Create two different legion units - Split from the Spears thread

Quote:

---

As a point of order, history books are not evidence, ancient writers and artifacts are.

To answer your point. A veteran unit is represented by a higher level of experience anyway. Why would we have a veteran and green version of a unit we already had. If you build a unit of Cohors Reformata then those a green troops. If you want veteran units I suggest you send them out to fight.

Either way the Roman faction already had 2.5 times as many unique units as any other faction. We are at our absolute limit.

---

Then why not only allow the recruitment of Pezhetairoi only when the Deuteroi get enough experience, and so on? I mean there could be two units that would represent a fresh levy post-marian legions, more numerous, cheap and weaker, and an unit of trained and tough professional legionaries, less numerous and more expensive.

Any thoughts?

I think we have the evocata in EB, don't we? So just raise their defense and attack value for a point or two and everything is fine.

Quote:

---

As a point of order, history books are not evidence, ancient writers and artifacts are.

---

Who said that? (stopped reading the spear threat since a while)

Phillip said it, and he's right of course.

Its foolish to represent ONE unit of soldiers with more than one game unit--thats what those chevrons are for-they represent experience.

If you're too lazy to go grow your legions into experienced units like real commanders had to do, edit your own game and have them recruitable with more experience. EB will never do it.

....

Pezhetairoi and Phalangitai Deuteroi are drawn from different parts of the population (Pezhetairoi are wealthier) and use (slightly) different equipment (Pezhetairoi use better/more expensive equipment), which makes them two distinct units in EB.

Your roman example is different, in that those units are just one and the same (equipment and population class wise) and as such don't need two units to represent them. A better comparison would be Hastati and Principes: principes are from a more wealthy part of the population and use (slightly) better/more expensive equipment and are therefore represented as two distict units.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Basileos ton Ellenon

Then why not only allow the recruitment of Pezhetairoi only when the Deuteroi get enough experience, and so on? I mean there could be two units that would represent a fresh levy post-marian legions, more numerous, cheap and weaker, and an unit of trained and tough professional legionaries, less numerous and more expensive.

Any thoughts?

---

A) Because we can't make units change as they get experience (there are units where we would do that if we could, talk to CA if you want that feature though.)

B) That's a really bad analogy. Pezhetairoi aren't more experienced Deuteroi. Its a class distinction. To quote from the unit descriptions:

Quote:

---

The Phalangitai Deuteroi are wealthier members of Makedonian or Eperiot society than the majority of peasants, but are still not in the class required to be considered Pezhetairoi (voting property owners)

---

C) We're not going to give Rome even more unit slots. They already have nearly twice the amount of any other faction. (I love how everyone who thinks EB hates Romans ignores the fact that they have more so much extra attention lavished on them).

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Basileos ton Ellenon

Any thoughts?

---

EB will not do this. We simply do not have the room, and we cannot justify this for a single faction.

If you wish to create an unofficial mini-mod to simulate this, please check out out sub-forum.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Zaknafien

Phillip said it, and he's right of course.

---

Yes he is.


(since I don't want this threat to become a discussion on the definition and right use of sources)

really youd be better off discussing a different unit for eastern and western legionary cohorts, or even a 'northern' cohort. this has been debated internally before and has more merit--even though it probably wont happen due to unit restrictions.

No, I'm discerning between Pezhetairoi and Deuteroi only as a question of training, not of personal wealth and status. Many from the capite censi turned into tough soldiers in the Legions, so it's not a question of your social class and wealth.

I was clearly making this analogy as a response to Zaknafien's post. You didn't deny that there were high quality and trained legions, but you also stated that during a war, many levies would be used to fill the ranks of the army thus degrading the quality.

I think clearly that an institution as widespread, diverse and large as the Roman army cannot be acurately represented by just generalizing one unit of Cohors Reformata. And I'm not talking about adding a veteran unit to the game, we already have the Evocati, but I'm talking about adding lower quality legions along with more trained and professional ones to represent the disparities in the Roman army. Then the Deuteroi vs. Pezhetairoi analogy comes.

As such, a distinction between regional legions in the later Augustan Era is also a good idea.

You, friend, are ludicrous. In one instance you argue for the discipline and cohesion of the Roman army, and in the next you argue for its widepsread diversity. You cant have it both ways mate.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Zaknafien

You, friend, are ludicrous. In one instance you argue for the discipline and cohesion of the Roman army, and in the next you argue for its widepsread diversity. You cant have it both ways mate.

---

Am I ludicrous? Call me ludicrous all the time you want, but I want to discuss EB 'till it becomes the best mod over there. I would make these things for myself if I had the time to do so.


The Roman army had discipline and cohesion enough, and it got famous over the Western World just because of their strict training, discipline and effectiveness. However, there were disparities enough in the legion, especially as you stated and I never disagreed with, when time of war came and many raw recruits entered the army especially during the "Post-Marian" era.

Later on, there is reference about the difference in quality between the Eastern and the Western legions. While this doesn't mean they were a bunch of levies, it means that the Roman army had a large discipline and cohesion, but that doesn't mean the Legion didn't have its share of low quality soldiers. All armies have, including the Greeks, the barbarians, and etc...

Quote:

---

Am I ludicrous? Call me ludicrous all the time you want, but I want to discuss EB 'till it becomes the best mod over there.

---

It already is the best mod, you spoiled brat...

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Basileos ton Ellenon

No, I'm discerning between Pezhetairoi and Deuteroi only as a question of training, not of personal wealth and status. Many from the capite censi turned into tough soldiers in the Legions, so it's not a question of your social class and wealth.

---

Once again.

We're not going to create a whole bunch of units based on the level of experience of Cohort A vs. Cohort B for the following reasons.
1) RTW already has its own experience system built in (problematic as it is).
2) We already stat the Marian and Augustan Cohorts the way we stat 'vetern' troops in EB.
3) The same argument could be made for almost any unit in the game, why not have a whole slew of units represting the varying experience levels of Peltasts, Cataphracts, or Gaeros?
4) We're not giving the Romans even more units, they already take up nearly twice as much model/unit space as any other faction.

yeah, plus we're already getting brand new principes and hastati anyways! --oops.

...Zak bullies the fans again... :inquisitive:

I am not sure 'fan' is the word to describe the 'I want' brigade....unless its....F.A.N......so do we have to suggest what this stands for....

....I think N=numpty....not sure of F.......or A....have to think on this....

It is incredible, but the EB team and some people here are by far the most reactionary I've ever seen. You can even say "a" without getting flamed, then get a lesson of "how good is this mod, how we spent our time building it, how it is great, how we are the kings, and how you should all shut up and bow because you're inferior". Pah! Many other mods welcome discussion with more open hands.

As for the quality of troops, EB already discerns between Kleurochoi, Deuteroi, Pezhetairoi and even Hysterioi Pezhetairoi. Were the Hellenic system like the Roman, then we would a single Pike Phalanx unit with another Reformed Pike Phalanx coming later, and both would only have average and below average skills.


Ah, OK, discussing here is like talking to the devil, so do whatever you want.

:inquisitive: Persecution complex much ?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by QwertyMIDX

2) We already stat the Marian and Augustan Cohorts the way we stat 'vetern' troops in EB.
...
4) We're not giving the Romans even more units, they already take up nearly twice as much model/unit space as any other faction.

---

This reminds me of a question I asked in the feedback thread a few days ago (not very clearly, judging from the response I got).

According to the unit cards, Marian and Augustan legions are absolutely identical now (IIRC they were very slightly different from each other in 0.8). Why do they use two unit slots, instead of just being a single "Cohors" unit representing all the legions after Marius? I'm guessing there's some little detail that's not shown on the cards that's important to keep different between Marian and Imperial legions, and I'm curious to know what that is.

And a follow-up to my question about those spear auxilia - why are there separate eastern and western versions? Again, identical stats, which to me indicates it may as well be a single unit... If they really were discernably different, shouldn't that show up in the stats? Maybe eastern guys had better armor since that was a richer part of the Empire, or something like that?

Thanks!

Mail and scale armour seem to be, all other thing being equal, functionally identical in game terms though. IIRC the Auxilias use skin slots from models other factions use for a lot of stuff (and which the Romani would have no other use for) so that's not an issue though.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Basileos ton Ellenon

It is incredible, but the EB team and some people here are by far the most reactionary I've ever seen. You can even say "a" without getting flamed, then get a lesson of "how good is this mod, how we spent our time building it, how it is great, how we are the kings, and how you should all shut up and bow because you're inferior". Pah! Many other mods welcome discussion with more open hands.

As for the quality of troops, EB already discerns between Kleurochoi, Deuteroi, Pezhetairoi and even Hysterioi Pezhetairoi. Were the Hellenic system like the Roman, then we would a single Pike Phalanx unit with another Reformed Pike Phalanx coming later, and both would only have average and below average skills.


Ah, OK, discussing here is like talking to the devil, so do whatever you want.

---

Your position has been noted and refuted several times already, you don't have to repeat it, indeed, pointless repetition is detrimental to your case, as copying the previous answer gets tiresome, which, in turn, leads to grumpy answers.

As for your ad hominem about us not being open-minded, there's a thread spanning multiple pages where your (off-topic, which is weird, as you started the thread) arguments have been responded to by team members, several times, and with actual sources, not to mention your arguments not having any solid foundation whatsoever. That is to say, you should bow down because of your inferior arguments.

Edit: Yes, you, good man, have begun to annoy me.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Basileos ton Ellenon

It is incredible, but the EB team and some people here are by far the most reactionary I've ever seen. You can even say "a" without getting flamed, then get a lesson of "how good is this mod, how we spent our time building it, how it is great, how we are the kings, and how you should all shut up and bow because you're inferior". Pah! Many other mods welcome discussion with more open hands.


Ah, OK, discussing here is like talking to the devil, so do whatever you want.

---

rofl, the EB team tries to explain things to you and in your ignorance ignore them. Get over it.

It's like talking to a wall, you can show it all the evidence in the world proving your point/reasoning but obviously it doesnt give a shit. (you being the wall.)

Thank you Spoofa. Now, if you'll excuse me, I'll get onto wondering what else I might get you to repeat after me.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by The_Mark

Thank you Spoofa. Now, if you'll excuse me, I'll get onto wondering what else I might get you to repeat after me. ~;p

---

Lol sorry, this guy has been pissing me off too and I just wanted to make sure he knows more then just 1 person is annoyed by his continued attitude. :laugh4:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Basileos ton Ellenon

As for the quality of troops, EB already discerns between Kleurochoi, Deuteroi, Pezhetairoi and even Hysterioi Pezhetairoi. Were the Hellenic system like the Roman, then we would a single Pike Phalanx unit with another Reformed Pike Phalanx coming later, and both would only have average and below average skills.

---

This has been dealt with, but again: Those are different classes of soldiers, from different backgrounds, with different sources of equipment and training, some providing their own gear, others state sponsored.

Post-Marian Legionaries are all one class of soldier. Hence one unit.

If there is such a problem with quality disparities between N/W/E legions, is it possible to have those regions recruit Cohors Reformata of better/lesser experience. In other words, have certain areas train Cohors Reformata with a chevron or two. That way you wouldn't have to use one of the units slots which you can't spare anyways. Honestly, I could see you just doing away with Cohors Evocata and letting one recruit a 3 chevroned (or such) Cohors Reformata instead, since the equipment was identical, no? Which would make MIC 3: Cohors Reformata, MIC 4: Cohors Reformata, Cohors Reformata (Exp Whatever) for X Mnai more.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Spoofa

Lol sorry, this guy has been pissing me off too and I just wanted to make sure he knows more then just 1 person is annoyed by his continued attitude. :laugh4:

---

Sigh. Sorry, my post was way too cheery. Don't clutter the thread with me-tooisms.

Edit: Yes, I'm grumpy.

hey, look over there!

*hopes bait distracts trolls*

https://i41.photobucket.com/albums/e...ed-1copy-2.jpg

About Ze Incredible Romans: Ze Question I always keep on asking myself is:
how could anybody be a good swordsman (piercing/slashing/hacking/cleaving/cracking/whatever) with this HUGE heavy inconvenient shield in thy left hand?
not trolling, just curious:help: