wow only 2 points for calling a habitual liar a liar
:2thumbsup:
Printable View
wow only 2 points for calling a habitual liar a liar
:2thumbsup:
And this post completed the ban? :no: :oops:
1 point for calling him a liar.
1 point for the two dozen laugh smilies.
Sounds fair. :laugh4::laugh4::laugh4::laugh4: :laugh4::laugh4::laugh4::laugh4: :laugh4::laugh4::laugh4::laugh4:
nananananaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaana
Yet no points for calling him a :daisy:.Quote:
1 point for calling him a liar.
1 point for the two dozen laugh smilies.
muahaha report
see you in a week :laugh4:
I am trembling in my boots , if I was worried you was going to report me for calling you a :daisy: I would never have called you a :daisy:.Quote:
muahaha report
Will you still be a :daisy: then?Quote:
see you in a week
:oops: better report that one too , sorry for calling you a :daisy: again Frag and I promise to not call you a :daisy: till next time I call you a :daisy: ...which was just now.
dont feel bad tribes. i got 2 points for calling a habitual troll a troll. :yes:
Calm down dudes, I'm sure there's a better way to express such things. :sweatdrop:
Who's feeling bad?Quote:
dont feel bad tribes. i got 2 points for calling a habitual troll a troll
I just think is funny that calling a liar a liar got two points and calling a :daisy: didn't get any
Maybe it was a special offer? Get two insults and pay for one.
There should be a topic where we just slag eachother off, then you dont have to post it in any other threads. It will be like the "the anger spot" where you rant and rave about anything, anyone and everyone.
On the plus side, with the stuff done in there, there shouldn't be any excuses for such behaviour in civil threads. :beam:
While I think an anger topic wouldn't be a good idea, I'm pretty sure a Tribesman vs Fragony one would provide quite some fun.
So the Backroom minus the warning points?Quote:
Originally Posted by Beskar
or bopa and i. we go way back.Quote:
Originally Posted by Meneldil
He is :daisy:, though.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stress_ballQuote:
Originally Posted by Beskar
This is easily the best and probably only worthwhile post in this entire thread. I vote Siggy no less than 7 internets as his prize.Quote:
Originally Posted by Sigurd
Hmmrph. Reporting ain't as fun as it used to be.Quote:
Originally Posted by Tribesman
yea :daisy: reportfunction...
You're ALL a bunch of :daisy: .
Thread solved. :beam:
is someone gonna start the anger spot thread? I'd be happy too....
I believe that would be a bad idea.Quote:
Originally Posted by Prussian Iron
I am not angry at Tribes just a little disappointedolol patronisingQuote:
Originally Posted by Prussian Iron
You know what I think is really childish... when a football player moans and whines at the referee to give an opposition player a card and then celebrates when they do so...
IMDHO...
that had to do with this how?
Looks like you've caught a mutated version of Lemur's disease. I suggest you start sending LG pm's with ominous titles like "Day 2".Quote:
Originally Posted by Prussian Iron
damn inside jokes.....not making sense to newbies like me....grr
Hello Beskar,Quote:
Originally Posted by Beskar
There are some problems with that. A big problem is that bad blood will spill over to other fora and such topics attract new people from outside who just want to create trouble for others.
But, all that 'fear' aside, it's an illusion to think that such a topic can be left unmoderated. And it simply won't: not in any place or any time in cyber space or the real world. A few people will insist to be a bit 'better' than the rest and those words/lines will become a new taboe. That taboe will then have to be banned and punished (a few troublemakers will cry the loudest to ban that; perhaps because troublemakers will be the only people left). Then we will be at the same position where we are now, but at a different level.
We are not doing this for fun or to prove something. We want to offer people a nice time with each other here and we don't want a survival of the fittest.
Why does Tosa only have 451 posts?
He often wipes his post count to check things.
you can do that?
He can, he has a red name which makes him OUR FEARED OVERLORD!
BOW BEFORE THE MIGHT TOSA INU.
Watchtower doesn't contribute to post count. OR DOES IT?
lets see:
purple rain!
yes it contributes to your post count.
sorry for the DP; it wont let me edir for some reason....
know your classics.Quote:
Originally Posted by Azathoth
http://www.amazon.com/Fahrenheit-451.../dp/0345342968
wtf???
Tosa isn't real didn't you know? Tosa is the internet and the internet is Tosa, 451 Fahrenheit is the EXACT temperature at which books burn, do you really think that is a coincidence. Make no mistake.
The hare is ready for the kettle, I repeat, the hare is ready for the kettle
The hare is ready?
We are go for the bunyip, I repeat, go for bunyip.
There's an invisible K after it.
It is actually 451K posts.
At one point didn't he have something stupid like a few hundred thousand postcount...
Ohh and PI if you can't understand my post think of the issue being discussed and imagine tribesman was the player sent off (the fact i used a 'soccer' example probably didn't help either...
Lemurs disease is when you repeat things already said....
lastly I didn't really get the rest of the joke either... so don't worry...
I agree with Tosa really... the .org wouldn't be right with some type of warzone place... I think sometimes things are a little uptight and sometimes it would maybe be better if they could get it out of thier system... but the .org doesn't work like that... and its an awesome forum... so maybe the .org way is better...
ah, see i was thinking american football. I'm like "250 pound linemen dont whine or cry...."Quote:
Originally Posted by LittleGrizzly
Eh? No it does not. I experimented too, and it only proved that there is no point spamming here :grin:Quote:
Originally Posted by Prussian Iron
WTH?
Why are Watchtower posts being counted? Tosa, I demand an answer:beam:! Just a week ago they were not...
Well, let usspamask more questions then! :laugh4:
Nevermind. Only Backroom Watchtower posts are counted. Not the regular WT.
And why no editing? To prevent people from modifying their arguments stated in their previous posts during heated debates on Backroom policy?
I never said backroom. we were specifically talking about the watchtower.Quote:
Originally Posted by Aemilius Paulus
Neither did I mention the Backroom. Watchtower posts do NOT add to your post count. I have tested it long ago, and today as well. But this place, the Backroom Watchtower, does count your posts and adds them to the cumulative post count.Quote:
Originally Posted by Prussian Iron
To serve and protect? What a lie!
trust me they do.....Quote:
I'm like "250 pound linemen dont whine or cry...."
Aww, why'd you have to go and do that?
Well, it's all good.
Wow, I love these Watchtower threads. It's like how I imagine each person acts at home, or high. :2thumbsup:
high more likely
drunk as well
Feelin' kinda lusty.
I cannot comment on whether my personality on the forum is similar to my RL personality because I still plan to go on a road trip with AP, Meth, AVSM, Subo, Miotas, AS and Lz3 across Europe and would like to surprise them with how I actually act in RL.
I love how people go "act in real life" as if they are really amazingly different people. :book2:
I'm much quieter. I say very little. You would be hard pressed to get me to talk if I felt uncomfortable.
Chances are I'd be watching everyone waiting...then I'd see something that reminds me of a memory of maybe a mafia game, or something I saw on tv and I would laugh.
says the man with 8k post in little under 4 years...Quote:
Originally Posted by pevergreen
Hence the "I'm much quieter."Quote:
Originally Posted by Veho Nex
Not really. It is a completely different format. If a real life conversation/afternoon with friends was forum posting, we would be reaching around the 1000-a-day mark.
Also, if you check pevergreen stats, it is approx 8 posts a day. Very minimum if this was a subitution.
There is also the personality aspect, obviously people are always evolving and social role play a big part, but there are still the fundamentals. Him being "quiet" doesn't come as amazingly different. If pevergreen turned around saying he was a party animal with 10 ladies a night, then that would really be a misjudgement of personality.
Also again, there is "impression" and "judgement" factors. You generally invent characteristics for people or communication isn't taken the same way, then there is obviously social roles. Many people sometimes post with the mindset of "this doesn't matter so i can say anything and everything" while in real life, I doubt they would say it infront of their parents without recieving a backhanded slap.
Hey! I resent that.Quote:
Originally Posted by Beskar