I agree, but on what basis? I can't think of any. The first few rounds of lynching are bound to be fairly random, and I'm unfortunately quite resigned to that having no past mafia experience to help me here.
I think it does make a difference on who's side the character is on. Those who have villager helpful roles may wish to hint at their role to imform their fellow villagers, but try to be as subtle as possible so as not to get killed immediately. The mafia know who the other mafia are and the thing at the top of their mind will be to prevent the others finding out.
At least Sir Moody is (pretending to/genuinely is?) trying to contribute. Having said that, for someone to try to exploit the villagers in such depth would be quite arrogant I think and quite unlikely. The same goes for the comments about Aggony Duck and Duck ponds and this being evidence for a framing of AD. Quite tenuous.
The ironic thing (stating the obvious) is that Sir Moody, Sasaki or even myself (

) could simply be trying to divert attention from something that's been said. Reminds me of the first blood test in the novelleta about the monsters.
Time to re-read the posts, I'll see if I can come up with something better

Bookmarks