-
Re: Star Wars: Fall of the Order [in play]
Vote: Jarema, he is far too agreeable.
-
Re: Star Wars: Fall of the Order [in play]
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Sprig
Vote: Jarema, he is far too agreeable.
I agree with this.
Vote: Jarema. For believing in pever.
But..wait..gah..in agreeing i'm now a hypocrite!
Unvote; Vote: ArpeggiateTHIS.
But that's how I roll.
Unvote; Vote: Jarema
-
Re: Star Wars: Fall of the Order [in play]
Yeah, maybe less sillyness.
Some people are able to be converted, some arent. Thats how it looks now.
-
Re: Star Wars: Fall of the Order [in play]
What? Vote: ATHIS
Set Phasers to stun...
-
Re: Star Wars: Fall of the Order [in play]
Quote:
Originally Posted by
pevergreen
Yeah, maybe less sillyness.
:(
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Khazaar
What? Vote: ATHIS
Set Phasers to stun...
Perhaps I did just post random nonsense there. It's early in the morning, I've just woken up and I've got an economics lecture in half an hour. Caffeine and/or sleep deprivation.
-
Re: Star Wars: Fall of the Order [in play]
To much is hpappening and I am tired after a busy day at work, so I just think that vote:ACIN could be worth it.
-
Re: Star Wars: Fall of the Order [in play]
OH SO TEMPTED TO VOTE ACIN FOR CAPS LOCK!
---
Quote:
Originally Posted by
YLC
Sorry, but I see 3 Sith attacks, 1 oddball, and a possible Vig/Third Party on N1 and 2 Sith attacks on N2.
Yet there are now 4 apparent Sith attacks?
Thinking logically. The last game had rule of two, and it's pretty central to the whole Star Wars galaxy lore. So if there are 3-4 Sith attacks, divide that by two (for rule of two) you get two separate Sith factions. In a game pretty much as big as Capo, 4 kills by two "families" makes a whole lot of sense IMHO. However, that doesn't account for the fluctuations of kills over the course of multiple nights. Speculating over game mechanics is a pretty dead-end street though, something to consider, but not really worry over.
---
For y'all consideration Seon: Can't have smoke without a fire.
Vote: Seon
-
Re: Star Wars: Fall of the Order [in play]
Is ACIN being lynched just for using cap locks or is there another reason?
-
Re: Star Wars: Fall of the Order [in play]
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Andres
Is ACIN being lynched just for using cap locks or is there another reason?
Don't you know that Caps Lock leads to suffering!
-
Re: Star Wars: Fall of the Order [in play]
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Beefy187
Its ACIN or Choxorn for me right now.
Sigurd close third.
Coin toss tells me Choxorn.
Vote: Choxorn
You just listed the people who had already received votes, then tossed a coin between them? Lazy...
Vote: Beefy
-
Re: Star Wars: Fall of the Order [in play]
-
Re: Star Wars: Fall of the Order [in play]
@Psychonaut: In Soviet Russia, fire smokes you...
Anyways, Vote: Ibn for that random vote.
-
Re: Star Wars: Fall of the Order [in play]
FOS: Ibn Khaldun
FOS: Choxorn
Vote: ACIN
Those posts really triggered me. I think ACIN's worth trying.
-
Re: Star Wars: Fall of the Order [in play]
Quote:
Originally Posted by
YLC
Odd number of attacks is odd. I'd like to go out on a limb and say one of the attacks hasn't a Sith source, but I'll wait another night for that.
Not sure whom I should vote - I usually don't get enough time on to let any specific person pique my interests - but can anyone answer where dear Renata is? Haven't heard much from her, am I missing her posts as I skim?
I believe that its valid, primarily with the choice of diction in the kill:
Quote:
Cloaked figure: Quite the contrary, you are the one that is under arrest.
Quote:
The deed done, the cloaked figure grimly returned to the turbolift, and said nothing more.
Rather than the sith kill of :
Quote:
The smell of burning flesh was gag-inducing. The figure simply grinned, looking down at the remains of the Jedi,
I don't see all the hate on Jarema, considering how its plausible that he could be agreeable with pever considering the fact that pever has been attacked (by sith was it?) multiple times already and has survived.
Vote: Sprig
Care to explain rather than just taking the easy vote out?
-
Re: Star Wars: Fall of the Order [in play]
Quote:
Originally Posted by
YLC
Odd number of attacks is odd. I'd like to go out on a limb and say one of the attacks hasn't a Sith source, but I'll wait another night for that.
Not sure whom I should vote - I usually don't get enough time on to let any specific person pique my interests - but can anyone answer where dear Renata is? Haven't heard much from her, am I missing her posts as I skim?
Apparently, dear YLC. :inquisitive:
-
Re: Star Wars: Fall of the Order [in play]
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Ibn-Khaldun
Vote: Niklas
The guy who it's been stated never actually meant to join the game, and who will be wogged as soon as the stated deadline is reached?
-
Re: Star Wars: Fall of the Order [in play]
Quote:
Originally Posted by
a completely inoffensive name
Ugh another mafia game where me fooling around gets me killed and practically gives the mafia a free day to recruit and kill.
Easy solution to that -- don't fool around. That said, do you usually complain about it?
-
Re: Star Wars: Fall of the Order [in play]
Okay caught up --
Can we get some votes on soup, please?
He posts a bunch of fluffity-fluff on day one (mostly game-mechanics stuff), culminating with this gem of insight in post 265.
[url=https://forums.totalwar.org/vb/showthread.php?131243-Star-Wars-Fall-of-the-Order-in-play&p=2053220798&viewfull=1#post205322079815 posts and two hours later[/url], Chaotix votes him, for the reason that he's been posting a lot without saying anything.
Soup hasn't been seen in these parts since. I voted him last phase.
Now keep in mind that this is the guy who once got me lynched almost single-handedly when he started an OMGUS-you-horrible-mafia-you!(I was, but that's beside the point) bandwagon on me after I voted him for a typically-stupid day two reason in a game over at CFC. For him to ignore an accusation is out of character. For him to ignore two is very out of character. It seems unlikely he didn't see Chaotix' vote at least, since he was posting continuously until just two hours beforehand.
vote:soup
-
Re: Star Wars: Fall of the Order [in play]
-
Re: Star Wars: Fall of the Order [in play]
Quote:
Originally Posted by
dcmort93
Hmmmm random Vote Sigurd
Random? Certainly not. Opportunistic in all forms, hence FoS on you.
So, Sasaki was not guilty after all and by making him so, did not save him either. The Sith either believed Sasaki was the real thing or believed I was intentionally putting him into the mid causeway for protection and hoping by killing him they would frame me. Haha, the Jedi is too smart for you.
The initiates are being wasted but the heavy Jedi is maturing. Soon you will see Jedi with the power to oppose you.
-
Re: Star Wars: Fall of the Order [in play]
Your quintiple post has moved me.
Unvote, Vote: soup
edit: @sigurd: they've seen, and I'm the weak one. :wink:
-
Re: Star Wars: Fall of the Order [in play]
Who are you voting for, Sigurd?
I agree with the FOS, regardless -- very opportunistic. I think he did something scummy early on, too. Maybe I should be voting him.
-
Re: Star Wars: Fall of the Order [in play]
Renata's case on soup looks as good as anything I've seen.
vote; soup
-
Re: Star Wars: Fall of the Order [in play]
Quote:
Originally Posted by
YLC
Sorry, but I see 3 Sith attacks, 1 oddball, and a possible Vig/Third Party on N1 and 2 Sith attacks on N2.
Yet there are now 4 apparent Sith attacks?
4? There were three kills and one WoG. 2 that were clearly Sith and 1 that could be or something else.
-
Re: Star Wars: Fall of the Order [in play]
Vote : soup
Also, I'm highly disappointed that I've not been under suspicion this game. Behaving silly is a known scumtell for me, yet nobody picked up on it. I'm going to FoS : 'khaan in particular for this, since he once got me lynched in a small game I was mafia in for exactly that reason.
-
Re: Star Wars: Fall of the Order [in play]
-
Re: Star Wars: Fall of the Order [in play]
-
Re: Star Wars: Fall of the Order [in play]
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Andres
Also, I'm highly disappointed that I've not been under suspicion this game. Behaving silly is a known scumtell for me, yet nobody picked up on it.
I definitely noticed it. Seon's also playing that style of game. It's a good way for scum to deflect attention/appear active/not give away anything. Maybe it's his scumtell too?
-
Re: Star Wars: Fall of the Order [in play]
It's Seon's Seon tell, as far as I can tell. But you could be right, regardless -- he has a tendency to just disappear altogether when hes' plain vanilla. He told me he should have gotten the crazy guy role.
I'm having second thoughts about soup. Apparently he has not turned up here (visibly anyway) since the 28th. Which is still 2 days past that vote of Chaotix', but still.
-
Re: Star Wars: Fall of the Order [in play]
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Renata
'm having second thoughts about soup. Apparently he has not turned up here (visibly anyway) since the 28th. Which is still 2 days past that vote of Chaotix', but still.
Wasn't he replaced by Stuck in Pi?
-
Re: Star Wars: Fall of the Order [in play]
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Renata
It's Seon's Seon tell, as far as I can tell. But you could be right, regardless -- he has a tendency to just disappear altogether when hes' plain vanilla. He told me he should have gotten the crazy guy role.
I has my own tell? (is honored)
-
Re: Star Wars: Fall of the Order [in play]
Quote:
Originally Posted by
classical_hero
To much is hpappening and I am tired after a busy day at work, so I just think that vote:ACIN could be worth it.
This guy still needs to die at some point...
-
Re: Star Wars: Fall of the Order [in play]
Vote Soup
I thought he was scum last time and I still think he is scum
-
Re: Star Wars: Fall of the Order [in play]
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Csargo
4? There were three kills and one WoG. 2 that were clearly Sith and 1 that could be or something else.
I said "attacks", not "kills". DIY brings up a good point, besides the fact that would make two seperate vigilantes at face value.
-
Re: Star Wars: Fall of the Order [in play]
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Andres
Vote : soup
Also, I'm highly disappointed that I've not been under suspicion this game. Behaving silly is a known scumtell for me, yet nobody picked up on it. I'm going to FoS : 'khaan in particular for this, since he once got me lynched in a small game I was mafia in for exactly that reason.
FoS: Andres. Why FoS someone who was killed and confirmed a Jedi Initiate? A typical "I'll fake that I don't know what is going on" routine. We are on to you Andres.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Psychonaut
Wasn't he replaced by Stuck in Pi?
Yeah... Soup has been replaced - people should stop voting for someone not playing. It is rather ridiculous. :beam: Who leaves the game as a Sith anyway?
-
Re: Star Wars: Fall of the Order [in play]
Vote: Andres Something is certainly off with you. First you vote Nightbringer then you dont unvote and jump the Soup bandwagon.In the same post you Fos Yaseikhaan who is already dead. Like you wouldnt know better. You claimed that you were some sort of non harmfull character, but we havent witnessed anything after the funny attack of the first night.
-
Re: Star Wars: Fall of the Order [in play]
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Sigurd
Yeah... Soup has been replaced - people should stop voting for someone not playing. It is rather ridiculous. :beam: Who leaves the game as a Sith anyway?
Do I detect a hint of Andresthenotsocunninganymore? :wink:
FoS: Sigurd/Tincow for their suspicion of Andres.
My eye is on CB. Going with the flow.
Unvote, Vote: Capt. Blackadder
-
Re: Star Wars: Fall of the Order [in play]
Finally, I get the attention I'm craving for.
Unvote ; Vote : Andres
*** Does disappear trick and won't return for the next 3 days, enjoying in advance how people will have sleepless nights because they don't know what to make of all that ***
-
Re: Star Wars: Fall of the Order [in play]
Quote:
Originally Posted by
pevergreen
FoS: Sigurd/Tincow for their suspicion of Andres.
You forgot Kagemusha.
-
Re: Star Wars: Fall of the Order [in play]
Oh geez Louise. It's like people expect me to read what ATPG has to say, or something.
unvote
I think I'll try Sigurd's vote: dcmort, then. Lemme see if I can go find that previous post.
-
Re: Star Wars: Fall of the Order [in play]
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Sigurd
Yeah... Soup has been replaced - people should stop voting for someone not playing. It is rather ridiculous. :beam: Who leaves the game as a Sith anyway?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Andres
You forgot Kagemusha.
https://i205.photobucket.com/albums/...YC/PWNLAND.jpg
-
Re: Star Wars: Fall of the Order [in play]
Quote:
Originally Posted by
pevergreen
My eye is on CB. Going with the flow.
Unvote, Vote: Capt. Blackadder
I'm not convinced. His only other post (below) is consistent. Scum aren't consistent. They vote willy nilly and often go back on themselves on a whim for no good reason.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Captain Blackadder
vote: soup
Seems to be trying too hard to appear town stating the obvious like the death of two townies last night being a bad thing.
---
dcmort? Looking through those, I'd have to say he wouldn't be the worst lynch.
-
Re: Star Wars: Fall of the Order [in play]
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Kagemusha
You claimed that you were some sort of non harmfull character, but we havent witnessed anything after the funny attack of the first night.
Pizza didn't want to continue it, because it would confirm my innocence (as if my innocence wasn't confirmed with that first "attack" already, pfuh) ~:(
I'm confirmed innocent and I can't be nightkilled. I can allow myself some frivolities in this game.
You're all jealous now, aren't you?
Nanananana!
-
Re: Star Wars: Fall of the Order [in play]
-
Re: Star Wars: Fall of the Order [in play]
posting links to searches doesn't display anything. Better is to do this:
https://forums.totalwar.org/vb/misc....osted&t=131243
Then click the number next to the name in question.
edit: Or, the search function is still broken and that doesn't work. Great!
TosaInu, I need you~
-
Re: Star Wars: Fall of the Order [in play]
Yeah, I have seven posts on dcmort --
1. vote Raskolnikov
2. deny it was a bandwagon vote, was only random.org
3. "So I've kinda been following the thread and I would like to know what the case on DE is before I vote for him " (The post I was thinking of, otherwise known as "tell me how to vote, oh townies")
4. vote new Raskolnikov
5. fluff about wideyed
6. "Vote: Joooray. You are playing way too much like last time I was with you and you turned out to be mafia after it was all said and done." (I don't know what game he's referring to, but maybe dcmort could explain what he had in mind.)
7. Random vote Sigurd. (except under the circumstances it's obviously not random)
So we actually have twice that he bandwagoned while denying that it was a bandwagon vote, one vote for Joooray that might be sensible (or might not), and trying to get other people to tell him which way to jump. I agree with myself; it's not a bad lead.
-
Re: Star Wars: Fall of the Order [in play]
Quote:
Originally Posted by
pevergreen
Do I detect a hint of Andresthenotsocunninganymore? :wink:
I have never participated in any such follies.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Andres
*** Does disappear trick and won't return for the next 3 days, enjoying in advance how people will have sleepless nights because they don't know what to make of all that ***
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Andres
You forgot Kagemusha.
O'rly?? Just made you a liar with that second post there. double FoS
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Renata
I think I'll try Sigurd's vote: dcmort, then. Lemme see if I can go find that previous post.
STRAWMAN!!
I only FoS'ed the guy. Any scared townie are opportunists.
-
Re: Star Wars: Fall of the Order [in play]
Im going to bed. Someone post who we should lynch by when I wake up.
-
Re: Star Wars: Fall of the Order [in play]
Well, if soup's going to behave like that...
unvote: soup, vote: Andres. Taunting is not the way of the light side.
-
Re: Star Wars: Fall of the Order [in play]
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Sigurd
O'rly?? Just made you a liar with that second post there. double FoS
I bought the trick from a second hand disappearence tricks salesman. Apparently, it only starts to work after 570 years. Gah.
-
Re: Star Wars: Fall of the Order [in play]
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Sigurd
STRAWMAN!!
I only FoS'ed the guy. Any scared townie are opportunists.
Your idea. Are you now trying to evade responsibility? :inquisitive:
-
Re: Star Wars: Fall of the Order [in play]
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Kagemusha
Vote: Andres Something is certainly off with you. First you vote Nightbringer then you dont unvote and jump the Soup bandwagon.In the same post you Fos Yaseikhaan who is already dead. Like you wouldnt know better. You claimed that you were some sort of non harmfull character, but we havent witnessed anything after the funny attack of the first night.
What's wrong with voting Nightbringer? Which convincing case can you present to us against another player who is more lynch worthy than the honorable Nightbringer?
-
Re: Star Wars: Fall of the Order [in play]
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Renata
Your idea. Are you now trying to evade responsibility? :inquisitive:
Again a new strawman. Show me where I uttered: Let's lynch this guy. There is a SEA of difference between a FoS and a vote, or haven't you initiates been taught this yet?
-
Re: Star Wars: Fall of the Order [in play]
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Andres
What's wrong with voting Nightbringer? Which convincing case can you present to us against another player who is more lynch worthy than the honorable Nightbringer?
Your vote against Nightbringer was not suspicious, but everything after it.
-
Re: Star Wars: Fall of the Order [in play]
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Kagemusha
Your vote against Nightbringer was not suspicious, but everything after it.
Suspicious? How exactly?
-
Re: Star Wars: Fall of the Order [in play]
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Andres
Suspicious? How exactly?
I explained earlier in the post you quoted. You vote people without unvoting, fos dead players etc. You dont strike me as someone who doesnt know what he is doing in a mafia game, thus i think you are acting suspicious. Now i dont really know really what to think about your claim that you cant be killed during nights, while somehow your role as some sort of joker role got cancelled. Is there something else there to know about you?
-
Re: Star Wars: Fall of the Order [in play]
FoS: All those going after Andres.
Andres is a cunning player, but he's not the type to intentionally draw votes onto himself as mafia... at least not unless he's protecting someone else. Mafo-Andres gets silly and provocative once he's a dead mafioso, not when he's a living mafioso. His current behavior is not consistent with him being scum. Those going after him seem be leaping at the opportunity to grasp at 'easy' suspicion. It's voting without any real thought. Of all those participating, there is one person who should seriously know better...
Unvote; Vote: Kage
-
Re: Star Wars: Fall of the Order [in play]
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Sigurd
Again a new strawman. Show me where I uttered: Let's lynch this guy. There is a SEA of difference between a FoS and a vote, or haven't you initiates been taught this yet?
Nobody teaches me anything. Three nights, one lousy new power. But anyway: I never said or even meant to imply that you had said "let's lynch dcmort". But you WERE the person to bring him up as someone worthy of suspicion. Can we at least agree on that much?
-
Re: Star Wars: Fall of the Order [in play]
TC is correct in his reasoning. Everyone should be voting for Kage. Now. :stare:
-
Re: Star Wars: Fall of the Order [in play]
-
Re: Star Wars: Fall of the Order [in play]
*sigh* Okay.
unvote, vote: Kagemusha
-
Re: Star Wars: Fall of the Order [in play]
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Renata
6. "Vote: Joooray. You are playing way too much like last time I was with you and you turned out to be mafia after it was all said and done." (I don't know what game he's referring to, but maybe dcmort could explain what he had in mind.)
He refers to the Star Wars game over at twcenter.net, there I had the cover role of C3PO and he was R2D2, but I was actually Grand Moff Tarkin, so I can understand him being a bit upset about that. However, I still think that's a very easy vote and in combination with the other things you mentioned, I fell he is a good choice at some point as well.
Now Kage seems to be the person of choice Vote: Kage.
-
Re: Star Wars: Fall of the Order [in play]
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Kagemusha
I explained earlier in the post you quoted. You vote people without unvoting, fos dead players etc. You dont strike me as someone who doesnt know what he is doing in a mafia game, thus i think you are acting suspicious. Now i dont really know really what to think about your claim that you cant be killed during nights, while somehow your role as some sort of joker role got cancelled. Is there something else there to know about you?
Of course I didn't unvote, since my vote for soup was invalid :wink: I didn't have to unvote.
And yes, I fos'ed 'khaan, because he should have been going after me based on past experience in a previous game.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TinCow
FoS: All those going after Andres.
Andres is a cunning player, but he's not the type to intentionally draw votes onto himself as mafia... at least not unless he's protecting someone else. Mafo-Andres gets silly and provocative once he's a dead mafioso, not when he's a living mafioso. His current behavior is not consistent with him being scum. Those going after him seem be leaping at the opportunity to grasp at 'easy' suspicion. It's voting without any real thought. Of all those participating, there is one person who should seriously know better...
Unvote; Vote: Kage
That's what has been going on for the entire game so far; you can accuse several people of that.
-
Re: Star Wars: Fall of the Order [in play]
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Joooray
He refers to the Star Wars game over at twcenter.net, there I had the cover role of C3PO and he was R2D2, but I was actually Grand Moff Tarkin, so I can understand him being a bit upset about that. However, I still think that's a very easy vote and in combination with the other things you mentioned, I fell he is a good choice at some point as well.
Now Kage seems to be the person of choice Vote: Kage.
Why is Kage the better option?
-
Re: Star Wars: Fall of the Order [in play]
So i should be lynched because to me Andres is acting suspicious? Unvote and Vote: Jooray, bit anxious to get into the bandwagon?
-
Re: Star Wars: Fall of the Order [in play]
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Kagemusha
So i should be lynched because to me Andres is acting suspicious? Unvote and Vote: Jooray, bit anxious to get into the bandwagon?
That's scummy and you know it.
-
Re: Star Wars: Fall of the Order [in play]
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Andres
That's scummy and you know it.
Surely. "Makes a note. Never, ever vote Andres, or the badwagon will run you over immediately".:drama1:
-
Re: Star Wars: Fall of the Order [in play]
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Andres
Why is Kage the better option?
Because Sasaki said so?! :shrug:
And I feel the case TC expressed has validity to it and I prefer it to the case on Sigurd, who I believe still has some votes on him and so to make sure Kage is lynched and not Sigurd I'll follow the Kage-vote for now.
-
Re: Star Wars: Fall of the Order [in play]
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Renata
Nobody teaches me anything. Three nights, one lousy new power. But anyway: I never said or even meant to imply that you had said "let's lynch dcmort". But you WERE the person to bring him up as someone worthy of suspicion. Can we at least agree on that much?
Don't mind me, My old and aching Jedi joints makes me quarrelsome.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Renata
*sigh* Okay.
A Sith!!!? Where?
Now, where did I put my mighty purple crystal powered lightsaver?
-
Re: Star Wars: Fall of the Order [in play]
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Kagemusha
Surely. "Makes a note. Never, ever vote Andres, or the badwagon will run you over immediately".:drama1:
It's not my fault people worship my awesomeness and are prepared to lynch whoever dares to question my integrity :shrug:
-
Re: Star Wars: Fall of the Order [in play]
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Andres
It's not my fault people worship my awesomeness and are prepared to lynch whoever dares to question my integrity :shrug:
Well i guess i better start dressing into my survival suit then. Otherwise. The dead howling for my death specially Khaan~;) is nothing new in these games, not Tincow to that matter, while he seems inconsistent Fossing you and then voting me for raising similar suspicions. For Renata hopping the wagon so easily is bit surprising, but Jooray seems blatantly wagoning, so i think the best lynch is Jooray.
-
Re: Star Wars: Fall of the Order [in play]
Quote:
Originally Posted by
pevergreen
Im going to bed. Someone post who we should lynch by when I wake up.
Dcmort.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TinCow
FoS: All those going after Andres.
Andres is a cunning player, but he's not the type to intentionally draw votes onto himself as mafia... at least not unless he's protecting someone else. Mafo-Andres gets silly and provocative once he's a dead mafioso, not when he's a living mafioso. His current behavior is not consistent with him being scum. Those going after him seem be leaping at the opportunity to grasp at 'easy' suspicion. It's voting without any real thought. Of all those participating, there is one person who should seriously know better...
This. Even despite his earlier (not very factually based) case against me, I'd say voting Andres is the wrong move.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Renata
Nobody teaches me anything. Three nights, one lousy new power. But anyway: I never said or even meant to imply that you had said "let's lynch dcmort". But you WERE the person to bring him up as someone worthy of suspicion. Can we at least agree on that much?
At least you've learnt any new powers. Guess who's still stuck with Breath and a single, tiny defense power?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Kagemusha
So i should be lynched because to me Andres is acting suspicious? Unvote and Vote: Jooray, bit anxious to get into the bandwagon?
I'm really stumped on this as well. There is no reason to vote Kagemusha.
I'm going to unvote: ACIN, FOS: ACIN, Vote: dcmort.
Also, Nightbringer, why so quiet?
Last: Join Haiku Mafia. We need to get a small game running! Link in sig!
(... sorry for advertising!)
-
Re: Star Wars: Fall of the Order [in play]
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Sigurd
Don't mind me, My old and aching Jedi joints makes me quarrelsome.
A Sith!!!? Where?
Now, where did I put my mighty purple crystal powered lightsaver?
Up your ... hmm, yes, well.
-
Re: Star Wars: Fall of the Order [in play]
D_E, what's the case on dcmort?
-
Re: Star Wars: Fall of the Order [in play]
Er, Diamondeye? I know I'm currently thinking you're a townie and all, but ...
You agree with TinCow's FOS of all those who are going after Andres, but think there's no reason to vote Kagemusha, who is ... going after Andres? Logic, please?
For me, in re Kagemusha, it is that his accusation post appears to ignore the critical difference between acting suspicious and "acting" suspicious. Andres is clearly doing the latter. When Kagemusha says that Andres "should know better", it appears that he's accusing him of the former.
Weird is not scummy. Not by default, anyway. The majority of the time, it's just weird. But heck if scumbags don't like to vote for it.
-
Re: Star Wars: Fall of the Order [in play]
Now accepting large cash bribes for information about the game. :tongue2: No checks, I don't trust you guys, you seem sleazy.
-
Re: Star Wars: Fall of the Order [in play]
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Kagemusha
For Renata hopping the wagon so easily is bit surprising, but Jooray seems blatantly wagoning, so i think the best lynch is Jooray.
He provided his reasons for his vote after I asked him.
-
Re: Star Wars: Fall of the Order [in play]
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Kagemusha
So i should be lynched because to me Andres is acting suspicious?
The problem is that you didn't go after Andres until after Andres himself had started complaining that no one was accusing him. You essentially jumped on him just because he drew attention to himself in a humorous manner.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Kagemusha
Tincow to that matter, while he seems inconsistent Fossing you and then voting me for raising similar suspicions.
I thought it was obvious that my FOS of Andres was a joke. Andres was complaining of no one suspecting him of anything, so I FOSed him to make him feel better. It was an attempt at humor.
-
Re: Star Wars: Fall of the Order [in play]
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Renata
For me, in re Kagemusha, it is that his accusation post appears to ignore the critical difference between acting suspicious and "acting" suspicious. Andres is clearly doing the latter. When Kagemusha says that Andres "should know better", it appears that he's accusing him of the former.
Precisely. :yes:
-
Re: Star Wars: Fall of the Order [in play]
Which is why I'm voting for;
Vote:Andres