Would you rather be the ruler of a small nation or a servant of a large nation?
Printable View
Would you rather be the ruler of a small nation or a servant of a large nation?
Nothing beats a good old-fashioned gah!
You can turn a small nation into a large one. ;)
Ruler of a small one of course. Nothing like a good bit of Total War foreign policy to expand the nation, especially if you're in a region where there are many other small countries.
T'is good to be king.
Time to beat up the US with 3 units of Mexican Guerillas, two of whom don't have guns.
I love the AI.
LOL.
How about ruler of a big nation?
Assassins are easy to spam.
I voted Gah, but in all honesty I'd rather be my own master than a puppet.
It depends on what you mean by servant. :inquisitive: And what kind of nation are we talking about here? I'd rather be a Oligarch of the late USSR than a faceless factory worker in Imperial Britain.
Really, this is a case-sensitive decision for me.
Like Justiciar, I could not be a factory worker in Imperial Britain, but I would not, like to be a higher up in the USSR for morality reasons.
Just one of the whining Canadian proletariat is good enough for me. :canada:
Or King of Naked Babe Kinkyland. Either one.
I see there's a lot more chiefs than indians here!
So long as it wasn't a small nation in Africa or Latin America, I'd be glad to rule it. There's a tendancy in those two regions to cycle through many leaders in relatively short periods.
Something like Luxembourg or Lichtenstein would be just perfect.
Ruler of the small nation, but I would be scared that the power would start to go to my head.
I'm a right honourable gentleman, not a majesty. :yes:Quote:
I see there's a lot more chiefs than indians here!
Duh, if you are ruler you can do what you please. For example if ones brother is a little bit annoying you can put him in the stocks and throw poo at him...
Quote:
Originally Posted by Quintus Of Pompeii
You don't have to be a ruler for that.
Australia's a small nation :yes:
Compared to what? Russia? :dizzy2:Quote:
Originally Posted by sapi
Most American states have more people than us :laugh4:
I must admit that it would be cool claiming to be the dictator of a whoel continent :grin:Quote:
Originally Posted by sapi
One has to have ambitions, eh? :beam:
Caesar said it best.
Safe answer: Gah!
Actually AUstralia is a massive nation, Australia is almost larger then the US!
It would take a few monthes to egt from the East Coast to the West Coast of Australia.
I would be the servant of Australia, and what type of servant would I be? Probaly the person who stands by Parliment door and during meetings, shovels all the crap away.
What would the title be?
"Your Honorable Dingo"
Hmm. Gonna have to go with "GAH!" on this one, as I would really have to judge it on a case-by-case basis. ~D
Certainly a ruler of a small nation.
Rather be a ruler, control is fun.
There's a reason I resigned my Kingship and became DM instead of KM...
It is better to be a lion for one day than a lamb for a thousand.
'tis better to reign in Hell than to serve in Heaven.
Or was it the other way 'round.
GAH! Just to be sure from the Secret Service
Almost larger? the US is also almost larger then RussiaQuote:
Originally Posted by Warluster
I'd rather be the leader of a small nation, something like Monaco or Luxembourg, then being a servant in a larger (exept offcourse if that would be a good position to overthrow the goverment?:yes: )
And that's the quote i was looking for :yes:Quote:
'tis better to reign in Hell than to serve in Heaven.
The quote was the other way round
...better to serve in heaven (actually, Earth, i think Achilles said) than be a king in hell...
Wasn't it Milton? I believe it was referring to Satan, in which case it would have been "'tis better to reign in Hell than serve in Heaven".
Perhaps, but isn't it also written in the Odyssey that Achilles says something quite contrary?
Without a doubt “ruler of a small nation”.
Oh, the laws I would pass!
Main import: Jell-O
Main export: videos of what we do in the Jell-O
:laugh4:
I'd rule a small country. Don't know which one I would want though.
I'd gladley serve in the mighty nation of Monty, ruled by the great Pythons.
Though if I was the uler of a small nation, it would have to be a nation of GOONS!
I voted "servant in a large nation". That for the serious part: mankind's only hope is to finally consider all those speaking monkeys as a part of one nation, and this doesn't mean that one has to make the others behave like him.
And wishing oneself some sort of king or princess unfortunately doesn't help.
Now, this would probably reduce the inspiration for totalwar games, wouldn't it? :laugh4:
Ruler of a small nation. Unless those two nations happen to be at war :laugh4:
It was Milton, and it's correct as quoted.Quote:
Originally Posted by Duke Malcolm
It doesn't make sense the other way around :laugh4:
:bow:
...well I'm tired of being a servant in hell. ~;)
Definitely ruler of a small nation. Look at Luxembourg. Big city, covered by huge walls. My type of kingdom from where to expand.
To quote Julius Ceasar: I would rather be the leader of a small gallic village, than be second man in Rome.
And in Paradise Lost, written by John Milton, the quote is from Satan's line: "'Tis better to reign in Hell than serve in Heaven." Which is actually a pretty powerful line because in Paradise Lost, Satan and his demons are just as tormented by Hell as any mortal.
Snite
I would like to be the King and Queen of Sealand....
Hermaphrodite then, huh...Quote:
Originally Posted by Cronos Impera
i'd rather serve in heaven but this does not relate to the question.Quote:
Originally Posted by Somebody Else
i say Gah!