Hey, nobody is hosting this Large Mafia [Concluded]

Posts incoming. All relating to mafia.

https://i.imgur.com/GiOtW.png

https://i.imgur.com/LwQCr.png

https://i.imgur.com/ygcLm.png

Sage advice:

https://i.imgur.com/RL9P5.jpg

Good times.

https://i.imgur.com/aYv6l.jpg

my eyes hurt

Vote: Visorslash

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Visorslash

Posts incoming. All relating to mafia.

---

!!!

Oh and Unvote; Vote: Arjos

vote: Visorslash for putting up bright colours that make my eyes hurt. Also, I don't tend to join in on bandwagons all that often, and so I figured I should try it out. Actually, it's quite fun. I should do this more often. :yes:

Vote : CountArach

vote:ishmael for blindly joining the bandwagon! and for using recycled reasoning of eyes hurting!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Nightbringer

vote:ishmael for blindly joining the bandwagon! and for using recycled reasoning of eyes hurting!

---

He's also killing my bandwidth usage, if that helps.

I believe this is the first time I've been targeted by the mafia early. I would vote for someone unaware of my general behaviour that always seem to come across as scummy.

Vote:visorslash for pretending to be the greatness that is Fluffy.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Greyblades

Vote:visorslash for pretending to be the greatness that is Fluffy.

---

To be honest, it's really not interesting. Though I'm really not inclined to play this game considering I don't even have the luxury of the votes on being random. I don't know why almost any of the votes are on me besides the fact that it seems like the thing that people do today. :shrug:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Visorslash

To be honest, it's really not interesting. Though I'm really not inclined to play this game considering I don't even have the luxury of the votes on being random. I don't know why almost any of the votes are on me besides the fact that it seems like the thing that people do today. :shrug:

---

Looks to me like you brought this upon yourself. You just kept voting for me, and even though I didn't retaliate, people just don't like to see their kind and caring moderator being voted for like that. :smug:

Chaotix is truly the master of oxymorons.

vote: Visor until he explains his vote.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Andres

Vote : CountArach

---

*gasp*

What are you doing Andres? You can't be doing that! Vote: Andres

Andres was scum yesterday and my guess is he's still scum today. vote: Andres

Okay, this is all very funny, but let's not have this become a runaway bandwagon on Visor (even though he may have brought this on myself, and I still have my doubts that he is town). We need to put some pressure on others as well. Unvote: Visor Vote: GeneralHankerchief. What was with the "voting closed" post from last lynch phase? Trying to manipulate the thread/vote count? :sneaky: At the time of that post, Seon and Chaotix were tied with 4 each, but Chaotix was 1st to reach 4 votes therefore the leader at the time. Were you trying to close the vote then, to save your mafia partner Seon or bus your mafia partner Chaotix? As far as I know you had no authority to close the voting at that time from Pizza, so either way this is very scummy play. :no::stare:

Actually, that's a very good point. GH's post fooled me into thinking that voting was closed for awhile. Very strange behavior. unvote, vote: GH

GH's is a good case...

I'll unvote; Vote: Atheotes, waited a bit to see and I hope a mafia jumped on the wagon...

Either way I FoS from the 3rd voter onwards in the first wagon and those in the counterwagon...

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by CountArach

This bandwagon is stupid. Vote: Arjos, for this post:

Keep in mind that this post is the one that started the current bandwagon and you might care to re-evaluate whether it is worth killing Visorslash.

---

I don't like his reasoning for voting Arjos.

Why is it relevant that Arjos' vote started the bandwagon on Visorslash? As if Arjos could have had predicted that?

Trying to fabricate a reason for your vote is something scum often does. Mafia often feel the need to explain themselves, but because they are mafia, they need to fabricate something. And this reason for CA's vote on Arjos is so rubbish, that it sounds fabricated.

CA is scum.

I think Chaotix might actually be town, because he would have typically responded with a laughing smilie then comment ":laugh4: Good logic", only to attempt to fool and trick me, he hasn't! So he isn't worried about being seen as scum.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Tiaexz

I think Chaotix might actually be town, because he would have typically responded with a laughing smilie then comment ":laugh4: Good logic", only to attempt to fool and trick me, he hasn't! So he isn't worried about being seen as scum.

---

Or, maybe I specifically didn't comment to make you think that! You see, Mr. Beskar, I know how you think just as well as you know me.

I know that this is yet another post attempting to bait me to make a comment on it.

And I will not fall for it. No, I will most certainly not.

What's this Beskar/Chaotix thing...?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Visorslash

What's this Beskar/Chaotix thing...?

---

Goes back to some game a long time ago where I was mafia and Tiaexz (at that time called Beskar) figured it out and got me lynched or something like that. Then in ATPG's Star Wars I got a neutral role and since I suspected Tiaexz would be suspicious of me I first-night killed him. Funny part was that he was actually the mafia.

Ever since, in every game Tiaexz and I have been in, he has posted something about me not being mafia because I didn't first round kill him. Then he uses my response to that comment to determine I am mafia and get me lynched again.

It always works. It's pretty uncanny.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Chaotix

It always works. It's pretty uncanny.

---

:beam:

Then the last game, I worked it out it was you and we could have worked together (since I was a neutral), but you killed me anyway! That was evil. You killed me for being right.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Andres

I don't like his reasoning for voting Arjos.

Why is it relevant that Arjos' vote started the bandwagon on Visorslash? As if Arjos could have had predicted that?

Trying to fabricate a reason for your vote is something scum often does. Mafia often feel the need to explain themselves, but because they are mafia, they need to fabricate something. And this reason for CA's vote on Arjos is so rubbish, that it sounds fabricated.

CA is scum.

---

It was a better reason than people have for voting for Visorslash and I was fishing for a response from Arjos as much as anything. It also served to get a bit more attention that served to remind everyone why they were lynching Visor. At this point all our voting is still completely random so really there was never going to be any good reasoning behind a vote.

If I had truly wanted to vote for someone to deflect votes away from Visor or someone else I could have just voted for anyone who was bandwagoning him and that would have been valid enough. If I had wanted to keep a low profile I would have just added to the bandwagon. Of course that is WIFOM.

In regards to the above: It could either be townie trying to stop a lynch he thinks is wrong, or scum snuggling and trying to look good. It could be either and there are fair cases for it.

Good luck.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Andres

I don't like his reasoning for voting Arjos.

Why is it relevant that Arjos' vote started the bandwagon on Visorslash? As if Arjos could have had predicted that?

Trying to fabricate a reason for your vote is something scum often does. Mafia often feel the need to explain themselves, but because they are mafia, they need to fabricate something. And this reason for CA's vote on Arjos is so rubbish, that it sounds fabricated.

CA is scum.

---

good point
unvote; vote: CountArach

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by CountArach

It was a better reason than people have for voting for Visorslash and I was fishing for a response from Arjos as much as anything. It also served to get a bit more attention that served to remind everyone why they were lynching Visor. At this point all our voting is still completely random so really there was never going to be any good reasoning behind a vote.

If I had truly wanted to vote for someone to deflect votes away from Visor or someone else I could have just voted for anyone who was bandwagoning him and that would have been valid enough. If I had wanted to keep a low profile I would have just added to the bandwagon. Of course that is WIFOM.

---

You felt the need to vote for someone and give a "legit" reason, but that "legit" reason you gave for voting was actually rubbish and sounded fabricated. That's why I think you're mafia.

Vote: Visorslash

Choo choo