Printable View
Ive been watching this Natalee Halloway story down in Aruba. If you didnt know a US girl has gone missing there since may 30th.
Anyway, the investigation seems centered on a Dutch guy who was last seen with her. I heard on the news that if he did in fact kill her the maximum sentence he could get under Dutch law is around 20 years.
Tell me the media screwed up, that cant be a real murder sentence! ~:eek:
well even if he is found guilty , which is not likely because our system doesn't really work erveytime...
even then he would probably get 5-10 , and will only need to serve 1/3 of his sentance ( or was it 2/3 ? )
And in holland if you get sentenced life, that means 20 years.
You don't see that allot here in Holland.
:balloon2:
Probably true, if Holland is in any way like Belgium, it's really hard to spend more then 10years in prison. You'll have to have committed multiple homicides,a nd even then...
You're quite lucky then because we see many here... I guess it's proportional to the size of the country.Quote:
Originally Posted by Dutch_guy
In France when you kill someone intentionally, you're condemned for perpetuity, which means at least 22 years and 30 if a child was murdered.
You don't see a lot of murder in Holland either.
And American criminal law is screwed up?
So if this kid killed that poor girl he wont even get 20 years? What kind of screwed up country.. oh wait.. that would be a slur. ~:rolleyes:
All I can say is that regime change should strongly be considered in this case if a murderer gets only a few years in prison. ~;)
What about executing mentally retarded minors? Is that more along your lines of justice? :dizzy2:
No, and we don't.
I believe that is illegal in the US isnt it? It certainly is in the state in which i live so I dont know what relevance that has to anything. Less than 20 years for cold blooded murder appears to be national law in Holland.. and thats just retarded. (Excuse the play on words ~;) )
Well it's not that bad. I don't see the use of keeping someone detained for that long for no reason. It's not even jail after 5 years, it's home and routine. You'd be amazed at how flexible people's concepts of home are.
You might find this surprising but I actually find this very logical on the Dutch parliament's part. If you're not gonna torture or execute these people as punishment then you might as well turn them into desent members of society. I think staying in jail for the rest of your life is pretty easy living anyways. You have no responsibilities, you get to read you get to lie down and if you're lucky.......
It is Federally illegal.
Cunning! ~:rolleyes:Quote:
and thats just retarded. (Excuse the play on words )
The execution of minors under the age of 15 is unconstitutional in the States. 19 states permit the execution of minors between the age of 16 and 18. Only since 2002, is the execution of retarded people prohibited. However, a good prosecution and/or poor defence will allow many clearly retarded individuals pass straight through this safeguard. Maybe a careful critique of your own system's failings is in order before you go pointing the metaphorical fingure...
So youre trying to draw relativity using a practice that is illegal? Wow, now thats cunning. ~:rolleyes:
Maybe you need to examine US law a bit more before trying to instinctively find something negative about it simply because someone from the US critiqued Dutch law. ~;)
US law is the same as dutch murder. You will not serve all of a sentence it is only about a third basically life = 20 years
When you start to make statements like "What kind of screwed up country" you generally open the door yourself to some (lets call it) constructive criticism. And lets not pretend this barbaric practice of executing retards is in some ancient past. Its only been prohibited for 3 years, and it was fought tooth and claw all the way. And STILL it happens! And just so ya know, and because it makes me feel all warm and fuzzy inside, I have examined US law on this issue.Quote:
Originally Posted by PanzerJager
And back on topic, I think 20 years is a suitable sentance for murder.
If you still want to draw some correlation between existent dutch law and nonexistent american law thats fine, but I dont remember this topic being about the US.
Not true in most cases, and even then 20 is the max in Holland(as far as i know), therefore 1/3 would be 6 1/3 years no? Is a persons life worth only 6 1/3 years?Quote:
US law is the same as dutch murder. You will not serve all of a sentence it is only about a third basically life = 20 years
Whatever u do, 21 years is maximum penalty no matter what in Norway.
Sidenote: 1 year for molesting a child at 3 years or below, 3 years for forging currency.
Dutch & Norwegian laws are similar enough.
I wouldnt say that is the question at hand. More like, what is acheived by locking someone away for much more than 20 years?Quote:
Is a persons life worth only 6 1/3 years?
Forget Law for a minute, im talking about what is practiced here. If there were no retarded and/or minor people being executed in the US, then I would not mention it. However, the fact remains that these executions STILL take place EVEN, after the federal government ruled it against the 8th amendment to execute the mentally retarded (and the execution of minors is still perfectly legal in 19 states..)!! That is a massive failure of the judicial/legal system, and seems to me pretty (to borrow your phrase) "screwed up"! The Legal system itself breaking the laws... ~:eek:Quote:
If you still want to draw some correlation between existent dutch law and nonexistent american law thats fine, but I dont remember this topic being about the US.
:dizzy2:
~:eek: 1 freaking year! Why does Miky Jackson live in the US? ~:confused:Quote:
Sidenote: 1 year for molesting a child at 3 years or below, 3 years for forging currency.
Justice for starters. What is achieved by letting a murderer back out into society?Quote:
I wouldnt say that is the question at hand. More like, what is acheived by locking someone away for much more than 20 years?
America is broken up into different states that are somewhat independent of eachother, but all are supposed to follow national law. Executing retarded people is not practiced in my state and is against federal law, so your attempt at relativity ("You cant criticise them because you execute retards!!") doesnt hold water. If i lived in a state where it was legal i would vote against it. On the other hand these lenient murder sentences are dutch national law. :shrug:Quote:
Forget Law for a minute, im talking about what is practiced here. If there were no retarded and/or minor people being executed in the US, then I would not mention it. However, the fact remains that these executions STILL take place EVEN, after the federal government ruled it against the 8th amendment to execute the mentally retarded (and the execution of minors is still perfectly legal in 19 states..)!! That is a massive failure of the judicial/legal system, and seems to me pretty (to borrow your phrase) "screwed up"! The Legal system itself breaking the laws...
Executing minors is a whole different story. A 17 year old shouldnt get off after killing a few people just because he is legally a minor. I think you will find that very few if any young children who could not think on their own have been executed. Remember its up to a jury or judge, so just because there isnt a specific law banning minor executions doesnt mean that every child that kills someone is executed. Im happy with the law as it is in that case because of the example i cited above. There are many 16/17 year olds who act just as adults and deserve to be treated that way.
Rehabilitaion is the aim of punishment over this side of the pond. What greater achievement is there than taking a brutal murdering man, and after years of incarceration, including extensive psychological treatment and a host of other methods, producing a remorseful yet newly upstanding, profoundly changed individual, who regrets what they have done to the core. That seems like justice to me and far more productive than simply throwing away the key. An eye for an eye if you will, the killer removes an upstanding citizen from society, so society removes a murderer, and produces an upstanding citizen... the scales of justice are balanced.Quote:
Justice for starters. What is achieved by letting a murderer back out into society?
Now dont get me started, I am the first to point out naked idealism, and there is no doubt that some people will are not reachable. But the fact remains that nothing at all is achieved by life term incarceration as a sole method of punishment. It clearly doesnt work as a deterant, or the murder rates in the US would be amounst the lowest in the world, not on the upper end of the scale.
As a matter of interest, what would you sentence this man to if it were up to you?
Dutch law sounds similar to german law.
Life long(those 20 or so years) is only applied if you kill several people in a very brutal way. If it was not that bad, when you killed only several people, but in a nice way, you can get out earlier if you behave in prison.
Best is to kill a child(but sometimes works with adults, too), because then you will be declared retarded in about 90% of all cases, you will be put into a mental home and can then flee when you´re out on a walk with an unarmed guard.[Please notice the irony ~;) ]
I think we already had one or two cases here, where murderers flew from mental homes, because they can go to the dentist or out for a walk with guards, and killed more people.
I´m not saying you should kill them, that´s another topic, but I think putting murderers in mental homes or in prison for a few years is by far not enough.
You can´t think that every murderer will be a good member of society after some crazy psychologists pumped him full of drugs for some years or after he was in prison for five years.
Not long ago I heard a story of a girl(she told it on the radio) whose mum shot her dad when she was nine years old. Her mum got imprisoned for 10 years and the girl got put into a children´s home for three years until she lived with her uncle. Now she is nineteen and her mum is about to be released, she doesn´t like her mum because of what she did and never visited her(I think that´s understandable, she loved her dad) and now her mum sent her a letter that she was going to do the same to her daughter, what she did to her husband. Ten years after she killed her husband, she wants to kill her daughter!
I don´t know how it went on, they wanted to inform the police, but I think the woman will maybe get a few more years or so and that´s it.
If I would see such a letter and had to decide, I´d give that woman 20 more years, including hard work!
That´s just my two cents.
For a start, thanks for explaining Federal Government to us all, I honestly had NO idea what it was! ~:rolleyes: :book: ~;)Quote:
America is broken up into different states that are somewhat independent of eachother, but all are supposed to follow national law. Executing retarded people is not practiced in my state and is against federal law, so your attempt at relativity ("You cant criticise them because you execute retards!!") doesnt hold water. If i lived in a state where it was legal i would vote against it. On the other hand these lenient murder sentences are dutch national law.
~:handball:
Im not attempting relativity of any sorts. What I am doing is getting you to examine and acknowlegde the massive failings of your own country's legal system (that retarded individuals, who are not wealthy enough to afford a top shot lawyer are still executed, by the State, even after it has been made illegal by the Federal Government) while you point out what seems to me to be a relatively minor flaw,(and even that is very subjective - I would call it a disagreement in applied severity of sentence) in the Netherlands. And then proceed to call that country screwed up on that grounds?? ~:confused: ~:eek: :dizzy2:
I see nothing productive about that. Also the logic is flawwed. There is no set treatment to change a murderer into a normal person.Quote:
Rehabilitaion is the aim of punishment over this side of the pond. What greater achievement is there than taking a brutal murdering man, and after years of incarceration, including extensive psychological treatment and a host of other methods, producing a remorseful yet newly upstanding, profoundly changed individual, who regrets what they have done to the core. That seems like justice to me and far more productive than simply throwing away the key. An eye for an eye if you will, the killer removes an upstanding citizen from society, so society removes a murderer, and produces an upstanding citizen... the scales of justice are balanced.
Justice is achieved. A life is taken by one person who then must pay for such a mortal crime with his own life - whether that be wasting away in prison or death.Quote:
Now dont get me started, I am the first to point out naked idealism, and there is no doubt that some people will are not reachable. But the fact remains that nothing at all is achieved by life term incarceration as a sole method of punishment. It clearly doesnt work as a deterant, or the murder rates in the US would be amounst the lowest in the world, not on the upper end of the scale.
As a side note, I like the turkish prison system, or what its made out to be in the movies. ~D
Western prisons are way too easy going. They should suffer every day, all day for what they did. Exercise rooms, cable, good food, and comfortable beds just dont cut it as punishment or rehabilitation.
If he is found guilty of willfully chosing to kill this girl than I would have him executed. He sold away his humanity and is nothing more than refuse that society must deal with.Quote:
As a matter of interest, what would you sentence this man to if it were up to you?
Then I would imagine you would also cry out for regime change in a country that let's it's soldiers murder unarmed, wounded prisoners and lets them off with not so much as a slap on the wrist.Quote:
Originally Posted by PanzerJager
Then surely the answer is to increase security at mental institutions? Not throwing all cases in prison, even if they are mentally ill? ~:confused:Quote:
I think we already had one or two cases here, where murderers flew from mental homes, because they can go to the dentist or out for a walk with guards, and killed more people.
I dont know, but I would have to see some statistics before I believed that 90% of childkillers in Germany are declared insane? Or is this rhetorical?Quote:
Best is to kill a child(but sometimes works with adults, too), because then you will be declared retarded in about 90% of all cases, you will be put into a mental home and can then flee when you´re out on a walk with an unarmed guard.
Surely it would be the Psychiatrists would be the ones doing all this drug pumping? And no, thats exactly what Im saying, locking someone up is not the way to achieve anything. Bring in the Psychologists, and maybe something can be done...Quote:
You can´t think that every murderer will be a good member of society after some crazy psychologists pumped him full of drugs for some years or after he was in prison for five years.
About the story you heard on the radio... well it seems odd to me, rather strange. But surely the woman (the mother) has incriminated herself again, with threatening to murder her daughter, which can be then dealt another term for that crime?
Ok... well fortunately that doesnt mean its wrong!Quote:
I see nothing productive about that.
Well, there is the irreconcilable, fundamental disagreement we have on this issue. This is the predominant view in the States, but it is generally viewed by most other western nations that this approach achieves absolutely nothing other than brutal revenge, note, not Justice. Call me a pansy wearing liberal pinko if you will, but I like to think that society has come along just a little since the middle ages when these customs, acts and laws were universal.Quote:
Justice is achieved. A life is taken by one person who then must pay for such a mortal crime with his own life - whether that be wasting away in prison or death.
yeah... Im sure you do. ~:confused:Quote:
As a side note, I like the turkish prison system, or what its made out to be in the movies.
Yeah... a real walk in the park! ~:rolleyes:Quote:
Western prisons are way too easy going. They should suffer every day, all day for what they did. Exercise rooms, cable, good food, and comfortable beds just dont cut it as punishment or rehabilitation.
Nothing productive? Instead of taking two people out of the population, you take one, and replace one useless being with a human who is willing to work and sees their errors. Is that not a greater justice? If you died would you rather have your death destroy another, or have that person reenter society and do good?Quote:
I see nothing productive about that.
I can point you to a number of studies that will tell you that during teenage years the brain is undergoing a growth spurt on the level that a three year old goes through. During this time teenagers don't have alot of self control, infact a pre-pubescant probably is able to act more rationaly than a 15-16-17 year old.Quote:
Executing minors is a whole different story. A 17 year old shouldnt get off after killing a few people just because he is legally a minor. I think you will find that very few if any young children who could not think on their own have been executed. Remember its up to a jury or judge, so just because there isnt a specific law banning minor executions doesnt mean that every child that kills someone is executed. Im happy with the law as it is in that case because of the example i cited above. There are many 16/17 year olds who act just as adults and deserve to be treated that way.
@Martyr: Of course I can´t prove any 90% or other things, I just guessed there, that more or less represents what the news make you think.
Concerning psychiatrists and psychologists, I still have my problems with these terms in English(just don´t remember them always), just insert what you think fits best. ~;)
I would say that a lot of people know about their guilt, but they just give in to their "needs"(having sex with children), so they have to be punished, even if that just means locking them away for many years(20 should be the least, not the most). And I seriously doubt that much of this can be "healed", I agrre for rehabilitation on small thieves or so, but if you go as far as to kill several children, knowing you´re wrong and then don´t dare to look into the mother´s eyes, because you know about your guilt, then you´re so mentally sick it´s almost hopeless to help you. In the case I´m thinking about(was in the news here lately), the guy even talked to other people in prison, claiming he killed more than the children he was supposed to have killed. He just said something like: "Well, there I got weak again."
Although I could get into a rage about such things, I´d still not kill them, but rather let them hack stones for the rest of their life(or do something productive, like coal mining).
Of course there may be really mentally ill people, but it appears they call almost every childkiller mentally ill here, which I seriously doubt.
Erm, well, I wouldn´t even believe those studies, but maybe that is due to the (christian) way my parents brought me up and that our family is intact and doesn´t belong to the 52% divorce rate we have here. How can children grow up in a normal way if their moms or dads change every few years?Quote:
Originally Posted by JimBob
But I won´t go any deeper into that.#
Maybe there is some brain development, but that doesn´t excuse murder in any way, hope we agree on that.
Hmmm...
Kidnapping, murder, paedophilia, capital punishment, mentally disabled people, minors, national lockup/rehabilitation schemes....
Yup, I'm in the Org Tavern. ~D
You don't have to keep it light, but keep it right, gentlemen. Forum rules, and all. Thank you. Please carry on.
Wait, what ever happened to justice? Isn't a murder a murder? Either way, isn't someone losing their life? An innocent person being killed for no reason? Yet, I take it that in your opinion if the persons retarted or a minor it's alright, like they didn't even kill anyone? What ever happened to Justice? Obviously people like you don't care about the victims, the people who's lives were cut short by murderous cutthroats!
In Indonesia you get death for murder. Had a serial killer last year that got that. Yesterday a Pakistani citizen got death penalty for drug trafficking and I believe that next month we will see 2 out of 5 bombers of the Australian embassy get that too. What I can't understand is that Americans keeps on critizing Indonesia for being to rough, isn't it death penalty you guy's want it to be ??
Said by Goofball-
Nope because I understand the nature of war and what a combat situation dictates.. nice try though.Quote:
Then I would imagine you would also cry out for regime change in a country that let's it's soldiers murder unarmed, wounded prisoners and lets them off with not so much as a slap on the wrist.
Said by Martyr-
I dont have a problem with agreeing to disagree. Oh and i would call you a pansy liberal pinko but i fear you would enjoy it. ~;)Quote:
Well, there is the irreconcilable, fundamental disagreement we have on this issue. This is the predominant view in the States, but it is generally viewed by most other western nations that this approach achieves absolutely nothing other than brutal revenge, note, not Justice. Call me a pansy wearing liberal pinko if you will, but I like to think that society has come along just a little since the middle ages when these customs, acts and laws were universal.
Said by Jimbob-
Your idealism doesnt change reality. Also, where is the justice in allowing a murderer to enjoy a good life that the victim was robbed of. Taking human life in a "cold blooded" manner strips someone of their basic humanity, and they dont deserve it back.Quote:
Nothing productive? Instead of taking two people out of the population, you take one, and replace one useless being with a human who is willing to work and sees their errors. Is that not a greater justice? If you died would you rather have your death destroy another, or have that person reenter society and do good?
Cite them please. I was 15, 16 and even 17 and I had the basic self control it takes not to kill another human being, as did all my friends. No, im sorry, hormonal changes excuse a lot of things, but not murder. :no:Quote:
I can point you to a number of studies that will tell you that during teenage years the brain is undergoing a growth spurt on the level that a three year old goes through. During this time teenagers don't have alot of self control, infact a pre-pubescant probably is able to act more rationaly than a 15-16-17 year old.
Said by Bmolsson-
I dont! ~DQuote:
In Indonesia you get death for murder. Had a serial killer last year that got that. Yesterday a Pakistani citizen got death penalty for drug trafficking and I believe that next month we will see 2 out of 5 bombers of the Australian embassy get that too. What I can't understand is that Americans keeps on critizing Indonesia for being to rough, isn't it death penalty you guy's want it to be ??
Indonesia, even with its imperfections, is a great example for the rest of the muslim world and even the west should adopt some of its stances, like their tough position on drugs. :bow:
In New Zealand it is the same as Holland; about 20 years (less for good behaviour).
It seems to work here, we do not need to try harsher sentences (i.e. Death Penalty) as a deterrent. It is better to try and rehabilitate the individual.
Have a look at these statistics
We have in New Zealand about 1 a week, whereas United States, which has the Death Penalty has the equivalent of 4 a week if populations were equal.
The population makeup has to be examined though. America has a much larger under-class than NZ. That has a lot more to do with crime than prison sentences.
Now ive never been to NZ but it seems to my you dont have to deal with the inner city violence on a level that America does. I may be wrong though, as I know that part of the world has issues with asian immigrants.
We have our problems with "gangs", "drugs", etc. and is not particular safe in the earlier hours of the morning. Our Assault rates are similar, but escalating to murder does not seem to occur as much.
Interestingly, NZ has more than twice as much burglaries per capita than the US.
Now that is not only one hell of a good post - :bow: - but something I can totally agree with. :bow:Quote:
Originally Posted by _Martyr_
Ow let me tell you about dutch law, he will probably have to write 'it is not nice to rape and kill' a hundred times, then he will get a course on social behaviour and a ticket to sixflags to channel all that negative energy. Then he will be put at kindergarten to see if he has learned anything, and if he has he can form a commision to avoid such behaviour in the future.
on a more serious note, forget sixflags.
I don't agree with the current Euro justice system. Not because I want vengeance, I don't believe in vengeance. But because it makes a serious crime (like murder) a serious option.
You spent five or six years in jail and you got rid of someone who got in your way. Sometimes this could be considered a good deal.
Don't get me started on rape and child abuse laws, they're ridiculous. People who are obviously sick get released after 5 years and start all over again. Murderers might not kill again often, but pedophiles will abuse again most of the time, yet we let those people near our children again...
And jail is like Disneyland here, criminals go swimming, go on bike rides, they don't have to work, they get to play videogames all day long...
I'm very much pro rehabilitation, but I think jail should still be a place where you don't want to go. And i think that with certain types of criminals, we should be very careful when considering releasing them on the streets again, ever.
He likes it.
http://www.geenstijl.nl/mt/archieven...temongeaul.jpg
a lot.
Another murderous psycho with TBS (which means you are beaucoup dangerous) that was 'on leave' or 'even helemaaaaaal weg', and to our utter amazement he has killed again yesterday! Ohnoes teh shock! All the experts said he was highly dangerous but that didn't impress the justice department at all, all homocidal serial rapists have rights here after all, right on a normal life. So it doesn't matter that you rape and kill, we all go crazy from time to time don't we?
Yanks? invade us? please?
Maybe because he can get out with nothing in the US ~:handball: ?Quote:
Originally Posted by PanzerJager
Louis,
Then I'm a liberal pinko too, because this was put brilliantly.Quote:
Originally Posted by _Martyr_
Very good post _Martyr_ :bow:
On a sidenote, in France, if you kill someone, or even a whole familly in a car accident, you'll likely get one or two years in jail, maybe more if you were drunk before the accident, but that's all.
Actually, I don't really understand why people still kill with guns and not by buying a big car and rolling over everyone ~:handball:
That's screwed.
We dont invade, but we will help in the removal of a screwed up government. ~;)Quote:
Yanks? invade us? please?
I can PM you George's telephone number, i think we can squeeze you in between Syria and France. ~:cheers:
That says it all doesn't it ?Quote:
Originally Posted by Meneldil
Accidents are things you try to avoid, or at the very least don't want to happen. If you followed all the rules, i don't think you should be jailed at all.
Have you ever driven around in a suburban/urban surrounding ? People seem to leap out from everywhere, kids are worse. Damn things act like they're immortal.
Either it's an accident or not, killing a whole familly and getting only a few years in jail is *not* right.
Furthermore, a lot of these 'accidents' happen because someone did drive while being drunk or on drugs, or was trying to run an illegal race, or some other crap like that. That's a total lack of respect for other citizens, and it deserve a serious punishment.
And when you drive in a urban surrouding, you're supposed to drive more carefully than ever.
But yeah, things like that may happen. Though there's a difference between killing someone when you are respecting the rules/laws, and when you are outlaw.
I like to say that if you want to kill many people here, try to kill them all before someone catches you, be fast, because then you get those 20 years only once. If you miss one of 500 persons, you will have to kill him 20 years later and get punishment of another 5 years, so be fast. ~;)
You see? Indonesia has a good law system. Do somthing bad, you don't have a chance to do it again buddy. Instead though, we have the socialistic pinkos of society forcing upon "rehibilitation" and "prisoners rights" LET ME TELL YOU SOMTHING: CRIMINALS DON'T REHIBILITATE! They never have, and they sure as hell never will. So by keeping Rapists, pedophiles, druggies, etc alive you are risking the lives of innocent people.
Yeah, lets execute all those reefer smoking druggies! Hang em high boys! YeeHaw!
:thinking:
While we are at it, why not chop peoples' hands off for stealing, or how about public floggings for burglars!? No? Letting them off easy am I?
Well, you're wrong there. I have a friend who drove drunk (not plastered, but over the legal limit) about 15 years ago. He caused an accident that caused another person to be crippled for life. He served jail time, but is out now. He has a respectable job and has not once even considered driving drunk since, and never will again.Quote:
Originally Posted by Kaiser of Arabia
He is completely rehabilitated and is no danger to society. In fact, he contributes more to society than many people who have never been convicted of a crime, IMO.
So, is this the kind of guy you propose we should execute because he is "IMPOSSIBLE TO REHABILITATE?"
May I ask how long he spent in prison?
I believe his sentence was 5 years, but as he was an ideal inmate with no criminal history and very low risk of reoffending, he was out in a little less than three.Quote:
Originally Posted by PanzerJager
I wonder how the person who is crippled for life feels about that sentence. "Oh well, no hard feelings." :inquisitive:
Probably unhappy. But then again, that doesn't change the fact that from all available information, he appears to be completely rehabilitated.Quote:
Originally Posted by PanzerJager
Is justice about revenge, rehabilitation or protection of the community? I would say it is the latter two, and they both appear to have been fulfilled here.
Which is why we don't let the victim set the punishment for crimes.Quote:
Originally Posted by PanzerJager
There should be a degree of punishment associated with justice. I dont see it as fair or just that one person devestated another's life - and spent 3 years in jail. How long will the victim have to live being crippled? How much happyness will he miss out on while the drunk lives a normal life?Quote:
Is justice about revenge, rehabilitation or protection of the community? I would say it is the latter two, and they both appear to have been fulfilled here.
Why not?Quote:
Which is why we don't let the victim set the punishment for crimes.
Nobody ever thinks of the victims anymore, and its truly sad. Whether victims of crime, abortion, or 9/11 - people always seem to focus on the criminal.
"Why should he get any more than a few years if he's rehabilitated?"
"Who are we to stop a mother from killing her own child?"
"How dare we force the poor terrorists to listen to Christina Agulara?"
Its all the same and it all points to a sad shift in public perception. We need to start thinking more about the innocent, not the guilty.
I think he could be considering leaving according to Jermaine Jackson. see NZ HeraldQuote:
Originally Posted by PanzerJager
"Why not?"
Because then the punishment is neither fair, nor just. If the pattern for sentencing varies for the same type of offence, the system is doomed to inconsistency.
It' s not alright it is wrong. But you do not destroy one person for destroying another, that is eye for an eye in the Hamburain sense. If someone destroys someone then that person who was previously a drain on society should replace the person who was destroyed, and become a productive member of soceity, eye for an eye in the Jewish sense.Quote:
Yet, I take it that in your opinion if the persons retarted or a minor it's alright, like they didn't even kill anyone?
We're not talking about hormonal changes, we are talking about the part of the brain that controls self control among other things not being developed.Quote:
Cite them please. I was 15, 16 and even 17 and I had the basic self control it takes not to kill another human being, as did all my friends. No, im sorry, hormonal changes excuse a lot of things, but not murder.
http://www.mohonasen.org/03parents/H.../teenbrain.htm
http://www.ahrp.org/infomail/03/08/24.php
http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp...nguage=printer
http://www.selu.edu/Academics/Facult...n_article.html
The brain’s frontal lobes (the areas that aid self-control, judgment, emotional maturity, organizing and planning) begin to grow again, starting at about age 10 for girls and age 12 for boys.
They found that adolescents undergo dramatic changes in the frontal lobe, or prefrontal cortex, the part of the brain critical to judgment, reason, self-control and planning.
You never commited murder because you never had reason, but if the idea gets into one's head, it is far more likely to take off, and far harder to stop.
OH GOD DRUGGIES! Their nefarious laughter at shiny objects, thier dazed look, their munchies could be the end of America as we know it, and those Neo-marxist Trotskist pinko commmies could invade. All because of...Reefer *end 50's informational video voice. Dude you do know that reefer madness was a joke?Quote:
So by keeping Rapists, pedophiles, ?druggies?, etc alive you are risking the lives of innocent people.
Is it wrong to kill ?? If you have a valid reason ??
Great! Now get on with it. I just found out that the killer (see photo above) allready escaped 7 times when on leave! Now that is hardly a reason to watch him better in lalaland. I got a laserpointer, if I point it at The Hague at the correct building, can you guys shower it with a few sidewinder rockets? Or one of these nifty baby nukes!Quote:
Originally Posted by PanzerJager
Saying something - however loud - doesn`t make it true. The fact is that in Germany most convicted murderers never seriously come into conflict with law again. So the claim that rehabilitation doesn`t work seems to be incorrect.Quote:
LET ME TELL YOU SOMTHING: CRIMINALS DON'T REHIBILITATE!
What teenager has a reason to commit murder? And what reasons justify it?Quote:
You never commited murder because you never had reason, but if the idea gets into one's head, it is far more likely to take off, and far harder to stop.
Are you suggesting that, had I felt the desire to murder someone, my brain didnt have the capacity to stop me from committing the act. Thats just ridiculous. Plenty of teens who are abused at school feel like killing other people - very few do.