very soon..
Quote:
Originally Posted by Foot
Printable View
very soon..
Quote:
Originally Posted by Foot
We're gonna prove you wrong.
oh here come the lies :)Quote:
Originally Posted by Krusader
my virgin ears...
Before you get anyone else' hopes up I'm just going to say you're dead wrong and I'm not lieing.Quote:
Originally Posted by EdwardL
lol, here comes the reverse psychology :beam:Quote:
Originally Posted by Philipvs Vallindervs Calicvla
guys don't buy into this, its a machine churning out mis-information and diluting propoganda. Anyways we all know how the blame game works, and when it comes down to it we can hold Foot accountable.
let's all sit back and chill
seriously, let these bad-boys do their work and have fun doin' it
and let's enjoy the kickass mod they made so far...
I can't wait for real Indian elephants, those rhomaphilia-men (sp?), and more African local warriors but I'm havin' a lot of fun learnin' how to play different factions and use their soldiers... trying different difficulties and seeing the differences.. etc. :yes:
roffle
And here's the "devil in the details". I also sense some "hidden messages approach"
We at EB, are rather getting tired of having to repeat again and again that the next version of EB will not be released anytime soon. However, feel free to have fun at out general direction, as it seems you are so fond of doing...
From that it is easy to understand that EB is hiding something...
:eyebrows:
I remember as a fan, looking for hidden messages and secret leaks, by the EB team. Now that I'm on the inside, I realize that it was all a wild goose chase. There are no hidden secrets.
The release date of the next version isn't a secret. Not even the team knows when the next release will be.
Due to summer holidays, employment, military duty, natural disasters, or moving, many EB team members have been away and not been around to do tons of work that would churn out releases.
And lots of the work that did get churned out, is now up for betatesting. Estimates are that we will go through at least one more internal version, which will enable us to test out the new recruitment code (for the new units).
And you know what that means: we are going to have a some more good nights playtesting... :grin:
Have a break.
haha MarcusAurelius tells it the way it is.
When I read the thread title I thought: "Holy cow, did someone solve it?" :grin:
Seriously though, what MAA said.
I did try it, but I failed ~:mecry:Quote:
Originally Posted by The_Mark
I used this Amanda (functional programming language) code:
But running it for f(5, 4) gives:Code:f :: num -> num -> num
f m n = m + 1 ,if n = 0
= f (m-1) 1 ,if m > 0 /\ n = 0
= f (m-1) (f m (n-1)) ,otherwise
Code:ERROR: stack overflow
You've been here a while so I'm not going to cut you any slack. When I end a post with "I'm not lying" it is both a litteral and spiritual statement about said post. Sorry you didn't get that.Quote:
Originally Posted by EdwardL
Unfortunately I am a man of virtually no forgiveness.
So it is in fact a very well guarded secret!Quote:
Originally Posted by MarcusAureliusAntoninus
JK.
I'd say that I don't mind it being a little while since I just had to restart my campaign anyway, but that would make me the object of every EB fans glaring hate. So I have not in fact said it.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Philipvs Vallindervs Calicvla
look see, another code. lets see if we can break it down on the spot
"I'm not lying"
I - Information
' - 4
m - Month
n - Not
o - Open
t - This
l - Late
y - You
i - Is
n - Next
g - Game
Information Not Open 4 You Late This Month Is Next Game
EdwardL, you are scaring me:skull:
Not good with subtext, are we? Lets try again.Quote:
Originally Posted by EdwardL
You have called me a lier, I am offended.
I'm not forgiveving.
So you mean to say you are either standing up or sitting down as opposed to lying down. GotchaQuote:
Originally Posted by Philipvs Vallindervs Calicvla
I like this new game it's neat.
No, I'm dyslexic.
Please stop this offensive line of posts, EdwardL.
EdwardL, you figured it out. The conspiracy has been broken.
And now, somebody lock this thread so it goes away.
You guys know that it is inevitable that you're going to get asked this question at least once a week until 1.0 is out.
Why not just make the next release 1.0 even if it is .9. At least then people might stop asking when the next release is coming out. Just a thought for the sake of your sanity. Answering the same question 7,000 times must get annoying.
I wasnt aware there was an offensive line of posts?Quote:
Originally Posted by bovi
When it's a game and both sides are playing, it's all good and fun, but when it isn't or they don't, it isn't.Quote:
Originally Posted by EdwardL
If you want, I'll play you.
Amanda seems snappy alright, though I'd say you have to use traditional methods to figure it out.Quote:
Originally Posted by Batahr
This post is all you get. Figure it out, you'll get a cookie.
hm.... what does does "aaagunner" mean? :shrug:
unless its scrambled..... ~:idea:
but you people probably aren't telling.... :stupido2:
Quote:
Originally Posted by hooahguy14
Anti Aircraft Gunner i noticed it too
actually its aaa gunner
maybe he's working on eb 6
could be.. :shrug:
I don't get the hint either :no:
But looking at how the function works I think that the m and n in the first line of the definition of the function should be switched. If that's the case, then the answer is just as helpful as I was expecting it to be :wall:
Oops. That is indeed the case. :sweatdrop:
Here's the correct function.
Sorry for the inconvenience. It does terminate, though.Code:f(m; n) = n + 1, when m = 0
= f(m-1; 1) when m > 0 and n = 0
= f(m - 1; f(m; n - 1)) when m > 0 and n > 0
Is the answer "very close to infinity (depending on your definition of 'close' and 'infinity' :beam: )" good enough for getting the cookie?
I also tried using Matlab, but the answer is a really big number I think, too big for Matlab to handle it seems. And using the "traditional methods" (as you put it) didn't help much either. I didn't realize until now how fast my math skills have deteriorated: it's only 4 years ago that I was following mathematical courses on an academic level, and now I don't even remember how to tackle this :embarassed:
Things I can tell about the function:
- The function does terminate for all (whole number) values for m and n (easy to prove: m=0 terminates the recursion and all the recursive steps decrease m or n. Decreasing m eventually leads to m=0 and decreasing n eventually leads to n=0 which leads to a decrease of m, etc. Also m is never increased and n can only be increased from 0 to 1, but this step also reduces m by 1.)
- By looking at the numbers (instead of deducing :sweatdrop: ) I did eliminate the recursion for some cases:
After that I couldn't generate any numbers to look at because they became to big...Code:f(1,n) = n + 2
f(2,n) = 2n + 3
f(3,n) = 2^(n+3) - 3
I prefer the term "ridiculously large". You still have the aaa gunner to solve, even though it has no significance whatsoever to the value of d.
You could try to estimate whether or not d is before the theoretical heat death of the universe.
Quote:
Originally Posted by The_Mark
Easy; aaagunner = Bovi as his slogan is "EB anti-CTD Missile".
Therefore the next release is ready, pending all CTD issues are resolved.
GG
I cant remeber the last time i have get a CTD it EB 0.81.2v :2thumbsup: :2thumbsup:Quote:
Originally Posted by EdwardL
every post in this thread offends me.