting without giving reasons, that's not town behaviour.
I already touched on this. No-one seems to give a :daisy: about town behaviour, everyone's just watching their own back. Which explains the rabid bandwagoning.
-
Re: Capo di Tutti Capi IV
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Oh! TheLastDays!
This cannot keep up. Stop voting without giving reasons, that's not town behaviour.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Diamondeye
I already touched on this. No-one seems to give a :daisy: about town behaviour, everyone's just watching their own back. Which explains the rabid bandwagoning.
Precisely. This was exactly the point I was trying to make earlier, voting without reasoning is both incredibly annoying and incredibly unhelpful.
-
Re: Capo di Tutti Capi IV
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Ishmael
Precisely. This was exactly the point I was trying to make earlier, voting without reasoning is both incredibly annoying and incredibly unhelpful.
While that is true but it is still better than not voting.
As it is, we should be looking long and hard at those still voting for Montmorency. I believe he has given a rather suitable account for himself that would justify him living a while longer.