What do you see as the worth of the stigma? Why is that worth greater than the benefits of legalization?
Do you think society will experience catastrophic destabilization if weed becomes somewhat more acceptable in polite company?
Printable View
What do you see as the worth of the stigma? Why is that worth greater than the benefits of legalization?
Do you think society will experience catastrophic destabilization if weed becomes somewhat more acceptable in polite company?
I just don't like it. Isn't that enough? I support things I like and oppose things I don't like. There's nothing else to it.Quote:
Originally Posted by Montmorency
I'm curious as to what differences you see between marijuana and alcohol. What is it that makes the latter acceptable, while the former is worthy of being stigmatized?Quote:
Originally Posted by rvg
As I mentioned earlier in this thread, alcohol too deeply ingrained in our culture. It's also a junk food of sorts. Weed has never seen the levels of social acceptance that alcohol has.Quote:
Originally Posted by TinCow
Do you believe that, if alcohol were not so deeply ingrained, it would be better if it were illegal?Quote:
Originally Posted by rvg
Certainly.Quote:
Originally Posted by TinCow
Then I applaud you on your consistency and have no further questions; apologies for the cross-examination.Quote:
Originally Posted by rvg
It's no trouble at all :)
Yes. As I mentioned earlier in this thread, I do not feel any moral obligation as far as decriminalizing weed.Quote:
Originally Posted by Gelatinous Cube
Perhaps you're looking for a complex explanation where a simple one would suffice: I do not like weed. Many people share that view. In fact, enough of them share that view that in most states weed is illegal. Those states who have allowed it, that's their prerogative. To me that's no more of a reason to legalize weed than it is to legalize prostitution just because Nevada has allowed it. If I were in minority, we wouldn't be having this conversation, as the anti-weed legislation would have been long since repealed.Quote:
I find that maddeningly illogical, and makes me worry about other people who refuse to see the big picture.
I've met plenty of people who think that all drugs, including alcohol (and one blasphemer even includes caffeine) should be illegal. It's not an opinion I share, but I think it's an understandable one. Some people believe that substances which cause intoxication or which otherwise alter your mental state are bad for society as a whole. I'm actually fine with that argument, and I don't really fight that one. The people that bug me are those that justify the legality of one drug (usually one they use) but then oppose the legality of another drug (usually one they do not use). That's just ignorance and crazy talk. The general anti-drug stance I think is more of a moral and philosophical argument which is very difficult to debate with statistics and anecdotes.Quote:
Originally Posted by Gelatinous Cube
Overall that leaves us where we started; the prohibition issue has never let facts stand in the way of what some think all ought to think.
In Canada we have had a Senate recommendation for decriminalization (1972 Le Dain Comission) sit ignored for 40 years; the recent (2002) recommendation for legalization has been championed twice, to die on the order paper.
For some reason it's an emotive issue, not a rational issue.
Here's to another half century of wasted money, lives and effort :party2:
Actually rvg’s attitude as those of the people TinCow mentioned is why we have illegal substances.
Anything that might prove to be fun for some people must be bad. Everyone should be as miserable as they are.
These are the people who know best how you should live your life and never miss an opportunity to tell you so.
I know full well that there are people with addictive personalities who will go over the top with a good thing but I see no legitimate reason to tell them they have no right to live as they wish.
These miserable, buzzkilling rascals are also commonly known under another name: The Majority.Quote:
Originally Posted by Fisherking
Not for long.Quote:
Originally Posted by rvg
http://graphics8.nytimes.com/images/...ot-blog480.png
Quote:
Originally Posted by rvg
Call the miscreants anything you like. You obviously judge others not to be capable of making their own decisions and feel that liberty and freedoms should be given up and we should live the way we are told.
How enlightened you are.
The moral crusaders don't need a reason to tell people what to do. They know in their hearts their cause is right and that's all they need.
Majority rules.Quote:
Originally Posted by Fisherking
Oh, worthy causes are always worth trying. Though the definition of "worthy" varies from person to person.Quote:
Originally Posted by Gelatinous Cube
The most frightining thing in this thread is that Idaho has a job with a coroporation
Bloody patrician IMO
I really don't care about weed. I say we legalize it, so all you thirty somethings in this thread will finally stop complaining becuase you think its the one thing you do that still makes you "cool" and "hip"
This thread has been painful to read becuase of that
Seriously grow old with some dignity
It's just not important to me. I understand that it is important to you, and yes, you do a good job of presenting your case, but I just don't like it. That's a perfectly good reason to vote against something; don't let anyone tell you otherwise.Quote:
Originally Posted by Gelatinous Cube
Sure you have, I do not dispute that. I'm not swayed by it, but it is a pretty good case. Thus you'll be better off trying to convince somebody other than myself.Quote:
Haven't we presented enough evidence to warrant a better response than "i don't like it" ?
So what you are saying is that he needs to open his mind.....Quote:
Originally Posted by Gelatinous Cube
Hey RVG give me your address, I want to send you some baked goods.
You have heard the phrase "tyranny of the majority", right?Quote:
Originally Posted by rvg
Send psilocybin instead.Quote:
Originally Posted by a completely inoffensive name
Quote:
Originally Posted by rvg
"Good intentions will always be pleaded for every assumption of authority. It is hardly too strong to say that the Constitution was made to guard the people against the dangers of good intentions. There are men in all ages who mean to govern well, but they mean to govern. They promise to be good masters, but they mean to be masters." – Daniel Webster (1782-1852)
An appropriate phrase. RVG and his fellow nanny state authoritarians would be tyrants, if we let them.Quote:
You have heard the phrase "tyranny of the majority", right?
The price of freedom is constant vigilance.
CR
Are you so smug and self assured that you forget the very purpose of a constitution and the way a Republic works.Quote:
Originally Posted by rvg
You are talking about a direct democracy which we, thankfully, do not live under.
The rights of everyone are supposed to be protected, not just the majority. Otherwise the “Majority” might think that rvg shouldn’t have that kind of car or even that rvg should not live where he does. Why do you think we did away with the “Jim Crow Laws”?
Your views are far from the majority here, however.
I could really care less about weed from a personal standpoint. I don’t use it but I don’t want others deciding how I live or what I do.
This is just a chance to undo some of the past wrongs of government. Or have you not noticed that they tend to proscribe things and intrude into your life to make everything safer for you?
Your view is that you don’t like it, therefore it should not be allowed. That is not a view I can respect, regardless of what others say.
It is selfish, short sighted, and very narrow minded. By those rules there is nothing that could not be disallowed, to include you. It is a highly repressive point of view.
I was waiting for this... I was waiting for someone to draw a comparison between the civil rights struggle and the legalization of weed. If you think smoking weed is a civil right, then, well... :laugh4: :laugh4: :laugh4:Quote:
Originally Posted by Fisherking
Sure. If disallowing weed is tyranny, then so be it.Quote:
Originally Posted by drone
The notion that disallowing weed is tyranny does, on the face of it, seem laughable.Quote:
Originally Posted by rvg
But then when you see the numbers of people imprisoned or fired from their jobs, it seems less like hyperbole. The very fact that it seems silly and insignificant would suggest that judicial intervention was highly disproportionate.
My question to you now, is whether you think infidelity should be made illegal? After all, you have stated that laws should mirror societal dissaproval.
I have said repeatedly that I do not have a problem with replacing jail sentences with fines in cases of pot users. Maintaining the social stigma is my main goal, and fines here would do just as well as jail.Quote:
Originally Posted by Idaho
Outlawing infidelity is like outlawing alcohol: impractical. Not a bad idea in theory, but only in theory.Quote:
My question to you now, is whether you think infidelity should be made illegal? After all, you have stated that laws should mirror societal dissaproval.
Oh crikey, there really is no hope for you :laugh4:Quote:
Originally Posted by rvg
I think the group pile-on with RVG is a little bit unseemly. He's admitted that he has no metric, logic, or large-scale reason to his position—he just doesn't like weed and wants it to stay illegal.
IMHO, that's enough said.
What do other posters expect, a change of heart and a mea culpa? That sort of turnaround is exceedingly rare, and requires a lot from the person being asked to admit error.
It's enough that we all lay out our positions and our reasoning. Nobody is required to say, "Crikey, you're right and I was wrong!"
Duty calls. ~DQuote:
Originally Posted by Lemur
And by the way, I'm highly disappointed you didn't post the stoned dog picture in this thread. :no: