Printable View
So, William is engaged to Kate Middleton, a commoner.
But the big question is, will this be enough to create healthy offspring, or will the centuries of inbreeding be too much to erase in just one generation? Only time will tell....
Discuss.
EDIT: Oh, and a linky for those who don't know or care what I'm talking about(cudos to you!).
None of the current British royals look inbred to me. Gone are the days of the Hapsburg chin!
Yes, well, a quick look at their sexual morals should give a clue as to why that is............Quote:
Originally Posted by Rhyfelwyr
Anyone who thinks William and Harry are actually Charles progeny needs an eyetest, I bet there is some secrert Illuminati, NWO, Bildergerg treaty that ensures every thirty years Euro royals secretly have a bit of commoner rough.Quote:
Originally Posted by Rhyfelwyr
The Queen is of good stock, please do not tarnish us with your Scandivanian looseness of morals! And I am absolutely not biased.
GOD SAVE THE QUEEN 1690 NO SURRENDER WATP
:laugh4::laugh4::laugh4::laugh4:Quote:
Originally Posted by gaelic cowboy
Ha ha too late on the loose morals line Rhy he has be going out with her for a couple of years now there effectively shacked up together in the best of UK tradition.Quote:
Originally Posted by Rhyfelwyr
I just want to say congratulations for William...
hope he will be nice enough king...
Disgraceful behaviour for a Christian magistrate! I must make a national Covenant and ensure the person of the king (should he become so) respects his office as the power by God appointed, things worked out really well the last time the Scots did that...Quote:
Originally Posted by gaelic cowboy
It'll be grand the last time I checked lately Huntingdon in East Anglia was pretty sleepy these days.Quote:
Originally Posted by Rhyfelwyr
And I must stop you.Quote:
Originally Posted by Rhyfelwyr
I knew I should have started this topic to prevent HoreTore from hating on our Royal Family.
William is clearly Charles' son, Harry probably is (they will have had a DNA test) and in any case it doesn't matter because he's not going to be King.
Congratulations to my future Liege Lord and his new possession.
How sad it is too see the English, once a beacon of liberty to the world, these days bow under tyrants, and have all sorts of heathen for kings over them. What of the ancient liberties? What of the Witan?Quote:
Originally Posted by Philipvs Vallindervs Calicvla
Sheesh I thought we sorted things out when we got good King Billy on the throne, how did things come to this. What's left of Christianity in England is a poor crypto-Papist excuse for a church, the Turks (or Mohametans to be more modern) will be the only religious folk left!
And the royals openly live in sin! Like a good Covenanter, I must form a completely self-contradictory movement that makes no sense to anybody in order to combat this evil, so I can attack the king while defending his majesty, fight for freedom of religion while imposing a theocracy, and secure political freedom for all by reinstating the rights of the nobility!
Last time I checked Cromwell wasn't a Covenanter. :tongue2:Quote:
Originally Posted by gaelic cowboy
Last time I checked he had no problem getting all stabby in the back with them though.Quote:
Originally Posted by Rhyfelwyr
:laugh4:Quote:
Originally Posted by Philipvs Vallindervs Calicvla
Nah Cromwell was cool the Covenanting movement was split up by that point, him and his New Model Army crew were with the Kirk Party (against the Engagers), which IMO were more in line in keeping to the National Covenant/Solemn League and Covenant.Quote:
Originally Posted by gaelic cowboy
.....It's at times like this I'm very happy with the Union with Denmark....Quote:
Originally Posted by Rhyfelwyr
It's quite easy to learn the Norwegian history when it's just king dies->danes take over->swedes take over->modern times. None of this dynastic and revolutionary sillyness....
Everything should be grand as long as ye keep down the Levellers :book:
I, for one, welcome our new tabloid monopolizing overlords!
One man one vote would surely lead to anarchy!Quote:
Originally Posted by gaelic cowboy
speaking as a monarchist; i don't give a damn........................
.........although it will be highly entertaining to watch the legions of lefty republicans agonise and moralise and posture over every second of the endless tv coverage of the wedding for the next year.
normally it is not considered nice to laugh at torture, self-inflicted or otherwise, but in this instance I think i will make an exception.
I want to marry a royal
I'm kinda handsome.Quote:
Originally Posted by Strike For The South
Say, you wanna get... wet?
Are you sure you are royalty?Quote:
Originally Posted by Megas Methuselah
An ancestor of yours having sold the lands of your tribe to the British in exchange for some trinkets and a few dollars does not mean you are royalty. That he and the other headmen of the tribe signed a treaty with 'Queen Victoria' does not imply they are her equal, nor even, perhaps, that he was a sovereign.
I must confess I am not aware of sovereignity in tribal North America. Is there a sovereign to every tribe? Hereditary? Combined with title to territory?
I myself am no doubt descended from Charlemagne, but that does not mean I'm emperor. I must have countless Gaul chieftains as my ancestors, who all signed away their lands to Caesar. This does not mean that I'm Celtic royalty and that my family dealt with Roman Emperors on an equal footing.
YES, we get to talk about Genghis Khan - 8% of the men in a large region of Asia (about 0.5% of the men in the world) are apparently descended from him. That's quite an achievement, never mind the sack, rape and pillage of the world's largest continent.Quote:
Originally Posted by Louis VI the Fat
aparantly same goes for charlemagne in europe...Quote:
Originally Posted by alh_p
Really? Good for Carlomagno aswell then!Quote:
Originally Posted by The Stranger
What about a game of Top-Trumps with despotic/absolute rulers: Population ruled = 2 million people, Genealogical descendancy -unbeatable!
Harry has the Windsor mouth (developed from the Hapsburg lip), his red hair and fair skin probably come from his maternal Uncle - the likelyhood is that he is Charles' son because Dianna was required to produce "heir and spare" before she was aloowed to go and play with her toys.Quote:
Originally Posted by HoreTore
Callous way of looking at it, I know, but the real problem was not the affairs she engaged in - it was the way she used them to embarress the Royal family.
judging by how goofy he is starting to look as he grows older I say no chance.Quote:
Originally Posted by HoreTore
So there's a name for it, wondered what the deal with it was...Quote:
Originally Posted by Philipvs Vallindervs Calicvla
He was such a handsome young men a few years ago! Now he's starting to resemble his father.Quote:
Originally Posted by Ronin
Kate does have a fine pr0n body. I'd hit that too. Good legs, fine tits, all sure to attract William' attention.
Normally I wouldn't be this sexist, but on the lure of her thighs depends the political stability of sixty million Europeans, so the exact attractiveness of her bossom is a matter of international diplomatic concern. :book:
https://img99.imageshack.us/img99/28...andprincew.jpg
I say, Louis, that pic reminds of Peter Crouch' legendary quote:
That picture proves that the same is true for dear Willy...Quote:
Originally Posted by Peter Crouch
The leaked US cables provide us with an insightful peek behind the scenes of this dreadful family.
The French are corrupt, Americans are stupid, corruption is fine, and those :daisy: journalists should mind their own business.
What a terrible man. Apparantly, of limited intellectual capacity to boot.
Quote:
WikiLeaks cables: 'Rude' Prince Andrew shocks US ambassador
Duke railed against France, British anti-corruption investigations into BAE and American ignorance, leaked dispatches reveal
http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2010/no...-prince-andrew
he is right on BAE.
......you don't believe corruption should be investigated....?Quote:
Originally Posted by Furunculus
i believe if the foreign country you are doing business with has a culture of 'gifts' and it represents a multi-billion dollar deal that helps support what is considered to be a strategic industry, then we shouldn't ask too many questions.
do i care that a bunch of saudi princes got millions in kick-backs after an endless round of parties involving coke and hookers? no, i care that we got to sell them hundreds of tornado fighter/bombers and a bunch of warships, along with support contracts that span decades!
would i start making an embarrassing fuss just before we agree to sell them over a hundred eurofighters, an act that may keep defence-aerospace alive in this country long enough to market UCAV's such as Taranis? hell no!
LOL Horetore you are such a hypocrite at times, suddenly inbreeding matters after all? Just as forward thinking when it comes to French shave mind you.Quote:
Originally Posted by HoreTore
hm?Quote:
Originally Posted by Fragony
Ha don't act as if you don't know what I'm talking about, our Turkish and Maroccan immigrant naturally. So how does inbreeding affect royals but not others who really care about family mattersQuote:
Originally Posted by HoreTore
Why Moroccan, but not Algerian or Tunisian?Quote:
Originally Posted by Fragony
Why Turkish, but not Kurdish?
To quote last time this came up:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Banquo's Ghost
Playing Devil's Advocate, as Horetore has already touched on, this is not Racism as it is based on National boundaries, and not just those of a specific racial heritage.
But still, seeking therapy as to the root cause of this hatred might be more profitable than lashing out in this manner.
~:smoking:
This was an unpromising thread to begin with, that has now veered into even rougher terrain.
:closed: