http://www.breitbart.com/article.php...show_article=1
Gotta love those palestinians. Is there ANY reason to believe that these people will ever get their #### straight and join reality? :no:
Printable View
http://www.breitbart.com/article.php...show_article=1
Gotta love those palestinians. Is there ANY reason to believe that these people will ever get their #### straight and join reality? :no:
Unlikely.:thumbsdown:Quote:
Originally Posted by Devastatin Dave
Typical of those people. :shame:
True , true , these fellas really need to get with the program , stop the crap with the propoganda cartoons for kids .:yes:Quote:
Gotta love those palestinians. Is there ANY reason to believe that these people will ever get their #### straight and join reality?
make a decent first person shooter as a propoganda outlet and recruiting aid for kids instead , perhaps they could call it intifada army or something like that ...then again they might get in a little trouble over copyright .
Let's all sing the Farfour Mouse Club song!!!!
Who's the leader with the gun :smg:
That's meant for Is-rea-lis?
F-A-R-F-O-R M-O-U-S-E :mickey:
Hey there! Hi there! Ho there!
You're as brainwashed as can be.
F-A-R-F-O-R M-O-U-S-E :mickey:
Farfour Mouse (blow 'em up)
Farfour Mouse (blow 'em up)
Forever let us blow ourselves up high! (High! High! High!) :bomb:
Come along with car bomb
And become a martyree
F-A-R-F-O-R M-O-U-S-E :mickey:
(sing slower)
Now its time to say goodbye
To all your family.
F-A-R Are you ready?
F-O-R Are the charges set?
M-O-U-S-E :mickey:
I think they already did that, Tribesy. Except, it was horrible, not even decent.
CR
Quote:
Originally Posted by Crazed Rabbit
Here are some screenshots.
http://zioneocon.blogspot.com/pal%20...6%20rifles.jpg
http://www.israelnewsagency.com/boysuicidebomber.jpg
Apart from the clothing that reminds me of your pic in the family albums thread, PJ. ~;)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Husar
True! :laugh4:
Those fat belts went out of style in the 70s and they still are no matter how much dynamite you attach to it. Besides, how're you gonna bend over, put your head between your knees and kiss your a...nevermind.Quote:
Originally Posted by PanzerJager
Seriously, that is a really disturbing picture.
To us it is, yes. Because for us, unlike for the people who are egging these kids on, the life of an Arab child holds value.Quote:
Originally Posted by Gregoshi
Farfour Mouse (blow 'em up)
Farfour Mouse (blow 'em up)
Forever let us blow ourselves up high! (High! High! High!) :bomb:
Indeed the greatest post ever in the Backrrom. Damn, I wish I could siggy it!!!!:laugh4: :laugh4: :laugh4: :laugh4: :laugh4: :laugh4: :laugh4: :laugh4:Quote:
Originally Posted by Gregoshi
Gregoshi :laugh4:
Walt would have approved !
I would wager that it is natural for those who have been kicked out of their land to react in such way as creating Farfour.
Anyhow it appears that the anti-Farfour crowd have won, they got rid of him after all. Having him killed off was just the creators' way of getting rid of him and saving face while doing so. In killing him off, they still caved to the controversy caused by Farfour's existance, though.
https://img.photobucket.com/albums/v...StreetGANG.jpgQuote:
Station officials said Friday that Farfour was taken off the air to make room for new programs. Station manager Mohammed Bilal said he did not know what would be shown instead.
A sneak preview of SemTech Street. I can't wait to hear Greg's new jingle for this one.
hehe, can't wait.
Tribes, that wouldn't be fair, most of these kids don't have rigs powerful enough to play a modern FPS without brutal slowdown.Quote:
Originally Posted by Tribesman
Now that Wigferth could be the start of a very cunning plan:yes:Quote:
Tribes, that wouldn't be fair, most of these kids don't have rigs powerful enough to play a modern FPS without brutal slowdown.
Uh... do they actually even have electricity ? You know, more than four hours a day ?
I'd be wondering that too, and if they even have computers at all.
CR
I do believe luke you've turned to the dark side, welcome to capitalism.Quote:
Originally Posted by Tribesman
Affordable FPS rigs for islamofacistterroristyoungsters, brilliant idea.
Gah!!!!
When no one notices bring up something that was brought up +6 months ago.
This entire thing has been dead for months, except for the dippys that want to reserect dead things to continue a silly attack on a silly theme.
What a buncha a genuises y'all are for even commenting on a dead subject.
The article was dated June 29, genius.
If being critical of the muslim world makes one a "dippy", what do you call someone who tries his hardest to downplay each and every bit of outrageous behavior coming out of arab nations?
Dopey?
Those people? :inquisitive:Quote:
Originally Posted by PanzerJager
The world is full of those people. Often those people and the other those people have a lot in common.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9dA2NWk-VDE
Sadly, there is no shortage of those people. They come in all shapes, sizes, nationalities, religions, and colours. I've noticed when one group is singled out as those people, the other people tend to gang up on them with inhuman results and become those people themselves.
How about these people ?Quote:
Those people?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OLhT...elated&search=
And they all live in Palestina :laugh4:Quote:
Originally Posted by Beirut
They really need to grow up, saw a clip of a schoolplay, it was adorable. Awwwwwww they are playing boomski, so cute. Their primitive bloodlust is cultivated from day one, and when their are no jews they turn on eachother, there will never be peace because the need to kill is just too strong.
//tries to listen, where is the we should talk with hamas crowd,
I hear.... silence.....
Indeed. And doubtlessly where you live there is no crime, no hatred, no racism, no violence, no discrimination, no those people at all.Quote:
Originally Posted by Fragony
Lucky you.
Sure there is, we imported it.Quote:
Originally Posted by Beirut
From where?Quote:
Originally Posted by Fragony
North africa mostly.Quote:
Originally Posted by Beirut
Really?Quote:
Originally Posted by Fragony
What does it look like?
Of course , where Fragony lives people would never dream of saying they are going out to attack immigrants ....well apart from someone like Fragony obviously .:thumbsdown:Quote:
Indeed. And doubtlessly where you live there is no crime, no hatred, no racism, no violence, no discrimination, no those people at all.
Lucky you.
Pretty bad, ussualy loud as well. Do we really have to do this? You know exactly what I mean, so can we skip the foreplay and take it upstairs?Quote:
Originally Posted by Beirut
By all means, let us climb those stairs. But if there's a lot of climbing to do, I need to know what the racism, violence and crime you imported from North Africa looks like? Is it heavy and easy to carry upstairs? Is it bigger than a breadbox?Quote:
Originally Posted by Fragony
Blimey, must've been one sunny happy place to live in if all the intolerance and crime and violence had to be imported. You know, downright unique and unprecedented actually. I take it the place was uninhabited then ?
Thankfully, up until recently, the Israelis have been keeping them occupied.Quote:
Originally Posted by Beirut
Now they seem hellbent on bringing their love for violence and terror to Europe and America. :no:
hey look a sarcasm!!! Nah, if I insist on getting warning points I'd rather get them for posting nudity. And besides, we have been on this road so many times. By all means continue making moral appeals, they don't work with me.Quote:
Originally Posted by Beirut
That's pretty evil of those settlers though it doesn't exactly look like the police and soldiers do nothing, they just don't seem to do enough.:no:Quote:
Originally Posted by Tribesman
Personally, I'd want to charge those stone-throwing kids and give them a spanking, they seem to be raised with the same hatred some palestinian kids are raised with. And kids full of hatred aren't cute, no matter how you dress them(referring to the dresses of some of the evil girls).
But..... does that mean that jews can be naughty as well????? Tell me it isn't so!!! Another pillar gone, how could I have been so blind :laugh4: :laugh4:
"I recommend we reasearchQuote:
Originally Posted by PanzerJager
A CLUE
so we can
GET ONE"
- Civ Wise Man
"Occupied" seems so transient in the grand scheme of things. We should find a solution that's more final.Quote:
Originally Posted by PanzerJager
Perhaps more efficiency, something... systematic.
Great idea, what's holding you back. The dhimmi-award is a price you pay you know.Quote:
Originally Posted by Watchman
You haven't the slightest idea of what you're talking about, do you ?
no. LOLQuote:
Originally Posted by Watchman
Anyways, Godwin has entered the building, now we get to say that we haven't learned anything in the last 60 years, and then we say uh-huh.
Sounds good?
Last time we tried something like that to stop the jewish violence, everybody hated us for it.:surrender:Quote:
Originally Posted by Beirut
That's not funny. The murders, the concentrationcamps, come to think of it, we haven't learned one bit. People keep diarys even today.Quote:
Originally Posted by Husar
Oh, I saw some bad attempts at irony here and thought I'd share some of mine.Quote:
Originally Posted by Fragony
And I don't have a diary.
No, it's not funny. And it's a good thing people are keeping diaries today. Sixty-years from now our grandchildren will know without a doubt that not a single one of us had the monopoly on civilization or inhumanity.Quote:
Originally Posted by Fragony
Those people are all us.
Farfour Clip
The infamous episode.
Somewhat violent and just despicably sad.
You know , that line pretty much sums up the reality of of the situation over there doesn't it .Quote:
Somewhat violent and just despicably sad.
It makes you laugh at the irony of comments like this.....Quote:
Is there ANY reason to believe that these people will ever get their #### straight and join reality?
re: Watchman - Telling people they're clueless does not a point make. :yes:
re: Beirut - C'mon man!? A holocaust reference? I didnt think this had gotten that down and dirty. You usually dont bring those out except for 10+ page threads. :laugh4:
Moral relativism is a weak argument only peddled by apologists. (Palestinian in this case)
How about instead of searching the internet for propaganda cli.... I mean proof that the other guys are just as bad, maybe consider the fact that thousands of palestinian pre-terrorists just saw their "Barney" beaten to death by the horrid Jew.
As I said, typical of those people.
Xenophobic generalisations do not a valid argument make.
Consider this Panzer , what do they see in real life ....besides which they didn't see the fictional character beaten to death did they , they saw him beaten and sent to jail :idea2:Quote:
maybe consider the fact that thousands of palestinian pre-terrorists just saw their "Barney" beaten to death by the horrid Jew.
I'm pressed for time.Quote:
Originally Posted by PanzerJager
I admit to a twinge that perhaps led to a tinge of hyperbole, but if the occupation you speak of with such thankfullness is not sufficient, as it clearly is not, and force would seem to be the only tool in the toolbox, I am curious as to the next step that should be taken regarding the Palestinian question.
Appeals to morality are sometimes all that seperates murder from compassion.Quote:
Originally Posted by PanzerJager
No need to fish for films, the proof is extant. We're all just as bad as each other. We are all those people.Quote:
Originally Posted by PanzerJager
You and me included. :evil:
Really? I thought the article said he was killed. My bad.Quote:
Originally Posted by Tribesman
Edit: GAZA CITY, Gaza Strip (AP) - A Mickey Mouse lookalike who preached Islamic domination on a Hamas- affiliated children's television program was beaten to death in the show's final episode Friday.
I just dont buy the argument that we are somehow equal to them. This sort of thing would not be accepted in Western society. I would say we've moved past them quite a bit.Quote:
Originally Posted by Beirut
The Israelis have done some brutal things, but even their society does not embrace this kind of disgusting hate mongering in the mainstream, not to say their aren't zealots among them.
You must be refering to someone else. I made no such comments. Its ok, I get confused sometimes too...Quote:
Originally Posted by Watchman
"Western societies" are on the whole quite a bit better off and not oppressed by someone. Which might of have something to do with it.Quote:
Originally Posted by PanzerJager
And remind me again - how long ago was it that the Irish stopped murdering each other...?
Oh, I think we still have a few demons to purge over here. Also, ever notice how many weapons used by either of those people are made by "we've moved on from that" Western society people? There's plenty of guilt to go around for the mess over there.Quote:
Originally Posted by PanzerJager
Israel is well capable of its own brand of "disgusting" behaviour. All nations are.Quote:
Originally Posted by PanzerJager
As for there being no zealots in Israel, I think even the Israelis would be surprised to hear that.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Beirut
I think he wanted to say that there ARE zealots in Israel.Quote:
Originally Posted by Panzer Jager
After that video of kids throwing stones that's hard to deny anyway, unless one goes all lunatic and says it's fake or that they were somehow justified.
I fthose countries want to stop the violence, they might want to start by stopping to teach their kids hatred towards the other country. It's of no use to anyone and people who really love their kids and want a better future for them wouldn't do that anyway because it will certainly not help their kids. At the very least the governments could try doing that in schools, teaching kids to respect the other is a big step towards a better future IMO.
My mistake. Bad reading before coffee. Apologies are offered. :embarassed:Quote:
Originally Posted by Husar
Beirut:Quote:
Originally Posted by Beirut
Nobody can fault your manners, that's for sure.
As to the larger socio-cultural discussion....
Remember, those of us writing from the USA have -- with few exceptions -- no experience of tribal warfare as a part of our national history.
Family Feuds -- rare, but understood (Hatfield/McCoy): Check.
Storied bandits -- 1920s & 1930s (Dillinger, Bonny & Clyde): Check.
Civil Wars -- one, but exceedingly violent (ACW): Check.
Aboriginal conflict -- many, 1776 to 1910 or so (lots of what we would label as terrorism today on both "sides"): Check.
The master narrative on all of these stories (note, this "narrative" does not always connect on all points with historical fact) depicts the feuders as backwoods idiots, the bandits as destined to lose to the power of the law, and the conquest of America from the Amerind peoples as a triumph OVER the inherently weaker political structure of tribalism.
Only episodes such as the Lincoln County War or the Cowboys/Marshalls struggle in Tombstone really feature open sub-national faction conflict akin to ongoing tribal conflicts. Even these are "spun" to depict the eventual triumph of the law.
Mostly though, we have a complete disconnect between US thinking and thinking that places tribe above nation and feud above rational problem solving. It requires effort to think in the other mode for us, and we're more comfortable recasting things in our own framework -- witness the take on Wallace's rebellion that Braveheart made.
Interesting angle Seamus Fermanagh. Do you think that the lack of an american comprehension of tribal affiliations also informs our experience in Iraq & Afghanistan?
Our work in the 60's and 70's with the Hmong springs to mind; but, then again, that was us exploiting tribalism in the interests of some national goal, versus actually operating tribally.
As an aside, I've seen it postulated that Americans on the whole have a bit skewed take on the whole issue of "nation" and "democracy" (we'll assume away the somewhat complicated and troublesome background of the concept of "nation" for the sake of brevity), stemming from not recognizing the fact that the birth of their own "nation" at the same time as becoming a democracy *is* indeed a quite unique combination. The rest of the world, however, was "nations" long before "democracies" or even "states" for that matter... obviously this could lead to some troublesome failures in understanding.
That's the Finnish perspective. You were a nation first, then a democracy, then a state. We, on the other hand, were a state first, then a democracy, then a nation. (Though many would disagree with that).Quote:
Originally Posted by Watchman
While we're at it, the English / British: a state first, then a nation, then a democracy. The US, broadly speaking, all three at once. Iraq, a state, and neither a nation nor a democracy.
@Seamus, interesting. But we could add racialism into the mix.
FYI, I'm pretty sure the scholar who postulated it wasn't a Finn. The point is in any case that the norm was community/people/nation/realm/state/whatever first, irrespective of the specific type of rulership, and mode of governance second. The argument being that Americans, who in essence became both at once, are prone to think of other communities and peoples in the same terms. Example gratia there being the manifestly buggered priorities in Iraq, where - so the argument goes - they tried to create a similar "at once" nation-state, trying to recreate (likely not even realizing it) the sui generis pattern of their own "Birth of the Nation" in completely different circumstances.
Just thought the theory might be relevant to the turn the thread had taken; I've no particular opinion on it myself actually.
All I have to say is that its clear from his analysis that Seamus is from Philadelphia. Nobody from Boston or New York, especially during baseball season, would ever say America has no familiarity with tribal warfare. :laugh4:
I understand the distinction between nation/state verus democracy. I do not understand the distinction between nation and state. Both describe a people that think of themselves as part of a sovereign people and sharers of a common cultural identity, correct?
Maybe if you could take the granddaddy of political confusion, the island cluster of Britannia and Hibernia over there....
England: Nation or State?
Great Britain: Nation or State?
The United Kingdom: Nation or State?
The Commonwealth: Nation or State?
:dizzy2: :dizzy2: :dizzy2: :dizzy2: :dizzy2: :dizzy2: :dizzy2:
I thought so, too, at first, but I think nation refers to the people thinking that they belong together and state refers to being an official, united political entity. Hope that makes it clearer.Quote:
Originally Posted by Don Corleone
For example Germany was a nation for a long time, but only in 1871 did it become a state.
Before that it was a nation that was split into many states, because the people saw themselves as germans but lived in states called prussia, bavaria, etc.
Definition of nation according to Merriam-Webster Online;Quote:
Main Entry: na·tion
Pronunciation: 'nA-sh&n
Function: noun
Etymology: Middle English nacioun, from Anglo-French naciun, from Latin nation-, natio birth, race, nation, from nasci to be born; akin to Latin gignere to beget -- more at KIN
1 a (1) : NATIONALITY 5a (2) : a politically organized nationality (3) : a non-Jewish nationality <why do the nations conspire -- Psalms 2:1 (Revised Standard Version)> b : a community of people composed of one or more nationalities and possessing a more or less defined territory and government c : a territorial division containing a body of people of one or more nationalities and usually characterized by relatively large size and independent status
2 archaic : GROUP, AGGREGATION
3 : a tribe or federation of tribes (as of American Indians)
same for state, superfluous meanings removed and emphasis added to the most relevant part.Quote:
Main Entry: 1state
Pronunciation: 'stAt
Function: noun
Usage: often attributive
Etymology: Middle English stat, from Anglo-French & Latin; Anglo-French estat, from Latin status, from stare to stand -- more at STAND
---
3 a : social position; especially : high rank b (1) : elaborate or luxurious style of living (2) : formal dignity : POMP -- usually used with in
4 a : a body of persons constituting a special class in a society : ESTATE 3 b plural : the members or representatives of the governing classes assembled in a legislative body c obsolete : a person of high rank (as a noble)
5 a : a politically organized body of people usually occupying a definite territory; especially : one that is sovereign b : the political organization of such a body of people c : a government or politically organized society having a particular character <a police state> <the welfare state>
6 : the operations or concerns of the government of a country
7 a : one of the constituent units of a nation having a federal government <the fifty states> b plural, capitalized : The United States of America
8 : the territory of a state
"Nation" is basically a group of people who identify themselves as such; a rather vague concept with a muddy and complicated history frankly. A "state" is a formal political entity which people live in/under.
There's also "nation-state" -- but AFAIK that concept is actually most commonly used interchangeably with the meaning of "state", particularly the so-called "Westphalian" state - the form of sovereign territorial state that became more or less the norm in Europe in the aftermath of the Thirty Years' War, and is still pretty much what people think of when they think of a "state".Quote:
Main Entry: na·tion-state
Pronunciation: 'nA-sh&n-'stAt, -"stAt
Function: noun
: a form of political organization under which a relatively homogeneous people inhabits a sovereign state; especially : a state containing one as opposed to several nationalities
England is a nation.Quote:
Originally Posted by Don Corleone
The United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland is a state.
The Commonwealth is neither.
The Commonwealth of Australia however is a nation-state.
Ah, but that is a different Commonwealth of course. Designed, it would seem, merely to confuse Americans!
And to make it more confusing the Commonwealth of Australia belongs in the Commonwealth of Nations :inquisitive:
I see, so to the majority of you, the term nation and cultural identity are interchangeable.
Interesting.
Is that really your conclusion?Quote:
Originally Posted by Don Corleone
Quote:
Originally Posted by Don Corleone
Well, it is how the same dictionary as above describes nationality.
Quote:
nationality
One entry found for nationality.
Main Entry: na·tion·al·i·ty
Pronunciation: "na-sh&-'na-l&-tE, "nash-'na-
Function: noun
Inflected Form(s): plural -ties
1 : national character
2 : NATIONALISM 1
3 a : national status; specifically : a legal relationship involving allegiance on the part of an individual and usually protection on the part of the state b : membership in a particular nation
4 : political independence or existence as a separate nation
5 a : a people having a common origin, tradition, and language and capable of forming or actually constituting a nation-state b : an ethnic group constituting one element of a larger unit (as a nation )
:balloon2:Quote:
Originally Posted by Devastatin Dave
Just to remind y'all what started this train wreck. It is atypical for threads to metamorph from worm to butterfly to slug, but this ones gone from irrelevent to incomprehensible. What now is the point?
Cultural clashes happen. Misunderstandings between them is a norm, there being an acceptance by one to the other for being equal to them is abnormal - it would also be perceived as weakness. To believe that one religion is better than another is the way each of us has been raised, and few are allowed to choose. [reminds me of a cartoon my Mom sent me when I was in the service. It showed an African style witch doctor - mask, spear, head on a stick, etc - in a normal american living room and the man is saying to his wife, "Your the one that wanted him to choose his own religion".]
When the nations of the world determine this is all the only planet they have and agree to share in it. When the religions of the world actually accept that their differences far outweigh their similarities ... and that's fine. When race matter less than the content of each individual; or that an individual matters more than race - or class, or intellect, or political preference, or economic strata, or political preference - then, it might be possible that man will exist beyond the present millenium. Then again, when all of us that live above the lesser 80 or 90% of the world populace grasp that it isn't the poor that are the enemy, but the men that control +90% of the world's wealth are - who knows. Maybe, maybe there can be change.
Me, I like dreams. Who knows, maybe in some near future - people will grasp whom the real enemy is. The wealthiest of the wealthy, those that have learned that stirring the pot on the basics that even the illiterate grasp - you can make the literate believe it as well.
Then, again - Mickey Mouse is dead.
With respect, I disagree KafirChobee. I think the thread has taken a turn towards illumination, rather than the heat it started with. But I'll grant you that it's not often we see a silk purse being made from a sow's ear around here. :bow: We agree there.Quote:
...It is atypical for threads to metamorph from worm to butterfly to slug, but this ones gone from irrelevent to incomprehensible...
Seamus took the essential elements of the conversation, put them in a (mental) box, shook them up, and laid them out on a new play-board.
Now the fellas are defining and refining terms. I personally am interested in exploring the obvious disconnect in world-views of 'the west' vs 'the east' (or middle east), nation/state orientation vs tribal orientation.