Quote:
The Background of the Arianic "Church" is the Priest Arius from Lybia and his theory that Jesus was, at least his body, a human beeing before God had chosen him. De facto after Arius it is claimed that he became what he was in the Moment St.John had baptized him and God gave him the Mission.
What evidence do you have to support this theory other than pure speculation?
Quote:
The Theories of Arius competed with those of the roman catholics, due to Emperor Constantine the roman variant was chosen and put into law resulting in the roman catholic Church.
Actually the Roman "variant" existed long before Constantine, I have historical records to prove it. This is a common Protestant notion, that the Catholic Church was formed when Constantine convened the edict of Milan in the 4th century but I'm afraid it's just myth.
Quote:
But Arius thoughts, as persecution of heretics was in those times not yet done, survived. Several Missionaires who believed in the arianic christianity went to the northern people, the Germanics. The Goths preffered the arianic message to the catholic one, due to the catholic one would have put them under rule of the Pope in Rome.
Arianism was the heresy that "spread like wildfire", at one point nearly every bishop in Christendom was an Arian, save for Augustine and those who were in league with him. You're right, Gothic Arianism survived for purely political motives.
Quote:
Within the Goths, Vandals and Huns the arianic christianity was then alternated by unique cultural conditions: The Christian God was made equal with Allfather from the native Asatruar faith. This can be compared with the development in Japan, where Shintoism and Buddhism fusioned to be Zen-Buddhism.
Do you view this as a doctrinal compromise or a cultural revision?
Quote:
The whole theory of non-existance of physical existance is not christian, it is converted from germanic paganism.
Are you forgeting the Gnostics?
Quote:
That and the fact arianic Bishops were independant from the Pope, resulted in the roman church to classify the arianics as beeing heretic later on and supporting wars to conquer their Kingdoms. This way they for example supported France to conquer the Visigoth Kingdom in Spain and reconvert them into becoming Catholic.
They were independent from the Pontiff because they were heretics, not because they were granted some nebulous autonomy.
Quote:
Modern people who got to know about this is by reading about them, and through the ban of herectism is not lifted this is mostly a thing for history buffs. This way there is no more arianic church, only the arianic theory beeing very similar to Descartes "cogito ergo sum" (I think, so I am.).
Descartes stole that from Gnosticism, it was hardly an original idea. Even as such its somewhat absurd, unless you have a really strange way of looking at the world. Were that the case then I should be able to manipulate my environment, since it is apparently under my control.
Quote:
Your Senses, feel, taste, smell, see and hear are related to your body. If you die they're gone. Your Soul, your Emotions and Thoughts, are the sixt sense which will live further.
I can mostly agree with that, with the exception of the fact that our bodies will be returned to us in a glorified manner on the last day.
Quote:
The Universe you can see with the five others is like an Ilusion from God and he is able to change it anytime. That explains why God can do such unexplainable things, like splitting the Waters or hide the Fortress of the holy Grail so only Parcival could see it.
Why is it necessary that material be an illusion in order for God to manipulate it? If God is the supreme master of the universe, would it matter then what state material was in?