According to one of the vigilantes, this player I am referring to was in that group and they did successfully kill.
So either the detective is lying or we have a known mafia Don.
Printable View
According to one of the vigilantes, this player I am referring to was in that group and they did successfully kill.
So either the detective is lying or we have a known mafia Don.
Haudegen is a mafia Don.Quote:
Originally Posted by KukriKhan
unvote, vote: Haudegen.
I dont know whether to vote for Twilightblade because I hate Twilight or splitpersonality for having random numbers and capitalized letters scattered throughout, making his name take a whopping 30 sec to type.
Oh wait, people have actual lynching reasons on some people?
vote: Haudegen
Unvote, Vote: Haudegan I wonder if Haudegan will show up to say something in his own defense.
Don't you just love it when things fall into place perfectly...
Unvote:CR Vote:Haudegan "Snake in the grass".....tried to hide, huh?:inquisitive:
I made my decision, my dislike of Twilight is greater then screen names that a while to type.
Vote: Twilightblade
This can't be right. Haudegen has a successfull protection with me and LG, Seamus cc'd the success result and we show up in the write up (though we had a talk about that I remember).Quote:
Originally Posted by pizza
You should have your detective pm seamus to see if there was a mixup again.
Tally as of post 2891:
Haudegen: 4 ATPG, Kukrikhan, Tratorix, White_eyes
Crazed Rabbit: 2 Xehh, SSNeoperestroika
Xehh: 2 Crazed Rabbit, Chaotix
Shinseikhaan: 1 Split
Twilightblade: 1 ACIN
Please double check. Thanks.
Come to think of it, Haudegen was supposedly in my group as well that night.
How very interesting.
Why was he in your group when he sent in orders for my group?
Don't ask me, people do things like that though. Beefy almost sent in orders with me one night as well. That's what you get for recruiting all the available people :whip:
But this is another case of your obstinence pizza, you agreed just last night that you'd misread the sigurd writeup.
Quote:
Sigurd was ready for an attack, but like so many before him he wasn’t expecting it to come in the form of a 6’ tall rabbit wielding a double-barreled shotgun. The bunny had leveled and fired on him before he though to take any evasive action.
Others, however, HAD reacted in time. Between Sigurd and the rabbit, a pair of large steel cellar doors had opened up, revealing the access to the storeroom below….and intercepting both of the shotgun’s heavy slugs. Firepower coming out of the nearby windows quickly convinced the rabbit to make his escape.
Sigurd’s second would-be assassin had been frustrated by a trio of vans pulling up between him and Sigurd. The second shooter’s first blast had been intercepted by the armored side of the van and ricochets had nearly come right back at their firer. This second gunman also faded into the darkness.
Quote:
Originally Posted by pizza
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sasaki
Your group heading off the first attacker, my group heading off the second.Quote:
Originally Posted by pizza
You already tried to vig kill LG based on misreading that.
And another thing, when we were discussing this, you mentioned yourself and LittleGrizzly. But you specifically avoided mentioning Haudegen. Why? Did you know something bizarre was going on with that protection? And why, of all people, did you decide to randomly protect Sigurd? Were you tipped off that he was protected by 5 people, and you thought you could make absolutely sure that Haudegen didn't get caught not protecting someone? What's really going on here?
And Haudegen has very few posts here, he hasn't posted in like a month. Why is he avoiding the thread? Why does he have a successful vigilante kill and an innocent result? Why have the mafia never targeted him?
He also said he did "nothing" from n1 to n5.
How many nights did you work with Haudegen, Sasaki? Just the once? Because he's been with my groups every night since night 6.
I'm quite disappointed that I was even on the lynching block. The very fact that I had a guilty result and had a clearly recognizable trail should have made it entirely obvious that I couldn't have possibly been a don. :whip: Anyways, should be interesting with this Haudegen thing. I'll get to a proper writeup, assuming no other twists get thrown in the way. Of course, I would enjoy narrating a tie between myself and someone else, if you're still up for that idea. :smash:
Are you admitting that we were there protecting sigurd?
I didn't specifically avoid mentioning haudegen, I avoided saying anything about what I was doing. You knew LG was working with me because I had to tell you when you tried to put him in a different group.
You've killed almost everyone I've tried to work with pizza...
I worked with haudegen just that one night, after that he didn't reply and I went back to working with you.
If so, this might count as a group of *seven*. No wonder you'd get credit for the thing. I don't believe this counts as a group of three. Anytime Haudegen was in a group of three, the target didn't get attacked.
It seems to me Haudegen may have intentionally been trying to get credit for a successful protection in a group of three "to prove himself" when in this instance it quite obviously wasn't a group of three.
You and LG both were keeping a lot of information from me.Quote:
I didn't specifically avoid mentioning haudegen, I avoided saying anything about what I was doing. You knew LG was working with me because I had to tell you when you tried to put him in a different group. You've killed almost everyone I've tried to work with pizza...
Just the one night, huh. Odd that all this happened on the one night Sigurd was attacked, the one night you worked with Haudegen, and on the one successful protection that Haudegen had. Haudegen, a player who none of the mafia have targeted, or really voted for, who has been under invisible mode all game, and who killed and has an innocent result, and who has Imperator Invictus as one of his four visitors.Quote:
I worked with haudegen just that one night, after that he didn't reply and I went back to working with you.
I believe there is foul play going on here.
We can probably sidestep it...will seamus be back in time to send out a correction?
-edit-
pizza, you're going into your "but isn't it just too ODD" mode...
Seamus will probably send out a correction as he did with Crazed Rabbit, I've personally requested an extension if there is a flawed detective result. So, let's wait and see what happens.
If it doesn't get extended, then what we will have is a player who isn't a detective claiming to be one, probably. And that would of course result in some more fun.
CR is so Mafia...
ATPG - "Well, it seems Haudegen has killed and has an innocent result. Hmm..."
CR - "RIGHT RIGHT!!! YEAH!! LETS LYNCH HIM GOGOGOGOGO VOTE: HAUDEGEN"
Anticipating a possible result back from Seamus which says this was all a mistake,
unvote, vote: Caius
Let's see what Seamus says.
Deadline extended to 1500.
Host's mistake on a reported investigation result is influencing things, needs time to be redressed.
EDIT
Yes, an innocent result was sent when a guilty was called for. My records for this rendition were choppy throughout the middle nights and I malfed it.
I am assuming that I will not receive the hand-me-down results from the detective in time, and as such, I'm going to take a guess and suggest that Haudegen does indeed have a guilty result as scheduled, andwould advise people to vote in a more Crazed and Rabbity direction.
EDIT: I retract this statement. See below for the goods on the Number 5 killer.
Alright, in the light of all of this I will have to renew my vote from last round.
Vote : Crazed Rabbit
The accusations against him have been around for a long time and so it is just about time to act on it.
Vote: Crazed Rabbit
Be a good little bunny now *pats*
Seriously, kill Xehh II. There was a #5 kill last night. I'm dead (and not the killer anyway) and khaan can't be the #5 killer because he was director. Kill Xehh II so we can rid ourselves of #5.
edit: and I still don't get why a serial killer couldn't have an unclear result. He's already 1 Vs 70ish. Why would Seamus give him an additional disadvantage of having a guilty result?