-
Vandal PBM - out of character thread
~:cheers: Hello everyone! Longtime lurker, first...er..second time poster here. I read the last few PBEM campaign writeups a while back, and was struck by what an incredible idea doing such a thing was. Since then I've been lurking around the throne room to see if a new one started up, but most of the new stuff seems to be mp or The Will of the Senate game, so I figured it was about time I quit lurking, signed up on the forums, and just posted here to find out if there's any interest in a new tradition PBEM campaign(that is, the kind where each player controls the entire reign of one leader or just a set number of terms a faction).
Would anyone like to give one a try? I see that for BI both of the Roman factions have already been done, as well as the Alemani. Maybe another barbarian faction, like the Saxons or Franks, or maybe the Celts could reclaim the lands stolen from them by the Romans, Gaul, Iberia, Britain, and the Po Valley(which would certainly be a challenge, given their rather limited unit lineup). Or the Romano British could establish a new Roman empire. I'm thinking Hard/Medium or Very Hard/Medium, to give a challenge but prevent computer limitanei from kicking the crap out of, say player Saxon Hearth Troops.
I'm open to house rules to make the campaign more challenging/longer (no peasant garrisons, no retraining, added campaign goals, etc.), and/or other factions. I'd also be happy to host the PBEM.
Any takers? :viking:
-
Re: New traditional PBEM anyone?
Sorry to be first to post and to say that I'm not interested. But I think if you used Goth's Mod for BI, which replaces the units with more realistic ones in some areas and better skins. It should improve gameplay as well.
For the R-B you'll certainly need a mod, and for the celts you probably want one too, to increase your choice in units. You could try playing Saxons as well, and establish your hold on the British Isles and then create an overseas colonial empire and war the Germanics ~;p
-
Re: New traditional PBEM anyone?
Welcome to the .Org Zimfan, and to the Throne Room of course ! :2thumbsup:
As you're playing Vanilla Rome, you might try advertising this in the Entrance Hall, or the Colosseum - they're both more active than the Throne Room is most of the time.And I'm sure at least a couple of the locals, or lurkers, are interested in a PBM which doesn't require tons of extra work that needs to be done to get the game working.
I don't think you've got anything to lose really, so give it a try.
PS: As for me....I'm busy with the RTRPE campaign as is Tiberius, and seeing that I'm not even that active (sadly) in that PBM it wouldn't be the smartest action to join another PBM. That said, I'm going on vacation in a couple of days , which means no Total War for three weeks....
:balloon2:
-
Re: New traditional PBEM anyone?
I'd be interested.
How about a Vandal campaign? It seems like they have a tough time for a Nomad faction, since they need to go from way out in the Steppes to Spain/Africa? The theme could be The Long March or something similar.
-
Re: New traditional PBEM anyone?
Mao-style long march?
:dizzy2:
-
Re: New traditional PBEM anyone?
:wall: Completely forgot.
Still, you get my drift.
-
Re: New traditional PBEM anyone?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tiberius
Sorry to be first to post and to say that I'm not interested. But I think if you used Goth's Mod for BI, which replaces the units with more realistic ones in some areas and better skins. It should improve gameplay as well.
For the R-B you'll certainly need a mod, and for the celts you probably want one too, to increase your choice in units. You could try playing Saxons as well, and establish your hold on the British Isles and then create an overseas colonial empire and war the Germanics ~;p
I'll have to take a look at that one. The only BI mod I've tried so faris Professor Spatula's Extra Horde and Romano-British mod. Well, that and the bug fixer.
I love playing the Saxons. The limited cavalry and archers, and knowing I can't horde always make them interesting. :2thumbsup:
-
Re: New traditional PBEM anyone?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dutch_guy
Welcome to the .Org Zimfan, and to the Throne Room of course ! :2thumbsup:
As you're playing Vanilla Rome, you might try advertising this in the Entrance Hall, or the Colosseum - they're both more active than the Throne Room is most of the time.And I'm sure at least a couple of the locals, or lurkers, are interested in a PBM which doesn't require tons of extra work that needs to be done to get the game working.
I don't think you've got anything to lose really, so give it a try.
PS: As for me....I'm busy with the RTRPE campaign as is Tiberius, and seeing that I'm not even that active (sadly) in that PBM it wouldn't be the smartest action to join another PBM. That said, I'm going on vacation in a couple of days , which means no Total War for three weeks....
:balloon2:
I'll probably try that. I had been under the impression that I had to post this kind of thing in the Throne room.
-
Re: New traditional PBEM anyone?
Quote:
Originally Posted by GeneralHankerchief
I'd be interested.
How about a Vandal campaign? It seems like they have a tough time for a Nomad faction, since they need to go from way out in the Steppes to Spain/Africa? The theme could be The Long March or something similar.
:charge: A Vandal campaign works for me. They can be a bit quick, though, with only a ten province goal. If we want to make the campaign last more than one or two people's turns, maybe we should add a few house campaign goals, like Christianization of the Vandal empire and control of the mediterranean(signified perhaps by placing all of the islands in it under Vandal control. What do you think?
-
Re: New traditional PBEM anyone?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zimfan
I'll probably try that. I had been under the impression that I had to post this kind of thing in the Throne room.
You're absolutely right on that, however, a bit of advertising never hurts :2thumbsup:
:balloon2:
-
Re: New traditional PBEM anyone?
I would be in for a Vandal campaign.
-
Re: New traditional PBEM anyone?
I'm interested. A vanilla BI campaign would probably open up the widest pool of players. But I'd second the idea of Goth's mod - the units are so much better looking while the gameplay is largely unchanged (a little more challenging and RTRish but not dramatically).
-
Re: New traditional PBEM anyone?
I would be in, only of it is vanilla BI.. Mods for WotS are already eating my disk drive..
-
Re: New traditional PBEM anyone?
Just a few notes if we are indeed doing a Vandal campaign:
-When compared with the Huns, the Vandals need to go farther with less troops (The Huns have 9 stacks compared to the six given to the Vandals, and the Hunnic cavalry has more than the usual 54 horses).
-Ideally their target area is the former territories of Carthage and Numidia, as well as Rome.
-The starting faction leader, Visimar, is extremely young (37 to be exact), which I think calls for an unorthodox reign system. Perhaps when certain areas have been entered play switches off. Once the Vandals have settled then we can resume the normal rule.
A few rules I am proposing:
-The route taken should be roughly what happened in history (Steppes-Germania-Gaul-Iberia-Africa).
-Corduba, when taken, is to be settled for a small amount of turns. Eventually, however, the player must horde up again and continue to Africa. Obviously the time taken when settled should be directed to building a navy.
-Carthage is to be settled and made the permanent capital. The Vandals must then work from there.
-No mercenaries while in horde mode.
That's all I can think of right now, do you guys approve/want to add more?
-
Re: New traditional PBEM anyone?
Maybe one person can have the migration to the Iberian peninsula and building of a navy, then the next can take Vandal migration number two, to Carthage. The first would be focused on gaining money through sacking settlements, and, of course, building up the navy, and the second on establishing a more permanant Vandal empire in Northern Africa, and building up their economy and regular military.
All of those rules sound fine to me. The only other thing I'd suggest is maybe changing the win conditions. 10 provinces seems like it would make for a very short post migration game.
Quote:
Originally Posted by GeneralHankerchief
Just a few notes if we are indeed doing a Vandal campaign:
-When compared with the Huns, the Vandals need to go farther with less troops (The Huns have 9 stacks compared to the six given to the Vandals, and the Hunnic cavalry has more than the usual 54 horses).
-Ideally their target area is the former territories of Carthage and Numidia, as well as Rome.
-The starting faction leader, Visimar, is extremely young (37 to be exact), which I think calls for an unorthodox reign system. Perhaps when certain areas have been entered play switches off. Once the Vandals have settled then we can resume the normal rule.
A few rules I am proposing:
-The route taken should be roughly what happened in history (Steppes-Germania-Gaul-Iberia-Africa).
-Corduba, when taken, is to be settled for a small amount of turns. Eventually, however, the player must horde up again and continue to Africa. Obviously the time taken when settled should be directed to building a navy.
-Carthage is to be settled and made the permanent capital. The Vandals must then work from there.
-No mercenaries while in horde mode.
That's all I can think of right now, do you guys approve/want to add more?
-
Re: New traditional PBEM anyone?
State of the PBEM:
Tentative list of players, in no particular order:
-General Hankerchief
-Ignoramus
-econ21
-x-dANGEr, so long as we're playing Vanilla BI
-And, of course, me, Zimfan
Proposed rules, most courtesy of General Hankerchief:
-The route taken should be roughly what happened in history (Steppes-Germania-Gaul-Iberia-Africa).
-Corduba, when taken, is to be settled for a small amount of turns. Eventually, however, the player must horde up again and continue to Africa. Obviously the time taken when settled should be directed to building a navy.
-Carthage is to be settled and made the permanent capital. The Vandals must then work from there.
-No mercenaries while in horde mode.
-As the faction leader is young, Division of first reign into the Migration to Iberia, and The Migration to Carthage
-Possibly some kind change to the victory conditions, as the Vandals only require 10 provinces to win.
I'm thinking VH/M and large unit size or medium. I'm visiting my fiancee for the summer and playing on her laptop, so huge unit size is out for me(too much lag).
-One reccomendation for Goth's mod and one player who can't play unless it's vanilla BI.
Anyone have any ideas on the proposed rules(or new ones) or other things?
-
Re: New traditional PBEM anyone?
On the idea of making things more difficult:
Perhaps on the initial journey there would be target cities to sack (i.e. everything in our path) in order to give the player a sense of preserving his forces. If we want to wreak as much havoc as we can during the game, I suggest we really go after the settlements that can make some factions go and horde.
A few of these settlements/factions are:
-Vicus Sarmatae/Sarmatians (while it's not technically in our route, we can give it a break and unleash the Sarmies on the ERE)
-Vicus Franki/Franks (probably will have expanded by the time we get there)
-Campus Burgundii
-Campus Lombardi
If we are successful, these four peoples will be bearing down on the civilized world, not to mention the Huns, and possibly the Roxolani/Slavs. Enough destruction to make worlds shake.
What do you think of this? And VH/M, Large is fine with me as long as I don't go first.
-
Re: New traditional PBEM anyone?
I think you have a very good set of groundrules, Zimfan. :2thumbsup:
Anyone have an idea how long it would take to get to Iberia? And from Iberia to Carthage? The first leg, in particular, sounds long. If it is significantly longer than 20 turns, I would advocate 20 turn reigns instead. Traditional PBEMs can get exhausting and BI games immediately start off pretty "big" (lots of factions are ready to go) compared to RTW ones where you slowly build up your land.
One house rule I like is no retraining units unless they are full strength (except ships). This stops the player instanteously replenishing losses and also prevents them creating full strength uber experienced units from a few lucky surivors.
I also like a "no extermination" rule as exterminating is too easy a solution to money and loyalty problems. Hordes can always sack settlements anyway.
Finally, I would reduce the bandit and pirate spawn rate. I find bandits tedious to fight while pirates can become overly powerful.
I guess we should play vanilla given that not doing so would be a deal breaker for x-dANGEr whereas doing so is not a deal breaker for anyone else.
-
Re: New traditional PBEM anyone?
General Hankerchief,
A quick check of the last save in a Vandal campaign of mine showed that it took me about 30 years/60 turns to sack all of Gaul and Italy, settle in Spain, convert Spain to Christianity, build up a full stack army and a navy, take Tingi, and march that stack halfway to Carthage. I think I beat that game within the next 10 years or so.
Sacking all of the horde factions capitals sounds like fun to me. Should we add Rome to the sacking list?
If noone else wants to, I can go first, but if the Huns attack me I may need to settle and rehorde(in my WRE game I had to force them to fight at rivers and in woods to beat them off, and they still killed as many of my men as I did their's).
econ21,
Thanks, but General Hankerchief came up with most of them. :)
20 turns works for me.
I don't mind no extermination, but given the Vandal's lack of happiness buildings maybe we should make an exception for WRE "Huge" cities(or allow the sacking of Carthage before settling it).
Does everybody have to reduce the spawn rates to the same level to make the game compatible for everyone, or is that only a problem with major mods? This is my first PBEM.
-
Re: New traditional PBEM anyone?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zimfan
I don't mind no extermination, but given the Vandal's lack of happiness buildings maybe we should make an exception for WRE "Huge" cities(or allow the sacking of Carthage before settling it).
Does everybody have to reduce the spawn rates to the same level to make the game compatible for everyone, or is that only a problem with major mods? This is my first PBEM.
OK, let's forget about a no extermination rule - I had not thought about the lack of happiness buildings. I believe only the first player needs to reduce the spawn rates - the relevant file is only read once, at the start of a campaign.
-
Re: New traditional PBEM anyone?
Regarding extermination, I don't think it's necesscary. I'm pretty sure that you settling as a horde faction automatically converts that city to your culture, so it completely eliminates the culture and capital distance penalties. We can eliminate it if we want, but after sacking so many cities it really won't matter to the Vandals from a role-playing point of view.
As for the first reign being over 20 turns, you forget that being a horde, there's really no administrative duties involved. Many of the turns will consist of clicking on a stack, clicking on its destination, repeat five times. In the later stages when our boys reach Gaul and Iberia, then there will be a bit more siegework.
I'll do a test to see about how long we're talking about until the Vandals hit Corduba in the meantime.
-
Re: New traditional PBEM anyone?
Quote:
Originally Posted by GeneralHankerchief
Regarding extermination, I don't think it's necesscary. I'm pretty sure that you settling as a horde faction automatically converts that city to your culture, so it completely eliminates the culture and capital distance penalties. We can eliminate it if we want, but after sacking so many cities it really won't matter to the Vandals from a role-playing point of view.
As for the first reign being over 20 turns, you forget that being a horde, there's really no administrative duties involved. Many of the turns will consist of clicking on a stack, clicking on its destination, repeat five times. In the later stages when our boys reach Gaul and Iberia, then there will be a bit more siegework.
I'll do a test to see about how long we're talking about until the Vandals hit Corduba in the meantime.
That's true, but only for the very first city you settle. Cordoba gave me trouble the whole game because of the culture penalty and high population.
Can't wait to hear the results of the test. :2thumbsup:
-
Re: New traditional PBEM anyone?
Well, my test is complete. I wanted to see roughly how long it took to get from the Steppes to Corduba, using this general route:
http://home.comcast.net/~general_han...al_pbm_000.JPG
During my test (Easy/Easy just to be quick), I besieged no cities aside from Corduba, and fought no battles unless the enemy was directly in my way. Although Vicus Sarmatae was out of the way, I simulated the army moving there. In addition, I also made the effort to keep my horde together. While Visimar, the leader, could have probably reached Corduba somewhat earlier I kept him close to the rest of the horde.
My route was divided into 3 sections.
Section 1
Vicus Sarmatae - no wall
Campus Lombardi - wooden wall
Campus Burgundii - wooden wall
Campus Chatti - wooden wall
Vicus Franki - stone wall
Section 2
Since you must go through Vicus Franki in order to pass, I split my horde up. Half went north, half south. Obviously in the actual game it will be sacked then we'll decide what to do from there.
North: (three stacks)
Colonia Agrippina - wooden wall
Samarobrive - stone wall
Avaricum - large stone wall (374 AD at this point)
South: (three stacks)
Augusta Treverorum - stone wall
Army then went south following road until bridge, where it went west and crossed a roadless plain, leading to Avaricum while North Section was "sieging"
Section 3 (reunified horde)
Burdigala - wooden wall
Tarraco - stone wall (passable if you don't wish to sack it- take the ford to the west)
Corduba - stone wall
NOTE: Carthago Nova is impassable if you want to stay on the road. I went west through Southern Iberia to hit Corduba.
~~~~~~
The horde settled Corduba in the Summer of 380 AD, seventeen years and thirty four turns in. Taking in the fact that there are eleven settlements along the way, plus adding some time for reorganization, I'd estimate the march taking about fifty turns or so. Visimar should have a few years left in him by the time that happens. Pretty long for a first leg, even if it's just moving six stacks and fighting a siege battle every once in a while.
This is a rough sketch of the journey I took (keyword being rough, because of my dumb mouse wheel getting in the way). My route is in green, with split and all (FOW was on for most of my journey so I could see if there were enemies ahead).
http://home.comcast.net/~general_han...al_pbm_001.JPG
Oh, and in case anybody was wondering, the Huns horded the poor Sarmatians twice. They were milling around the area between their original land and the Roxolani capital at the end. The Romano-British had emerged due to Celtic takeover and had captured Londinium. The Huns were sieging Ravenna for a second time, after being repulsed before. The WRE had destroyed the Alemanni by about Turn 3, and was actually pretty stable. The ERE had lost Athens, about half of Turkey, and some other place in the Middle East due to rebels.
-
Re: New traditional PBEM anyone?
That's an interesting test run - I think it confirms that the march to Iberia is rather long for one player to do. If we have five players, I think cutting the PBM into bite sized 20 turn pieces might be the best way to share it out.
-
Re: New traditional PBEM anyone?
~:cheers: Very impressive General Hankerchief.
That means that at 20 turns per person the first three will most likely handle the migration to Iberia(The Long Ma...er...Lengthy Stroll) and establishment of a fleet and the last two the setting up of a permanant base in Carthage and taking of the needed territories for the win.
We should probably start thinking about the play order now. Does anyone have any preferences? I can go first if nobody else wants to.
-
Re: New traditional PBEM anyone?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zimfan
We should probably start thinking about the play order now. Does anyone have any preferences? I can go first if nobody else wants to.
Seconded. :2thumbsup: I think it's good if the creator of a PBM goes first - he can set the tone, so to speak. I suggest starting with the order people expressed interest in this thread and then letting people request alterations depending on their availability and prefences.
I make that:
Zimfan
GeneralHankerchief
Ignoramus
x-dANGEr
econ21
Dutch_guy was 2nd to post interest but is away for 3 weeks, so could be slotted in somewhere on the list depending how far the campaign gets in the next 3 weeks.
-
Re: New traditional PBEM anyone?
Good, I get to invade Spain!
I have one more rule to add: We are allowed to exterminate the population of cities we sack.
What do you think?
-
Re: New traditional PBEM anyone?
There are two choices when you take a city as a horde: Sack or Settle.
If you sack it it's pretty much extermination, although you kill even more people, get even more gold, and destroy a lot of the buildings in the city. So extermination would fall under the category of "sacking."
-
Re: New traditional PBEM anyone?
Ah ok. Also, I think we should make it a rule that we must cross at the Strait of Gibraltar, and march along the African coast to Carthage.
-
Re: New traditional PBEM anyone?
What I had in mind was Corduba being a pit stop of sorts - what's left of the horde settles down and refreshes for five turns or so. The player then clicks the horde button, and the Vandals cross the Strait, proceed across Africa, and permanently settle at Carthage.
-
Re: New traditional PBEM anyone?
Ok, I think we're ready to go. I don't think I have any mods installed but since I brought all of my cds with me on vacation I'm going to do a clean reinstall of BI and patch 1.6 just to be safe and forestall any incompatibility problems.
I'll start my turn tonight, but first better get some dumb questions out of the way. :)
Will the presence or absence of the bug fixers on my version cause any problems?
Does anyone know where I can get some software to convert those tga screenshots to jpeg? I've never posted any before.
-
Re: New traditional PBEM anyone?
Paint should do it. Copy the screenshot and then paste it onto paint. 'Save as' and then choose .jpeg file.
-
Re: New traditional PBEM anyone?
Ok, the first ten years of Visimar's reign have ended. The Sarmatians were successfully horded, but dissapointedly settled in Campus Iazyges. The Goths horded and were destroyed in the same turn, oddly, the Huns seem to be bearing down on the ERE, the Lombardi have been horded and are making their way through Gaul, and the last settlements of the Burgundii and Franks have been sieged. Both have decent garrisons, and the Franks have family members with those annoying Paladin bodyguards, but they should be no match for the besieging armies.Oddly, our horde took the biggest hit from taking the Sarmatian capital, mostly due to the crapulence of horde infantry and high armor of the Sarmatian horse archers. :furious3: But our horde is nonetheless scarcely weaker than it started. :2thumbsup:
I'm going to try to upload the save right now before I go to bed (3:40 A.M. here in the West Coast) and hopefully finish my writeup by tomorrow night.
-
Re: New traditional PBEM anyone?
-
Re: New traditional PBEM anyone?
~:) Not done yet. I just finished the game half an hour ago. I'm still pretty wired from the huge amount of caffeine I've consumed so I'll try to stay up and finish it tonight, but I might not be done until tomorrow. I take it that it should be posted here in the throne room as a new thread?
Btw, our game is now uploaded, rather uncreatively under the name of Zim'sVandals373.
-
Re: New traditional PBEM anyone?
I'm sorting through my screenshots right now. I think I may have gone a bit overboard. I have over 70 of them.
-
Re: New traditional PBEM anyone?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zimfan
I take it that it should be posted here in the throne room as a new thread?
Yes, that's best - it keeps the story clean of administrative stuff.
PS: I use Irfanview for saving tgas as jpg - it's free to download on the internet. Please resize to 75% of the original before posting. (I use imageshack to host screenshots).
-
Re: New traditional PBEM anyone?
:thumbsup: Wow! Didn't know you'd be that fast, Zimfan!
I'll get right to work on the game. Although my progress will definitely be slower.
-
Re: New traditional PBEM anyone?
Quote:
Originally Posted by GeneralHankerchief
:thumbsup: Wow! Didn't know you'd be that fast, Zimfan!
I'll get right to work on the game. Although my progress will definitely be slower.
I was still hopped up on caffeine when my fiancee went to bed last night, so I just stayed up and did it all in one go.
I'm working on the writeup right now. Hoping to get it done tonight, but it might take a bit.
Good luck! I think I left our horde suitably enrichened and not overly depleted, although I think Visimar will be happy to finish up with these poor barbarian towns and get started on the richer, poorly defended Roman towns.
-
Re: New traditional PBEM anyone?
Ok, the writeup is done, the tgas converted, and hopefully after a visit to imageshack(thanks for the tip, econ21!) it'll be up tonight(well, tonight for me here on the U.S.'s West Coast). :2thumbsup:
-
Re: New traditional PBEM anyone?
Ok, I'm glad now that I did that before trying to post the whole writeup with all it's pics.
-
Re: New traditional PBEM anyone?
-
Re: New traditional PBEM anyone?
-
Re: New traditional PBEM anyone?
-
Re: New traditional PBEM anyone?
:2thumbsup: I posted the writeup! https://forums.totalwar.org/vb/showt...20#post1209520
:oops: I can't edit my posts, could a mod please delete that bandwidth sucking post I made a bit back while trying to figure out how to post screenchots?
-
Re: New traditional PBEM anyone?
Things are progressing well here. The Burgundii and Franks have been horded (although fighting a stack with five generals in it was extremely annoying :wall:), and Visimar & co. are marching on.
Just a heads-up though, I will be on vacation for three or four days starting tomorrow and won't be able to play at all during that time, so don't be alarmed if I don't post for a while.
-
Re: New traditional PBEM anyone?
Just an update:
I am back and about half done my reign. Things have progressed slower than I had hoped, so I'm slightly behind schedule as far getting to Corduba. Will try to speed things up for the second half, maybe skip a city.
-
Re: New traditional PBEM anyone?
Well, my reign is wrapping up. I'll finish it and post the savegame within a couple of days. Sorry it took so slow, everyone.
I'll give my notes to Ignoramus when the time comes, but for now let me just say that the next few players should have no problems when it comes to money. :grin:
Also, is x-dAnger still interested? I know he left the Senate...
-
Re: New traditional PBEM anyone?
Quote:
Originally Posted by GeneralHankerchief
the next few players should have no problems when it comes to money. :grin:
Good, I tend to be a big spender...
-
Re: New traditional PBEM anyone?
Ok, it's done. Ignoramus, I'm passing the savegame to you.
http://www.totalwar.org/patrons/pbm/Vandals-Sum-383.zip
A couple of notes:
-Our treasury stands at around 140k. So you really need to work to get us in financial trouble.
-Every single horde faction is in WRE territory, which is excellent. :evil: Most are sieging a settlement currently, and the Lombardi have settled in Mediolanium.
-Our spy is in Corduba. Our diplomat hasn't had too much to do, but he's making his way to Mediolanium to (hopefully) patch things up with the Lombardi. Our assassin didn't even make it to my reign. :hide:
I'll post my writeup in a day or two. Right now there's a mountain of screenshots that need to be sifted through.
EDIT: Oh yeah, Zim, your pictures don't work anymore.
-
Re: New traditional PBEM anyone?
Quote:
Originally Posted by GeneralHankerchief
Ok, it's done.
Ignoramus, I'm passing the savegame to you.
http://www.totalwar.org/patrons/pbm/Vandals-Sum-383.zip
A couple of notes:
-Our treasury stands at around 140k. So you really need to work to get us in financial trouble.
-Every single horde faction is in WRE territory, which is excellent. :evil: Most are sieging a settlement currently, and the Lombardi have settled in Mediolanium.
-Our spy is in Corduba. Our diplomat hasn't had too much to do, but he's making his way to Mediolanium to (hopefully) patch things up with the Lombardi. Our assassin didn't even make it to my reign. :hide:
I'll post my writeup in a day or two. Right now there's a mountain of screenshots that need to be sifted through.
EDIT: Oh yeah, Zim, your pictures don't work anymore.
:oops: Sorry about the assassin. He somehow managed to die going after a Sarmatian...agent, I think.
I'm not sure what I can do about the pics. I hosted them on imageshack. I still have them in jpeg form on my comp, but without being able to edit my posts I can't put them back in.
-
Re: New traditional PBEM anyone?
Why can't you edit your posts, Zimfan? You are a member now, so should be able to.
-
Re: New traditional PBEM anyone?
Quote:
Originally Posted by econ21
Why can't you edit your posts, Zimfan? You are a member now, so should be able to.
:2thumbsup: You're right. An edit button has indeed appeared at the bottom of my posts. I hadn't even noticed that my membership had upgraded. I'll go fix the pics right now.
-
Re: New traditional PBEM anyone?
Ok, pics are now up.
And while I'm at it, I thought you guys might be mildly amused at something that happened during an Allemanii campaign I started right after my turn at the pbem.
I had spent the first decade or so in a struggle to evade destruction at the hands of vastly larger and more advanced Roman armies when I noticed somethign odd. Vandals on my back dorrstep (Campus Quadi). The first time I'd ever seen them go for Germany. They made a bee line straight for Campus Franki, horded them, and both hordes tore settled Gaul and promptly spent the rest of the game fighting eachother for it. I wonder if the AI learns by copying the player.
http://www.uploadfile.info/uploads/0995e10ac9.jpg
-
Re: New traditional PBEM anyone?
I've PMd the next players - Ignoramus and x-dANGEr.
x-dANGEr can't play his turn.
Ignoramus has not logged on yet. To keep things moving, I propose we give him until Friday 6pm UK time to post here that he has picked up the savegame. If he does not reply, I could pick it up - I should have done my turn by Monday.
But I'll let Zimfan decide whether that is ok.
-
Re: New traditional PBEM anyone?
Quote:
Originally Posted by econ21
I've PMd the next players - Ignoramus and x-dANGEr.
x-dANGEr can't play his turn.
Ignoramus has not logged on yet. To keep things moving, I propose we give him until Friday 6pm UK time to post here that he has picked up the savegame. If he does not reply, I could pick it up - I should have done my turn by Monday.
But I'll let Zimfan decide whether that is ok.
Hmmm..would you be able to pick up the game Monday? I'd be inclined to give him until Sunday(and thus a full week since his last post) before bumping him back a space in line but I also understand that pbems tend to die if they stop progressing for too long. If this weekend is a short opening in an otherwise busy upcoming week then I say go for it, assuming he doesn't reply the within the next couple of days.
-
Re: New traditional PBEM anyone?
Ignoramus posted on the Org today and I sent him another PM asking him to post here. My constraint is that I can only really play weekends.
-
Re: New traditional PBEM anyone?
Quote:
Originally Posted by econ21
Ignoramus posted on the Org today and I sent him another PM asking him to post here. My constraint is that I can only really play weekends.
In that case we'll have to give him until Friday. If he hasn't posted by then he be bumped back in line behind you.
-
Re: New traditional PBEM anyone?
Sorry for not replying sooner. I'll start my turn today.
-
Re: New traditional PBEM anyone?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ignoramus
Sorry for not replying sooner. I'll start my turn today.
Good hunting! :2thumbsup:
-
Re: New traditional PBEM anyone?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ignoramus
Sorry for not replying sooner. I'll start my turn today.
:2thumbsup: Great! I was worried for a while.
-
Re: New traditional PBEM anyone?
Half of my writeup is done. The other half should be finished tomorrow.
-
AW: New traditional PBEM anyone?
Great writeup General Hankerchief!:2thumbsup:
-
Re: AW: New traditional PBEM anyone?
Sorry guys, I only just realised that I only had 1.4, not 1.6. Somehow I thought BI came with 1.6. That is a really big shame.
-
AW: Re: AW: New traditional PBEM anyone?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ignoramus
Sorry guys, I only just realised that I only had 1.4, not 1.6. Somehow I thought BI came with 1.6. That is a really big shame.
You can pick up 1.6 on totalwar.com ~:)
-
Re: New traditional PBEM anyone?
Hi, Ignoramus. Please let us know whether you want to patch your game to 1.6 or you want to withdraw from the campaign. If we don't hear from you by Friday, I guess I should pick up the savegame.
-
Re: AW: New traditional PBEM anyone?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zimfan
Great writeup General Hankerchief!:2thumbsup:
Seconded - a very enjoyable read! I liked the allusions to the Will of the Senate and the WRE PBMs. Shame I have a traitor's heart - my sympathies are all with Marcus Flavius.
-
Re: AW: New traditional PBEM anyone?
Heh, thanks guys. I wanted to make it longer but seeing as how there's only really one storyline going on (hordes rampaging through Europe) it couldn't really be stretched.
TinCow must get the credit; his WRE writeups inspired me to get BI as well as use Marcus as a central character. It's a shame that his force didn't move during my turn- it would have been great if there was a final showdown between him and Visimar. Oh well, can't win 'em all.
The last writeup will be posted tomorrow.
-
Re: New traditional PBEM anyone?
OK, I've done my 10 years. It was very quiet - only 3 land battles. I confess I've never played a horde faction before so I may have messed up things. (Was a little shocked to realise I could not sack a second city after settling in Cordoba and that I'd lose effectively my entire army if I took a third city ~:doh:). But we have taken Carthage on the last turn of my reign. I think Rome is do-able but not straightforward.
I kept to a houserule of only transporting one unit per one boat. We then hit a problem with massive pirate fleets sinkng our ships. Getting to Rome using that houserule will not be easy, but would be more characterful than simply sneaking a full stack across on one boat.
The savegame is: Vandals-Sum-393.zip
As there are no other players, AFAIK, I suggest we recycle the reigns. Maybe Zimfan can finish the campaign off or failing that, GeneralHankerchief after him?
-
Re: New traditional PBEM anyone?
Quote:
Originally Posted by econ21
OK, I've done my 10 years. It was very quiet - only 3 land battles. I confess I've never played a horde faction before so I may have messed up things. (Was a little shocked to realise I could not sack a second city after settling in Cordoba and that I'd lose effectively my entire army if I took a third city ~:doh:). But we have taken Carthage on the last turn of my reign. I think Rome is do-able but not straightforward.
I kept to a houserule of only transporting one unit per one boat. We then hit a problem with massive pirate fleets sinkng our ships. Getting to Rome using that houserule will not be easy, but would be more characterful than simply sneaking a full stack across on one boat.
The savegame is: Vandals-Sum-393.zip
As there are no other players, AFAIK, I suggest we recycle the reigns. Maybe Zimfan can finish the campaign off or failing that, GeneralHankerchief after him?
I don't suppose Mr. Hankerchief and I can switch places? My turn at the Julii campaign should be coming shortly and I'm starting school again. If I have to I can just play a late night on Sunday.
-
Re: New traditional PBEM anyone?
I could do it - just need some notes from Econ (nice writeup btw :2thumbsup:) on how things are going. E.g. Financial situation and such.
Btw, my last writeup is done. Check the post that formerly said "placeholder."
-
Re: New traditional PBEM anyone?
Quote:
Originally Posted by GeneralHankerchief
I could do it - just need some notes from Econ (nice writeup btw :2thumbsup:) on how things are going. E.g. Financial situation and such.
I'm not sure I can tell you much more than you would find out by loading up the savegame. We are down to about 100k balance. We have about a stack of troops around Carthage. We have less in Spain but it is not threatened. The Berbers are not hostile, but I guess that will change now we have Carthage.
If you want to stick to the 1 unit: 1 fleet houserule, the biggest challenge will be getting across the sea to Rome with the massive pirate fleets around. If it were me, I'd build 4 ships in Carthage and start ferrying the men across via Sicily. Challenging the pirates in a straight up battle is not really viable - I tried it and lost a lot of ships.
It probably looks a sad inheritance compared to what you left me - all the horde units are gone - but it's doable.
-
Re: New traditional PBEM anyone?
Just uploaded the savegame - it's not bad at all. You're overcritical of yourself, Econ.
I was pleasantly surprised when I saw Marcus' position and status. Looks like he might be getting another starring role.
Also looks like the hordes have burned themselves out fighting each other - and the Huns have Rome and Ravenna! :dizzy2: Gah, I sided with the wrong people... Although it should be made for some great RP'ing.
Ok, FOW off now, time to play... :juggle2:
-
Re: Vandal PBM - out of character thread
Thank you General Hankerchief. The starting player for the Julii campaign had computer troubles and I'll be going first. Between that and financial aid problems my weekend will be very packed. I'm grateful to you for taking the next turn. I'll be happy to go after you, or if you guys think my turn this round should be forfeited, after Econ21.
-
Re: Vandal PBM - out of character thread
Heh, you don't have to forfit your turn. This is a PBM, we're all friendly here. :grin: I think there will only be one round left after me.
I haven't gotten the chance to play much (this weekend will be different, however), but the main concentration is on the navy. In addition, a force is being sent to Tingi to boost trade revenue/make more boats. The only trouble is that ever since I changed the capital to Carthage, Corduba has been a pain in the you-know-where.
-
Re: Vandal PBM - out of character thread
Ok, just a short update.
I am over halfway done the ten years. We are strapped for cash. That 147,000 denarii made on the march is gone. It's forced me to keep conquering just to keep us in the black. Basically, the campaign looks like the start of the WRE one at this point.
I have quit so that when I load the game, there is a battle waiting for me that will probably decide the success of the PBM. It's small-scale but absolutely crucial that we win.
Depending on how real-life goes my turn will be finished up in a couple of days. Just pray that Zim isn't handed a pile of ash.
-
Re: Vandal PBM - out of character thread
I just managed to get 1.6, so can I take over next?
-
Re: Vandal PBM - out of character thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ignoramus
I just managed to get 1.6, so can I take over next?
If General Hankerchief's last two posts haven't made you wary of taking the next turn, then be my guest.
-
Re: Vandal PBM - out of character thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zimfan
If General Hankerchief's last two posts haven't made you wary of taking the next turn, then be my guest.
Ok, it's not that bad. I do have a backup plan (no, I haven't had any time to play the battle today) but it won't be pretty. Mainly it'll involve - isn't this appropriate - condensing.
-
Re: Vandal PBM - out of character thread